Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - OPERATIONAL UPDATE: STRATEGIC ATTRITION AND INTENSIFIED RF AIR STRIKES

DTG: 021430Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH. Confidence is high regarding the effectiveness of UAF deep strikes and the RF commitment to high-cost attrition on the ground, supported by persistent KAB use.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational geometry is defined by high-intensity combat operations focused on the Pokrovsk Axis and persistent RF stand-off strikes against UAF rear areas and critical infrastructure.

• Pokrovsk Axis (Rodynske): UAF forces continue to inflict "gigantic losses" on RF assault groups attempting to advance toward the Pokrovsk-Myrnohrad agglomeration, validating the critical holding action by UAF mechanized units. This sector remains the most kinetically active ground front.
• Deep Rear (Tuapse): Confirmed video intelligence of an oil spill and damaged infrastructure at the Tuapse oil terminal confirms the strategic effectiveness of UAF deep strikes, impacting RF ability to export crude and manage logistics (See 1.3).
• Kharkiv Oblast (Tsyrkuny): Confirmed new RF strike using Guided Aerial Bombs (KABs) on the settlement of Tsyrkuny (Kharkiv Raion), indicating a sustained effort to degrade positions and civilian will in the Kharkiv suburbs.
• Dnipropetrovsk Oblast: Confirmed casualties among UAF personnel following a combined missile and drone strike yesterday, highlighting RF capability to strike operational rear areas effectively.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No significant changes. Conditions remain stable for high-tempo UAV/UAS operations (both offensive and reconnaissance). The confirmed oil spill at Tuapse poses a significant environmental factor, potentially impacting local maritime traffic and port operations, which must be assessed for secondary military impacts.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Forces (Ground): RF ground forces in the Pokrovsk sector are demonstrating a willingness to accept extremely high casualty rates to achieve localized political objectives, indicating strategic direction prioritizing tactical gains over personnel preservation.
• RF Forces (Air/Strike): Continued high-volume use of KABs in the Kharkiv sector (Tsyrkuny) and combined missile/drone strikes against Dnipropetrovsk rear areas confirms the continued RF strategy of multi-domain kinetic pressure.
• UAF Forces (Air Defense): Strategic confirmation from the President's Office of the strengthening of the Patriot component in UAF Air Defense (AD) indicates a high-priority, ongoing effort to mitigate the RF deep strike and KAB threat. This is a critical development affecting the balance of power in the air domain.
• UAF Forces (Tech Exploitation): Video evidence from RF military channels showing UAF self-propelled artillery (Bogdana-B) being destroyed by RF Counter-Battery Fire (KBB) utilizing drones (244th Artillery Brigade, 11th AC, GrV "Sever") confirms advanced RF counter-fire integration.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

• Sustained Attrition and Fire Superiority (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF maintains the ability to mass high-lethality kinetic assets (KABs, drones for KBB) to effectively destroy UAF fixed positions and inflict casualties in rear areas (Dnipropetrovsk).
• Advanced Counter-Battery Integration (HIGH CONFIDENCE): The confirmed destruction of UAF artillery via drone-enabled KBB (244th Brigade) shows RF forces are effectively closing the sensor-to-shooter loop for priority targets.
• Propaganda Escalation (CRITICAL - HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF media is fully invested in institutionalizing anti-NATO propaganda (Leopard tank trophy in the Kremlin) and high-level political disinformation (Errol Musk interview) to erode Western resolve.

Intentions:

1. Force Breakthrough at Pokrovsk: Continue to expend large amounts of manpower and material to force a breakthrough, leveraging high attrition as a functional TTP.
2. Degrade UAF Rear Area Capacity: Sustain combined missile and KAB strikes on UAF logistics, command nodes, and personnel assembly areas (Dnipropetrovsk, Kharkiv) to disrupt forward deployment and defense.
3. Counter UAF AD Buildup: Attempt to identify and target the newly reinforced Patriot systems before they can be fully integrated and operationalized.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• RF Use of Camouflage: New video evidence suggests RF forces are utilizing extensive, dense camouflage netting ('Combat Hedgehog' or similar ghillie systems) on MBTs to counter UAF aerial reconnaissance and FPV/UAV strikes. This adaptation shows a direct response to UAF drone dominance.
• Increased Information Exploitation (IE) Speed: RF channels rapidly exploit minor tactical successes (e.g., capture of a 'Baba Yaga' drone, destruction of a Bogdana SPG) for immediate morale boosting, demonstrating an agile IO cycle.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The confirmed oil spill at the Tuapse terminal validates the continued disruption of RF energy logistics. While RF military fuel supplies are not immediately crippled, the cumulative effect of these strikes adds significant friction, forcing resource allocation toward rear-area defense and civil repair.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective in coordinating complex, multi-domain operations (high-attrition ground assaults combined with deep strike air/missile campaigns). The effective drone-enabled KBB (244th Brigade) suggests strong C2 integration at the Corps/Army level for fire support.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF posture remains highly defensive and resilient on the Pokrovsk Axis, defined by effective decentralized fire (FPV) to inflict significant casualties. The strategic announcement of the Patriot system upgrade demonstrates UAF commitment to a robust, layered AD defense.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success (Deep Strike Confirmation): Visual confirmation of damage/oil spill at Tuapse reinforces the strategic success of the deep strike campaign against RF energy infrastructure.
• Success (AD Reinforcement): Confirmed deployment/upgrade of Patriot AD components (likely German-provided) significantly increases UAF survivability against ballistic and cruise missile threats (Critical counter to previous MDCOA).
• Setback (Rear Area Losses): Confirmed UAF personnel losses in Dnipropetrovsk due to combined missile/drone strikes indicate persistent vulnerability in rear assembly/staging areas.
• Setback (Artillery Loss): Confirmed loss of a Bogdana SPG to RF drone-enabled KBB highlights a critical vulnerability in UAF fire position concealment/EW countermeasures.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

Immediate requirements include:

1. Counter-KBB EW/AD: Dedicated EW support and mobile short-range AD systems (SHORAD) to protect high-value artillery assets from drone-enabled KBB (as seen with the Bogdana SPG).
2. Concealment Doctrine: Immediate review and dissemination of counter-aerial-reconnaissance TTPs to counter new RF dense camouflage applications.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Strategic IO (Institutionalized Trophy): The display of Leopard tank components in the Kremlin is a deliberate, institutionalized psychological operation aimed at demoralizing NATO partners and domestically reinforcing the narrative of a successful war effort against the West.
• RF Political IO (Discredit UK/West): The TASS interview with Errol Musk is a low-effort, high-impact attempt to use a high-profile Western figure to spread anti-Western media distrust and pro-RF political narratives.
• UAF Strategic IO: The rapid, public announcement of the Patriot reinforcement is an effective counter-narrative, signaling continued Western support and military capability.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF morale is reinforced by confirmed deep strike successes and the arrival of high-end Western AD systems. RF military morale is boosted by local tactical reporting (Bogdana destruction, drone capture) and high-level political props (Kremlin trophy).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The Patriot system reinforcement confirms the effectiveness of diplomatic engagement and sustains the positive trend observed in previous reporting (German spending increase). This provides a strong foundation for continued requests for long-range interceptors.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 24-72 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will attempt to exploit UAF personnel losses in the Dnipropetrovsk area by conducting follow-on strikes with high-precision long-range systems (Iskander/KN-23) to target remaining C2/logistics nodes, testing the readiness of the newly reinforced Patriot systems. Concurrently, high-intensity attrition efforts on the Pokrovsk Axis will continue to maximize RF ground casualties in an attempt to force a tactical collapse before UAF can integrate reserves.

• Indicators: Increased RF UAV activity (Orlan-10, Supercam) over Dnipropetrovsk and Kharkiv Oblasts; sustained reporting of high-casualty RF assaults near Rodynske.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24-72 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF will launch a coordinated, multi-axis deep strike targeting the newly deployed Patriot AD components. This strike will likely involve a saturation attack using cruise missiles (Kh-101/Kh-555) and/or Shahed drones to force system activation and deplete interceptor stocks, immediately followed by the use of ballistic missiles (Iskander/KN-23) targeting identified launch sites or associated radars.

• Indicators: Sudden and significant spike in RF electronic warfare (EW) activity against UAF AD frequencies; simultaneous missile launches from multiple air and naval platforms.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/J2 (Counter-KBB Defense): PROTECT HIGH-VALUE ARTILLERY. Immediately issue a Flash Intelligence Report (FLASH INTREP) detailing the RF drone-enabled Counter-Battery threat (e.g., 244th Brigade TTP) to all UAF artillery units. Mandate continuous deployment of organic short-range EW/AD systems (e.g., portable MANPADS, electronic jammers) to protect all self-propelled artillery assets outside of firing missions.
2. J7 (Strategic Communication): AMPLIFY PATRIOT SUCCESS. Coordinate a unified media campaign leveraging the President's statement on the Patriot reinforcement. Use this as a direct counter-narrative to the RF's strategic "Leopard Trophy" IO, emphasizing that Western support is translating into immediate, life-saving capabilities against RF aggression.
3. J4 (Logistics & Sustainment): ADDRESS REAR AREA VULNERABILITY. Conduct an immediate vulnerability assessment of all UAF assembly, logistics, and personnel staging areas within $100\text{ km}$ of the FLOC, particularly in Dnipropetrovsk and Kharkiv Oblasts. Mandate rapid dispersal and concealment measures, recognizing the heightened RF intent to strike these high-density targets.

//END SITREP//