Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - 131000Z OCT 25 (UPDATE 37)

SUBJECT: RF Deep Strike Campaign Shifts Focus to Northern Infrastructure (Chernihiv, Sumy); Ground Pressure Intensifies on Central Donbas Axes (Pokrovsk, Kostiantynivka); Moscow Terror Plot Alleged.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational picture is characterized by simultaneous RF kinetic and informational operations across multiple domains.

• Deep Strike/Energy Infrastructure: Confirmed emergency power shutdowns are now reported across a total of six oblasts (Dnipropetrovsk, Poltava, Kharkiv, Kirovohrad, Sumy, and the occupied part of Donetsk Oblast) (Dva Mayora, Operatsiia Z, RBK-Ukraina). This confirms the widening operational success of RF shaping strikes.
• Northern Operational Area (NOA): Confirmed RF strike on a "promyslove pidpryiemstvo" (industrial enterprise) in Nizhyn, Chernihiv Oblast, and UAV activity targeting Borzna (Chernihiv) (RBK-Ukraina, UAF Air Force). This represents a geographic expansion of high-value non-energy targeting into the NOA.
• Central Donbas Axis (Pokrovsk/Kostiantynivka): RF pressure is confirmed to be extremely high. Pushilin (RF proxy) reports "serious clashes" near Kostiantynivka (TASS). UAF General Staff reports clashes across a wide front including Volodymyrivka, Rodynske, Pokrovsk, and Dachne (Pokrovsk direction), and near Siversk (Liveuamap Source). This confirms RF intent to maximize advances toward the Myrnohrad cluster and key Donbas logistical nodes.
• Kharkiv/Sumy: UAF repelled four RF assaults near the border in the Kursk/North Slobozhansky directions (Sumy), indicating persistent, low-level cross-border pressure intended to fix UAF units (Liveuamap Source). A recent explosion was reported in the center of Kharkiv (RBK-Ukraina).
• Crimea: New reports confirm a UAF drone attack on a neftebaza (fuel depot) in annexed Crimea, resulting in a fire (Sever.Realiyi), and renewed claims of drone attacks on the Simferopol TPP (RBK-Ukraina). RF milbloggers claim 16 UAF UAVs were shot down over Crimea (Voenkor Kotenok).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No significant change from previous reporting. Conditions remain suitable for kinetic and UAV operations.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF forces are under increasing strain due to the dual demands of defending against concentrated ground assaults in the Central Donbas and managing strategic energy instability caused by the widespread deep strike campaign across six oblasts. The confirmed strike in Nizhyn necessitates the allocation of PPO assets further north, potentially degrading readiness for the anticipated main missile strike in the Kyiv/Dnipro corridor.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(CAPABILITIES):

• Deep Strike Saturation (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF retains the demonstrated capability to conduct synchronized deep strikes across multiple axes (South, East, North) targeting energy and industrial infrastructure to induce widespread civilian and military disruption.
• Sustained Attritional Advance (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF ground forces maintain the mass and momentum required to sustain high-intensity attritional engagements, especially on the Pokrovsk/Myrnohrad axis, aimed at creating operational encirclements (Rodynske) or forcing major UAF reserve commitment.

(INTENTIONS):

1. Execute Main Strike Wave (Imminent): Launch the massed missile strike (MLCOA 1) to exploit energy outages and global media focus (Middle East/Hostage Exchange). The Nizhyn strike suggests an intent to draw PPO assets away from the central axes.
2. Achieve Tactical Decisive Point: Pressure the Pokrovsk-Kostiantynivka corridor to gain control of a major defensive line or logistical node, leveraging the concentration of UAF forces in the sector.
3. Undermine Internal Stability: Utilize hybrid warfare techniques (e.g., the FSB’s narrative of a Moscow terror plot involving Ukraine/ISIS) to degrade international perceptions of Ukrainian state legitimacy and further justify massive military retaliation.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Targeting Expansion: RF has expanded its deep strike target set from core energy distribution to include industrial facilities in the North (Nizhyn), indicating a shift toward broader economic degradation and possibly targeting dual-use military production/storage facilities.
• IO Synchronization: The confirmed arrival of the first hostages in Israel (TASS) and the FSB's simultaneous announcement of a Moscow terror plot (FSB via TASS, ASTRA) confirm robust synchronization of kinetic action with global IO efforts to distract Western attention and malign Ukraine's international standing.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

UAF deep strikes into Crimea (neftebaza/fuel depot) confirm persistent targeting of RF logistical choke points, forcing RF to commit limited PPO assets to protect rear area supply lines. RF sustainment for the Donbas ground fight remains robust, supported by continuous artillery and air support (confirmed КАБ launches on Donetsk region).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective, demonstrated by the synchronization of:

1. Widespread deep strikes (six oblasts affected by power outages).
2. High-intensity ground combat across multiple sectors (Pokrovsk, Kostiantynivka, Lyman, Orikhiv).
3. Multi-domain IO leveraging global events (Middle East) and internal security narratives (Moscow terror plot).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF ground forces maintain defensive posture across the Eastern and Southern axes, repelling multiple assaults (e.g., 4 near Sumy/Kursk border). However, the critical stress factors are escalating:

1. Energy Resilience: Six oblasts now report emergency power outages, severely impacting civilian morale and complicating logistics/C2 redundancy.
2. PPO Allocation: The need to defend against deep strikes in Chernihiv and the persistent high threat to Kyiv/Dnipro is stretching PPO resources beyond sustainable limits ahead of the MLCOA.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success: Confirmed successful UAF deep strike against Crimean fuel depot (neftebaza), disrupting RF logistics. UAF forces repelled multiple assaults on the Northern front (Sumy).
• Setback: Confirmed expansion of emergency power outages to six oblasts. Continued high-intensity engagement in Central Donbas (Pokrovsk/Kostiantynivka) with confirmed heavy fighting (Pushilin claim). Confirmed damage to industrial enterprise in Nizhyn, near a potentially vulnerable logistics/rail hub.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The primary constraint is the PPO interceptor inventory and the capacity to rapidly reallocate PPO assets (e.g., from the Kyiv defense bubble to protect exposed industrial/energy sites in Chernihiv/Sumy) without compromising readiness for the MDCOA. Critical resource requirement: Emergency power generation (mobile generators, fuel) for military infrastructure in the six affected oblasts.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO channels are aggressively pushing three narratives:

1. Internal RF Victory/Counter-Terrorism: The FSB claim of preventing a terror attack in Moscow by "Ukrainian special services" collaborating with ISIS (TASS, ASTRA, Voenkor Kotenok) is designed to equate Ukraine with international terrorism, justify further escalation, and galvanize domestic support.
2. Global Distraction/US-Ukraine Discord: Continued heavy coverage of the Middle East hostage exchange (TASS) and the speculative reporting on potential "Tomahawk" missile supply discussions between Trump/Zelensky (Operatsiia Z) are used to signal US political instability and distract from Ukrainian military setbacks.
3. Energy Attrition: Amplification of emergency power outages across Ukraine ("Electricity in deficit") to promote hopelessness and demoralization.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

The expansion of emergency power outages into populous regions (Kharkiv, Dnipro, Poltava) is severely degrading public confidence and increasing psychological stress. RF IO attempts to link Ukraine with ISIS are highly inflammatory and necessitate a strong, coordinated counter-narrative from UAF INFOSEC.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

International attention is effectively fixed on the Middle East due to the ongoing hostage release (TASS, ASTRA) and former President Trump's arrival in Israel (ASTRA). The highly speculative report regarding Tomahawk transfers (Axios via Operatsiia Z) highlights the perceived political volatility of future military aid, a vulnerability RF exploits.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1 (Strategic Strike Wave - Peak Exploitation): RF launches the massed ballistic and cruise missile strike against Kyiv, Dnipro, and other high-value C2/PPO facilities. The strike will be layered, employing decoy UAVs (confirmed in Chernihiv/Borzna) to degrade Northern PPO readiness before the main wave.

• Window: 131200Z OCT - 140000Z OCT. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

MLCOA 2 (Central Donbas Assault Synchronization): Concurrent with MLCOA 1, RF forces will execute a major breakthrough attempt on the Pokrovsk-Kostiantynivka axis, aiming for a rapid 5-10 km advance toward a key logistical hub, exploiting UAF C2 disruption or reserve hesitation.

• Window: 131500Z OCT - 140600Z OCT. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1 (C2 Decapitation and Operational Encirclement): RF achieves severe degradation of the National C2 network in Kyiv (by overcoming layered PPO defenses) while simultaneously achieving a successful tactical penetration that threatens to cut off UAF forces fighting near Rodynske/Pokrovsk. The Nizhyn strike suggests preparatory targeting to reduce reserve mobility from the North.

• Window: 131200Z OCT - 141200Z OCT. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

• Decision Point (PPO Final Deployment/Alert): 131100Z OCT. All remaining high-value PPO systems (especially IRIS-T, NASAMS) must confirm full alert status and reserved interceptor allocation for the MLCOA.
• Decision Point (Central Donbas Reserve Commitment): 131200Z OCT. Operational Command East must have designated reserve units pre-positioned and ready for immediate counter-attack if RF penetration exceeds the primary defensive line in the Myrnohrad/Pokrovsk sector.
• Decision Point (Northern PPO Asset Allocation): 131300Z OCT. Decision required on whether to commit mobile PPO assets to establish temporary defenses around critical energy nodes in Sumy/Chernihiv or retain them for the strategic defense of Kyiv/Dnipro.

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Maximize PPO Readiness for MLCOA (STRATEGIC PRIORITY):

   • Recommendation: Given the wide-area energy degradation, it is critical to prioritize the defense of National C2 and PPO logistics hubs (Kyiv/Dnipro) over widespread energy distribution points. All available short-to-medium range PPO assets must be fully integrated into the defense of MLCOA target zones.
   • Action: Chief of Air Defense Forces to issue a final PPO High Alert Directive by 131100Z OCT, confirming maximum density and reserve interceptor status in Kyiv/Dnipro.

2. Reinforce Central Donbas Secondary Line (OPERATIONAL PRIORITY):

   • Recommendation: The claimed "serious clashes" near Kostiantynivka and Rodynske indicate an imminent RF peak effort. Commit designated mobile reserves (e.g., mechanized brigade tactical groups) immediately to reinforce the secondary defensive belt between Pokrovsk and Kostiantynivka, mitigating the MDCOA of operational penetration.
   • Action: Operational Command East must confirm full deployment and readiness of reinforcing reserves by 131200Z OCT.

3. Counter-Hybrid Warfare Directive (INFORMATION PRIORITY):

   • Recommendation: Immediately deploy a coordinated UAF/Government INFOSEC counter-narrative to officially refute the FSB's terror plot claims, highlighting the absurdity of linking Ukrainian forces with ISIS and emphasizing the RF strategy of international distraction and malign influence.
   • Action: INFOSEC Directorate to launch the counter-narrative campaign NLT 131030Z OCT.

//END REPORT//