Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - OPERATIONAL UPDATE: UAF COUNTER-CNI ESCALATION AND RF AD SATURATION RESPONSE

DTG: 012330Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH. UAF deep strike operations are confirming an escalation of targeting priorities against RF energy export infrastructure, while RF simultaneously faces drone threats across multiple domestic regions and maintains kinetic pressure on the FLOT.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational geometry is defined by the strategic counter-CNI operations conducted by UAF deep strike assets inside the Russian Federation, forcing RF AD to disperse resources across multiple domestic regions, even as ground pressure persists along the FLOT.

• Deep RF Rear (Black Sea Coast): Confirmed successful kinetic attack by UAF on the Tuapse Marine Oil Terminal (Krasnodar Krai) (23:07Z, 23:12Z). Secondary reporting suggests a second impact, specifically targeting the oil loading pier (23:31Z). This signifies a deliberate, coordinated strike aimed at maximum incapacitation of a key RF oil export node. Air raid sirens were activated as far as Dagomys (Sochi) (23:16Z), confirming the depth of the penetration.
• Deep RF Rear (Domestic Threats): Multiple oblasts within the RF are under elevated threat levels:
  • Lipetsk Oblast: Red alert for "UAV Attack Threat" across multiple districts (Yelets, Dolgorukovsky, Stanovlyansky, Izmalkovsky) (23:06Z).
  • Lipetsk Oblast (Extended): Red alert extended to include Lipetsk City and surrounding districts (Volovsky, Terbunsky, Khlevensky) (23:19Z).
  • Orel Oblast: Confirmed reports of drone activity (23:25Z).
• Contested Rear (Occupied Territories): Unconfirmed reports suggest a UAF strike on the Alchevsk Substation (PS Alchevsk, 220 kV) in occupied Luhansk Oblast, causing power outages (23:20Z, 23:23Z). This reinforces UAF’s intent to strike CNI supporting RF logistics in the occupied areas.
• Frontline (Zaporizhzhia Sector): RF milblogger sources are attempting to leverage the reported capture of Novoaleksandrovka to claim disruption of main UAF logistics toward Huliaipole (23:19Z). This assessment requires immediate validation, but the messaging suggests RF intent to exploit any perceived logistic vulnerability.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Night conditions continue to facilitate drone operations for both sides, enabling deep strikes and RF’s multi-axis saturation campaign.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Air Defense (AD) Dispersal: RF AD assets are demonstrably being stretched, having to defend critical economic targets on the Black Sea coast (Tuapse) simultaneously with defending Central Russian CNI (Lipetsk, Orel), indicating a successful UAF strategy of strategic distraction.
• UAF Deep Strike Initiative: UAF capability and intent to strike high-value, fixed maritime energy infrastructure are confirmed and appear to be a sustained, multi-munition strategy (confirmed primary strike, highly probable secondary strike).

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

• Information Warfare/Propaganda (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF maintains a highly effective capability to rapidly link localized gains (e.g., Novoaleksandrovka) to strategic logistic disruption (Huliaipole) through military expert commentary, intended to inflate tactical success.
• AD Response (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE): RF is prioritizing the defense of strategically significant industrial sites (oil terminals, cities) over general area defense, leading to mass mobilization of local security/AD forces in response to alerts (Lipetsk, Orel).

Intentions:

1. Protect Energy Exports: Dedicate AD and naval resources to secure maritime energy export infrastructure against future UAF drone attacks.
2. Maintain Frontline Pressure: Exploit any perceived UAF logistic weaknesses, specifically near the Pokrovsk axis or the Zaporizhzhia/Huliaipole corridor, to force UAF to reallocate reserves.
3. Domestic De-escalation: Use state media to minimize the impact of the CNI attacks (Tuapse, Lipetsk alerts) to prevent domestic morale erosion.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• RF AD Focus Shift: The widespread UAV alerts across Central Russia (Lipetsk, Orel) suggest RF AD is struggling to predict and interdict UAF long-range drone paths, forcing a reactive, wide-area alert system.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• Critical Impact on RF Oil Exports (HIGH CONFIDENCE): The repeated strikes on the Tuapse Marine Oil Terminal, specifically targeting the pier, will significantly impede RF Black Sea oil exports, directly impacting state revenue and military sustainment funding.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• RF C2 appears capable of coordinating rapid local responses (alerts, fire services) but is failing to establish an effective counter-UAV umbrella against UAF deep strike missions.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Deep Strike Effectiveness: UAF has demonstrated enhanced capacity to conduct complex, multi-munition strikes on highly defended, high-value maritime targets deep within RF territory. This capability maintains strategic initiative.
• FLOT Defense: UAF forces must remain vigilant against RF attempts to exploit claimed successes like the alleged logistical disruption near Huliaipole via Novoaleksandrovka.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success (STRATEGIC): Confirmed, impactful dual-strike on the Tuapse Marine Oil Terminal (port infrastructure and pier).
• Success (OPERATIONAL): Highly probable successful strike on the Alchevsk 220 kV substation, degrading RF power distribution in occupied territory.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• Immediate verification of the logistic status in the Huliaipole sector is required to prevent RF information operations from influencing operational planning.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Narrative (Logistics Disruption): RF military experts (Marochko, via TASS) are pushing the narrative that the capture of Novoaleksandrovka guarantees a disruption of UAF supply lines to Huliaipole (23:19Z). This is a focused effort to induce strategic anxiety.
• UAF Counter-Narrative (Strategic Retaliation): UAF affiliated channels are rapidly confirming and showcasing the strategic damage inflicted at Tuapse and Alchevsk, emphasizing UAF's ability to impose costs on the RF across multiple domains.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• The strategic effect of the deep strikes serves as a significant morale multiplier for Ukrainian forces and the population. The widespread air alerts and damage inside Russia reinforce the perceived inability of the RF to fully secure its rear areas.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• The attacks on major oil export infrastructure, particularly on the Black Sea, will increase pressure on international markets and potentially solidify support for UAF's right to strike RF strategic targets.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 12-24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will execute a large-scale retaliatory strike using high-precision missiles (Kalibr/Kh-101) targeting UAF deep strike launch/C2 infrastructure. This is a standard kinetic response to significant damage on strategic targets. Simultaneously, RF will increase military pressure on the Huliaipole corridor to test the alleged logistical vulnerabilities claimed by their own information operation.

• Indicators: Increased activity by Black Sea Fleet surface combatants; heightened use of ISR over Zaporizhzhia Oblast; massed launch reports targeting Western/Central Ukraine.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 12-24 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF conducts a deliberate multi-pronged conventional and hybrid attack targeting a critical maritime export hub (e.g., Odesa port infrastructure or the Danube corridor). This attack would utilize both air assets (drones/missiles) and potential naval sabotage/mine laying operations to achieve strategic isolation, directly impacting global food security in retaliation for the Tuapse strike.

• Indicators: Naval assets positioning for launch or deployment; simultaneous UAV/missile saturation focused on the Odesa/Izmail region.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/G2 (Logistics Security): URGENT ACTION. Immediately task dedicated ISR and forward unit intelligence teams to verify the actual logistical status and vulnerability of the MSRs leading to Huliaipole. Pre-stage alternative bypass routes and security escorts until the threat is mitigated.
2. Air Force/Air Defense (Force Protection): IMMEDIATE ACTION. Disperse and harden all known or suspected C2 nodes and deep strike staging areas. Implement full emission control (EMCON) protocols for 12 hours on all identified high-value targets in Central/Western Ukraine to preempt RF retaliatory missile strikes.
3. J7/GUR (Exploitation): ACTION. Immediately produce and disseminate visual confirmation (photos/video) of the Tuapse oil terminal damage and the Alchevsk substation outage to international partners and media, maximizing the strategic effect of the successful UAF counter-CNI campaign.

//END SITREP//