Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - OPERATIONAL UPDATE

TIME: 070933Z OCT 25 AOR: Multi-domain focus, emphasizing Southern FLOT (Zaporizhzhia/Dnipropetrovsk), Central FLOT (Donetsk/Bakhmut), and Logistics/Deep Strike Operations. REPORTING PERIOD: 070900Z OCT 25 – 070933Z OCT 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): MEDIUM-HIGH (RF is executing a coordinated ground push supported by deep strikes and sustained IO, capitalizing on identified UAF C2 vulnerabilities. UAF successfully maintains localized counter-offensive capability and deep interdiction.)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational picture is characterized by simultaneous RF ground gains in the Donetsk and Zaporizhzhia sectors, coupled with continued RF deep interdiction strikes (Chernihiv).

• Southern Axis (Zaporizhzhia/Dnipropetrovsk): RF MoD and 394th Guards Motor Rifle Regiment (5th Army, Vostok Grouping) confirm the capture of Novovasylivske (09:04Z and 09:11Z).
  • Significance: Confirms the tactical loss from the previous report. The participation of the 394th GMRR suggests this was a planned, deliberate attack by RF Vostok Grouping, validating the MLCOA of exploiting the former OSUV "Dnipro" C2 seam.
• Central Axis (Donetsk): RF MoD claims the liberation of Fedorovka (09:03Z and 09:11Z) and confirmation of the use of FAB-3000 guided glide bombs to destroy a "strategic bridge" (09:19Z). RF also claims destruction of UAF robotic complexes near Ivanopillia and Berestok (09:14Z).
  • Significance: Fedorovka's reported capture indicates continuous, localized RF pressure near the Bakhmut or Avdiivka axes. The confirmed use of the FAB-3000 against a logistics bridge demonstrates RF's increasing reliance on heavy, long-range guided munitions to suppress UAF maneuverability and resupply.
• Deep Rear (Chernihiv): RF MoD claims a "Geran-2" (Shahed variant) strike destroyed a UAF warehouse near Chernihiv (09:17Z).
  • Significance: Demonstrates RF's continued capability to strike UAF logistics deep in the rear, forcing UAF to maintain extensive AD coverage far from the FLOT.
• UAF Deep Strike Assessment: UAF sources confirm continued fundraising success ($125k cryptographically received, 09:09Z) for FPV drones, indicating sustained capacity for tactical superiority in local engagements. UAF 79th Air Assault Brigade confirmed successful cleanup and casualty evacuation using captured equipment (09:11Z), demonstrating localized tactical resilience.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No new environmental factors reported in this period.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF Forces: RF is focused on aggressive, localized ground advances (Novovasylivske, Fedorovka) supported by stand-off fire (FAB-3000 strike) and continued interdiction (Chernihiv Geran strike). The specific mention of the 394th GMRR confirms a designated, named unit is leading the Zaporizhzhia advance. UAF Forces: UAF forces are engaged in active defense and localized counter-attack operations (previous report confirmation of Sichneve capture, 79th Air Assault Brigade operations). UAF continues to leverage technological superiority in the tactical domain (FPV procurement) and strategic interdiction (Feodosiia).

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(CAPABILITY - Heavy Standoff): The confirmed use of the FAB-3000 guided glide bomb against a strategic bridge indicates RF has successfully integrated this heavy ordnance into its long-range strike inventory, increasing the threat to UAF critical infrastructure and fixed logistics lines. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

(INTENTION - Coordinated Seam Exploitation): RF's simultaneous claims of capturing Novovasylivske (Zaporizhzhia, former OSUV Dnipro) and Fedorovka (Donetsk) confirm the clear intention to utilize massed local efforts to exploit UAF command friction following the OSUV "Dnipro" dissolution. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

(COA - Counter-UAV/Robotics): RF forces are actively targeting UAF advanced tactical assets, evidenced by the claimed destruction of three "robotic complexes" near Ivanopillia and Berestok. This confirms RF is adapting its ISR-strike cycle to specifically neutralize UAF remote/unmanned systems superiority. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Integrated FAB-3000 Employment: The targeting of a bridge with a FAB-3000 is a significant escalation in standoff munitions used against fixed infrastructure, surpassing the lethality of previous FAB-1500 usage. This suggests an operational-level goal of impeding UAF logistics over a large water obstacle or deep rear area.
• Targeted Counter-Robotics: The destruction of UAF robotic complexes suggests dedicated RF counter-UAS/UAV teams are operating effectively in forward areas, utilizing their own ISR (drones) to hunt UAF unmanned ground/air assets.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The logistics required to sustain the FAB-3000 glide bomb campaign (heavy bomber sorties, guidance packages) are significant. Despite the success of the Feodosiia strike, RF maintains substantial deep strike logistics (Geran launches toward Chernihiv). The success of the 394th GMRR attack at Novovasylivske suggests adequate forward sustainment for localized combined arms assaults by RF Vostok Grouping.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective in coordinating simultaneous, dispersed operational objectives (ground gains in two sectors, deep interdiction strikes, heavy bomb usage). The rapid public reporting of captured villages by the MoD suggests a unified effort to control the narrative and maximize the psychological impact of their advances.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking) (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF posture remains engaged and determined, demonstrated by the continued successful fielding of FPV drones and the confirmed operations of elite units (79th Air Assault Brigade). Readiness is high, but resources are strained by the requirement to defend against simultaneous RF pressure on multiple critical axes (Kupyansk, Novovasylivske, Fedorovka).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes:

• Continued FPV/ISR Funding: Rapid $125k in crypto funding indicates strong public and technological support for decentralized warfare capabilities.
• Elite Unit Resilience: The 79th Air Assault Brigade demonstrating casualty evacuation and continued operations in contested areas.
• Counter-Artillery Success: UAF-aligned FPV drone footage showing the destruction of an RF armored vehicle (likely light APC/truck) indicates sustained success in surgical strikes against RF forward logistics and transport.

Setbacks:

• Confirmed Tactical Losses: Loss of Novovasylivske and Fedorovka confirms RF momentum in both the Southern and Central axes.
• Logistics Interdiction: The successful FAB-3000 strike on a strategic bridge represents a significant degradation of UAF maneuver options and resupply redundancy.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The primary constraint is the urgent need for enhanced counter-FAB/KAB capabilities and redundancy for critical fixed infrastructure (bridges, large warehouses). The delay in Tomahawk/ATACMS delivery (as per previous reports) places continued pressure on existing UAF deep strike and AD assets.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain) (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO Strategy: RF MoD immediately publicized the capture of Novovasylivske and Fedorovka to project operational success, directly countering the recent UAF narrative dominance following the Feodosiia strike. They also heavily promoted the use of FAB-3000 to project overwhelming firepower superiority.

UAF IO Strategy: UAF sources are focusing on localized tactical success (79th Brigade operations, FPV funding) and maintaining a long-term strategic perspective (cyber analysis of RF energy sector strikes).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF public sentiment remains robust, driven by localized tactical successes and effective community-based fundraising (STERNENKO). However, confirmed losses of villages (Novovasylivske, Fedorovka) and the imagery of major infrastructure strikes (FAB-3000 bridge destruction) could lead to temporary localized morale dips, particularly near contested areas.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The arrival of the OSCE President in Kyiv (09:14Z) highlights continued international political engagement. RF continues hybrid legal warfare, increasing the sentence for TV host Tatyana Lazareva and listing Ukrainian political figures on wanted lists, aimed at suppressing dissent and external criticism. Russian domestic focus remains on internal issues (alcohol poisoning, mortgage proposals), standard wartime normalcy bias.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations) (IPB Step 5)

RF will prioritize consolidating gains at Novovasylivske and Fedorovka while maintaining deep pressure on UAF logistics via heavy glide bombs and Geran drones. RF seeks to paralyze UAF C2 transition efforts and disrupt resupply before UAF can commit reserves.

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1 (Consolidated Offensive in Southern/Central Sectors): RF Vostok Grouping will leverage Novovasylivske and Fedorovka to launch probing attacks (T+0 to T+24 hours) against adjacent UAF defensive positions, utilizing combined arms (including continued use of FPV/loitering munitions and heavy glide bombs on supporting infrastructure). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

MLCOA 2 (FAB/KAB Saturation): RF Aerospace Forces will increase the volume and dispersion of FAB/KAB strikes (T+0 to T+48 hours), targeting key logistics choke points and regional C2 nodes in the Central and Northern axes (Sumy, Chernihiv, Donetsk logistics hubs) to prevent UAF reserves from being rapidly committed. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

MLCOA 3 (Counter-UAS Campaign): RF will continue targeted strikes against known/suspected UAF CPs and robotic complexes (T+0 to T+24 hours), attempting to neutralize the advantage provided by UAF FPV superiority near the FLOT. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1 (Focused Exploitation of C2 Seam): RF concentrates armor and assault detachments along the former OSUV "Dnipro" boundary, achieving a tactical breakthrough facilitated by paralyzing C2 friction, and rapidly advances to seize a key intermediate city (e.g., Uspenoivka or a major regional road junction). This would threaten the stability of the entire Southern flank. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Northern/Southern Coordination - Strategic Reserves (OPERATIONAL - CRITICAL):

   • Recommendation: Given the simultaneous pressure on Novovasylivske and the unconfirmed, high-risk status of Kupyansk (DP 3), finalize the deployment plan for General Reserve forces to prevent RF from forcing a major logistical withdrawal in either sector. Deployment should be contingent on Kupyansk verification (T+2 hours).
   • Action: Immediately review and pre-position engineer units and materiel for rapid construction of temporary bridging or alternative bypass routes near the FAB-3000 strike zone (DP 2).

2. Air Defense and Counter-Strike Posture (FORCE PROTECTION - URGENT):

   • Recommendation: Prioritize the defense of C2 nodes and critical logistics centers in the Chernihiv/Sumy corridor against the MLCOA 2 saturation strike threat.
   • Action: Implement active deception measures (decoys, false electromagnetic signatures) around key logistics facilities in the deep rear to draw RF drone/missile fire away from actual targets.

3. Tactical Counter-Exploitation (TACTICAL - URGENT):

   • Recommendation: Utilize the UAF 141st Brigade's momentum from the Sichneve success to apply cross-pressure on the flanks of the RF Vostok Grouping advance at Novovasylivske, forcing the 394th GMRR to slow consolidation and divert resources.
   • Action: Deploy high-volume FPV assets and targeted artillery saturation on RF assembly areas and immediate rear-echelon logistics near Novovasylivske (DP 1).

//END REPORT//