Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - OPERATIONAL UPDATE: RECIPROCAL DEEP STRIKES AND ATTRITION TACTICS

DTG: 020900Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH. The operational environment is characterized by escalating reciprocal deep strike operations, with UAF successfully targeting RF strategic CNI and RF maintaining a high tempo, multi-axis deep strike campaign aimed at AD saturation and civilian infrastructure damage. Tactical success on the FLOT is defined by localized UAF counter-attrition (FPV) and strong defensive integrity (DShV at Pokrovsk).

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The conflict is currently focused on deep strike interdiction and attrition warfare, rather than major territorial gains.

• UAF Deep Strike Success (CRITICAL):
  • Confirmed UAF strike on five (5) Russian substations in occupied Luhansk Oblast (TOT), significantly disrupting RF military and logistics power grids. (Source: SBS/Operatyvny ZSU/ASTRA - HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • NEW: UAF Deep Strike on Tuapse Oil Terminal (RF Territory): Confirmed successful strike on a Rosneft oil terminal in Tuapse, damaging port infrastructure vital for RF energy exports to Asia, and reportedly setting a tanker ablaze. This extends the UAF deep strike strategic reach and targets RF economic sustainment. (Source: Tsaplienko/UAF - HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Air Defense (AD) Success: Confirmed destruction/suppression of 67 enemy UAVs by UAF AD Forces overnight, demonstrating continued high readiness against saturation tactics. (Source: UAF Air Force/Genshtab ZSU - HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• FLOT - Pokrovsk Axis: UAF DShV forces successfully disrupted recent RF assaults, confirming continued robust defensive integrity. RF continues kinetic strikes on local industrial/CNI (Pokrovske Mining Administration).
• FLOT - Lyman Axis (Attrition Data): The Ukrainian 63rd Mechanized Brigade reports eliminating/wounding 869 RF personnel in October, confirming extreme pressure and high RF commitment to sustained assaults in the Lyman sector, despite catastrophic losses. (Source: Butusov Plus - HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Tactical Attrition (FPV): Confirmed successful UAF FPV strikes destroying a camouflaged RF main battle tank and an All-Terrain Vehicle (ATV) in a wooded area, demonstrating effective small-unit ISR and anti-armor capability. (Source: Sternenko - HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No new significant weather reports. The effectiveness of UAF FPV and ISR drones (thermal footage noted in the FPV strikes) suggests current conditions are permissive for small-scale aerial reconnaissance and strike missions.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF is effectively balancing strategic deep strike (Tuapse, TOT CNI) with tactical defense and counter-attrition (FPV strikes, DShV defense). UAF AD assets are highly engaged, focusing on the multi-axis UAV threat (new reports of UAV ingress toward Pavlohrad, Dnipropetrovsk region).

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

• Strategic Deep Strike (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF maintains the capacity for complex, synchronized multi-axis deep strikes using UAVs and UMPK glide bombs (Poltava, Sumy, Kharkiv, Zaporizhzhia, Dnipropetrovsk).
• Sustained Attrition: RF is demonstrating willingness to sustain extremely high personnel losses (869 casualties in October on the Lyman axis) to achieve localized pressure or potential breakthroughs.
• Information Warfare (IO): RF state and proxy channels are actively engaged in strategic IO, attempting to undermine Western aid resolve ("trophy exhibit") and promote battlefield claims (Colonelcassad promoting old/staged footage of failed UAF operations).

Intentions:

1. Reciprocal Interdiction: RF will immediately seek to retaliate for the Tuapse and TOT CNI strikes by escalating kinetic action against UAF strategic logistics and energy CNI.
2. AD Overload: RF intent is fixed on stretching UAF AD assets via the multi-axis saturation strategy, creating temporary windows for high-value kinetic strikes.
3. Domestic Deception: RF state media (TASS, Moscow News) continues to focus on unrelated domestic issues (VR medical training, traffic laws) to insulate the general population from the war's high cost and recent RF infrastructure losses.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The shift toward targeting key economic infrastructure in operational depth (Pokrovske Mining Administration) reinforces the RF intent to paralyze UAF support areas economically, not just militarily.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The successful UAF strikes on the Tuapse oil terminal and TOT substations represent a direct attack on RF strategic economic sustainment and military power projection capacity in occupied regions. This increases the friction on RF logistics, though immediate frontline effects are assessed as LOW.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective in synchronizing the dispersed, complex air campaign. IO efforts are also tightly coordinated (e.g., the "trophy exhibit" timing).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF readiness is HIGH in both offensive counter-CNI operations (Tuapse, TOT substations) and defensive AD operations (67 UAV kills). Specialized units (FPV teams, 63rd Mech Bde) are demonstrating high operational effectiveness in local attrition warfare.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Strategic Success: Successful deep strike on Tuapse oil terminal (Russian territory) is a major escalation of strategic reach, directly impacting RF export revenue and military fuel supplies (Confidence: HIGH).
• Tactical Success: Successful heavy equipment destruction via FPV near the FLOT (Confidence: HIGH).
• Setback: Continued reporting of UAV ingress toward major logistics hubs (Pavlohrad) indicates that despite high kill rates, RF is successfully forcing AD deployment to critical logistics areas, potentially drawing resources from the immediate FLOT.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The multi-axis air campaign places extreme strain on mobile AD assets. There is a confirmed, ongoing need for advanced EW/SHORAD systems to counter the FPV and UAV saturation threat, especially around critical logistics nodes (Poltava, Dnipropetrovsk).

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Counter-IO (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF channels (Colonelcassad, Mash) are amplifying narratives of successful RF operations (e.g., failed UAF GUR operations) and downplaying infrastructure losses.
• UAF Public Morale Issue (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE): Public sentiment, as reflected in social media comments, shows significant frustration and anger over perceived government mismanagement of funds (filming a documentary during wartime), suggesting internal resource allocation disputes are negatively affecting morale.
• RF Satire/Psychological Ops (LOW CONFIDENCE): Highly stylized, satirical content (clowns with military helicopters in Pokrovsk) suggests localized psychological operations, likely aimed at mocking UAF movements or command decisions, but lack strategic impact.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF deep strike successes (Tuapse, TOT CNI) are likely major morale boosters. However, the recurring civilian casualties and public criticism over resource management introduce friction in the civil-military relationship.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The Tuapse strike provides strong evidence of UAF capability to impose costs deep within RF territory, reinforcing the argument for providing UAF with more advanced long-range precision strike systems.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will execute an immediate, aggressive kinetic response targeting high-value UAF CNI and logistics nodes in the Central/Eastern Oblasts. This will likely involve a heavier concentration of UMPK glide bombs directed toward established rail/logistics hubs (e.g., Poltava, Dnipropetrovsk rail yards, or key military storage facilities). RF ground forces will maintain continuous, high-volume artillery pressure on the Pokrovsk and Lyman axes to pin down UAF reserves and fix AD assets near the FLOT.

• Indicators: Immediate launch of heavy cruise/ballistic missiles (Kh-series, Iskander) after sunset; heavy UMPK sorties confirmed over Sumy/Poltava areas; increased indirect fire volume (e.g., >2000 munitions in the Southern sector).

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) Integrated RF SEAD/STRIKE Operation. RF employs a coordinated Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses (SEAD) effort using focused EW (Krasukha/R-330Zh) and anti-radiation missiles (ARM), immediately followed by a massed UMPK/UAV strike aimed at neutralizing a key UAF AD complex defending a major city (e.g., Kyiv or Odesa) or major logistics node (Dnipropetrovsk). The objective would be to establish localized air superiority long enough to cause catastrophic damage to a strategic asset.

• Indicators: Significant, unexplained drop in UAF AD radar efficiency; ELINT detection of heightened RF EW activity (e.g., Krasukha activation); multiple waves of cheap targets (UAVs) used to draw fire, immediately followed by high-speed kinetic ordnance.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/Air Force (Counter-Retaliation): PRIORITIZE DEFENSE OF RAIL NODES. Given the critical strategic success of the Tuapse strike and the high threat of RF kinetic retaliation (MLCOA), immediately shift mobile AD assets to prioritize the point defense of all major rail marshaling yards and critical energy distribution centers linked to the military supply chain in the Poltava/Dnipropetrovsk/Kharkiv triangle.
2. J7 (Strategic Communication): EXPLOIT TUAPSE STRIKE IMMEDIATELY. Task J7/Public Affairs to issue a measured, facts-based statement on the success of the Tuapse strike, emphasizing the necessity of targeting RF military-economic capacity. Use this successful extension of strike range to justify and lobby Western partners for immediate release of long-range ATACMS/Storm Shadow inventories.
3. J2/GUR (Counter-Propaganda): DIRECTLY REFUTE RF CLAIMS. Task GUR IO units to rapidly generate and push verified counter-evidence against the RF propaganda claims (e.g., the "failed GUR operation" footage). Utilize confirmed, recent BDA (e.g., FPV tank kills, 63rd Brigade losses report) to maintain narrative dominance regarding tactical effectiveness.

//END SITREP//