Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - 010600Z NOV 25

DTG: 010600Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): MEDIUM (New kinetic and Information Warfare [IW] efforts focusing on the Pokrovsk Axis strongly suggest RF is attempting to capitalize on the recent logistics interdiction. The severity of the alleged GUR setback requires immediate verification.) PRIORITY FOCUS: Immediate confirmation/denial of alleged GUR special forces losses near Pokrovsk and assessment of new GAB strike frequency on the Donetsk axis.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The Pokrovsk Axis (Donetsk/Dnipropetrovsk Border) remains the center of gravity, with RF actively targeting the area kinetically and informationally to exploit the logistics crisis caused by the Vovcha River bridge destruction (Ref: Previous Daily Report).

• Pokrovsk Axis (Donetsk): Confirmed new launches of Guided Aerial Bombs (GABs/KABs) targeting Donetsk Oblast (010145Z NOV 25). This correlates with the aggressive RF Information Warfare (IW) claims of neutralizing UAF Special Forces in the same area. This suggests a combined kinetic-IW effort to paralyze local UAF operations.
• Vovcha River Interdiction Point: The site remains a High-Value Target (HVT) for RF surveillance and interdiction fires, as noted in the previous report.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Night conditions prevail. Clear atmospheric conditions are required for effective GAB deployment and the use of high-resolution thermal drone footage observed in RF propaganda (Kotsnews).

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• UAF Forces: UAF Air Force is tracking GAB launches on the Donetsk axis. Ground forces near Pokrovsk must maintain strict discipline and security protocols, especially against airborne ISR and precision strikes, given the RF claims of targeting GUR elements.
• RF Forces: RF is synchronizing deep-strike (GAB) and IW operations aimed at maximizing demoralization and capitalizing on tactical successes along the Pokrovsk axis.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(RF CAPABILITIES):

• Targeted Lethality (GUR/SOF focus): RF demonstrates the ability to execute highly localized, precise kinetic strikes against high-value UAF elements (e.g., helicopter, alleged GUR SOF) using advanced ISR/FPV coordination, as suggested by the Kotsnews video.
• IW Amplification: Immediate and aggressive IW exploitation of alleged tactical successes using high-quality video footage ("LIQUIDATION OF GUR SPECIAL FORCES CONTINUES").

(RF INTENTIONS):

1. Paralyze Pokrovsk Operations: Use GAB saturation to suppress UAF responses to the Vovcha logistics crisis and exploit any perceived weakness through localized SOF/GUR elimination claims.
2. Degrade Elite Morale: Targeting GUR/Special Forces units directly (if claims are true) or through amplified disinformation is intended to degrade the morale and operational confidence of UAF elite formations.
3. Domestic Diversion: TASS continues to broadcast low-priority domestic policy changes (e.g., pregnant aid, US transgender policy) to normalize the conflict and maintain focus on internal affairs.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The direct, targeted claim of "LIQUIDATION OF GUR SPECIAL FORCES" coupled with footage of a downed helicopter/aircraft ("Black Hawk Fall in Pokrovsk") marks an escalation in RF information warfare targeting UAF elite units. This is a significant tactical shift from generic claims of unit destruction to specific, high-profile operational successes.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics appear fully capable of sustaining high-tempo GAB operations across multiple axes (Donetsk, Sumy).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is highly effective in synchronizing kinetic strikes (GAB launches, localized drone attacks) with immediate, high-impact propaganda dissemination (Kotsnews, Colonelcassad).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue force tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF posture remains defensive and resource-strained, now facing high-intensity GAB strikes on the critical Pokrovsk sector while simultaneously managing the logistics interdiction at Vovcha River. Readiness is contingent on rapid verification of the alleged GUR losses.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Setback (Potential/Alleged): The RF claim of a downed helicopter/aircraft and the "Liquidation of GUR Special Forces" near Pokrovsk constitutes a potential, significant tactical and informational setback. (FACT/ANALYTICAL JUDGMENT): The claim is unverified; however, the video evidence suggests a kinetic event targeting an airborne platform and ground personnel.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The immediate requirement is for comprehensive ISR coverage of the Pokrovsk forward operating areas to monitor GAB effectiveness and verify/deny the SOF casualty claims.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF Primary Narrative (Decisive Victory): RF channels (Kotsnews, Colonelcassad) are heavily pushing video content captioned "Black Hawk Fall in Pokrovsk" and text stating, "LIQUIDATION OF GUR SPECIAL FORCES CONTINUES."

• Analytical Judgment: (HIGH CONFIDENCE) The specific mention of GUR Special Forces is designed to inflict maximum psychological damage and disrupt the operational environment around Pokrovsk. The term "Black Hawk" is likely a sensationalized description for a similar-shaped UAF military helicopter/aircraft. The footage itself appears edited to maximize impact, but the kinetic event targeting a rotary-wing asset is probable.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Confirmation of the logistics interdiction combined with alleged losses of elite GUR forces will severely test UAF public and military morale. Rapid, factual counter-messaging is critical.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

TASS is attempting to divert attention from the conflict by publishing news about US military policy (transgender restrictions), likely an attempt to appeal to domestic audiences with conservative narratives and minimize focus on RF actions.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1 (GAB Saturation to Mask Breakthrough): (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) RF will increase the frequency and density of GAB strikes (Ref: New KAB launches reported) across the Pokrovsk Axis over the next 6-12 hours. This saturation bombing will serve to suppress UAF fire control and cover an imminent, limited mechanized assault intended to exploit the logistics paralysis at Vovcha River.

MLCOA 2 (Exploitation of GUR/SOF Claims): (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM) RF IW will sustain the narrative of successful elimination of UAF elite forces to induce paralysis in localized C2, potentially preceding drone or mechanized probes to test the response capabilities of potentially affected UAF units near the claimed strike zone.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1 (Deep Strike on UAF C2/Logistics HQ): (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM) RF uses FSTH-LD/other advanced ISR to locate and prosecute a high-level UAF Command Post or the alternate logistics hub for the Pokrovsk sector. This deep-strike attack (likely using GABs or Iskander/Shahed) aims to completely decapitate UAF defense coordination following the logistical crisis.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

• T+0 to T+4H (GUR Verification): Immediate window for GUR/J3 to confirm or deny the loss of rotary-wing assets and personnel near Pokrovsk. (DECISION POINT: J3/GUR - Information required for immediate operational and IW response.)
• T+4H to T+8H (Combat Readiness Alert): High probability of localized RF ground assault following the GAB strikes. (DECISION POINT: J3 - Shift all forward units on the Pokrovsk line to DEFCON 2 / High Alert for mechanized penetration.)

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Immediate GUR/SOF Incident Verification (GUR/J3 Priority):
   • Recommendation: Prioritize the use of manned/unmanned ISR with ground-penetrating radar capabilities to rapidly assess the wreckage/impact site near Pokrovsk.
   • Action (GUR/J3): If losses are confirmed, ensure immediate casualty notification is managed with utmost security; simultaneously, prepare a factually accurate, but highly controlled, counter-narrative to prevent the RF narrative from achieving operational dominance. If denied, release a strong counter-IO message immediately.
2. GAB Counter-Suppression Protocol (J-ADF Priority):
   • Recommendation: Given the GAB focus on the critical Pokrovsk logistics zone, integrate all available electronic countermeasures (ECM) and mobile short-range AD systems around established/new logistics bypass routes.
   • Action (J-ADF/EW): Dedicate EW assets to GPS jamming in the Pokrovsk sector to degrade GAB precision. Prioritize the protection of mobile C2 and Engineer repair teams over static infrastructure.
3. Engineer Protection and Resilience (J4/J3 Priority):
   • Recommendation: Treat all Vovcha River bypass operations as operating under immediate and persistent RF fire control.
   • Action (J4/Engineers): Deploy engineer teams in dispersed, small units to multiple tertiary crossing sites. Utilize continuous smoke generation (Screening Smoke) during daylight hours to obscure bridging efforts and complicate RF ISR/targeting.

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS & COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS (CRITICAL FOCUS)

//END REPORT//