Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 031200Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The RF maintains a high-intensity, multi-domain attack profile characterized by massed kinetic strikes and concentrated ground operations. The primary axes of effort remain unchanged: Pokrovsk (Donetsk) and Deep Rear Areas (Mykolaiv, Dnipropetrovsk).

• Deep Strike Saturation (Critical): RF launched a massed air attack overnight, utilizing 3 Kh-47M2 Kinzhal missiles, 4 ballistic missiles, 5 anti-aircraft guided missiles (likely S-300/400 ground attack), and 138 UAVs (approx. 80 Shaheds). This constitutes a significant saturation attempt against UAF AD/EW capabilities. (FACT - UAF Air Force/HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Southern Axis (Mykolaiv): Drone attacks caused a significant fire in a commercial/logistical structure (supermarket) in Mykolaiv, confirming continued RF targeting of civilian logistics and infrastructure in oblast capitals. (FACT - Local Authorities/HIGH CONFENCE)
• Northern Axes (Sumy/Kharkiv): RF tactical aviation is employing Guided Air Bombs (KABs) on Sumy and Donetsk Oblasts, alongside ground attacks against 12 settlements in Kharkiv Oblast, indicating sustained pressure to fix UAF defenses outside the main Pokrovsk effort. (FACT - UAF Air Force, Local Authorities/HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Pokrovsk (Dymytrov/Krasnoarmiysk): RF sources claim to have isolated several UAF groups near Dymytrov (Pokrovsk direction), indicating continued focus on severing UAF supply lines and creating localized tactical encirclements. (FACT - RF IO/LOW CONFIDENCE, ANALYTICAL JUDGMENT: Intent confirmed)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No significant change. Clear nighttime conditions facilitated the large RF drone/missile attack.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Posture: RF forces are clearly prioritizing Deep Strike Saturation to degrade UAF AD and disrupt rear-area logistics, likely to support the continued push on the Pokrovsk axis. The alleged isolation of UAF groups near Dymytrov (Krasnoarmiysk area) suggests RF units, specifically the 33rd Motor Rifle Regiment (seen receiving Starlink donations), are actively engaged in maneuver warfare aimed at interdiction. (ANALYTICAL JUDGMENT/HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• UAF Posture: UAF AD/EW forces achieved a high success rate, neutralizing/suppressing 116 out of 150 air targets (77%). This remarkable performance confirms high operational readiness against the hybrid RF air threat (drones, cruise, ballistic). UAF forces are maintaining high operational security, with domestic media focusing heavily on commemoration and morale (Moment of Silence). (FACT - UAF Air Force/HIGH CONFIDENCE)

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

• Kinetic Saturation: RF retains the capability to launch a complex air assault exceeding 150 kinetic objects (UAVs, missiles) in a single night. This is a severe threat to UAF AD resource management. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Tactical Air Support: RF continues high-tempo employment of guided aerial bombs (KABs) on front-line regions (Donetsk, Sumy) to suppress UAF defenses and facilitate ground advances. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• IO Synchronization: RF is effectively synchronizing political IO (Trump quotes, EU asset disputes, military readiness claims via Venezuelan commentary) with kinetic attacks and ground force propaganda (POW videos, Starlink donations).

Intentions:

1. Overwhelm UAF AD: The primary kinetic intent is to saturate UAF AD/EW defenses to achieve unacceptable damage to critical energy/logistics hubs.
2. Sever Pokrovsk LOCs: On the ground, RF intent remains focused on isolating and cutting off UAF defensive groups near Pokrovsk/Dymytrov to force operational collapse in the sector.
3. Degrade EU Financial Will: RF IO is actively promoting European disputes (France, Italy, Belgium opposing asset transfer) to signal fragmentation and weaken financial support for Ukraine.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

RF forces, specifically the 33rd Motor Rifle Regiment, are demonstrably utilizing civilian-sourced satellite communication (Starlink) to improve tactical C2, indicating a dependence on commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) technology due to limitations in organic secure communications. This presents a potential EW vulnerability. (FACT - RF Milblogger/HIGH CONFIDENCE)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The large number of drones and missiles launched indicates adequate short-term resupply for deep strike capabilities. However, UAF forces must exploit the COTS dependence (Starlink) of RF front-line units like the 33rd Motor Rifle Regiment to disrupt their tactical sustainment and coordination. (ANALYTICAL JUDGMENT/MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective in coordinating complex, massed air attacks across multiple domains. However, the reliance on Starlink for front-line units suggests that secure military C2 links remain vulnerable or insufficient at the tactical edge. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF Air Force/AD readiness is exceptionally high, proven by the successful neutralization of 77% of a complex air threat package. This success preserves critical infrastructure and maintains operational tempo. Ground forces readiness is highest on the Pokrovsk axis, where operational reserves must be carefully managed to counter RF interdiction attempts (near Dymytrov). (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes:

• AD Superiority: The 77% interception rate (116/150 targets) against a highly saturated and complex attack (Kinzhal, ballistic, cruise, drone) is a critical strategic success, preventing wider damage.
• Morale/Cohesion: UAF and government agencies are prioritizing national commemoration, reinforcing domestic resolve and unifying the narrative against RF aggression.

Setbacks:

• Infrastructure Damage: Despite high AD success, strikes still impacted civilian logistics (Mykolaiv supermarket fire) and Kharkiv Oblast settlements, causing localized disruption and casualties.
• Tactical Pressure: RF claims of UAF groups being isolated near Dymytrov, if accurate even partially, indicate sustained successful RF penetration and interdiction attempts that must be immediately addressed.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The immediate requirement is for counter-KAB/SEAD capabilities to suppress RF tactical air activity on the Sumy and Donetsk axes, which is rapidly attriting fixed UAF defenses. Continued supply of AD interceptors is paramount given the high RF saturation rate (150 objects per night).

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Political IO (US/EU): RF media is heavily leveraging quotes from former President Trump and reports of EU financial friction (France, Italy, Belgium opposing asset transfer) to paint a narrative of diminishing Western resolve and impending aid cuts. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• RF Hybrid IO (Global South): RF channels are amplifying narratives suggesting RF geopolitical success and comparing US political dynamics to South American conflicts ("Venezuelan scenario"), attempting to build a perception of RF global dominance and resilience.
• UAF Counter-Narrative: UAF media is focused on high-morale events (Engineer Day, Moment of Silence) and celebrating AD successes (116 targets neutralized) to stabilize domestic sentiment against foreign political turbulence and kinetic threats.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Public morale remains resilient due to the high AD performance but is subject to constant stress from deep strikes (Mykolaiv) and geopolitical uncertainty (US political statements, EU financial debates). The daily national moment of silence serves as an important, officially reinforced mechanism for collective grief and resolve. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The reported opposition from France, Italy, and Belgium to the full transfer of frozen Russian assets represents a negative, though non-kinetic, diplomatic friction point. This may slow vital financial support and must be addressed diplomatically. (FACT - RF IO citing Corriere della Sera/MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will continue the multi-domain pressure strategy:

1. Sustained Deep Strike (Focus Shift): RF will execute another large-scale kinetic strike, likely reducing the number of costly ballistic missiles but maintaining a high volume of Shahed drones (80+). Targets will shift slightly, focusing on known UAF reserve assembly areas or large rail logistics hubs in central Ukraine.
2. Pokrovsk Interdiction Attempt: RF forces (e.g., 33rd Motor Rifle Regiment) will attempt to turn the tactical success near Dymytrov into a localized operational interdiction, aggressively targeting UAF supply routes (LOCs) into Pokrovsk.
3. KAB Saturation on Sumy/Kharkiv: RF tactical aviation will increase guided bomb usage on Northern axes to force UAF AD/EW redeployment away from the main Donetsk effort.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 72 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF achieves a decisive information and kinetic victory:

1. DPRK Counter-IO Success: RF executes the predicted counter-IO campaign, successfully discrediting the DPRK POW capture via fabricated torture/execution claims, thereby negating the strategic intelligence value and causing a major diplomatic fallout with partners.
2. Ballistic Overmatch: RF concentrates a significant stockpile of Kinzhal/Iskander/KN-23 missiles (e.g., 8-10 systems) on a single high-value target (e.g., major AD node, command post, or critical power grid substation), achieving an undeniable localized breakthrough that compromises national AD coverage.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/J2 (Counter-EW/Fires): EXPLOIT COTS DEPENDENCE: Immediately task EW/SIGINT assets to prioritize the jamming and geo-location of all Starlink communications used by RF forward units (e.g., 33rd MRR). Use kinetic fires (HIMARS, artillery) to target identified Starlink C2 nodes to disrupt tactical coordination on the Pokrovsk axis. (CRITICAL PRIORITY)
2. J7/J2 (Information & Diplomatic Warfare): AMPLIFY AD SUCCESS: Launch an immediate, coordinated public information campaign highlighting the 77% AD success rate (116/150 targets) of the recent massed strike to neutralize the RF narrative of overwhelming kinetic power and counter the negative impact of US political turbulence. (URGENT PRIORITY)
3. J3/J4 (Counter-KAB): SEAD ASSET REDEPLOYMENT: Re-evaluate AD/SEAD asset allocation, prioritizing the deployment of mobile counter-air or SEAD platforms to interdict RF tactical aviation operating near Sumy and Donetsk to reduce the KAB threat against fixed defenses. (HIGH PRIORITY)

//END SITREP//