Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 031600Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The Pokrovsk Axis (Krasnoarmeysk/Dymytrov/Ivanopillya) remains the most critical sector, showing immediate RF encroachment into urban centers. The Southern Axis (Zaporizhzhia) shows localized RF offensive drone activity, while the Kharkiv Axis (Kupiansk/Oskol River) remains contested.

• Pokrovsk Axis (Immediate Threat): Confirmed UAF officer reporting indicates RF forces are establishing observation posts (OPs) and taking up defensive positions within the town of Pokrovsk (formerly Krasnoarmeysk) itself, suggesting deep RF tactical penetration and an immediate shift from external pressure to internal urban combat. RF sources claim they have "liberated 24 buildings in Dymytrov" and are expanding control. (FACT - UAF Officer/HIGH CONFIDENCE; RF MoD/MEDIUM CONFIDENCE - Self-serving)
• Zaporizhzhia Axis: RF forces (specifically UAV operators from the 14th Guards Spetsnaz Brigade and 114th Motorized Rifle Regiment of "Vostok" Grouping) conducted successful FPV drone strikes against UAF transport and personnel. This confirms continued RF multi-domain warfare dominance (ISR/Strike) in the southern direction. (FACT - RF Milbloggers/HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Kupiansk/Oskil Axis: RF MoD claims to have dislodged UAF forces from four fortified positions on the left bank of the Oskil River. While unconfirmed by UAF, this suggests continued high-intensity, localized fighting to challenge UAF control of the eastern river bank. (FACT - RF MoD/LOW CONFIDENCE - High Propaganda Value)
• Deep Strike Operations (RF): RF MoD claims a successful group strike using long-range precision weapons, including Kinzhal hypersonic missiles, against UAF military-industrial complex (MIC), power/gas infrastructure, a military airfield, and a repair facility. This is presented as a direct response to UAF deep strikes on RF civilian infrastructure. (FACT - RF MoD/MEDIUM CONFIDENCE - Claim of success likely inflated)
• Air Activity (UAF Air Force): New UAV activity detected in the eastern Dnipropetrovsk Oblast and Kharkiv Oblast (near Krasnopavlivka). This requires immediate AD response to protect rear logistics and C2. (FACT - UAF Air Force/HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No new environmental factors reported; prior reporting of muddy conditions in the border zones remains relevant, favoring drone operations (observed in Zaporizhzhia).

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Posture: RF forces are leveraging their achieved kinetic superiority (KAB/FAB, artillery, FPV drones) to transition from attrition to tactical exploitation and localized urban capture in the Pokrovsk area. The use of Kinzhal missiles signals RF intent to rapidly degrade UAF industrial and support capacity.
• UAF Posture (Defensive Depth): UAF continues to reinforce the strategic defense line, highlighted by official IO emphasizing the professionalism of Engineer Troops (e.g., 211th Pontoon-Bridge Brigade). This confirms ongoing efforts to ensure mobility and survivability against RF pressure, though the immediate urban encroachment in Pokrovsk is a significant challenge.
• UAF Posture (Mobilization): New legislation signed by President Zelensky on mobilization registration flexibility indicates ongoing institutional adaptation to manpower requirements.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

• Hypersonic Strike Capability: Confirmed use (or credible claim of use) of Kinzhal missiles validates RF capability to strike time-sensitive or hardened targets deep within Ukraine. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Hybrid Penetration: RF forces are employing small infiltration groups/Spetsnaz elements to establish forward OPs and fixed positions within Pokrovsk, utilizing the urban terrain to offset UAF advantages. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Localized Drone Superiority (Zaporizhzhia): RF combined forces demonstrate effective use of FPV drones for precision strikes against light vehicles and personnel in the Southern Axis. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

Intentions:

1. Urban Seizure (Pokrovsk): RF intent is to transition to phase line operations within Pokrovsk/Dymytrov to force a wider UAF operational withdrawal from the region.
2. Degrade Strategic Support: The deep strike campaign using Kinzhal aims to disrupt UAF MIC output and energy supplies to complicate winter operations.
3. IO Domination: RF is attempting to correlate its deep strikes directly with UAF strikes on RF territory to justify the aggression internationally and internally.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The shift from generalized shelling pressure to urban infiltration and establishment of fixed OPs inside Pokrovsk represents a critical tactical pivot. This suggests RF assesses UAF defensive integrity in the immediate vicinity is fractured enough to support forward deployment, forcing UAF to commit to costly urban combat.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The geopolitical pressure on RF oil sales is increasing, with reports that Chinese NPZs are beginning to refuse Russian oil due to Western sanctions. This complements UAF deep strikes and applies long-term strain on RF budget and sustainment. (FACT - Bloomberg/ASTRA/HIGH CONFIDENCE)

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective in coordinating complex, multi-axis deep strikes (Kinzhal, UAVs) alongside simultaneous ground operations across the Donetsk and Southern fronts.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF forces are under extreme pressure in the Pokrovsk sector. The confirmation of RF OPs within the city necessitates immediate CQC (Close Quarters Combat) readiness and counter-infiltration procedures. The UAF is strategically focused on maintaining defensive depth through engineer works and politically focused on adapting mobilization laws to sustain manpower.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes:

• Strategic Geopolitical Pressure: Western sanctions are starting to affect RF trade with China, validating the overall strategy of economic warfare coupled with deep strikes.
• Institutional Adaptability: The new law on mobilization/registration flexibility addresses critical manpower constraints.

Setbacks:

• Urban Penetration: RF forces have achieved tactical penetration into Pokrovsk, forcing a reactive urban defense.
• Deep Strike Damage: Kinzhal strikes pose a severe, immediate threat to UAF critical infrastructure and MIC capability, the extent of which is currently unknown.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

Immediate requirements include:

1. Specialized CQC and counter-infiltration training/equipment for units rotating into the Pokrovsk sector.
2. Improved AD/EW coverage against FPV drones in the Zaporizhzhia axis.
3. Rapid battle damage assessment (BDA) of the Kinzhal targets (MIC, airfield, gas infrastructure) to estimate operational impact.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF IO (Tactical Victory): RF channels (Podoubny, TASS) are heavily promoting civilian evacuation footage from Krasnoarmeysk/Pokrovsk and claims of "liberation" in Dymytrov to establish the narrative of unstoppable advance.
• RF IO (Strategic Retaliation): RF MoD is using the Kinzhal strike narrative to frame its deep strikes as justified, proportional retaliation ("in response to terrorist attacks") rather than pre-emptive aggression.
• UAF IO (Institutional Strength): UAF continues to counter this by emphasizing the stable, professional execution of military functions (Engineer Corps, mobilization reform).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Civilian displacement and distress observed in Pokrovsk area video messages (Podoubny) indicates severe local humanitarian stress, which RF IO will exploit to depict UAF as unable to protect its population. Frontline UAF morale is likely stressed by the urban encroachment but may be motivated by the strategic wins (China/Turkey oil shifts).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

RF PM Mishustin's visit to China confirms high-level diplomatic alignment. However, the report of Chinese NPZs refusing RF oil due to sanctions is a significant fissure in the economic relationship, directly impacting RF capability to mitigate Western financial pressure.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will capitalize on its current tactical momentum in the Pokrovsk sector:

1. Urban Consolidation (Pokrovsk): RF will reinforce the established OPs inside Pokrovsk and increase kinetic fire (artillery, FPV) to force UAF units to withdraw from the most contested southern/western urban quarters.
2. Increased Deep Strike Focus: RF will follow up on the Kinzhal strike with further long-range precision attacks targeting newly identified vulnerabilities in the UAF energy/MIC sector, attempting to maintain pressure on strategic support functions.
3. Local Attrition (Zaporizhzhia): RF 14th Guards Spetsnaz/114th MRR will sustain high-tempo FPV drone hunting operations against UAF logistics and forward deployed assets in Zaporizhzhia.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 72 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF achieves an operational breakthrough in the Donetsk region:

1. Flanking Maneuver via Pokrovsk Seizure: Successful RF consolidation of Pokrovsk allows them to use the urban area as a secure forward operating base (FOB), enabling mechanized units to conduct a short-notice deep flanking maneuver west or northwest, threatening UAF logistics hubs servicing the entire western Donetsk front.
2. Disruption of National Power Grid: RF Kinzhal/cruise missile strikes succeed in severely damaging a major national power or gas transfer hub, causing widespread, long-term outages that significantly degrade military and civilian support capacity ahead of winter.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/J7 (Pokrovsk Urban Response): IMMEDIATE COUNTER-INFILTRATION OPERATION: Task J3 to launch an immediate, localized counter-infiltration and clearing operation utilizing high-mobility, heavily armored infantry (e.g., 3rd Separate Assault Brigade if available) to rapidly destroy RF OPs and regain tactical control of key Pokrovsk city centers before RF can solidify its defensive lines. (CRITICAL PRIORITY)
2. J2/J4 (Energy/MIC Protection): HARDEN DEEP TARGETS: Based on the Kinzhal strike claim, task J4/J2 to implement immediate, dispersed, and hardened protective measures (e.g., berms, overhead cover) for key MIC production sites, airfields, and energy relay centers. Prioritize relocation of vulnerable repair assets. (URGENT PRIORITY)
3. J3/EW (Counter-Drone Defense): DEPLOY EW AGAINST FPV: Immediately re-task available counter-UAV Electronic Warfare (EW) assets, specifically targeted at the 14th Spetsnaz Brigade’s drone command frequencies, to the forward edge of the battle area (FEBA) in Zaporizhzhia to disrupt and degrade RF FPV strike effectiveness. (HIGH PRIORITY)

//END SITREP//