Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 031200Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The RF continues a high-volume, multi-domain kinetic saturation strategy, focusing on critical infrastructure and deep rear areas, while maintaining intense, localized ground attrition on the Eastern Front.

• Deep Strike Saturation (Critical): Overnight RF attacks involved a complex mix of 3 x Kh-47M2 Kinzhal, 4 x Iskander-M, 5 x S-300/S-400 (ground attack mode), and 138 x UAVs. This confirms the previously identified intent to overwhelm UAF Air Defense (AD) capabilities. (FACT - UAF Air Force/HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Southern Axis (Frontline): RF forces on the Southern Front (Zaporizhzhia/Kherson direction) conducted 490 positional attacks using nearly 2,000 munitions in the last 24 hours, indicative of sustained, high-intensity indirect fire attrition against UAF fixed positions and adjacent settlements. (FACT - UAF Southern Defense Forces/HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Donetsk Axis (Pokrovsk): The area remains the primary ground effort. RF IO channels are actively promoting the "evacuation" of civilians from Pokrovsk, including interviews with residents alleging forced eviction by UAF forces and highlighting humanitarian suffering. This correlates with the ongoing RF effort to isolate the sector. (FACT - RF IO/MEDIUM CONFIDENCE, ANALYTICAL JUDGMENT: IO preparation for further ground advance)
• Zaporizhzhia Front: RF forces (Dnepr Group of Forces, 58th Guards Combined Arms Army) are actively conducting maneuver training using dirt bikes (off-road motorcycles) on challenging terrain. This suggests preparation for highly mobile, light reconnaissance or special operations in the sector, possibly aiming to bypass fixed UAF defenses. (FACT - RF MoD/HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Terrain remains muddy and challenging (observed in both UAF and RF videos), favoring the use of tracked vehicles, light off-road mobility (ATVs/dirt bikes), and low-flying FPV drones. Clear nighttime conditions facilitated the large RF missile/UAV attack.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Posture: RF forces are employing advanced counter-mobility tactics, utilizing FPV drones to target logistics (trucks) and, notably, a Russian soldier employing a bicycle for rapid, low-signature movement, confirming highly dispersed, low-signature tactical movement by some units. RF is actively training for enhanced off-road mobility on the Southern Front (Zaporizhzhia). (FACT - RF Milbloggers, UAF Video/HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• UAF Posture: UAF forces, specifically the 47th Separate Mechanized Brigade "Magura," are prioritizing rapid tactical mobility using ATVs for reconnaissance, fast insertion/extraction, and maneuvering in challenging terrain. This mirrors the observed RF focus on light mobility. UAF FPV drone teams continue to demonstrate highly effective counter-mobility targeting. (FACT - UAF 47th Mech. Brigade, UAF FPV Video/HIGH CONFIDENCE)

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

• Kinetic Saturation (Increased Complexity): The combination of Kinzhal, Iskander, and S-300/400 missiles with 138 UAVs demonstrates RF's ability to execute complex, layered strikes designed to exhaust UAF AD capabilities and find gaps. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Tactical Mobility: RF is actively training for and employing highly mobile, dispersed tactical elements (dirt bikes, bicycles) for low-signature maneuver, especially in the Zaporizhzhia and Donetsk sectors, to penetrate UAF flanks. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Information Preparation of the Battlefield (IPB): RF is using coordinated IO narratives (civilian evacuation, UAF cruelty/forced eviction) to legitimize or justify imminent offensive operations near Pokrovsk. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

Intentions:

1. Degrade Critical National Infrastructure: The continued use of high-value ballistic assets (Kinzhal, Iskander) confirms the intent to inflict critical, strategic damage despite UAF AD successes.
2. Achieve Breakthrough in Pokrovsk: RF ground operations remain focused on creating localized tactical encirclements and severing supply lines, supported by coordinated IO.
3. Exploit Mobility Gaps: RF is actively seeking to leverage light mobility assets (dirt bikes) to bypass established UAF fortifications and force a response from mobile UAF reserves.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

RF is exhibiting increased resourcefulness in tactical mobility, employing bicycles and light motorcycles for single or small-team operations. This is likely an adaptation to UAF dominance in high-signature logistics interdiction and heavy armor targeting.

Critical Adaptation: UAF intelligence confirmed the targeting of enemy communications equipment labeled "STARLINK" by an FPV drone. While the RF 33rd MRR was previously noted using COTS comms, this video evidence (captured by UAF "Irishmen" Detachment) provides direct confirmation of RF COTS reliance for C2/logistics and UAF capability to exploit this vulnerability. (FACT - UAF FPV Video/HIGH CONFIDENCE)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The continuous large-scale missile and UAV strikes confirm adequate deep strike ordnance resupply. However, the reliance on COTS systems like Starlink for front-line C2 and the use of low-tech mobility (bicycles) points to persistent limitations in secure military C2 and organic tactical transport at the operational edge.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains robust at the strategic level, coordinating massed kinetic strikes. At the tactical level, the verified targeting of Starlink equipment underscores the vulnerability of RF C2 when forced to rely on commercial systems.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF maintains high readiness against the air threat (77% interception rate reported previously). Ground forces are actively countering the mobility threat by integrating their own light maneuver assets (47th Brigade ATVs) and effective FPV drone hunter-killer teams targeting both RF logistics and specialized light mobility units (bicycle/dirt bike operators). (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes:

• Counter-C2 Interdiction: Direct targeting and destruction of RF Starlink COTS equipment by UAF FPV assets is a critical tactical success, validating the prior intelligence assessment on COTS vulnerability.
• Targeting Low-Signature Mobility: Successful FPV strike against a Russian soldier using a bicycle demonstrates UAF surveillance superiority even against low-observable, dispersed enemy personnel.

Setbacks:

• Artillery Attrition: The Southern Front (Zaporizhzhia) faces severe attrition, evidenced by the 490 attacks and 2,000 munitions used in 24 hours. This high expenditure rate threatens fixed UAF defenses.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

Given the confirmation of RF reliance on Starlink at the front line, EW/SIGINT/Drone counter-C2 resources must be immediately prioritized. Continued resupply of FPV drone systems is essential, as they are proving highly effective against RF logistics, C2, and light mobility.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Political IO (US Support): RF channels are heavily amplifying comments by Donald Trump that he would deny Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine and could end the conflict in "a couple of months." The intent is to signal that Western aid is unreliable and unstable, directly undermining UAF morale and partner nation cohesion. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• RF Humanitarian IO (Pokrovsk): The synchronized promotion of videos featuring civilians alleging forced eviction by UAF forces near Pokrovsk (Kotsnews) serves as Information Preparation of the Battlefield (IPB), framing the subsequent RF offensive as a "liberation" or humanitarian intervention. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• RF Morale IO (Domestic): RF military bloggers are promoting domestic support programs (veteran psychological consultations via MinTsifry/Defenders of the Fatherland Foundation). This is a standard attempt to project internal stability and address high combat stress/casualty rates.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF public morale benefits from localized tactical successes (FPV strikes, AD rates), but remains highly sensitive to geopolitical developments, particularly statements from prominent US political figures suggesting a cutoff of military aid or a rapid, unfavorable peace settlement. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

Donald Trump's repeated statements regarding non-provision of Tomahawks and promises to end the war quickly constitute a significant threat to long-term Western military planning and aid continuity. This requires a rapid, coordinated diplomatic counter-narrative from current US administration and NATO partners. (FACT - Multiple Sources/HIGH CONFIDENCE)

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will consolidate kinetic and IO efforts on the Eastern Front:

1. Pokrovsk IO/Kinetic Synchronization: RF ground forces will intensify pressure on the Pokrovsk axis (Dymytrov/Ivanopillya), leveraging the prepared IO narrative of "civilian protection" to increase maneuver aggression and legitimize offensive actions to international audiences.
2. EW/C2 Countermeasures: Following confirmed Starlink targeting by UAF, RF EW units will likely increase counter-drone jamming efforts and implement more stringent COTS communication security protocols or shift C2 reliance to less vulnerable organic systems (if available).
3. Southern Front Attrition: The high rate of indirect fire on the Southern Front will be maintained (400+ attacks/day) to pin UAF reserves and prevent redeployment to the Pokrovsk sector.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 72 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF achieves a decisive, synchronized multi-domain victory:

1. Strategic Kinetic Breakthrough: RF launches a synchronized strike of high-value ballistic missiles (Kinzhal, Iskander) on a single, vital rail logistics hub or a key UAF AD command node, achieving a critical suppression of UAF deep strike resupply capabilities.
2. Pokrovsk Operational Encirclement: RF units (potentially leveraging light mobility assets previously observed training) breach a weak point in the UAF line near Pokrovsk/Dymytrov, interdicting two main supply routes and creating a localized operational encirclement that forces a rapid, costly UAF withdrawal.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/J2 (Counter-Mobility Fires): PRIORITIZE LIGHT RF ASSETS: Immediately disseminate confirmed RF light mobility TTPs (bicycles, dirt bikes) to all FPV/ISR teams, prioritizing these assets as high-value targets. Initiate targeted counter-mobility ambushes using ATVs (47th Brigade TTP) in suspected infiltration zones on the Zaporizhzhia/Donetsk flanks. (CRITICAL PRIORITY)
2. J7/J2 (Information Warfare): COUNTER-IO ON POKROVSK: Develop and deploy an urgent counter-narrative against the RF "civilian evacuation" IO near Pokrovsk. Provide documented evidence of UAF humanitarian efforts and clearly debunk claims of forced eviction, linking the RF IO directly to preparation for an imminent offensive push. (URGENT PRIORITY)
3. J3/J6 (EW Exploitation): EW FORCE MULTIPLIER: Following the confirmed Starlink hit, maximize EW platform usage against suspected RF COTS communication nodes to increase tactical C2 disruption during the expected Pokrovsk push. Monitor SIGINT for RF attempts to revert to less-exploitable organic communications. (HIGH PRIORITY)

//END SITREP//