Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - OPERATIONAL UPDATE: DEEP STRIKE SATURATION AND PARTISAN OPS

DTG: 021200Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH. Confidence is high regarding the verified multi-axis air campaign and the documented success of UAF deep and partisan operations targeting RF logistics and air infrastructure.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational environment remains defined by RF pressure on the Pokrovsk axis and a strategic, multi-domain RF effort to degrade UAF C2 and logistics through air strikes and information warfare (IO).

• Air Domain Saturation (CRITICAL IMPACT): Confirmed: RF is executing simultaneous multi-axis drone and guided bomb attacks. New confirmed UAV movement detected in Kharkiv Oblast (passing Nova Vodolaha, heading south) and Chernihiv Oblast (Koriukivka district, frequently changing direction). Confirmed: RF tactical aviation has launched Guided Aerial Bombs (GABs/KABs) towards Zaporizhzhia Oblast. This confirms the sustained effort to stretch UAF Air Defense (AD) capability across multiple regions. (Source: UAF Air Force - HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Deep Strike Reciprocity and Partisan Operations:
  • Air Infrastructure Disruption: UAF drone attacks successfully delayed "dozens" of flights at Sochi Airport, suggesting a targeting focus on air logistical/transportation hubs. (Source: Tsaplienko - HIGH CONFIDENCE on reported delays)
  • Rail Interdiction (NEW FACT): Ukrainian resistance movement (partisans) successfully engaged and burned railway relay cabinets across a vast geographical area, including occupied Luhansk Oblast, Krasnodar Krai, Tyumen Oblast, Bryansk Oblast, Murmansk Oblast, Orenburg Oblast, Karachay-Cherkess, and Chechen Republics. This demonstrates a coordinated, deep-rear interdiction campaign targeting RF rail logistics C2. (Source: Operatyvnyi ZSU - HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Pokrovsk Axis: The RF focus remains on the Pokrovsk sector, though no new verified ground advances have been reported since the previous SITREP. Previous intelligence confirmed strikes on the Pokrovske Mining Administration and the Vovcha River bridge.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No new significant changes. Conditions favor continued drone and guided bomb usage by RF, enabled by clear operational air space over the deep rear.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF forces are posturing for flexible defense, allocating mobile AD assets to counter the dispersed drone threat in the North/Center (Chernihiv, Kharkiv, Poltava). The confirmed transfer of advanced drones and EW systems to a GUR unit in Zaporizhzhia indicates proactive adaptation to the EW/drone threat environment.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

• Synchronized Deep Strike (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF demonstrates the capability to synchronize UAV, GAB, and possibly missile attacks across 4+ oblasts simultaneously (Poltava, Kharkiv, Chernihiv, Zaporizhzhia).
• Hybrid Armor Protection (NEW FACT - MEDIUM CONFIDENCE): Observed RF tank operations featuring makeshift "hedgehog" type defenses ("Еж") designed to defeat FPV/top-attack drones. This confirms RF is rapidly adapting armor to the primary UAF tactical threat (FPV/drone-dropped munitions). (Source: Colonelcassad - HIGH CONFIDENCE on observation, MEDIUM on broad application extent)
• Strategic IO Integration (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF IO is running simultaneous, high-profile campaigns (CNI attacks, NATO trophy exhibits, hero monuments in occupied territories like Volnovakha) designed to maximize internal support and external demoralization.

Intentions:

1. Air Superiority through Saturation: RF intends to overload UAF AD capabilities by launching multiple, geographically dispersed drone attacks, preserving higher-value assets (missiles, manned aircraft) for subsequent strikes on vulnerable High-Value Targets (HVTs).
2. Disrupt Strategic Logistics (Rail/Air): RF is attempting to counter UAF deep strikes (Tuapse) by aggressively targeting UAF industrial and logistics hubs (Pokrovske Mining Administration).
3. Reinforce Narrative of Victory: Through IO (Volnovakha monument, NATO trophy exhibit), RF aims to cement the narrative of irreversible success and the futility of Western aid.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Defensive Armor Modification: Rapid adoption of "Еж" (Hedgehog) anti-drone cages/spikes on tanks, reflecting the immediate necessity to mitigate UAF FPV drone lethality.
• Dispersed Air Attack Pattern: Shift from concentrated strikes on a few large targets to multiple, geographically distributed attacks designed to dilute UAF AD response.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics are facing significant disruption due to the coordinated partisan campaign targeting railway control infrastructure across multiple military districts and occupied territories. This disruption, if sustained, will degrade the timely rotation and resupply of front-line units, particularly along the eastern axes relying on the Southern and Central military districts' rail networks.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective in coordinating complex, multi-axis air operations. The widespread partisan activity targeting rail C2 (relay cabinets) indicates a critical vulnerability in RF logistical C2 security, necessitating immediate internal security resource diversion.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF maintains an alert posture, actively tracking multi-axis drone movements and deploying mobile AD assets. The confirmed deep partisan activity demonstrates robust capability for asymmetric warfare, pressuring RF rear logistics and necessitating force diversion from the FLOT.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Successes (CRITICAL): Confirmed successful execution of deep partisan operations targeting RF railway C2 across vast administrative areas. This directly degrades RF military mobility and supply chain resilience. Confirmed disruption of air traffic at Sochi, impacting RF use of the facility.
• Setbacks: Continued high volume of RF kinetic activity against CNI and industrial targets (Zaporizhzhia GAB strikes, previous CNI blackout).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

1. Mobile AD/EW Systems (CRITICAL): Urgent requirement for additional mobile Short-Range Air Defense (SHORAD) and Counter-UAV EW systems to cover the newly expanded, dispersed threat area (Poltava, Chernihiv, Kharkiv corridors).
2. Engineer Protection: Dedicated force protection and counter-ISR resources must be allocated to secure engineer operations aimed at restoring essential infrastructure damaged in the Pokrovsk sector (bridges, industrial sites).

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF IO (Domestic Consolidation - HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF channels are emphasizing the commemoration of deceased commanders (Volnovakha monument) and featuring reports on domestic socio-political commentary (Zhirinovsky archives, Sverdlovsk demographic issues). This is designed to sustain domestic support and distract from military setbacks.
• RF IO (Western Demoralization - HIGH CONFIDENCE): The aggressive highlighting of destroyed Western equipment (NATO trophy exhibit) and the amplification of negative Western reports (The Telegraph on Trump's impact) serve the direct strategic goal of undermining international political support for Ukraine.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF deep strike and partisan successes (Sochi disruption, rail sabotage) are critical for maintaining public morale amidst RF's CNI and air saturation campaign. Conversely, the high volume of incoming threats across central oblasts will strain civilian resilience.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The reported US-China military cooperation talks (PENTAGON) are a macro-level diplomatic development that, while tangential to the current conflict, highlights shifts in global focus that could influence future resource allocation by international partners. UAF must continue showcasing combat effectiveness to ensure continued priority status.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will sustain and potentially increase the volume of multi-axis, dispersed UAV/GAB attacks aimed at forcing UAF AD expenditure and stretching defensive coverage thin. Simultaneously, RF ground forces will continue probing attacks on the Pokrovsk axis, seeking to exploit perceived C2 and logistical vulnerabilities caused by prior CNI and industrial strikes. RF engineers will prioritize rapid repairs to rail lines, while internal security forces conduct sweep operations in response to partisan activity.

• Indicators: Continued tracking of drone groups crossing borders/FLOTs; localized high-intensity GAB strikes near Zaporizhzhia/Kharkiv; increased security presence (Rosgvardia, FSB) near RF rail infrastructure.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) Concentrated Strike on a High-Value Reserve Area/Logistics Hub. Having located vulnerable points through the saturation campaign, RF will deploy a concentrated package of high-precision assets (Iskander/Kalibr or massed GAB/Shahed-136) against a recently established UAF reserve assembly area, military fuel depot, or large forward maintenance facility in the operational depth (e.g., Dnipro or Poltava region). Successful targeting of such a node could severely degrade UAF combat sustainability.

• Indicators: Sudden cessation of dispersed UAV activity followed by high-volume, simultaneous launch reports for cruise or ballistic missiles targeting a single regional hub; increased RF ISR preceding the strike.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/Air Force (AD Counter-Saturation): ACTIVATE ROTATIONAL MOBILE AD COVERAGE. Implement a rotating, scheduled deployment of mobile AD systems between key logistics centers (e.g., Poltava/Dnipro) and northern ingress corridors (Chernihiv/Sumy) to prevent the RF multi-axis campaign from finding static, vulnerable targets.
2. J4/Engineers (Pokrovsk Logistical Resilience): PRIORITIZE INDUSTRIAL SITE DENIAL/HARDENING. Based on the strike on Pokrovske Mining Administration, immediately assess all remaining major industrial sites near the FLOT for potential RF operational use (as fire bases, cover) or as future targets. Either demolish them preemptively or harden them for defense/use as UAF strongpoints.
3. J7/GUR (Partisan Exploitation): CAPITALIZE ON RAIL DISRUPTION. Task GUR to immediately provide necessary material/technical support to resistance movements in areas of confirmed successful rail sabotage. Exploit the resulting RF logistical bottleneck by identifying and targeting stalled military convoys (SIGINT/IMINT) awaiting rail repair.

//END SITREP//