Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - OPERATIONAL UPDATE: POKROVSK PRESSURE AND STRATEGIC ISR SUCCESS

DTG: 021200Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH. Confidence is high regarding the verified multi-axis air campaign and the documented success of UAF ISR/Assault operations, particularly the capture of critical RF communications and identification material.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational environment is characterized by sustained RF offensive pressure focused on the Pokrovsk Axis and continuing RF deep strike saturation, countered by highly effective UAF tactical and special operations forces (SOF) engagements.

• Pokrovsk Axis (CRITICAL FOCUS): RF continues active efforts to isolate the Krasnoarmiysk (Pokrovsk) agglomeration. RF analysis suggests that to relieve the area, UAF would need to recapture Rodynske and the Red Lyman area, and dislodge RF units south of Hryshyno (Colonelcassad analysis). This confirms RF is consolidating control over the industrial and transport nodes west of the previous FLOT.
• Deep Air Threat (CONTINUED SATURATION): Confirmed continued multi-axis UAV movement. A group of UAVs originating from Kharkiv Oblast is now tracked on a course toward Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (UAF Air Force). This sustains the pattern of stretching UAF Air Defense (AD) capability to facilitate strikes on logistics or CNI.
• Zaporizhzhia/Donetsk Engagement: Confirmed close-quarters combat (CQB) engagement by the State Border Guard Service (SBGS) DOZOR Special Forces unit against an RF/proxy ambush in the zone of the "3rd Army Corps" (likely the RF formation opposite the Donbas axis).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No significant changes. Ground conditions remain favorable for sustained positional warfare, while clear air space supports continued drone and glide bomb usage by RF.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• UAF Forces: UAF maintains a flexible defensive posture, employing specialized units (3rd Assault Brigade, SBGS DOZOR) for localized counter-attacks and clearing operations in the Donetsk region. The 148th Separate Artillery Brigade (Air Assault Forces) is confirmed actively employing heavy artillery (likely towed howitzers) from prepared defensive positions, indicating sustained fire support capability.
• RF Forces: RF forces are confirmed operating entrenched positions and employing ambush tactics (detected by 3rd Assault Brigade) while utilizing various nationalities/proxies (evidenced by captured documents). RF forces in the Pokrovsk sector are confirmed focused on neutralizing UAF logistics near Krasnoarmiysk.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

• Localized ISR/Fire Control (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF is utilizing drones to guide highly accurate strikes on UAF positions (Archangel Spetsnaz footage showing trench strikes).
• Ambushes/Small Unit Tactics (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE): RF/Proxy forces retain the capability to establish effective small-unit ambushes in complex terrain, as encountered by the 3rd Assault Brigade and DOZOR units.
• Integrated Proxy Forces (CRITICAL NEW FACT - HIGH CONFIDENCE): The captured RF military ID and a Belarusian passport confirm the continued integration of non-RF regular forces, including Belarusian nationals, into frontline combat operations in the Donetsk region.

Intentions:

1. Isolate Pokrovsk: RF's primary operational objective remains the full isolation of the Krasnoarmiysk/Pokrovsk agglomeration by severing key logistical and defensive nodes.
2. Degrade UAF Reserves/Logistics: Continue the multi-axis air saturation campaign to stretch UAF AD assets, creating opportunities for high-value strikes on logistics hubs (Dnipropetrovsk region threat).
3. Reinforce Frontline Positions: Maintain heavy positional defense, using prepared fortifications and ambushes to absorb UAF counter-attacks.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Adaptive Camouflage/Terrain Use: UAF footage confirms RF units are utilizing heavy cover (woods, dense vegetation) for ambush and concealment (SBGS DOZOR engagement).
• Focus on UAF Counter-Attack Disruption: RF analysis (Colonelcassad) confirms that RF commanders are anticipating and preparing defenses against potential UAF counter-attacks aimed at relieving the Pokrovsk pocket, suggesting a proactive defensive posture.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The deep partisan rail sabotage reported in the previous SITREP continues to be a major systemic constraint on RF strategic logistics. At the tactical level, the successful UAF seizure of multiple communication devices (smartphones, radios) and documents (Belarusian passport, RF military ID) from engaged RF elements suggests potential vulnerability in RF communications security and identity management within mixed units.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective in coordinating deep air strikes and local tactical fire support (drone-guided artillery). However, the use of multiple disparate communication devices (radios and personal phones) by frontline units highlights a persistent vulnerability in maintaining secure and standardized C2.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF maintains a high state of readiness, demonstrating successful offensive small-unit tactics in complex terrain (3rd Assault Brigade and DOZOR operations). The confirmed deployment of the 148th Artillery Brigade indicates sustained commitment to long-range fire support on the FLOT. The focus remains on aggressive engagement of RF deep/rear assets (Sochi airport disruption) while maintaining tactical initiative through targeted clearing operations.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Successes (CRITICAL):
  • Intelligence Gain: SBGS DOZOR SOF successfully engaged enemy forces and captured critical intelligence material: Russian and Belarusian passports, RF military ID, and multiple phones/radios. This provides immediate, actionable intelligence on enemy unit composition and communication security failures.
  • Strategic Disruption: Continued flight delays at Sochi Airport (20 flights delayed due to drone attack) confirm sustained strategic impact on RF air logistics/transportation hubs.
• Setbacks: The continued, high-intensity pressure on the Pokrovsk axis persists, requiring significant UAF commitment to holding the lines and disrupting RF logistical strangulation efforts.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

1. ISR/BDA Analysis: Immediate high-level technical analysis of captured RF phones/radios to rapidly extract contact lists, unit affiliations, and operational plans.
2. Counter-ISR/AD for Deep Strikes: Continued requirement for mobile AD assets to counter the shifting trajectory of RF UAVs (now heading toward Dnipropetrovsk).

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF IO (Domestic Consolidation - HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF messaging continues to focus on domestic issues (funding for disabled veterans, cultural outreach in occupied Donbas) to maintain internal stability and reinforce the narrative of "normal life" in occupied territories.
• RF IO (Military Analysis - MEDIUM CONFIDENCE): RF military bloggers (Colonelcassad) are openly discussing the operational necessity for UAF to relieve Pokrovsk, effectively setting an expectation of RF defensive success and amplifying the difficulty of UAF offensive action.
• UAF IO (Morale/Recruitment - HIGH CONFIDENCE): UAF channels emphasize combat success (DOZOR/3rd Assault Brigade engagements) and heroic narratives (MMA fighter deploying to Pokrovsk), intended to maintain domestic morale and support recruitment.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF public morale is reinforced by demonstrated combat effectiveness and successful deep strikes (Sochi). However, RF efforts to undermine international support (NATO trophy exhibit reported in the previous period) and persistent air raid threats (Dnipropetrovsk direction) will remain a strain.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

RF claims that a Putin-Trump meeting is "unnecessary" at this time (Peskov statement) indicates RF is managing expectations regarding major diplomatic breakthroughs, suggesting a focus on achieving battlefield success before engaging in high-level talks. US-China military cooperation talks remain a significant macro development, potentially altering global security priorities.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will sustain high-volume UAV/GAB saturation strikes, with a specific focus on pressuring the Dnipropetrovsk region. On the ground, RF forces on the Pokrovsk axis will increase localized assaults aimed at capturing Rodynske and consolidating control over the industrial terrain near Krasnoarmiysk. Internal security forces in the RF rear will conduct aggressive counter-insurgency operations targeting the confirmed partisan rail network sabotage.

• Indicators: Increased reports of GAB launches targeting Dnipropetrovsk CNI/military sites; RF artillery focus on UAF defensive positions near Rodynske.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) Deep Penetrating Strike on a UAF AD Command Node. RF will leverage the dispersed UAV campaign to pinpoint the location of a key mobile AD headquarters or a strategic C2 node supporting the anti-UAV operation in Central Ukraine (e.g., Poltava or Dnipropetrovsk). This location will be immediately targeted by a highly precise asset (Iskander or Kinzhal) to achieve temporary local air superiority over a critical logistical corridor.

• Indicators: RF ISR overflight (UAV or Satellite) reports over Central Ukraine preceding a strike; sudden, temporary lapse in UAF air defense communications/alerts in a major region.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. G2/GUR (Exploitation Priority): INITIATE FLASH REPORT ON CAPTURED MATERIAL. Immediately disseminate the confirmed presence of Belarusian military-aged personnel and the specific communication devices used by enemy forces in the Donetsk region. Use this intelligence to update EW profiles and target specific RF units known to integrate foreign fighters.
2. J3/J4 (Defense of Dnipropetrovsk): PRE-POSITION MOBILE AD ASSETS. Given the confirmed UAV trajectory toward Dnipropetrovsk, immediately deploy mobile SHORAD and EW systems to establish a deep protective layer around critical infrastructure (rail hubs, power stations) that are likely HVTs for the incoming strike wave.
3. J7/SOF (Counter-Ambush Tactics): DISSEMINATE COUNTER-AMBUSH TTPs. Develop and disseminate immediate tactical guidance to infantry and dismounted reconnaissance units based on the successful clearing operations conducted by the 3rd Assault Brigade and DOZOR, focusing on effective engagement and clearance of entrenched positions in wooded and ruined terrain.

//END SITREP//