Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 031030Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The Pokrovsk Axis remains the main effort for the Russian Federation (RF), with RF forces attempting to consolidate gains within the town of Pokrovsk (Krasnoarmeysk). The tactical focus has shifted to urban defense and counter-encirclement operations.

• Pokrovsk Axis (Critical): RF Ministry of Defense (MoD) claims to have repelled 10 separate Ukrainian Armed Forces (UAF) attacks northwest of Pokrovsk (Krasnoarmeysk), stating these were attempts to extract encircled UAF forces. This RF claim, though likely inflated, confirms that UAF forces are under acute pressure and possibly partially isolated within the Pokrovsk urban area. (FACT - RF Milbloggers/MEDIUM CONFIDENCE - Based on consistency with previous urban penetration analysis)
• Eastern Axes (Contested): General Staff of UAF (GSUA) reports clashes in multiple sectors including:
  • Kupiansk: Near Stepova Novoselivka, Borivska Andriyivka.
  • Lyman: Near Hrekivka, Kolodyazi, Zarichne.
  • Kramatorsk: Near Chasiv Yar and Stupochky.
  • Pokrovsk: Extensive engagements across 17 settlements, emphasizing the immense pressure on this axis. (FACT - GSUA/HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Deep Strike Operations (UAF): GSUA confirms successful strikes against the Saratov Oil Refinery (NPZ), providing kinetic validation for the strategic targeting of RF energy infrastructure. Smoke plumes seen in RF channels corroborate a major fire incident. (FACT - GSUA/HIGH CONFIDENCE; RF Milbloggers/MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)
• Air Activity (RF): GSUA reports RF aviation conducted airstrikes across multiple regions, particularly in Kharkiv Oblast (Borova, Tsyrkuny) and Zaporizhzhia Oblast (Ternuvate, Solodke, Malokaterynivka). This indicates sustained RF air support dominance in localized tactical areas. (FACT - GSUA/HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No significant changes. Continued seasonal conditions favor drone operations but complicate heavy mechanized movement off-road.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Posture: RF is maintaining high-intensity ground pressure in Donetsk while utilizing multi-domain strikes (Kinzhal/Ballistic/UAVs) to degrade UAF deep support structure and MIC. The focus in Pokrovsk is to convert initial urban penetration into a successful encirclement and seizure.
• UAF Posture (Defense & Logistics): UAF continues to emphasize the role of Engineer Troops in establishing minefields, non-explosive obstacles, and ensuring mobility (roads/bridges) for reliable logistics. This is a critical mitigating measure against the intense RF pressure. (FACT - KMVA/HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• UAF Posture (Manpower): New legislation signed by President Zelensky allowing booking (exemption from military service) for individuals in critical enterprises, including the defense industry, even if they are under investigation or lack proper military documents. This prioritizes industrial output and MIC readiness over legal status for high-value personnel. (FACT - Operatyvnyy ZSU/HIGH CONFIDENCE)

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

• Urban Encirclement: RF forces possess the capability to partially isolate UAF units in Pokrovsk and utilize overwhelming fire superiority to force a withdrawal or capitulation.
• Multi-Domain Kinetic Strike: Confirmed use/claims of Kinzhal, ballistic, and UAV strikes validates RF capability to strike across the entire depth of the operational area.
• Information Warfare (IO) Integration: RF IO is highly synchronized with tactical action (e.g., claiming counter-encirclement operations) and strategic diplomacy (Mishustin’s economic claims).

Intentions:

1. Complete Seizure of Pokrovsk: The primary tactical intent is to break UAF control of Pokrovsk (Krasnoarmeysk) to collapse UAF defensive lines in the western Donetsk Oblast.
2. Strategic Decoupling: RF aims to use economic rhetoric (Mishustin's claim of USD/EUR irrelevance in trade with China) and military actions (deep strikes) to demonstrate stability and strategic resilience to its partners while eroding Western confidence in Ukraine.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The RF claim of repelling UAF breakout attempts suggests that their forces may have achieved at least a partial operational encirclement or blocking position around UAF units inside Pokrovsk. This forces UAF to conduct high-risk counter-attacks from the exterior or costly clearing operations from the interior.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The confirmed UAF strike on the Saratov NPZ represents a significant kinetic impact on RF logistics, specifically fuel supply (FS). This continues the strategy of long-term degradation of RF military sustainment capacity.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains robust, coordinating multi-directional ground assaults, high-volume air strikes, and synchronized state-level economic and diplomatic messaging (Mishustin/TASS).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF readiness is currently defined by an intense defense-in-depth posture, reliant on field fortifications and efficient logistics. The tactical situation in Pokrovsk is critical, demanding rapid response and external fire support to prevent a material loss of forces. The new mobilization and critical enterprise law demonstrates a necessary institutional adaptation to safeguard the MIC and industrial base needed for long-term sustainment.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes:

• Confirmed Deep Strike Success: The confirmed strike on the Saratov NPZ is a significant operational success that compounds pressure on RF energy production and logistics.
• Manpower/MIC Protection: The new mobilization flexibility law protects essential personnel in the defense industry, ensuring continuity of production.

Setbacks:

• Pokrovsk Encirclement Risk: The RF claim of blocking UAF exit attempts suggests a severe operational risk, potentially leading to the loss of forces or equipment in the city.
• Civilian Casualties (Kharkiv): RF attacks resulting in 5 civilian casualties in the Kharkiv region underscore the continued vulnerability of civilian centers to RF fires.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The urgent requirement is for precision long-range fires and ISR to support UAF units potentially attempting to break out or reinforce Pokrovsk. Continued need for AD/EW assets, particularly for defense against RF fixed-wing strikes (Kharkiv/Zaporizhzhia).

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF IO (Economic Resilience): TASS reports on Mishustin's claim that USD/EUR share in RF-China trade has dropped to "statistical error." This is a high-level strategic IO effort aimed at domestic and international audiences, signaling successful "de-dollarization" and economic alignment with Beijing, mitigating the perception of Western sanctions effectiveness.
• RF IO (Tactical Victory): RF military channels (Colonelcassad) are amplifying claims of successful counter-encirclement operations near Pokrovsk to demoralize UAF forces and portray the ongoing offensive as decisive.
• RF IO (Diversion/Lateral): RF milbloggers (Rybard) are pushing aggressive narratives regarding U.S. intervention in Nigeria and the Venezuela-Guyana dispute, likely intended to dilute Western media focus on Ukraine and promote the narrative of Western global instability.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF morale will be boosted by the confirmed success of the Saratov NPZ strike. However, the urban crisis in Pokrovsk and continued civilian casualties in Kharkiv will place stress on local populations and potentially frontline units fighting to hold ground.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

RF PM Mishustin’s meeting with Chinese counterparts reaffirms the strategic economic relationship, although the operational effect of this partnership (especially following the previous report of Chinese NPZs refusing RF oil) is complex. The IO focus on the USD/EUR in trade suggests the RF views financial autonomy as a key strategic objective.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will prioritize the immediate tactical objective in Donetsk and reinforce strategic IO:

1. Pokrovsk Sealing: RF forces will intensify fire and close any perceived gaps in the Pokrovsk perimeter, likely utilizing dismounted infantry and precision strikes to eliminate isolated UAF strongpoints and prevent further UAF withdrawal or resupply attempts.
2. Sustained Aviation Pressure: RF will continue high-volume airstrikes (KAB/FAB) against forward UAF positions in Kharkiv and Zaporizhzhia, exploiting their local air superiority to degrade UAF defenses ahead of any potential ground assaults.
3. Diplomatic/Economic IO Amplification: RF state media will flood the information space with commentary supporting Mishustin’s claims, portraying RF as economically resilient and strategically partnered with China.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 72 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF achieves an operational collapse on the Pokrovsk Axis:

1. Forced UAF Withdrawal/Capture: RF manages to force the surrender or total withdrawal of UAF units within Pokrovsk, capturing the city and creating a large salient that threatens the logistics lines running north-south in the western Donetsk Oblast.
2. Concentrated Aviation Breakthrough: RF utilizes coordinated deep strikes and localized aviation to suppress AD in a critical sector (e.g., Kramatorsk or Kupiansk), enabling a temporary but significant breakthrough in the defensive line by mechanized units.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/J2 (Pokrovsk Extraction/Fire Support): CONDUCT FOCUSED BREAKOUT FIRE SUPPORT: Immediately task high-precision long-range artillery (e.g., HIMARS) to pre-selected RF strongpoints identified as key blocking positions northwest of Pokrovsk (as per RF claims) to open a temporary corridor for any potentially isolated UAF forces to withdraw or receive resupply. (CRITICAL PRIORITY)
2. J7 (Strategic Counter-IO): EXPLOIT ENERGY STRIKE NARRATIVE: Immediately amplify confirmed GSUA reporting on the Saratov strike across all platforms. Use the strike as direct proof that UAF maintains offensive reach against RF strategic logistics, directly countering RF claims of economic stability (Mishustin's IO). (URGENT PRIORITY)
3. J3/AD (Counter-Air Defense): REINFORCE KHARKIV/ZAPORIZHZHIA AIR DEFENSE: Re-task one mobile AD battery (e.g., NASAMS or Gepard) to the Kharkiv region to counter persistent RF aviation strikes on Borova/Tsyrkuny, focusing on reducing RF ability to employ glide bombs near the FEBA. (HIGH PRIORITY)

//END SITREP//