Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - 011000Z NOV 25

DTG: 011000Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): MEDIUM (The operational focus has shifted to RF aerial suppression across two major axes—Pokrovsk and Sumy—following the logistics interdiction at Vovcha River. RF Information Warfare (IW) remains coordinated, emphasizing tactical wins and domestic stability.) PRIORITY FOCUS: Immediate confirmation/denial of RF claims regarding UAF personnel losses near Kharkiv and rapid assessment of the new kinetic threat direction (Sumy Oblast).

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational geometry is defined by RF deep-strike capability forcing UAF resource commitment across disparate axes:

• Pokrovsk Axis (Donetsk/Dnipropetrovsk Border): Continues to be the critical logistics choke point following the Vovcha River bridge destruction. RF is sustaining air pressure via Guided Aerial Bombs (GABs/KABs) and UAVs, threatening any UAF attempts to establish emergency bypasses.
• Kharkiv Axis: RF continues localized tactical assaults and persistent UAV monitoring. TASS is claiming the destruction of UAF personnel attempting to exfiltrate surrounded officers near Kharkiv (010128Z NOV 25), indicating potential localized encirclement threats or intense RF fire control in specific sectors.
• Sumy Axis (NEW KINETIC THREAT): UAF Air Force confirms new GAB launches targeting Sumy Oblast (010123Z NOV 25). This expands the geographic scope of the RF GAB threat, potentially indicating an attempt to draw UAF Air Defense assets north or target critical infrastructure in a less-defended region.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Night conditions prevail. The confirmed use of GABs requires clear weather for effective targeting, but their high-altitude launch profile makes them less susceptible to low-level weather than direct air support.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• UAF Forces: UAF Air Force is actively tracking threats on the Sumy and Donetsk axes. Ground forces near Kharkiv must immediately verify the TASS claims of encirclement to prevent local panic and ensure force integrity.
• RF Forces: RF is maintaining aggressive kinetic synchronization: GAB launches (Sumy) and persistent tactical operations (Kharkiv). IW continues to prioritize high-volume tactical claims (280 settlements liberated, UAF officer entrapment) and morale boosting (photo reels of rested troops).

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(RF CAPABILITIES):

• GAB/Air Strike Dispersion: Proven capability to execute simultaneous GAB strikes across widely separated operational sectors (Donetsk/Dnipropetrovsk and Sumy).
• Localized Maneuver/Fire Control: Demonstrated ability to create localized tactical dilemmas (e.g., surrounding small UAF elements near Kharkiv) and suppress exfiltration attempts using precision fires (likely drone-assisted).

(RF INTENTIONS):

1. Pressure Dispersion: Force UAF Joint Air Defense Force (J-ADF) to commit AD assets to the Sumy region, diluting protection for critical logistics hubs near Pokrovsk and CNI sites.
2. Validate Tactical Superiority: Use media claims (TASS: 280 settlements, Kharkiv entrapment) to project inevitable victory and demoralize UAF front-line troops.
3. Maintain Domestic Stability: TASS continues to broadcast messages focused on domestic affairs (school system, debt collection) to normalize life inside the RF.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The addition of Sumy Oblast to the GAB strike envelope is a significant tactical adaptation. Previously, GABs were concentrated on the direct axes of advance (Donetsk/Kharkiv). This shift suggests RF has sufficient GAB inventory and launch platforms to expand kinetic pressure geographically, testing UAF AD resource allocation.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The UAF logistics crisis at the Vovcha River is the primary constraint. RF logistics appear robust enough to support geographically dispersed GAB operations.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 demonstrates strong control over IW and kinetic effects, coordinating GAB launches, tactical fire missions, and simultaneous information campaigns across multiple Telegram channels (Colonelcassad, TASS).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue force tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF posture is defensive and reactive, currently attempting to mitigate a dual crisis: logistics paralysis at Pokrovsk and expanded aerial threat (Sumy). Readiness remains high, but resource allocation friction is increasing due to the multi-axis threat.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Setback: The expanded GAB threat to Sumy adds complexity and resource strain. The unconfirmed RF claims of UAF personnel losses near Kharkiv require urgent verification, as they imply significant local tactical setbacks if true.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The immediate constraint is the limited supply of advanced AD systems capable of intercepting GAB launch platforms or the GABs themselves. The geographical dispersion of threats (Pokrovsk logistics, Sumy CNI, Kharkiv front) demands a difficult allocation decision.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF Primary Narrative (Success and Expansion): TASS claims the liberation of "more than 280 settlements" since 2025 (010122Z NOV 25) and the tactical destruction of UAF personnel near Kharkiv (010128Z NOV 25).

• Analytical Judgment: (HIGH CONFIDENCE) The 280-settlement claim is a gross exaggeration intended for domestic consumption and projecting strategic momentum. The Kharkiv claim requires immediate UAF verification, as it is targeted to demoralize local units.
• RF Secondary Narrative (Morale/Normalization): Colonelcassad continues with photo reels of RF soldiers, while TASS publishes content about educational policy, maintaining a facade of stability and normalcy in the RF rear.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

The confluence of the alleged CNI data breach (previous SITREP), the Vovcha River logistics crisis, and new GAB strikes will negatively impact public confidence. Rapid and transparent counter-messaging on both the cyber threat and the status of UAF forces near Kharkiv is vital.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

(No new relevant data.)

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1 (GAB Attrition and Diversion): (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) RF will continue GAB strikes on Sumy and the Donetsk/Dnipropetrovsk border simultaneously over the next 12 hours. The Sumy strikes serve as a diversion, compelling UAF J-ADF to deploy valuable AD assets to protect CNI there, thereby reducing AD density over the critical Pokrovsk logistics routes.

MLCOA 2 (Exploitation of Kharkiv Localized Disruption): (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM) RF will amplify the claim of encircled/destroyed UAF officers near Kharkiv to degrade UAF unit cohesion and readiness in that sector, possibly preceding a limited, local mechanized assault to test the line weakness created by the alleged tactical success.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1 (Coordinated Air and Ground Exploitation at Pokrovsk): (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM) RF maximizes GAB strikes on the Pokrovsk logistics rear (aided by the Sumy diversion) to suppress UAF long-range fires and C2. Under the cover of this aerial suppression, RF launches the previously identified mechanized reconnaissance-in-force across the Pokrovsk axis, aiming to establish a bridgehead or secure a key elevated position before UAF reserves can be committed.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

• T+0 to T+6H (Verification/Counter-IO Window): Critical time for UAF to verify claims of personnel loss near Kharkiv and the extent of the CNI data breach. (DECISION POINT: J3/SBU - Immediate ground reporting is required from Kharkiv sector to deny/confirm RF claim and prepare counter-IO.)
• T+6H to T+12H (AD Allocation Point): Continued GAB strikes will force a decision on resource allocation. (DECISION POINT: J-ADF - Decision needed whether to accept higher risk to Sumy CNI to maintain maximum AD density over Pokrovsk logistics routes.)

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Verify/Neutralize Kharkiv Tactical Claims (J3/GUR Priority):
   • Recommendation: Immediately task reconnaissance elements (ground/UAV) to conduct highly localized ISR near Kharkiv to verify or deny the TASS claim of surrounded/destroyed UAF officers.
   • Action (J3): If verified, execute immediate, coordinated relief/extraction operations. If denied, J7 must release counter-IO within 2 hours of confirmation to maintain unit morale.
2. Maintain AD Focus on Logistics (J-ADF Priority):
   • Recommendation: Treat the GAB strikes on Sumy as a feint intended to divert critical AD assets.
   • Action (J-ADF): Prioritize the defense of the Pokrovsk Axis logistics bypasses and C2 nodes over the protection of lower-priority CNI in Sumy Oblast, unless specific national-level infrastructure is targeted. Use mobile, short-range AD systems (e.g., MANPADS, SA-8) for Sumy if necessary, reserving high-value assets for the main effort.
3. Harden Critical Infrastructure Against GAB/UAV Threat (J4/J7 Priority):
   • Recommendation: Given the expanded GAB threat, all critical logistics and CNI in high-risk areas (Donetsk, Sumy) must increase physical and electronic countermeasures.
   • Action (J4/Engineers): Deploy high-frequency jamming systems (EW) near fixed CNI targets in Sumy to disrupt GPS guidance systems used by GABs, supplementing limited kinetic AD assets.

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS & COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS (CRITICAL FOCUS)

//END REPORT//