Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - 130800Z OCT 25 (UPDATE 36)

SUBJECT: RF Continues PPO Shaping Campaign; Confirmed Energy Infrastructure Degradation; Increased Ground Pressure near Myrnohrad/Pokrovsk Axis.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The strategic threat environment remains dominated by synchronized deep strike shaping operations and concentrated ground offensives.

• Deep Strike/Energy Infrastructure: Post-strike assessments confirm successful RF targeting of energy infrastructure. Emergency power shutdowns (Kirovohrad, Dnipropetrovsk, Donetsk Oblasts) are confirmed due to the overnight UAV attack (RBC-U, Operatyvnyi ZSU). The attack also focused heavily on Odesa Oblast, resulting in significant fire damage to storage facilities (DSNS, Shef Hayabusa video of 5,000 m² textile warehouse fire).
• Central Donbas Axis (Myrnohrad/Pokrovsk): RF proxies claim significant advance, stating the Russian Armed Forces (RF ВС) have "practically encircled Rodinskoye" and that "city battles are taking place in Siversk" (Pushilin via TASS, TASS). While these claims are likely exaggerated for IO effect, they confirm high-intensity combat operations and RF focus on achieving operational encirclement near the Myrnohrad cluster (formerly Pokrovsk).
• Crimea (UAF Deep Strike BDA): Confirmed successful UAF deep strikes against RF logistics and energy nodes (Simferopol substation and Feodosiia fuel depot, confirmed by Tsaplienko BDA photos). RF continues to claim successful interception of UAF UAVs targeting Crimean power stations (Dva Mayora).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Weather remains conducive to UAV and precision strike operations. Note: Initial snowfall reported in the Moscow region (TASS), but this does not immediately impact the current Ukrainian theater of operations.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

The Ukrainian Air Force (UAF) confirmed neutralizing 69 out of 82 launched enemy UAVs in the overnight attack (Air Force, General Staff). This indicates a 84% effectiveness rate but confirms the massive scale of the shaping wave (82 launches). UAF ground forces remain engaged in high-intensity defensive battles along the Central Donbas Axis. Emergency power shutdowns initiated in three oblasts confirm that the RF strategy of energy attrition is yielding tactical success.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(CAPABILITIES):

• Massed UAV Attrition: RF retains the capability to launch large-scale UAV waves (82 targets) to deplete UAF PPO interceptor stocks and degrade energy infrastructure across multiple strategic axes (Odesa, Dnipro, Kirovohrad). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Localized Ground Encirclement: RF is capable of mounting sustained, high-attrition assaults on the Central Donbas axis (Siversk, Rodinskoye claims) intended to fix and draw UAF operational reserves. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

(INTENTIONS):

1. Execute Main Strike Wave (Imminent): Launch the massed ballistic/cruise missile strike (MLCOA 1) to coincide with the peak of the global media distraction (hostage exchange), targeting key National C2 and PPO centers (Kyiv, Dnipro).
2. Sustain Energy Degradation: Continue targeting energy distribution infrastructure to generate domestic instability and emergency power outages (Confirmed in 3 Oblasts), increasing the cost of strategic defense.
3. Achieve Localized Breakthrough: Exploit resource draw to the strategic defense by attempting a breakthrough or operational encirclement (Rodinskoye) on the Myrnohrad/Pokrovsk axis.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The shift in deep strike targeting from purely military/logistical nodes to widely distributed, civilian-adjacent infrastructure (Odesa textile warehouses, confirmed power distribution centers) confirms RF intent to maximize widespread economic and societal disruption ahead of the main strike. This is a multi-domain strategy that leverages kinetic effects to generate political and economic pressure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

UAF deep strike BDA (Feodosiia fuel depot, Simferopol substation) confirms persistent targeting of RF logistical vulnerabilities in Crimea. RF is forced to expend high-value assets (PPO) to protect these sites. The loss of textile warehouses in Odesa does not directly impact UAF combat logistics but reduces civilian economic resilience.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 demonstrated effective synchronization of the 82-target UAV wave across multiple operational areas (Odesa, Central, North-East). Synchronization with IO focusing on the Middle East hostage exchange remains consistent, indicating robust multi-domain C2. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF Air Defense maintained high effectiveness (84% intercept rate) against the massed UAV wave, confirming high operational readiness. However, the subsequent emergency power outages in three oblasts confirm that RF achieved partial mission success against energy targets, forcing a reactive posture on civilian infrastructure protection. UAF forces are concurrently battling increased RF pressure in the Central Donbas, requiring rapid mobilization of reserves.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success: Effective engagement of the massed UAV wave (69 intercepts). Confirmed BDA of successful deep strikes into Crimea (Feodosiia, Simferopol).
• Setback: Confirmed emergency power shutdowns in three oblasts (Kirovohrad, Dnipropetrovsk, Donetsk), indicating successful degradation of national energy resilience by RF shaping strikes. Casualties confirmed in Preobrazhenka following enemy attack (Zaporizhzhia OVA).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The critical constraint remains the PPO interceptor inventory, depleted by the multi-day massed UAV attacks. The immediate operational constraint is the need to manage energy supply instability simultaneously with preparing for the main missile strike (MLCOA 1) and reinforcing the threatened Myrnohrad sector.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF and proxy channels (TASS, Colonelcassad, Kotsnews) are prioritizing three key narratives:

1. Global Distraction: Intensive reporting on the Hamas-Israel hostage exchange (ASTRA, TASS, confirmed first seven released), successfully drawing attention away from Ukraine.
2. Ground Success Exaggeration: Claims of "encircling Rodinskoye" and "city battles in Siversk" (TASS) aim to project tactical momentum and demoralize UAF forces holding the line.
3. Domestic Discord Amplification: Amplifying narratives of internal Ukrainian political and social fracture (e.g., alleged anti-TCC sentiment among women, political corruption claims regarding Western aid).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Confirmed emergency power outages will place immediate stress on civilian morale and economic activity in affected oblasts, potentially amplifying existing war fatigue narratives, which RF IO is actively seeking to exploit. The confirmed rise in demand and price for backup power devices (Shef Hayabusa) indicates public anticipation of prolonged energy sector vulnerability.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The commencement and successful initial phase of the hostage release solidify the global focus on the Middle East. A statement attributed to former US President Trump mentioning the potential transfer of Tomahawk missiles to Kyiv (Shef Hayabusa) is significant, suggesting potential future escalatory support, but is highly conditional and speculative, unlikely to impact immediate RF decision-making.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1 (Strategic Strike Wave - Peak Exploitation): RF will launch the main strategic ballistic and cruise missile strike (MLCOA 1) against high-value strategic targets, focusing on Kyiv and Dnipro C2/PPO facilities, exploiting the successful energy degradation and global distraction.

• Window: 131200Z OCT - 140000Z OCT. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

MLCOA 2 (Central Donbas Breakthrough Attempt): RF will initiate a high-attrition, mechanized assault against the UAF defensive line, likely targeting the Myrnohrad/Rodinskoye axis, immediately following or concurrent with the strategic missile strike to capitalize on potential C2 disruption or resource reallocation.

• Window: Next 24 Hours. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1 (C2 Decapitation and Operational Encirclement): RF achieves severe damage to a primary National C2 facility in Kyiv, coupled with a successful penetration past the secondary defensive line in the Myrnohrad sector (5-10 km deep). This combined kinetic/maneuver action threatens operational stability in the East and strategic paralysis in the rear.

• Window: 131200Z OCT - 141200Z OCT. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

• Decision Point (PPO Asset Final Readiness/Deployment): 130900Z OCT. CONFIRMED that critical PPO assets are fully integrated and reserved for the main strike wave.
• Decision Point (Myrnohrad Reserve Commitment): 130930Z OCT. Operational Command East must be prepared to commit mobile reserves to reinforce the threatened Rodinskoye sector if confirmed RF penetration exceeds 3 km.
• Decision Point (Energy Grid Stabilization): 131100Z OCT. Confirmation that emergency power outages are stabilized and essential critical infrastructure (hospitals, military bases) are operating on backup power without major incident.

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Enforce PPO Munition Reserve Protocol (STRATEGIC PRIORITY):

   • Recommendation: Strictly enforce the reservation of high-efficiency interceptors for the main ballistic/cruise missile strike (MLCOA 1). Direct Mobile Fire Groups (MFGs) to prioritize protection of energy distribution centers (substations, transformers) against any follow-on UAV attacks, recognizing the immediate strategic threat to stability.
   • Action: PPO units must confirm the final reserved inventory status NLT 130900Z OCT.

2. Accelerated Defensive Stance for Myrnohrad (OPERATIONAL PRIORITY):

   • Recommendation: Given the critical RF claims near Rodinskoye and Siversk, deploy the planned operational reserves immediately to establish and man the secondary defensive line. This deployment must be conducted under maximum ECM coverage to prevent RF aerial targeting during transit.
   • Action: Operational Command East must confirm reserve transit status and integration into secondary defensive positions NLT 131000Z OCT.

3. Critical Infrastructure Hardening Directive (NATIONAL PRIORITY):

   • Recommendation: UAF, in coordination with the Ministry of Energy, must immediately task military engineering units to reinforce physical security and redundancy at critical remaining energy distribution nodes, particularly those supporting National C2 and military command posts in Kyiv and Dnipro Oblasts, prior to the anticipated main strike.
   • Action: Chief of Engineering Corps to report on immediate hardening measures initiated NLT 131100Z OCT.

//END REPORT//