Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 031600Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 031300Z NOV 25 – 031600Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational center of gravity remains the Pokrovsk-Konstantinovka axis (Donetsk Oblast).

• Pokrovsk Urban Defense: RF forces have achieved a confirmed penetration into the southern quarters of Pokrovsk (Previous Daily Report), representing a critical failure point in the UAF defensive line. RF channels (WarGonzo) are amplifying claims of successful neutralization of UAF equipment near Pokrovsk, suggesting sustained pressure and close-quarters combat. (FACT - UAF Confirmation / HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Konstantinovka/Ivanopillya: RF OSINT mapping (Z комитет) indicates sustained RF attempts to advance toward Ivanopillya and stabilize positions near Konstantinovka, maintaining pressure across the immediate rear of the Pokrovsk salient. This pressure aims to pin UAF reserves. (ANALYTICAL JUDGMENT - RF Map Analysis / MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)
• Deep Strike Domain: A ballistic missile threat from the northeast was reported and subsequently stood down (Air Force, 14:38Z - 15:00Z). This indicates RF is maintaining high alert status through short-notice, high-tempo ballistic missile launches, likely from the Belgorod/Kursk area. (FACT - Air Force Alerts / HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No significant changes. Muddy conditions persist.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF General Staff (GENSTAFF) confirms active operational command on the Donetsk Axis, specifically within the area of responsibility of the 7th Quick Reaction Airborne Assault Corps (DSHV). This suggests UAF is deploying high-readiness elite units to stabilize the deteriorating situation near Pokrovsk. (FACT - GENSTAFF Post / HIGH CONFIDENCE)

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

• Urban Assault and Fire Control: RF possesses the capability to reinforce and expand its initial penetration into Pokrovsk. RF uses tactical advantages (drones, EW) to neutralize UAF armor and logistics (WarGonzo claim of $1.4M destroyed equipment).
• Persistent Ballistic Threat: RF maintains the capability for rapid, short-notice ballistic strikes against rear areas (Northeast direction alert).

Intentions:

1. Exploit Pokrovsk Breach: RF primary intention is to consolidate and expand the foothold in southern Pokrovsk, turning the tactical penetration into an operational encirclement attempt.
2. Destabilize Rear Areas: RF will continue to use deep strikes (UAVs/Missiles) against central/rear logistics hubs (e.g., Poltava, Dnipro) to slow UAF resupply to the Donetsk front.
3. IO Amplification: RF will amplify claims of UAF setbacks (e.g., the 35th Brigade incident) and perceived UAF technological inferiority (WarGonzo/Operatsiya Z) to degrade UAF morale and Western support.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

RF has successfully transitioned from prolonged siege/attrition warfare around Pokrovsk's periphery to direct urban assault/infiltration tactics. This signals an increased tolerance for higher casualties to achieve rapid operational gains.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

UAF SSO strikes on POL and MTS depots in Luhansk (Dovzhansk, Rozkishne) have significantly complicated RF logistics on the eastern flank. RF must now rely more heavily on road transport and longer supply lines, increasing the vulnerability of materiel supporting the Pokrovsk main effort.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective, coordinating multiple-axis pressure (Pokrovsk, Konstantinovka) while simultaneously executing deep strikes. However, the successful UAF counter-intelligence operation capturing an "Azov" saboteur indicates UAF is actively disrupting RF hybrid warfare C2 networks.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF readiness is high for counter-penetration operations, evidenced by the deployment of the 7th DSHV Corps command staff to the Donetsk AO. The Unmanned Systems Forces (USF) report high effectiveness, claiming over 8,000 targets struck in October, demonstrating critical tactical superiority in the drone domain.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes:

• Logistics Interdiction: Successful SSO strikes on RF POL/MTS depots in Luhansk.
• Deep Strike Capability Augmentation: Confirmed delivery of additional Storm Shadow cruise missiles.
• Counter-Hybrid Warfare: Capture of the key "Azov" saboteur/guide.

Setbacks:

• Pokrovsk Breach: Confirmed RF penetration into the southern quarters of Pokrovsk is a critical tactical setback that threatens the operational integrity of the entire sector.
• OPSEC Failure Amplification: RF media (Starshie Eddy) is actively utilizing the alleged Iskander strike on the 35th Marine Brigade assembly point to damage UAF trust and morale.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: Immediate heavy armor/mechanized infantry reserves for counter-attack operations to eject RF forces from Pokrovsk's southern quarters. CONSTRAINT: The alleged OPSEC failure and the strain on personnel rotation (165 days without rotation previously noted) pose a significant internal constraint on combat effectiveness and unit morale.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF External IO (Strategic): RF sources (TASS) are promoting the Finnish proposal for a Putin-Trump meeting, attempting to signal a potential diplomatic off-ramp that bypasses Kyiv and undermines the narrative of Western unity.
• RF Tactical IO (Internal Critique): RF channels (Colonelcassad) are promoting videos from perceived Ukrainian sources criticizing UAF leadership for lack of preparedness (e.g., failure to build fortifications in Pokrovsk over three years). This hybrid tactic seeks to sow internal dissent and reduce confidence in UAF leadership.
• Belarusian "Peacekeeping" Assertion: Belarus claims readiness for a "peacekeeping mission" in Ukraine (РБК-Україна), a low-credibility statement intended to inject diplomatic noise and affirm Belarusian support for RF.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Morale is severely impacted by the confirmed RF penetration into a major city (Pokrovsk) and the high-profile media coverage of the alleged OPSEC failure in the 35th Brigade. The USF achievement reports provide a needed counter-narrative, focusing on technological superiority and effectiveness.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The confirmed delivery of the new Storm Shadow tranche is the most important recent development, providing a tangible increase in offensive capability. EU discussions on Ukraine's future (РБК-Україна) suggest continued political support, offsetting RF diplomatic posturing.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will prioritize securing the Pokrovsk penetration and consolidating its position for a deeper thrust:

1. Pokrovsk Consolidation and Reinforcement: RF will deploy dismounted infantry and light armor reinforcements into the captured southern quarters of Pokrovsk, establishing strong points and engaging in urban block-by-block clearing operations, supported by increased FPV/C-UAS efforts.
2. Increased IO on OPSEC Failure: RF will increase the scale and sophistication of the IO campaign exploiting the 35th Brigade tragedy, possibly using fabricated or manipulated casualty footage to force a major distraction for UAF senior command.
3. Drone Swarm on Central Logistics: RF will launch a concentrated UAV attack (Shahed/Lancet) against a major transportation or repair hub in the Poltava/Dnipropetrovsk region, attempting to interdict movement of the 7th DSHV reserves.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 72 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

1. Rapid Operational Encirclement: RF commits substantial armored reserves from the Konstantinovka axis to link up with forces in southern Pokrovsk, effectively isolating UAF defenders in Myrnohrad and forcing a disastrous, high-casualty withdrawal from the Pokrovsk-Dymytrov area.
2. Targeted Strategic Assassination/Deep Sabotage: Exploitation of the captured saboteur network's intelligence allows RF GRU/FSB to successfully strike a high-value UAF C2 node (e.g., GENSTAFF forward element or the 7th DSHV command post in the area), severely disrupting UAF counter-attack coordination.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/J7 (Pokrovsk Counter-Attack): COMMIT DSHV FOR COUNTER-PENETRATION: Immediately task the operational commander of the 7th DSHV Corps with the mission to decisively clear RF forces from the southern quarters of Pokrovsk within 24 hours. Ensure adequate artillery and precision fire support is pre-staged to neutralize RF reinforcements. (CRITICAL PRIORITY)
2. J2/GUR (Targeting and Exploit): MAXIMIZE STORM SHADOW STRIKES: Immediately prioritize the deployment of the new Storm Shadow missiles against fixed, high-value RF operational C2 nodes (identified by intelligence gap CRITICAL) or known POL/Ammunition staging areas supporting the Donetsk Axis. The goal is to cripple RF reinforcement ability. (CRITICAL PRIORITY)
3. SBU/GUR (Counter-Intelligence): LAUNCH INTERNAL SECURITY SWEEP: Based on the saboteur capture, initiate a focused, multi-agency sweep (SBU, GUR CI) across the rear operational area (Kharkiv, Dnipro, Zaporizhzhia) to dismantle the network. Implement enhanced physical security around critical C2 centers and high-ranking personnel. (HIGH PRIORITY)

//END SITREP//