Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - 011500Z NOV 25

DTG: 011500Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): MEDIUM-HIGH (Confidence remains high in the analysis of RF multi-domain synchronization. Confidence in immediate tactical control of Pokrovsk remains volatile due to conflicting IO.) PRIORITY FOCUS: Immediate assessment of RF intent on the Pokrovsk axis (IO vs. kinetic reality) and the current multi-axis ballistic and UAV threat to central Ukraine.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Pokrovsk Axis (Donetsk Oblast): The information conflict over Pokrovsk remains the primary focus. RF sources (Starshie Eddy, Kotsnews) are actively mocking UAF claims of GUR "clearance operations," asserting that the UAF narrative is a temporary propaganda effort that will be rapidly countered by imagery of Russian flags in the city.
  • Judgment: This is a clear indicator that RF forces believe they hold a dominant position (if not full control) within Pokrovsk/Krasnoarmiysk and are deliberately allowing the UAF IO space only to maximize the psychological impact of the inevitable counter-narrative. The tactical situation remains fluid, but RF commitment to the town is high.
• Deep Strike Zone (Multi-Axis): High alert status across central and eastern Ukraine confirms the continuation of the multi-axis strike campaign identified in the previous daily report.
  • Air Force Alert (13:44Z): UAV detected inbound toward Sumy Oblast from the north.
  • Air Force Alert (13:54Z): Ballistic missile threat issued for the eastern axis. This threat vector is highly concerning given the established expanded KAB range toward Poltava.
  • Zaporizhzhia OVA Alert (13:54Z): Simultaneous air alert for Zaporizhzhia Oblast, reinforcing the multi-domain pressure.
• Weather/Environmental: The fog advisory noted previously is a temporary factor; the new ballistic threat indicates RF intent to utilize systems less affected by localized atmospheric conditions.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• The shift to ballistic/long-range guided munitions (KAB) and UAV swarm tactics is partially offsetting the visibility constraints imposed by the fog, maintaining high kinetic pressure regardless of weather.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF: RF forces are synchronized across the IO and Kinetic domains. High-ranking political figures (Kirienko, Pasechnik) are conducting high-visibility visits to occupied territories (Krasnyy Luch, Severodonetsk) to project control and stability. This political-military synchronization is indicative of long-term planning for consolidation in occupied areas.
• UAF: UAF focus is split between managing the critical deep strike threat and maintaining a robust counter-IO narrative (GUR clearance operation, 82nd Air Assault Brigade training footage) to counter RF claims and bolster domestic morale.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(RF CAPABILITIES):

• Ballistic and Glide Weaponry: Confirmed capability to launch ballistic missiles and long-range KABs against multiple axes simultaneously (Poltava, Sumy, Zaporizhzhia threat rings).
• Advanced IO/PSYOPS Integration: RF successfully executing a dual-track IO campaign: (1) Strategic display of NATO trophies (M1 Abrams) to erode Western support, and (2) Tactical deception and mockery (Pokrovsk claims) to induce emotional volatility and operational confusion within UAF ranks (Starshie Eddy's intent to "let Ukrainian propaganda shit itself").
• Fixed Wing Capability: The confirmed KAB range expansion (100km+) is reinforced by the general threat of FAB deployment across Kharkiv Oblast (Operatsiya Z), implying persistent fixed-wing sorties.

(RF INTENTIONS):

1. Strategic AD Attrition: Continue the simultaneous UAV/ballistic/KAB strikes to force UAF Air Force to commit and deplete high-value AD interceptors across the expanded threat geography.
2. Psychological Breakage on Pokrovsk: Use the temporary UAF IO success regarding Pokrovsk as a setup for a high-impact counter-reveal (RF flag imagery/POW footage) within the next 48 hours to cause a major morale collapse for defending forces.
3. Consolidate Occupied Territory: Use high-profile visits (Kirienko) to normalize and legitimize the political control over newly annexed/occupied areas (Krasnyy Luch, Severodonetsk), linking current military success to long-term political reality.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Shift to Ballistic/Multi-Axis Strike: The immediate shift to a multi-axis air campaign utilizing systems less dependent on local weather (ballistic threats confirmed) is a direct adaptation to counter UAF AD and exploit the extended KAB range.
• Targeted Psychological Operations: The deliberate strategy of allowing the UAF to broadcast its success in Pokrovsk before delivering the counter-narrative (as detailed by Starshie Eddy) is a sophisticated IO tactic designed to maximize psychological shock and is a new, aggressive adaptation in the cognitive domain.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• Logistics for deep strike munitions (UAVs, KAB kits, ballistic systems) appear adequate to support the current high operational tempo.
• Logistics support for high-level political visits to occupied areas (Kirienko) is functioning effectively.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is demonstrating high effectiveness in synchronizing high-level political messaging (Kirienko visits) with tactical IO (Starshie Eddy) and strategic kinetic strikes (multi-axis AD saturation).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue force tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• UAF Air Force remains at HIGH ALERT due to the ballistic and UAV threats from the eastern and northern axes. The necessity of covering Sumy, Kharkiv, Poltava, and Zaporizhzhia simultaneously is critically stressing AD assets.
• UAF Ground Forces (specifically Air Assault Brigades - 82nd AAB) are displaying high readiness, as shown by published training footage emphasizing rapid maneuver and concealment, likely intended as a morale booster and a signal of continued combat capability.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Successes: UAF successfully launched an IO counter-narrative (GUR in Pokrovsk) that currently dominates some segments of the information space. The proactive resourcing of GUR units in Zaporizhzhia with EW/drones is a positive adaptive step.
• Setbacks: The continued multi-axis ballistic and UAV threats (Sumy, East) demand immediate, costly AD commitments and represent a major operational challenge. The ongoing intense combat and IO conflict over Pokrovsk indicates significant kinetic and political costs on this axis.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• CRITICAL CONSTRAINT: The limited inventory of high-value medium/long-range AD interceptors is the primary constraint against the multi-axis ballistic threat.
• CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: Rapid deployment of EW assets to Sumy/Kharkiv to address the UAV threat from the north and east, alleviating pressure on kinetic AD systems.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF IO Focus - Emotional Rollercoaster: The explicit RF strategy (Starshie Eddy, Kotsnews) is to create an information trap: encourage UAF to celebrate a false/premature victory in Pokrovsk, then use overwhelming evidence of RF control (flags, POWs) to cause maximum demoralization. This is a deliberate, targeted PSYOPS attack against UAF domestic morale.
• RF IO Focus - Legitimacy: High-level political visits (Kirienko in Severodonetsk/Krasnyy Luch) are propaganda aimed at solidifying the narrative of permanent RF political and economic control over occupied territories.
• UAF IO Focus: UAF counter-IO centers on demonstrating national resilience (Zelenskyy’s "Winter Support" programs, military training videos) and refuting RF tactical claims (GUR Pokrovsk narrative).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• Public sentiment is likely buoyed by the GUR Pokrovsk claim and the announcement of domestic support programs (Winter Support, free rail travel).
• However, repeated ballistic warnings (especially the shift to multi-axis attacks) risk increasing public stress and anxiety in central and eastern regions.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• The RF "trophy exhibit" remains the core threat in this domain, directly challenging the narrative of Western aid effectiveness.
• UAF domestic economic challenges (NBU proposing tariffs on non-priority imports) may signal resource constraints that RF will attempt to exploit in their IO.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1 (Pokrovsk IO Trap Trigger): (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) Within the next 24-48 hours, RF will publicly release high-impact visual evidence (e.g., drone footage of RF flags over Pokrovsk administrative buildings, captured UAF personnel, interviews with alleged residents) to decisively counter the UAF clearance operation narrative and trigger the psychological shock detailed in their public IO strategy.

MLCOA 2 (Sustained AD Attrition Campaign): (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) RF will maintain the high operational tempo of synchronized, multi-axis deep strikes (UAVs against Sumy/Kharkiv, KAB/Ballistic threats against Poltava/Zaporizhzhia) for at least the next 72 hours to force UAF AD commanders into suboptimal resource allocation decisions.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1 (Ballistic Strike on Strategic Reserve HQ): (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM) RF will utilize its demonstrated multi-axis saturation campaign to mask a precision ballistic strike (e.g., Iskander or similar) against a pre-identified UAF strategic reserve or command and control node located in the operational depth (e.g., near Poltava or Dnipro), capitalizing on the expanded threat envelope and AD system dispersion.

• Trigger Condition: Confirmed vulnerability of UAF mobile AD systems due to their necessary dispersion across the four threatened oblasts.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

• T+24H (Pokrovsk IO Counter): UAF high command must prepare a response package for the anticipated RF IO counter-reveal regarding Pokrovsk (MLCOA 1).
• T+48H (AD System Re-orientation): UAF Air Force must have completed re-orientation of mobile AD assets to provide layered defense against ballistic threats directed at the Poltava/Kremenchuk logistics corridor.
• T+72H (Counter-PSYOPS Launch): UAF J7 must launch the high-impact counter-IO campaign featuring recent RF destruction to blunt the effect of the NATO trophy exhibit narrative and the Pokrovsk PSYOPS.

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Counter-Ballistic Posture (Air Force Command - CRITICAL ACTION):

   • Recommendation: Prioritize allocation of available long-range AD systems to protect major rail hubs and operational reserves within the Poltava/Dnipropetrovsk threat zone. Accept higher risk for static CNI in less critical areas during this high-tempo ballistic phase.
   • Action (Air Force): Immediately increase ELINT collection focus on RF Eastern launch sites to reduce warning time for ballistic threats. Utilize every available SHORAD system to protect AD batteries themselves from secondary UAV attacks.

2. Mitigate Pokrovsk PSYOPS (J7/GUR - URGENT ACTION):

   • Recommendation: Prepare an aggressive, morale-boosting message package now, independent of the outcome in Pokrovsk. If RF successfully releases "proof" of control (MLCOA 1), the counter-message must immediately pivot to emphasizing the high attrition inflicted on RF forces and the strategic importance of denying deep operational depth, rather than claiming tactical control of the town center.
   • Action (J7/GUR): Launch a high-volume, global media campaign showcasing the 82nd AAB training and GUR successes in other theaters to distract from the tactical loss narrative.

3. Target RF IO Enablers (J2/J3 - HIGH PRIORITY):

   • Recommendation: Exploit current intelligence gaps (PIR 345) to rapidly geolocate and target RF tactical FPV/ISR command posts (as mentioned by RF sources like Starshie Eddy who claim to be "sitting in a pillbox"). Disruption of tactical C2 will directly impair RF's ability to film and disseminate immediate counter-narrative footage from Pokrovsk.
   • Action (SOF/GUR): Assign FPV/Artillery strike missions specifically against identified/suspected RF C2 and field propaganda positions on the Pokrovsk axis.

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS & COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS (CRITICAL FOCUS)

//END REPORT//