Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - OPERATIONAL UPDATE: RF AIR SATURATION AND UAF DEEP CNI STRIKES

DTG: 012230Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH. RF continues to prioritize AD saturation across Central/Eastern axes while UAF maintains effective deep-strike counter-CNI pressure on RF sovereign and occupied territory.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational picture is defined by dispersed UAV ingress routes across three primary axes (Black Sea/Odesa, Northern/Central, Deep RF Rear) and confirmed localized ground fighting near key logistics nodes.

• Southern Axis (Odesa): A new group of UAVs is confirmed entering Odesa Oblast from the Black Sea, targeting the extreme south (Katlabug, Lyman-Pryminske, Izmail), threatening port infrastructure and distribution points (22:08Z, 22:23Z, 22:29Z, 22:32Z). This forces UAF AD to cover the western corridor, further dispersing assets.
• Northern/Central Axis: UAV groups are detected in Western Sumy and Eastern Chernihiv Oblasts (vicinity Baturyn, Bakhmach, Konotop) moving south, sustaining the threat to Central Ukrainian logistics and command centers (22:11Z).
• Frontline Ground Action (Dnipropetrovsk/Zaporizhzhia Border): TASS reports the RF capture of Novoaleksandrovka, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, stating this forms a "buffer zone" with Zaporizhzhia (22:04Z). While the claim is unconfirmed by UAF, it suggests persistent, localized RF attempts to advance and secure operational depth along this critical junction.
• RF Rear - Deep Counter-CNI Operations: UAF drones successfully struck a substation in Zheleznogorsk, Kursk Guberniya, causing partial blackouts (22:08Z). Reports also indicate RF AD activity against drones over Krasnodar Krai (Gelendzhik, Tuapse) (22:13Z, 22:18Z), confirming UAF's multi-domain strategy to disrupt RF energy and military logistics far behind the FLOT.
• Kupiansk/Lyman Axis (Localized Action): RF milblogger footage near Borova-Borivska Andriivka (Kharkiv/Luhansk border) confirms localized artillery strikes on UAF positions, with claims of UAF personnel losses (22:30Z).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• Night conditions continue to favor both sides' deep-strike and counter-CNI drone operations, offering cover for low-altitude penetration.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• UAF Air Defense (AD) Posture: AD is stretched thin, actively monitoring and engaging threats across the Southern (Black Sea ingress) and Northern/Central axes, simultaneously managing the persistent threat of KAB strikes mentioned in the previous report (22:10Z, 22:11Z, 22:23Z).
• UAF Deep Strike Initiative: Confirmed successful UAF drone strikes on critical RF infrastructure (Zheleznogorsk, Kursk) demonstrate sustained operational capability and intent to impose costs on RF sovereign territory.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

• Ground Offensive (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE): RF maintains the capability to execute localized, successful ground assaults along contested frontlines (e.g., claimed capture of Novoaleksandrovka) aimed at securing tactical high ground or logistics junctions.
• Multi-Axis Drone Coordination (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF continues to launch drones from multiple domains (Black Sea, Kursk/Bryansk border area) to fix and fragment UAF AD resources across the entire country.

Intentions:

1. Isolate Odesa Port/Logistics: The new focus on the extreme south of Odesa (Izmail/Katlabug) suggests an intent to degrade the critical grain corridor and associated logistics hubs, potentially leveraging the fragmentation of UAF AD resources.
2. Establish Buffer Zones: Advance locally along the Dnipropetrovsk-Zaporizhzhia axis to consolidate control and push UAF fire away from RF-held logistics routes.
3. AD Exhaustion (Sustained): Maintain relentless, dispersed air threats to exhaust UAF interceptor stockpiles ahead of expected larger, higher-payload kinetic strikes (e.g., large cruise missile or KAB barrages).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Shift in Southern Threat Vector: The appearance of a new, distinct wave of drones targeting the Izmail/Odesa South region signifies a tactical adaptation to exploit perceived vulnerabilities in UAF AD coverage along the Black Sea/Danube corridor.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• RF is demonstrably facing successful UAF interdiction in its deep rear, with significant energy disruption in Kursk and potential logistics impacts from strikes in Krasnodar Krai. This suggests internal sustainment is under pressure, though RF front-line resupply remains adequate.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• RF C2 remains robust enough to coordinate multi-axis air assaults and synchronize state media reporting (TASS claim on Novoaleksandrovka) with operational objectives.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Adaptive Counter-Strike: UAF continues to demonstrate strategic depth strike capability, placing military and economic pressure on RF's interior, maintaining the initiative in the cognitive and deep-kinetic domains.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success (STRATEGIC): Confirmed successful kinetic strike on the Zheleznogorsk substation (Kursk), disrupting RF energy grid.
• Setback (TACTICAL, UNCONFIRMED): TASS claim of Novoaleksandrovka capture requires immediate confirmation/refutation. If confirmed, this represents a localized setback requiring a review of forward defense lines near the Dnipropetrovsk/Zaporizhzhia junction.
• Setback (TACTICAL): Localized RF artillery effectiveness near Borova-Borivska Andriivka, resulting in confirmed personnel losses (22:30Z).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• Air Defense Coverage: The threat to Odesa South (Izmail) necessitates the immediate allocation of mobile AD assets to protect critical port infrastructure, potentially drawing resources away from Central Ukrainian population centers.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• Territorial Gains Amplification (RF): TASS report on Novoaleksandrovka is designed to portray RF ground forces as making meaningful, strategic advances and securing "buffer zones," bolstering internal morale and deflecting from operational setbacks elsewhere (22:04Z).
• Counter-Strike Dismissal (RF): RF state sources (TASS, milbloggers) are simultaneously reporting UAF strikes on RF sovereign territory (Kursk, Krasnodar) while framing them as terrorist acts or minor inconveniences, minimizing the domestic political impact of UAF deep-strike capability.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• The expansion of the drone threat to Odesa South (Izmail) raises concerns regarding economic stability and civilian safety in this critical agricultural and port region.
• Successful UAF strikes deep inside RF (Zheleznogorsk, Krasnodar) serve as a significant morale boost for UAF forces and the civilian population, demonstrating reach and retaliation capacity.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• The focus on the Odesa port infrastructure aligns with RF's long-term goal of destabilizing global grain markets and pressuring international partners relying on the Black Sea export corridor.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will maintain high-tempo, dispersed air strikes focusing on three simultaneous objectives: logistics (Central Ukraine/Poltava), CNI (Zaporizhzhia/Dnipropetrovsk), and maritime infrastructure (Odesa South/Izmail). On the ground, RF forces will attempt to consolidate control over claimed gains (Novoaleksandrovka) and exploit localized tactical successes (Borova sector) by increasing small-scale probing assaults to force UAF expenditure of reserve forces.

• Indicators: Repeat UAV/Missile strikes on Odesa port facilities; increased artillery fire on the Dnipropetrovsk/Zaporizhzhia border; official UAF confirmation of heavy fighting in Novoaleksandrovka.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF executes a strategic kinetic strike on a major port terminal or bridge in the Odesa region (near Izmail), potentially using high-end cruise missiles or KABs, capitalizing on the currently fragmented AD posture. A successful strike would severely halt Black Sea grain exports, triggering immediate economic and diplomatic crisis.

• Indicators: Massed launch of Kh-22 or Kalibr missiles targeting a single point in the Odesa South area; prior heavy EW activity detected along the Black Sea coast.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/Air Force (Southern Defense): IMMEDIATE ACTION. Divert a mobile Short-Range Air Defense (SHORAD) battery to the Odesa South area (Izmail/Reni) immediately to provide point defense for critical port infrastructure, prioritizing defense against low-altitude UAV penetration.
2. J3/G2 (Ground Assessment): URGENT ACTION. Task tactical ISR assets (M-UAVs, forward scouts) to confirm the status of Novoaleksandrovka. If the RF claim is confirmed, immediately initiate planning for a localized counter-attack or the establishment of a reinforced fallback position to prevent further RF penetration toward Zaporizhzhia logistics routes.
3. J7/GUR (Information Dominance): IMMEDIATE ACTION. Utilize the confirmed UAF strikes on RF sovereign territory (Kursk, Krasnodar) in international and domestic information campaigns to counter RF narrative of territorial gains and demonstrate UAF capability to impose costs across the entire depth of the operational area.

//END SITREP//