Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - DTG: 022359Z NOV 25

ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): MEDIUM-HIGH. High confidence in current UAV operational picture; Medium confidence in the tactical effectiveness of RF IO regarding the Pokrovsk axis.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational tempo is dominated by high-intensity nocturnal Russian Federation (RF) Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) activity, primarily concentrated in the central and southern regions of Ukraine.

• Air Domain (UAV Focus): The ongoing Shahed-type UAV attack wave, identified in the previous SITREP, has intensified. Tracking confirms UAVs executing maneuvers in the Kyiv and Mykolaiv Oblast areas.
  • One UAV group was tracked north of Obukhiv (Kyiv Oblast), subsequently changing course to the north-west (Air Force Command update).
  • Multiple Shahed UAVs ("mopeds") were reported attacking the Vinohradivka/Inhulka region (Mykolaiv Oblast). Local reports indicate successful UAF interdiction ("minus" for the southern mopeds).
• Southern Kinetic Activity: Explosions were confirmed in Mykolaiv Oblast during the UAV attacks (Suspilne report), confirming kinetic engagement and/or impacts.
• Donetsk Axis (IO Amplification): RF Information Operations (IO) channels are amplifying the narrative of imminent UAF collapse and withdrawal, explicitly naming Krasnoarmiysk (Pokrovsk) and Dmytriv (Dimytrov) as positions UAF is "on the verge of losing." This narrative is now being pushed through state media (TASS) and by quoting former high-ranking Ukrainian officials, indicating a high-level, coordinated IO effort.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Nighttime clear/partial cloud conditions continue to favor low-altitude nocturnal UAV penetration tactics by the RF, necessitating increased vigilance and reliance on acoustic and radar detection systems.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Posture: RF is executing the predicted Most Likely Course of Action (MLCOA) by maintaining saturation pressure via UAVs. Military bloggers (e.g., Fighterbomber) are signaling continued air operations ("Night is the time to work"), reinforcing the intent to maintain operational tempo.
• UAF Posture: UAF Air Defense (AD) units are actively engaging incoming UAVs, demonstrating successful, localized interceptions in the Southern Operational Zone (Mykolaiv). AD priority remains the defense of critical infrastructure near Kyiv and logistics nodes in the South.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

• Persistent Asymmetric Strike: RF demonstrates high capacity for sustained, low-cost UAV strikes, designed to degrade AD munition stocks and stress civilian C2.
• Deep Information Attack: RF can leverage both official state media and perceived 'insider' Ukrainian sources (e.g., quoting former officials) to inject narratives of defeat directly into the Ukrainian information space.

Intentions:

1. Exploit AD Stress: Utilize the current Shahed wave to locate and fix vulnerable AD assets, potentially for future high-impact missile strikes (MDCOA).
2. Force Premature Withdrawal: Use the aggressive, pervasive IO regarding Krasnoarmiysk/Dmytriv (Pokrovsk) to pressure UAF Command into premature troop withdrawals or divert scarce reserves unnecessarily.
3. Provoke Geopolitical Distraction: RF military blogger channels are circulating disinformation regarding a "drone disruption" at Bremen Airport in Germany, attempting to tie the conflict to internal European security issues and erode partner confidence.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The direct citation of a former Ukrainian Deputy Minister of Defense (Vitaliy Deynega) by TASS to amplify the "loss of Pokrovsk" narrative is a significant adaptation in RF IO strategy. This tactic aims to provide false credibility to their claims of UAF operational failure, moving beyond anonymous military bloggers. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The continued high-rate use of Shaheds confirms RF has adequate immediate stocks for attritional warfare. RF ground logistics sustainment in the Pokrovsk/Ivanopillya axis remains unconfirmed but is supported by the sustained fire superiority observed against UAF fortifications. (INTELLIGENCE GAP)

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is demonstrating highly synchronized multi-domain operations: kinetic (UAV strikes) coordinated with the cognitive domain (state media IO regarding Pokrovsk). This indicates centralized control over both strategic missile assets (Kinzhals/stand-down) and low-end attritional strikes (Shaheds) (HIGH CONFIDENCE).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF AD units remain on high alert. The successful interdiction of UAVs in the Mykolaiv sector confirms effective execution of counter-UAV Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), prioritizing SHORAD and mobile systems against the current threat.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

SUCCESS: Initial reports of successful counter-UAV action in the Southern Operational Zone (Mykolaiv). This localized success is critical for preventing damage to logistics and infrastructure.

SETBACK: UAF is being actively targeted in the information space with high-impact narratives intended to undermine C2 decision-making and public morale regarding the stability of the key Pokrovsk defensive line.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The high tempo of UAV attacks necessitates sustained replenishment of SHORAD and mobile AD munitions.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO has converged on a clear, single strategic goal: The pre-emptive declaration of a UAF defeat in the Donbas.

1. Donbas Defeatism: TASS directly quoting a former UAF official regarding the "loss" of Krasnoarmiysk (Pokrovsk) and Dmytriv. This is intended to be picked up by international media as a credible internal critique.
2. European Security Erosion: Military bloggers attempt to link conflict instability to EU internal security (Bremen airport drone report), a tactic designed to discourage further military aid.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

The successful AD interceptions (Mykolaiv) provide a localized boost to morale. However, the sustained nocturnal threat (UAVs) and the aggressive media campaign regarding Pokrovsk increase generalized stress and require immediate, official counter-messaging.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

RF's attempt to use the Bremen airport narrative is a persistent attempt to undermine the recent positive geopolitical shifts (German budget removal, Turkish oil shift) identified in previous reports.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will maintain high-intensity nocturnal UAV pressure on central and southern logistics/infrastructure nodes (Kyiv, Mykolaiv, Zaporizhzhia). Simultaneously, RF IO channels (TASS, milbloggers) will aggressively amplify the Pokrovsk/Krasnoarmiysk withdrawal narrative, likely attempting to link it to the previously displayed "Leopard trophy" as evidence of Western aid failure. Ground operations near Ivanopillya will continue to focus on the destruction of UAF fortifications.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 48 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) Following the established pattern of high-low tempo oscillation, RF initiates a coordinated, limited strike wave using high-precision ballistic missiles (Iskander/KN-23) against a critical, previously identified infrastructure target (e.g., major transformer or rail hub) near the current UAV attack zones (e.g., Kyiv or Mykolaiv Oblast). This strike will be synchronized with an increased tempo of artillery fire in the Ivanopillya sector to force localized, tactical reserves commitment.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J7/Strategic Communications (Counter-Defeatism): IMMEDIATE PUBLIC STABILIZATION CAMPAIGN. Task J7 to issue an immediate, high-level statement (Presidential Office or General Staff) directly refuting the TASS/Deynega narrative regarding Krasnoarmiysk (Pokrovsk) and Dmytriv. Reinforce the stability and resolve of UAF defensive lines, using imagery or statements from frontline units (e.g., 3rd Separate Assault Brigade).
2. J3/Air Command (Adaptive AD): DEPLOY MOBILE AD PATROLS (KYIV/OBLAST). Given the shift in the Obukhiv UAV vector, task mobile AD units (SHORAD/SPAAG) to dynamically patrol the new North-Western corridors of Kyiv Oblast, which may be exploited for future penetration attempts.
3. J2/GUR (DPRK Exploitation): EXPLOIT DEFEATISM NARRATIVE OPPORTUNITY. Coordinate with J7 to integrate actionable intelligence (e.g., initial debriefing highlights) from the captured DPRK personnel into the counter-IO campaign. This successfully captured foreign asset directly counters the narrative of UAF collapse and highlights Russian reliance on external support.

//END SITREP//