Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - OPERATIONAL UPDATE: RF AIR SATURATION AND UAF DEEP CNI STRIKES

DTG: 012300Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH. The RF continues its strategy of air saturation to fragment UAF AD resources, while UAF successfully expands its deep counter-CNI operations, striking critical RF oil infrastructure.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational geometry is characterized by persistent RF drone attacks across three axes (Southern, Northern, Central) and a significant expansion of the Ukrainian deep strike capability into high-value RF economic targets.

• Southern Axis (Odesa/Izmail): The concentration of the air threat on the southern corridor is confirmed by a reported explosion in Izmailsky District (23:02Z). This confirms the MDCOA identified in the previous report (012230Z NOV 25) regarding the critical threat to port infrastructure.
• Northern/Central Axis (Drone Ingress): New drone activity is confirmed in Chernihiv Oblast (vicinity Koriukivka) moving south, and a separate drone is tracked from Sumy Oblast (vicinity Romny) heading toward Poltava Oblast (23:02Z, 22:36Z). This sustains the multi-axis saturation strategy aimed at Central Ukrainian logistics.
• Deep RF Rear - Expanded Counter-CNI Operation: Ukrainian forces (SOF/UAVs) successfully struck the Tuapse Marine Oil Terminal (Rosneft) in Krasnodar Krai (22:34Z). This strike on a high-value energy export facility represents a significant escalation in UAF deep strike targeting priorities, moving beyond regional electricity substations to major national economic targets.
• Seversk Direction (Localized Ground Action): RF milblogger footage confirms successful, localized artillery/mortar strikes by RF forces on UAF dugouts/trench positions in a densely vegetated, hilly/gully area (22:43Z). This suggests persistent RF attrition efforts in contested areas, likely supported by localized ISR/UAV assets.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• Night conditions continue to provide optimal cover for both RF multi-axis drone attacks and UAF deep penetration missions (Tuapse).

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• UAF Air Defense (AD) Posture: AD is actively engaging threats across four oblasts (Chernihiv, Sumy, Poltava, Odesa). The ongoing multi-axis threat necessitates maximum dispersal of mobile AD assets, stretching response timelines.
• UAF Deep Strike Initiative: The confirmed strike on Tuapse demonstrates that UAF possesses the capability and intent to strike RF targets beyond the scope of the energy grid, directly impacting maritime trade and oil export revenue.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

• Multi-Axis Air Assault (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF sustains the capability to launch simultaneous, geographically dispersed air strikes utilizing coordinated drone paths from the north (Sumy/Chernihiv) and south (Black Sea) to maintain continuous pressure on UAF AD.
• Information Warfare (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF milbloggers are actively engaged in preemptive narrative setting, attempting to undermine UAF command credibility by linking current localized fighting (Krasnoarmiisk/Dmytriv) to previous failed defense efforts (Vuhledar/Avdiivka) (22:39Z).

Intentions:

1. Isolate Danube Port Access: Leverage the drone strikes to disrupt operations at Izmail/Reni ports, impacting grain exports and international diplomatic leverage.
2. Degrade Central Logistics: Utilize drones tracked in Chernihiv and Poltava to identify and target critical logistics nodes supporting frontline units.
3. Undermine UAF Command: Continue aggressive messaging campaigns targeting senior UAF leadership (Syrskyi), aiming to erode morale and public confidence.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• No major tactical shifts detected in the last hour, but the consolidation of drone attacks on the Izmail district confirms the RF is doubling down on its effort to exploit the vulnerability of the southern port infrastructure.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• The successful UAF strike on the Tuapse oil terminal will impose significant financial and logistical costs on the RF, potentially impacting fuel availability for military operations if the terminal remains offline for an extended period.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• RF C2 remains effective in coordinating the multi-domain pressure campaign (air strikes, ground attrition, and information operations).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Counter-Strike Effectiveness: UAF deep strike forces (GUR/SOF/UAV) are achieving strategic effects by successfully hitting high-value, previously difficult-to-reach targets deep within RF territory.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success (STRATEGIC): Confirmed successful kinetic strike on the Tuapse Marine Oil Terminal, a critical RF economic target.
• Setback (TACTICAL): Reported explosion in Izmailsky District suggests a successful drone penetration or strike on a target of opportunity, requiring immediate BDA.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• The persistent, simultaneous threat to Central and Southern Oblasts requires careful management of AD interceptor stockpiles and continuous re-tasking of mobile units.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• FUD Campaign (RF): RF milbloggers are directly targeting the credibility of UAF senior command (Syrskyi) regarding control over crucial settlements (Krasnoarmiisk/Dmytriv), intending to sow Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) both domestically and within the ranks (22:39Z).
• Action Confirmation (UAF): UAF affiliated channels are quickly confirming and amplifying the highly successful strike on the Tuapse oil terminal, maximizing the perceived impact of UAF retaliation capability (22:34Z).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• The strike on the major oil terminal provides a significant morale boost, signaling UAF's ability to exert strategic pressure despite RF air saturation attempts.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• The targeting of the Izmail/Danube corridor remains highly relevant to international grain security and will likely prompt immediate diplomatic action and potential requests for further AD support for the region.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 12-24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will escalate counter-AD measures along the southern axis and attempt follow-up attacks on high-value logistics/port infrastructure in Odesa South (Izmail/Reni) in response to the UAF deep strikes. RF ground forces will maintain localized high-intensity artillery attrition on contested frontlines (e.g., Seversk, Dnipropetrovsk/Zaporizhzhia border) to draw UAF attention away from the air threat.

• Indicators: Increased RF EW activity over the Black Sea; further reports of explosions/strikes in Izmailsky district; confirmed RF ground force penetration attempts near Novoaleksandrovka.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 12-24 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF executes a punitive cruise missile strike (e.g., Kalibr, Kh-101) against a key UAF deep strike staging area or command post in response to the Tuapse attack. This would demonstrate immediate retaliation capability and seek to degrade the UAF's long-range strike capacity.

• Indicators: Massed launch originating from the Black Sea Fleet or Caspian Flotilla targeting high-value C2 nodes in Central/Western Ukraine.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/Air Force (Southern Defense): URGENT ACTION. Implement layered defense procedures in the Izmail district, combining high-resolution radar (to detect low-flying threats) with actively patrolled mobile SHORAD units. Prioritize the protection of loading/unloading infrastructure over general area defense.
2. J7/GUR (Information Dominance): IMMEDIATE ACTION. Counter the RF FUD campaign regarding Krasnoarmiisk and Dmytriv by rapidly releasing verified video evidence and official statements confirming UAF control and command effectiveness in these contested areas.
3. J2/J4 (Logistics Protection): ACTION. Given the confirmed drone threats moving into Poltava, immediately shift logistics handling operations (staging, loading, refueling) to unpredictable, dispersed locations away from known fixed infrastructure and utilize robust, persistent mobile EW coverage on all major supply routes in the Central region.

//END SITREP//