Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - OPERATIONAL UPDATE: RF CNI AND DEEP REAR PRESSURE ESCALATION

DTG: 020700Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH. RF maintains high tempo deep strike operations and strategic Information Operations (IO). The key analytical shift is the confirmed reciprocal escalation in deep-strike activity by both RF and UAF, moving the conflict deeper into sovereign territory.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational geometry is defined by long-range pressure and counter-pressure.

• RF Deep Rear (Lipetsk/Krasninsky MR): A Red Level "UAV Threat" alert was announced across multiple districts in Lipetsk Oblast (Krasninsky MR, Stanovlyansky MO, etc.) (03:04Z). This geographically expanded alert confirms sustained UAF deep strike capability targeting industrial and military support areas within the RF interior, a direct counter to RF CNI strikes.
• Eastern Front (Kharkiv Axis): Confirmed observation of RF UAVs in the southern part of Kharkiv Oblast moving on a south-easterly trajectory (03:08Z). This places the UAVs in position to target logistics hubs, CNI, or forward-deployed assets in the Izium or Kupiansk sectors, reinforcing the previously assessed MLCOA of continued distributed air strikes.
• International Domain (US-China): Diplomatic signaling regarding new military communication channels between the US and China (03:02Z). This is a strategic factor relevant to global stability and potentially impacting future aid calculus, but has no immediate tactical bearing.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No change from previous reporting. Night hours continue to favor deep strike and UAV ingress operations.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Deep Strike C2: RF demonstrates the sustained ability to launch multi-axis air assaults, forcing UAF Air Force (AF) to issue alerts across multiple oblasts simultaneously (Kharkiv/Zaporizhzhia axis).
• UAF AD and Deep Strike: UAF deep strike forces are effectively imposing costs on the RF interior, as evidenced by the repeated and expanded "Red Level" UAV threat alerts across RF oblasts. This action forces RF to divert AD and ISR assets internally.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

• Integrated Multi-Domain Strike (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF is capable of launching highly dispersed air assets (UAVs, glide bombs) while simultaneously amplifying strategic IO (nuclear deterrence messaging, NATO trophy exhibit).
• Advanced C-UAS Countermeasure Display (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE): RF military bloggers are amplifying videos showcasing the new URS-680 EW/C-UAS system (03:33Z), identified as a multi-sensor counter-drone solution (Radar, RF detection, multiple jammers). This technology, likely sourced or inspired by Chinese military industrial complex (due to visible labeling/design), indicates RF intent to rapidly field advanced defenses against UAF's primary deep strike weapon (drones).

Intentions:

1. Maintain Pressure on CNI: Continue strikes targeting energy and logistics hubs (MLCOA).
2. Bolster Deep Rear Defenses: Rapidly deploy and publicize advanced C-UAS/EW systems to mitigate UAF deep strike effectiveness and manage domestic security concerns (URS-680 amplification).
3. Strategic Deterrence via IO: Sustain the nuclear narrative (Poseidon, 03:27Z) to influence Western aid decisions.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The immediate tactical change is the visible introduction of, or emphasis on, sophisticated C-UAS technology (URS-680). This suggests RF is seriously adapting to the increasing effectiveness of UAF drone operations in the deep rear. The amplification of this technology via military channels is likely intended to dampen UAF morale regarding drone superiority and reassure the RF population.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

Humanitarian reports from RF sources regarding acquiring vehicle tires for medics (01:17Z) suggest continued, albeit localized, reliance on volunteer logistics networks for non-frontline support. UAF pressure on RF logistics via deep strikes (Lipetsk alerts) is directly constraining RF internal movement capacity.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective, particularly in the rapid synchronization of strategic IO (nuclear messaging/trophy exhibit) with kinetic strikes. The rapid promotion of new EW equipment (URS-680) indicates a centralized effort to counter emerging UAF threats.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF maintains an active, multi-domain defense. The persistent and expanding UAV threat alerts in RF territory (Lipetsk Oblast expansion) confirm UAF deep-strike forces are successfully sustaining the retaliatory pressure campaign, forcing RF resource reallocation.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success (Deep Strike): UAF actions successfully triggered new, expanded Red Level UAV alerts in key RF industrial oblasts, increasing the cost imposition on the aggressor.
• Setback (Information/EW): The RF demonstration of new, potentially advanced C-UAS systems (URS-680) signals a new technological challenge to UAF drone supremacy, requiring immediate analysis and counter-EW planning.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The primary constraint remains the rapid identification and procurement of counter-EW and counter-C-UAS solutions to maintain the effectiveness of UAF deep-strike drone assets against rapidly modernizing RF defenses.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Strategic Deterrence (HIGH CONFIDENCE): TASS continues to leverage military experts to amplify the strategic capabilities of nuclear systems (Poseidon, 03:27Z). This narrative consistently aims to raise the perceived global risk ceiling, primarily targeting international decision-makers.
• RF Domestic Mobilization (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE): RF military bloggers (Colonelcassad, 03:04Z) are using rhetoric appealing to soldiers to "return home... with a shield or on a shield," combined with calls for material support (humanitarian aid). This indicates an ongoing, low-level effort to manage domestic sentiment, recruitment, and sustain volunteer support.
• C-UAS Projection (HIGH CONFIDENCE): The rapid and deliberate promotion of the URS-680 C-UAS system is an Information Operation aimed at degrading UAF morale and confidence in their drone technology advantage.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF deep strikes into the RF interior (Lipetsk alerts) continue to positively reinforce domestic morale by demonstrating retaliation and capability projection. However, the confirmed sightings of RF UAVs in Kharkiv Oblast (03:08Z) will fuel local anxiety regarding continued air strikes.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The announcement of new US-China military communication channels is a strategic development. While not directly linked to the conflict, improved strategic stability between major powers could indirectly free up diplomatic bandwidth for increased focus on Ukraine, but could also lead to global de-escalation pressures.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will continue the synchronized deep strike campaign against CNI and logistics, focusing on areas with confirmed UAV ingress (Kharkiv/Sumy/Poltava). Simultaneously, RF forces will begin rapid deployment of advanced C-UAS systems (like the URS-680) in the deep rear (Lipetsk/Tuapse) and potentially near critical FLOC C2/logistics nodes to mitigate UAF drone effectiveness.

• Indicators: Increased reports of GPS/signal loss on UAF long-range drones; repeated "Red Level" alerts in RF industrial centers concurrent with RF media emphasis on successful drone interceptions.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF will launch a large-scale combined arms attack on the Pokrovsk axis, exploiting the previously induced logistical constraints (Vovcha River bridge destruction, Pokrovske Mining Admin damage). The attack would be preceded by an intense EW phase, testing the resilience of UAF tactical C2 following the multi-axis AD strain.

• Indicators: Observed massing of RF Armor/Mech assets confirmed by IMINT near Avdiivka or Bakhmut sectors; significant increase in RF ground-based EW signature preceding the attack time; decrease in RF deep strike activity (reallocating munitions).

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J2/J7 (GUR/IO): IMMEDIATE COUNTER-EW PROTOCOL. Task GUR technical specialists to immediately assess the URS-680 system's capabilities based on open-source material (Colonelcassad video) and develop immediate, short-term frequency-hopping and transmission-burst protocols for deep strike assets to mitigate the potential effects of newly deployed RF C-UAS systems.
2. J3 (Air Defense): RESERVE MOBILE AD DEPLOYMENT. Deploy one mobile AD battery (e.g., Gepard or similar) in a high-readiness posture to the border of Kharkiv and Poltava Oblasts, maintaining maximum mobility to rapidly cover both key logistics hubs and anticipated UAV ingress routes simultaneously, responding directly to the confirmed UAV sightings.
3. J4 (Acquisitions): PRIORITIZE COUNTER-EW ACQUISITION. Immediately elevate the procurement priority for anti-jamming GPS systems (e.g., GNSS) and high-power, directional, short-range jammers for UAF deep strike assets to maintain technological advantage against RF's adaptive C-UAS defense (URS-680).

//END SITREP//