Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - 131000Z OCT 25 (UPDATE 38)

SUBJECT: RF Strategic Deep Strike Intensifies, Widening Energy Outages to Seven Oblasts; Coordinated RF IO Campaign Attempts to Link Ukraine to Terror/ISIS; UAF Counter-Hybrid Operations Ongoing.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational geometry is defined by the RF deep strike campaign aimed at systemic energy collapse, while ground assaults continue to fix UAF forces in the East.

• Deep Strike/Energy Infrastructure (CRITICAL): Confirmed emergency power shutdowns are now reported across seven oblasts (Kharkiv, Sumy, Poltava, Donetsk, Dnipropetrovsk, Zaporizhzhia (industrial), and partially Kirovohrad) (Ukrenergo, Operational AFU). This represents an expansion from the previous six, confirming the sustained operational success of RF shaping strikes and increasing stress on the national grid.
• Northern Operational Area (Kharkiv/Sumy): Persistent UAV activity is confirmed targeting the Kyivskyi Raion of Kharkiv (Kharkiv OVA, AFU Air Force). An incoming hostile UAV from the north toward Kharkiv city was confirmed (AFU Air Force, 0718Z). This confirms RF intent to exploit PPO reallocation by continuing low-level, high-impact strikes on major northern urban centers.
• Southern Operational Area (Zaporizhzhia): The Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) reported preventing a terrorist attack in the center of Zaporizhzhia (Operational AFU). This points to RF continued use of internal sabotage networks, often synchronized with external kinetic strikes.
• Strategic Defense: European diplomatic presence in Kyiv (arrival of EU High Representative Kallas) confirms the continued geopolitical importance of the capital, despite the ongoing RF deep strike threats.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No significant changes. Conditions remain optimal for RF standoff missile and UAV employment. Colder temperatures, combined with power outages, will amplify the humanitarian and morale impact of the strategic strikes.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF defensive posture is increasingly challenged by the need to manage widespread energy instability across seven oblasts while maintaining PPO readiness for the anticipated main missile wave against strategic C2 nodes (Kyiv/Dnipro). Confirmed UAV strikes on Kharkiv and the new SBU action in Zaporizhzhia highlight the multi-domain threat requiring PPO and internal security prioritization.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(CAPABILITIES):

• Strategic Disruption (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF possesses the demonstrated capability to widen power outages and degrade energy resilience across a majority of eastern and central Ukraine, increasing civilian and logistical pressure.
• Hybrid Warfare/Sabotage (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF effectively synchronizes kinetic operations with internal sabotage and coordinated global Information Operations (IO). The alleged Moscow terror plot (FSB claim) and the prevented Zaporizhzhia attack (SBU claim) illustrate the intent to leverage internal instability and international distraction.

(INTENTIONS):

1. Exploit PPO/Grid Degradation (Immediate): Launch the main strategic missile strike (MLCOA 1) within the previously identified window, exploiting PPO exhaustion and the expanded seven-oblast energy crisis.
2. Malign Ukrainian Legitimacy: Use the FSB-generated narrative of a terror plot (involving Ukraine and ISIS) to complicate future Western military aid, especially from the US (given former President Trump's focus on the Middle East/Israel).
3. Fix Reserves: Maintain high pressure on the Pokrovsk/Kostiantynivka axis (confirmed in previous reporting) to prevent UAF reserve release to address the strategic deep strike threats.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Expanded Deep Strike Area: The inclusion of Zaporizhzhia (industrial) and Kirovohrad (partial) in the emergency outage zone confirms RF commitment to broader, simultaneous grid collapse rather than selective targeting.
• IO Synchronization Refined: The timing of the FSB terror plot claim (TASS, Two Majors, Operatsiia Z) directly coincides with the expanded power outages and high-profile international diplomatic events (Trump in Israel, Kallas in Kyiv), maximizing distraction and counter-narrative complexity.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF sustainment remains focused and effective for the high-intensity ground conflict. UAF efforts to interdict RF logistics (e.g., Crimean fuel depots in previous reporting) are insufficient to halt the immediate deep strike campaign, which relies on pre-positioned cruise and ballistic missile stockpiles.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is demonstrating high synchronization across kinetic (deep strike, ground assaults) and non-kinetic (IO, internal security) domains. The immediate coordination of multiple channels amplifying the 'Ukraine-ISIS terror plot' narrative indicates robust IO C2 structure.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF readiness remains HIGH for the anticipated MLCOA, but stress factors are accumulating:

1. Energy Disruption: Seven oblasts under stress demand resource allocation (generators, security, logistics) that pulls resources from kinetic operations.
2. Hybrid Threat Diversion: The need for SBU/National Police action to prevent internal sabotage (Zaporizhzhia) diverts internal security forces and attention from front-line support.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success: SBU successfully prevented a terrorist attack in Zaporizhzhia, disrupting an RF internal sabotage effort.
• Setback: Expansion of energy outages to the 7th oblast (Zaporizhzhia Industrial/Kirovohrad partial). Continued UAV strikes on Kharkiv.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The critical constraint remains the PPO interceptor inventory and the capacity to rapidly restore power generation capabilities in the affected oblasts. The arrival of EU representative Kallas in Kyiv provides a critical window for high-level resource discussions (PPO, generators, financial aid).

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO continues to push the core narrative via all major channels (TASS, Colonelcassad, Operatsiia Z): Ukraine is a state sponsor of terrorism, collaborating with ISIS, and planning attacks on Russian soil. This narrative is highly dangerous as it seeks to:

1. Justify massive, retaliatory kinetic strikes (MLCOA).
2. Delegitimize Ukraine in the eyes of Western and global security partners.
3. Distract from the Middle East hostage crisis (currently a high-focus topic, with another 13 hostages confirmed transferred to the Red Cross).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

The widening energy outages (seven oblasts) directly impact morale, increasing public stress and reliance on government/military assurances of resilience. The immediate SBU success in Zaporizhzhia provides a temporary morale counter-boost against the internal threat narrative.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• Critical Diplomatic Focus: The arrival of EU High Representative Kallas in Kyiv is a timely demonstration of continued Western diplomatic support, potentially mitigating the effect of the ongoing RF deep strike campaign.
• US Focus Shift: The continued high-profile coverage of former US President Trump's arrival in Israel (TASS, RBK-Ukraina) and the ongoing hostage situation confirms significant international attention diversion away from the Ukraine-Russia conflict, which RF actively exploits.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1 (Strategic Strike Wave - Peak Exploitation): RF launches the massed ballistic and cruise missile strike, likely layered with decoy UAVs, targeting Kyiv, Dnipro, and major PPO/C2 nodes. The strike aims to capitalize on the seven-oblast energy crisis and the strategic distraction provided by the IO campaign.

• Window: 131200Z OCT - 140000Z OCT. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

MLCOA 2 (Ground Offensive Reinforcement): RF forces will attempt to secure significant territorial gains on the Pokrovsk-Kostiantynivka axis, exploiting the distraction of the strategic strike and the strain on UAF C2.

• Window: 131500Z OCT - 140600Z OCT. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1 (C2 Decapitation and Integrated Hybrid Attack): RF successfully penetrates PPO defenses (e.g., in Kyiv/Dnipro) with the main strike, achieving severe degradation of national C2. Concurrently, RF activates multiple internal sabotage cells (similar to the Zaporizhzhia attempt) across several major cities to induce systemic panic and governmental paralysis, coordinated with the ground assault in the East.

• Window: 131200Z OCT - 141200Z OCT. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

• Decision Point (MLCOA Response Readiness): 131100Z OCT. All PPO systems must be fully allocated, with reserve interceptors confirmed, and mobile fire groups pre-positioned to defend against expected UAV feints (e.g., in the North/Kharkiv corridor).
• Decision Point (Counter-Terrorism Mobilization): 131100Z OCT. National Police and SBU must confirm elevated alert status for potential follow-on RF sabotage attempts in non-front-line major urban centers (e.g., Odesa, Lviv, Dnipro), anticipating the MDCOA.
• Decision Point (Strategic Communications): 131030Z OCT. Finalize and disseminate counter-narrative against the RF 'Ukraine-ISIS' claim, leveraging the presence of EU officials in Kyiv to emphasize Western solidarity.

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Execute Strategic Communication Counter-Narrative (INFOSEC PRIORITY):

   • Recommendation: Immediately use the presence of EU High Representative Kallas in Kyiv as a backdrop for a high-level government statement, directly refuting the FSB's terror claims and emphasizing that Ukraine, a victim of state terrorism, cooperates with international partners, not terror groups.
   • Action: Presidential Administration and INFOSEC Directorate to issue a joint, translated counter-narrative statement NLT 131030Z OCT.

2. Reinforce Internal Security/Counter-Sabotage (INTERNAL PRIORITY):

   • Recommendation: Given the confirmed SBU success in Zaporizhzhia, command must assume that other RF sabotage cells are primed to act during the anticipated kinetic MLCOA. Increase security and surveillance on all critical urban infrastructure (rail, water, energy) in unaffected oblasts.
   • Action: Chief of SBU/National Police to issue an Elevated Counter-Sabotage Alert for all major cities outside the immediate Eastern front (Odesa, Lviv, Vinnytsia, etc.).

3. Optimize PPO for Resilience over Mass Interception (STRATEGIC PRIORITY):

   • Recommendation: Given the simultaneous energy and kinetic threats, PPO assets must prioritize the physical security of C2 nodes and power grid repair crews and materials (protecting recovery efforts) over attempting 100% interception of the MLCOA. Reserve interceptor use must be disciplined.
   • Action: Chief of Air Defense Forces to confirm deployment of SHORAD/MFGs to protect critical energy repair and logistics depots in the seven affected oblasts before the main strike.

//END REPORT//