Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - 010700Z NOV 25

DTG: 010700Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): MEDIUM (The logistics crisis at Pokrovsk remains the kinetic focus. New intelligence confirms RF prioritization of deep-rear Information Warfare (IW) and continued reliance on Guided Aerial Bombs (GABs)/UAVs, demanding resource allocation decisions on AD/cyber defense.) PRIORITY FOCUS: Immediate confirmation/denial of large-scale RF cyber-intrusion into Ukrainian Civilian National Infrastructure (CNI) and managing the critical air threat on the Donetsk/Dnipropetrovsk border.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The situation remains defined by the Pokrovsk Axis logistics crisis (Vovcha River bridge destruction, confirmed in previous SITREP) and aggressive RF attempts to suppress UAF freedom of maneuver in key operational areas through deep strike and cyber means.

• Donetsk/Dnipropetrovsk Border: RF tactical aviation is actively conducting launches of Guided Aerial Bombs (GABs - likely KAB variants) near the administrative border (010042Z NOV 25). This area is critical as it covers supply lines leading into the Pokrovsk sector and represents forward UAF operational depth.
• Kharkiv Axis: A hostile UAV (likely a reconnaissance or FPV/Shahed variant) was detected moving toward Kharkiv from the north (Zolochiv area), course Southeast, later confirmed heading directly for Kharkiv city (010036Z, 010042Z NOV 25). This indicates persistent kinetic pressure on key Northern CNI and military infrastructure.
• RF Deep Rear (Moscow): RF MoD/Mayor Sobyanin confirmed intercepting two more UAVs targeting Moscow (010049Z NOV 25). This confirms UAF retains the operational capability to conduct deep interdiction missions, forcing RF AD commitment far from the front.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Night conditions prevail. The confirmed use of GABs indicates RF prioritization of standoff weapons delivery, which is less constrained by ground weather than close-air support, but is highly dependent on RF targeting and ISR capabilities.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• UAF Forces: J-ADF is actively tracking multiple incursions across different axes (Kharkiv, Donetsk/Dnipropetrovsk border). UAF Cyber Defense (SBU/GUR) assets must immediately shift focus to assessing the scale of the alleged data breach.
• RF Forces: RF is synchronizing kinetic effects (GABs, UAVs) with Information Warfare (IW) actions (mass data breach claim). RF MilBloggers are consolidating psychological wins and emphasizing morale (photo reel of happy, rested soldiers; the paratrooper post suggesting rest - 010103Z, 010320Z NOV 25).

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(RF CAPABILITIES):

• GAB Strike Capability: Proven capability to deliver GABs against high-value targets on the Donetsk/Dnipropetrovsk border, targeting key UAF concentration areas or logistics choke points.
• Cyber Warfare/IW: Confirmed intent and claimed capability to execute large-scale data breaches targeting Ukrainian CNI (insurance firms) to disrupt society and undermine trust in the government/private sector.
• Deep Air Defense: RF AD continues to effectively counter UAF deep strike attempts on Moscow.

(RF INTENTIONS):

1. Kinetic Suppression (Primary): Use GABs to inflict damage and psychological pressure on the critical Pokrovsk-supporting areas (Donetsk/Dnipropetrovsk) while maintaining UAV pressure on Kharkiv.
2. Strategic Disruption (IW): Maximize the social impact of the claimed data breach (7 million clients’ data) to sow domestic discord and distract UAF C2 from front-line kinetic threats.
3. Project Stability (Domestic): TASS continues to broadcast messages of domestic stability (judicial debt collection successes - 010039Z NOV 25), counteracting the success of UAF deep strikes on Russian soil.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The shift toward simultaneous, high-impact cyber operations (data breach claim) alongside kinetic strikes is a key adaptation. This Hybrid Warfare approach aims to divide UAF resources between the physical and cognitive domains.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

UAF logistics remain critically constrained on the Pokrovsk Axis. RF has not shown signs of internal logistics strain, as evidenced by continued GAB and UAV supply chains (reinforced by the prior report's sanctions evasion analysis).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is highly effective in synchronizing IW, deep strike, and domestic narrative control. The rapid promotion of the data breach claim (Colonelcassad) demonstrates operational-level synergy between kinetic operations and cyber influence campaigns.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue force tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF Air Force is reacting appropriately to incoming threats (UAVs, GAB launches). Readiness levels must be maintained, specifically for Electronic Protection (EP) and Cyber Defense, to mitigate the dual threat posed by RF IW and guided munitions.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success: Continued UAF deep strike capability (Moscow intercepts) compels RF AD dispersion.
• Setback: Confirmed GAB launches threaten front-line positions and logistics nodes near the Donetsk/Dnipropetrovsk border. The large-scale data breach claim, if even partially true, constitutes a major strategic intelligence setback.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The immediate requirement is for Cyber Incident Response Teams (CIRT) to rapidly assess the integrity of the affected CNI network. The constraint is the persistent AD requirement across multiple oblasts (Kharkiv, Zhytomyr, Vinnytsia, and now the frontline GAB threat).

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF Primary Narrative (Cyber Superiority/Societal Breakdown): RF sources are heavily promoting the alleged hacking and acquisition of data from 7 million Ukrainian insurance clients (010035Z NOV 25).

• Analytical Judgment: (HIGH CONFIDENCE) The purpose is to delegitimize UAF governmental/corporate security and increase public distrust, mirroring previous attempts to disrupt social cohesion. This is a classic Hybrid Warfare objective.
• RF Secondary Narrative (Morale/Normalization): RF MilBloggers are attempting to normalize the conflict and project high morale via photo reels of Russian soldiers and a post emphasizing rest/sleep for troops (010103Z, 010320Z NOV 25).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Public sentiment will be immediately stressed by the data breach claim, particularly regarding financial/private security. UAF counter-IO must address both the kinetic threat (GABs/UAVs) and the cognitive threat (cyber-breach) simultaneously.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

(No new relevant data for this reporting period. Focus remains on internal operational crisis management.)

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1 (GAB/UAV Attrition): (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) RF tactical aviation will maintain GAB launches against fixed targets and concentration areas near the Donetsk/Dnipropetrovsk border, coinciding with UAV strikes on Kharkiv. This pressure is designed to maximize attrition and disrupt logistics flow into Pokrovsk.

MLCOA 2 (Exploitation of Cyber Breach): (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) RF actors will release select, sensitive data from the claimed CNI breach to media or dark web channels over the next 24-48 hours to validate the attack and maximize public panic and political fallout.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1 (GAB Saturation Followed by Mechanized Feint): (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM) RF uses GABs to suppress UAF fire positions on the Donetsk/Dnipropetrovsk border and simultaneously launches a mechanized reconnaissance-in-force toward the Pokrovsk axis. The goal is to force UAF Commanders to commit reserves to secure the disrupted rear area, leaving the main front line vulnerable to the pre-positioned RF exploitation force (as detailed in previous report's MDCOA).

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

• T+0 to T+4H (Cyber Validation Window): Critical time for RF to begin validating the data breach claim. (DECISION POINT: SBU/GUR - Immediate public statement on the breach status and mitigation actions is required to counter RF PSYOPS before they achieve maximum psychological effect.)
• T+6H to T+12H (GAB/UAV Wave): Expect continued GAB and UAV activity on the Donetsk/Dnipropetrovsk and Kharkiv axes, targeting logistics and CNI. (DECISION POINT: J-ADF - Need to ensure that AD assets protecting the Pokrovsk approach routes are not pulled away to defend non-critical infrastructure in Kharkiv.)

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Prioritize Cyber Incident Response (SBU/GUR/J7 Priority):
   • Recommendation: Treat the alleged CNI data breach (insurance firms) as a high-priority strategic attack.
   • Action (SBU/GUR): Immediately launch full-spectrum forensic analysis and incident response. Simultaneously, J7 must prepare rapid counter-IO materials to manage public perception and mitigate the psychological impact of the claimed 7 million data records being compromised.
2. Counter-GAB/Tactical Aviation Threat (J-ADF/J3 Priority):
   • Recommendation: Due to the GAB threat on the Donetsk/Dnipropetrovsk border, UAF must increase the density of forward-deployed AD (e.g., SA-8, NASAMS) or deploy heavy EW systems to disrupt RF tactical aviation C2/GPS targeting in that specific operational zone.
   • Action (J-ADF): Establish immediate "No-Fly Zones" (NFZ) defined by active EW coverage over key logistics hubs near the affected border area.
3. Harden Logistics Routes Against Stand-Off Attack (J4/J3 Priority):
   • Recommendation: Given the Vovcha bridge loss and the GAB threat, all established logistics bypasses or engineer repair efforts must be secured against standoff aerial threats.
   • Action (J4/Engineers): Utilize heavy smoke generation and rapid camouflage techniques (CARC paint, thermal blankets) at all new crossing points and identified logistics nodes to defeat RF GAB targeting systems.

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS & COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS (CRITICAL FOCUS)

//END REPORT//