Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 031200Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The strategic center of gravity remains the Pokrovsk-Myrnohrad Axis (Donetsk Oblast), characterized by RF’s overwhelming use of air-dropped ordnance (FABs) to collapse defenses.

• Rodynske (Pokrovsk Axis): Confirmed use of FAB-500 glide bombs by RF Aerospace Forces (VKS RF) against temporary deployment points (ПВД) in Rodynske. RF sources claim continued fierce fighting in the western part of the settlement, suggesting UAF defenses are holding despite the heavy bombardment. The intense focus on Rodynske confirms it as the immediate tactical objective for achieving a breakthrough toward Pokrovsk. (FACT - RF MOD Video/HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Artemivka and Kucherov Yar: RF forces (163rd Tank Regiment and 57th Separate Reconnaissance Battalion) claim destruction of UAF UAV Control Points (ПУ БЛА) in these areas, indicating RF counter-ISR/EW efforts targeting UAF long-range reconnaissance and strike capabilities on the Eastern Front. (FACT - RF Milbloggers/MEDIUM CONFIDENCE - Requiring UAF confirmation of loss)
• Southern Axis (Mykolaiv/Odesa Zone): UAF Southern Defense Forces (SDF) report successful interception and destruction of 18 Shahed-136/131 UAVs overnight. A subsequent strike in Mykolaiv hit a civilian service station (СТО), highlighting the continued risk of collateral damage from Shahed attacks and RF's sustained campaign to suppress UAF logistics/rear area infrastructure. (FACT - UAF SDF, Local Gov/HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Deep Strike Operations (UAF): Satellite imagery confirms successful targeting and damage at the RN-Tuapse Oil Refinery (NPZ), providing further validation of UAF strategic interdiction capabilities. (FACT - UAF OSINT Sources/MEDIUM CONFIDENCE - Specific damage quantification pending IMINT confirmation)
• Deep Strike Operations (RF): A threat of ballistic missile usage from the North-East was active for Kyiv and surrounding regions, and specifically noted for Varvarivka (Donetsk Oblast) and the border of Donetsk/Kharkiv Oblasts. This confirms RF is preparing for or executing high-speed, high-value strikes targeting UAF logistics and C2 deep in the rear. (FACT - UAF Air Force/HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No new major environmental factors reported, but the high volume of night operations (UAVs, ballistic threats) suggests the weather is currently permissive for aerial and missile strikes.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Posture: RF forces are fully committed to breaking the Pokrovsk-Myrnohrad line using air supremacy (FABs) to compensate for heavy ground attrition. The claims of destroying UAF UAV C2 points suggest a synchronized effort to blind UAF defenses before the main ground thrust.
• UAF Posture (Defensive Depth): UAF General Staff explicitly highlighted the Day of Ukrainian Engineering Troops, releasing footage showcasing extensive construction of multi-layered defensive lines, anti-tank obstacles (Dragon's Teeth), and field fortifications. This confirms a strategic commitment to defense-in-depth and the establishment of fortified fallback positions in anticipation of RF breakthroughs. (FACT - UAF General Staff/HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• UAF Posture (Energy Sector): UAF's operational resilience is slightly improved, with reports of temporary cancellation of rolling power outages across Ukraine. This suggests successful repair or stabilization of critical energy infrastructure following recent RF strikes. (FACT - UAF Media/HIGH CONFIDENCE)

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

• Precision Air-Ground Integration: RF VKS is effectively utilizing modernized FAB-500 glide bombs with high destructive effect, capable of destroying fortified UAF positions (PVDs) even in urban environments like Rodynske. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Multi-Domain Kinetic Strike: RF maintains the capability to execute multi-axis strikes involving Shaheds (Southern Axis), reconnaissance UAVs (Mykolaiv), and high-speed ballistic missiles (Kyiv/Donetsk/Kharkiv axes). This forces AD dispersal and complicates UAF defense. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Hybrid Warfare Evolution (UAVs): RF-aligned sources claim the "Geran" (Shahed) UAVs have been modernized to be "almost invulnerable" to UAF Electronic Warfare (EW) systems, based on an alleged statement by a UAF communications expert. This indicates RF is actively adapting its cheapest strike asset against UAF’s most effective defensive layer (EW). (ANALYTICAL JUDGMENT - Based on RF IO, requires verification of alleged UAF statement/MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

Intentions:

1. Exploit Firepower Advantage: RF intent is to continue kinetic saturation (FABs) in the Pokrovsk sector to force operational collapse before UAF can fully man its newly prepared defensive lines.
2. Blind and Degrade UAF ISR/C2: The targeted destruction of UAF UAV Control Points (Artemivka) and the high volume of Shahed/ballistic threats against rear areas (Kyiv, Mykolaiv) aim to degrade UAF ability to conduct counter-attacks and manage logistics.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The escalation of FAB usage deep into settlements (Rodynske) indicates RF is prioritizing rapid territorial gain over collateral damage mitigation or tactical restraint. This heavy-handed approach is designed to overwhelm UAF reserves.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics are supporting sustained high-volume consumption of air-dropped ordnance (FABs) and continuous ballistic missile launches. The successful downing of 18 Shaheds in the South confirms RF's high-volume, continuous supply of these systems.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective, coordinating heavy air support (VKS) with ground troop advances near Pokrovsk and simultaneous deep strike sequencing (ballistics/Shaheds) across the operational depth.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF forces are demonstrably transitioning into a deep defensive posture, with active, high-priority construction of defensive features. The engineering efforts highlighted by the General Staff are critical to ensuring strategic depth against the RF’s primary thrust. UAF AD remains robust, with 18 Shaheds destroyed in the Southern Operational Zone.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes:

• AD Effectiveness: High Shahed interception rate (18 destroyed) in the South.
• Strategic Interdiction: Confirmed damage to the Tuapse Oil Refinery reinforces the strategic impact of the deep strike campaign.
• Information/Support Platform: Launch of the "Veteran PRO" platform for veteran support, demonstrating sustained institutional support for combat personnel.

Setbacks:

• FAB-Induced Attrition: The sustained use of FABs in Rodynske poses a severe threat to UAF personnel and material in fixed positions.
• Ballistic Threat: The active threat of ballistic strikes on Kyiv and Eastern axes remains a critical vulnerability.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The reported modernization of RF Shahed UAVs against EW systems (if accurate) mandates an immediate review and potential upgrade of UAF's primary counter-UAV EW doctrine and equipment.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF IO (Defeatism on Pokrovsk): RF milbloggers are leveraging Ukrainian media reports on the threat to Pokrovsk to amplify defeatist narratives, claiming Ukraine risks losing "not only Pokrovsk but several brigades." This is highly synchronized with the kinetic push.
• RF IO (Hybrid Adaptation): The claim of "Geran" invulnerability to EW is a classic hybrid tactic, designed to degrade UAF EW operator morale and potentially convince UAF leadership to shift resources away from EW toward less effective defensive measures.
• RF IO (Historical Expansionism): The RF celebration of erecting a monument to Ivan the Terrible in Vologda, justified as a "symbol of the Russian world and multiplier of Russian lands," serves as background strategic IO, reinforcing the historical justification for current expansionist goals.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF domestic messaging focuses on resilience (veteran support, engineering efforts) and strategic impact (NPZ strikes). The temporary relief from rolling power outages provides a minor morale boost.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

RF information operations appear to be targeting the economic backbone of UAF support, with media reports suggesting IMF aid to Ukraine is under threat (Politico report). This narrative, if amplified, could impact partner economic security guarantees.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will attempt to collapse the current UAF defensive layer near Pokrovsk:

1. Sequential FAB Strikes: VKS will continue relentless FAB strikes on Rodynske and other key approach settlements (e.g., Ivanopillya), followed immediately by probing ground assaults by dismounted/mechanized elements to exploit shock and attrition effects.
2. Sustained Deep Strike/ISR: RF will maintain the high tempo of reconnaissance (Mykolaiv, Kharkiv) and tactical strikes (ballistics on Varvarivka, Shaheds in the South) to keep UAF Air Defense and logistics under constant pressure and prevent reserve redeployment to the Pokrovsk axis.
3. Counter-UAV Focus: RF counter-ISR/EW forces will prioritize the targeting of UAF UAV C2 points and communication hubs to neutralize UAF tactical reconnaissance and loitering munitions capabilities.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 72 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF achieves a decisive, localized operational breakthrough:

1. Forced Withdrawal to Myrnohrad: The sustained FAB bombardment forces UAF units near Rodynske into a disorganized fighting withdrawal, allowing RF mechanized forces to bypass the primary defensive line and threaten the main logistics route to Pokrovsk.
2. EW Superiority Gained: The alleged modernization of Shaheds is confirmed, allowing RF to execute devastating, unhindered multi-wave drone attacks against previously protected UAF logistics and C2 nodes, significantly degrading UAF operational capacity in the rear.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/Fires (Counter-FAB Strategy): PRIORITIZE FAB LAUNCH PLATFORM INTERDICTION: Due to the devastating effect of guided FABs (Rodynske), task ATACMS/MLRS assets to prioritize deep strike targeting of confirmed RF airbases or forward staging areas known to launch aircraft carrying glide bombs. Shift focus from purely front-line artillery suppression to pre-empting the air threat. (CRITICAL PRIORITY)
2. J6/J2 (EW Counter-Adaptation): RAPID EW DOCTRINE REVIEW: Immediately convene a multi-domain working group to assess the alleged "Geran" EW modernization. Develop and rapidly disseminate updated TTPs and software/firmware patches for UAF EW systems, prioritizing assets deployed in the Southern and Eastern Operational Zones. (URGENT PRIORITY)
3. J7/J2 (Counter-IMF IO): MITIGATE ECONOMIC IO THREAT: Task J7 to proactively engage with Western financial media and partner nation treasuries, providing verifiable data on UAF economic stabilization efforts (e.g., energy sector resilience, veteran support platforms) to counteract the RF-amplified narrative that IMF aid is futile or at risk. (HIGH PRIORITY)

//END SITREP//