Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - TACTICAL UPDATE: AD SYSTEMS CONFIRMED & DEEP STRIKE CONTINUITY

DTG: 021833Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH. High confidence in both UAF deep strike effectiveness (Shakhtarsk, substations) and the successful deployment and operational status of new Patriot AD systems. Medium confidence in RF intent regarding the immediate escalation of submarine-based IO.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational geometry remains bifurcated: intense, sustained positional battles along the Donetsk axis, offset by persistent UAF deep strike dominance in the Russian-occupied and RF rear areas.

• Donetsk Axis (Pokrovsk/Konstantinovka): RF forces continue localized attrition, utilizing FPV and heavy fire to target UAF positions and personnel. RF propaganda (Alex Parker Returns) is amplifying claims of neutralizing UAF GUR units near Pokrovsk, suggesting attempts to preemptively degrade UAF reconnaissance and special operations capabilities in the sector. UAF President Zelenskyy confirms successful defensive operations and destruction of RF personnel in the Pokrovsk sector.
• Deep Rear (Donetsk Oblast, RF): Multiple confirmed reports (Оперативний ЗСУ, ASTRA, РБК-Україна) verify successful UAF drone attacks on the oil depot in occupied Shakhtarsk (Donetsk Oblast), generating explosions and fire. Furthermore, the 1st Separate SBU Center confirmed strikes against key electrical substations (Komunarska, Kysneva-2, Peremoha, and potentially targets in Lipetsk region, RF), reinforcing the systematic degradation of RF energy infrastructure.
• Northern Border (Narva River/Estonia): The confirmed sighting of an FSB Border Guard vessel flying a Wagner PMC flag near the Estonian coast (STERNENKO, Операция Z) constitutes a low-level hybrid provocation on the NATO border, consistent with previous reporting.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No significant change. Low visibility and nighttime conditions remain prevalent, enabling both UAF (SBU/GUR deep strikes) and RF (FPV/attrition attacks) to execute complex, low-signature operations.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• UAF Air Defense (CRITICAL SUCCESS): The immediate ballistic missile threat to Kyiv/Central Oblasts has been TERMINATED (Отбій загрози). President Zelenskyy confirmed the operational deployment of additional Patriot AD systems supplied by Germany, which are now being put into operation, significantly bolstering strategic air defense capacity.
• RF Forces (Training/Logistics): RF MoD footage confirms the training of "Sever Group of Forces" assault detachments utilizing off-road motorcycles, emphasizing rapid maneuverability and light reconnaissance/assault tactics in rear areas.
• RF Strategic Projection (IO): RF state media (Kotsnews) highlighted the commissioning or rollout of major nuclear submarines ('Khabarovsk' for Poseidon delivery and 'Karelia'), a clear signal of strategic deterrence aimed at the international community.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

• Deep Strike Capability (High Confidence): RF retains the ability to execute geographically widespread kinetic strikes using a mixed array of munitions (Iskander-M, UMPK glide bombs, Geran/Gerber UAVs) across the entire depth of Ukraine (Colonelcassad map analysis).
• Hybrid Provocation (Northern Flank): RF/FSB is capable of executing sophisticated, deniable hybrid provocations (Wagner flag on FSB vessel) designed to test NATO's response threshold without initiating a direct military confrontation.
• Information Warfare (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF continues to run aggressive, morale-degrading IO campaigns, including the promotion of captured hardware (Leopard pieces, reported previously) and exaggerated claims of destroying elite UAF units (GUR in Pokrovsk).

Intentions:

1. Strategic AD Saturation (Kinetic Intent): Continue mixed, multi-axis strikes (Colonelcassad map confirms widespread, varied attacks Nov 1-2) to degrade UAF AD stocks and challenge the newly deployed Patriot systems.
2. Bolster Domestic Morale/Global Deterrence: Showcase strategic military assets (nuclear submarines) and propaganda victories (Leopard, Pokrovsk GUR claims) to project strength domestically and internationally.
3. Local Attrition and C2 Disruption: Sustain high-intensity, localized kinetic pressure on the Donetsk axis (Pokrovsk) while targeting high-value UAF elements (GUR, leadership) to disrupt defensive planning.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Motorized Assault Tactics: The training of assault detachments on motorcycles suggests an adaptation toward highly mobile, light infantry tactics for reconnaissance and rapid attack, possibly in response to terrain difficulty or a shortage of heavy, well-protected vehicles.
• Fiber-Optic FPV (Reported): RF sources claim the destruction of UAF GUR units using "drones on fiber optics" (оптоволокне). If true, this indicates RF is utilizing specialized, jam-resistant FPV/suicide drone variants for high-value targets in urban or complex EW environments. (Requires verification - HIGH GAP).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The confirmed successful UAF strikes on the Shakhtarsk oil depot and multiple substations (Alchevsk, Dovzhansk) represent significant logistical and energy strain on RF occupation forces. This systematically reduces the capacity to fuel and power forward RF units in the Donbas region.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains capable of generating coordinated multi-domain strike packages. However, the confirmed communication gap between frontline UAF commanders and high command (marine complaint via Hayabusa) suggests potential friction within UAF C2, particularly concerning the accuracy of the overall operational picture at the strategic level.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF posture is strong in strategic air defense (Patriot confirmation) and highly effective in the deep strike domain (Shakhtarsk, SBU substations). UAF ground forces are maintaining defensive integrity in critical sectors (Zelenskyy confirms results in Pokrovsk).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• STRATEGIC SUCCESS (AD): Confirmation of additional German-supplied Patriot systems being put into operation drastically reduces strategic vulnerability to RF ballistic threats.
• OPERATIONAL SUCCESS (Deep Strike): Repeated successful strikes by UAF drones/SBU on the Shakhtarsk oil depot and key substations directly impede RF logistics and warfighting capacity in the occupied territories.
• Setback (Information/C2): Internal reporting (Hayabusa) indicates a perception among frontline units that high command lacks accurate tactical awareness, which poses a threat to command trust and operational cohesion.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

1. Counter-Mobility/Anti-Motorcycle Tactics: Immediate dissemination of Counter-UAS/Counter-Mobility TTPs to frontline units to address the newly observed RF use of assault detachments on motorcycles (Sever Group).
2. C4ISR and Fusion: Need for enhanced, rapid dissemination of ground-level ISR and combat feedback to high command to mitigate the perception of C2 disconnect.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO is operating on multiple tracks:

1. Internal Mobilization/Deterrence: Promoting strategic military power (submarines) and political control (Kremlin Leopard exhibit).
2. Tactical Exaggeration: Claiming destruction of elite UAF GUR units near Pokrovsk to demoralize frontline fighters and preemptively deny UAF successes.
3. Hybrid Provocation IO: Utilizing the Wagner flag on an FSB vessel to reinforce the image of unpredictable, aggressive border actions and test NATO psychological resilience.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF morale is high due to strategic wins (Patriot systems, German support) and confirmed deep strike effectiveness. However, the perceived disconnect between the frontline and Kyiv C2 (Hayabusa report) indicates a potential vulnerability that must be managed through transparent communication.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The confirmation of additional Patriot systems from Germany solidifies Western commitment to UAF defense capabilities. Zelenskyy emphasizes continued lobbying for more AD systems (Gripens/F-16s) directly from manufacturers, signaling a long-term resource acquisition strategy.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will attempt to immediately validate the destruction of UAF GUR units near Pokrovsk via released combat footage or IO. Simultaneously, RF deep strike activity will likely increase use of UMPK glide bombs (Colonelcassad map confirms heavy use) on the Eastern front (Kharkiv/Sumy) as a low-cost, high-volume alternative to ballistic missiles, seeking to exploit UAF AD saturation near the FEBA. The FSB will maintain low-level hybrid presence on the Northern Flank using unconventional signaling.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF will utilize its newly trained, highly mobile motorcycle assault detachments (Sever Group) to attempt rapid, deep infiltration and reconnaissance behind UAF forward defensive lines in the Kharkiv or Kupyansk sectors. This maneuver, aimed at probing C2 and supply vulnerabilities, would leverage poor visibility and the speed of the motorcycles to bypass traditional static defenses, potentially leading to immediate tactical surprise and high-value interdiction.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/Ground Forces (Tactical Defense - IMMEDIATE): INCREASE COUNTER-RECONNAISSANCE AND NIGHT OPS. Prioritize thermal/NVG ISR in the Pokrovsk sector to pre-emptively identify and neutralize RF FPV/drone teams and confirm the operational status of UAF forces targeted by RF IO. Incorporate anti-motorcycle deployment tactics (e.g., rapid road interdiction, low-flying UAS detection) into patrol briefs.
2. J2/J7 (Strategic Communications): ADDRESS COMMAND DISCONNECT PUBLICLY. High Command must issue a transparent statement or video (e.g., via General Staff or GUR) acknowledging the challenges of the frontline and demonstrating active engagement with ground-level reports (e.g., citing specific unit successes in Pokrovsk) to restore internal trust and neutralize RF IO attempts to sow discord.
3. J3/Air Force (AD Systems): FOCUS PATRIOT DEPLOYMENT ON C2/LOGISTICS HUBS. Ensure the newly operational Patriot systems are positioned to provide overlapping coverage for the highest-value C2 and logistics hubs (including the capital) to deter and mitigate the immediate deep strike threat (MDCOA). Maintain high readiness for EW countermeasures.

//END SITREP//