Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - OPERATIONAL UPDATE

TIME: 070900Z OCT 25 AOR: Multi-domain focus, emphasizing Southern FLOT (Zaporizhzhia/Dnipropetrovsk), Deep Strike Operations (Crimea/Black Sea), and Northern Axis (Kupyansk/Sumy). REPORTING PERIOD: 070833Z OCT 25 – 070900Z OCT 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH (RF continues to synchronize deep strikes and localized ground pressure, targeting known C2 seams, while UAF sustains effective deep strike and tactical counter-attacks.)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational picture is defined by UAF deep strike persistence and highly contested tactical ground operations, specifically around Novovasylivske and Kupyansk.

• Deep Strike Operations (Feodosiia, Crimea): UAF and RF sources confirm the Feodosiia oil terminal continues to burn for a second day (РБК-Україна, Оперативний ЗСУ).
  • Significance: Confirms sustained operational success and RF failure to contain the damage. This directly impacts RF fuel logistics for naval and air assets in the Black Sea and resupply for the Southern Grouping of Forces (SOF).
• Southern Axis (Novovasylivske): Multiple RF sources (Дневник Десантника🇷🇺, Операция Z, Z комитет) confirm and disseminate video evidence of the capture of Novovasylivske (Dnipropetrovsk/Zaporizhzhia boundary), claimed by RF Vostok Grouping. This aligns with the MLCOA of exploiting the OSUV "Dnipro" C2 transition.
  • Significance: This is a confirmed tactical loss for UAF, placing immediate pressure on neighboring positions, particularly Uspenoivka (previously identified DP 1).
• Southern Axis (Sichneve): UAF 141st Separate Mechanized Brigade (141 ОМБр) confirms a successful localized offensive, seizing/clearing the village of Sichneve and inflicting significant casualties (50 killed, 8 captured).
  • Significance: Demonstrates UAF operational flexibility and successful localized counter-attack capability, offsetting the loss at Novovasylivske.
• Northern Axis (Kupyansk): RF milbloggers (Kotsnews) claim RF forces have taken control of the center of Kupyansk (09:01Z).
  • Significance: This RF claim requires immediate UAF verification. If confirmed, this would represent a highly significant RF penetration into a major logistics hub and would necessitate a major commitment of UAF operational reserves.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

TASS reports possible weak magnetic storms on 07 OCT 25 due to solar plasma cloud impact.

• Significance: Weak magnetic storms have a LOW probability of affecting modern military satellite communications or precision-guided munitions, but could minimally impact older RF radio communications or long-range UAV command links.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF Forces: RF is focused on deep strike mitigation (claiming nine UAVs shot down over Black Sea) and coordinated localized attacks in two critical sectors: Kupyansk (Northern Axis) and Novovasylivske (Southern Axis). RF units continue to employ combined arms, utilizing self-propelled mortars (2S23 Nona-SVK) for shoot-and-scoot tactics (Krasnoarmeysk direction), demonstrating awareness of UAF counter-battery threats. UAF Forces: UAF continues highly effective multi-domain operations: deep strike sustainability (Feodosiia), successful localized offensive (Sichneve), and active defensive AD posture (warning of UAVs toward Sumy). UAF procurement continues rapidly, with 265 FPV drones (including 20 Shahed interceptors) acquired in the last 24 hours (STERNENKO).

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(CAPABILITY - Drone Countermeasures): RF claims success in neutralizing UAF drone C2 (TASS claims 4 UAV CPs destroyed in DNR; MoD Russia claims 1 UAV CP destroyed near Krasnoarmeysk). This indicates RF is prioritizing the neutralization of UAF tactical UAV superiority. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

(INTENTION - Seize Key Terrain): The aggressive claims regarding both Novovasylivske and Kupyansk center indicate a clear, coordinated RF intention to seize high-value terrain and operational hubs simultaneously. This forces UAF to divide its attention and resources between the Northern and Southern axes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

(INTENTION - Force C2 Confusion): The simultaneous pressure on Novovasylivske (exploiting OSUV "Dnipro" dissolution) and Kupyansk (a vital Northern hub) confirms the RF intent to create strategic command friction during the UAF C2 transition phase. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Integrated Strike on UAV Infrastructure: RF claims of destroying multiple UAV CPs and robotic complexes suggest a targeted, refined RF counter-drone strategy focusing not just on the airframe but on the supporting infrastructure (e.g., ground control stations, antennas).
• Utilization of Foreign Nationals: The confirmed capture of a 22-year-old Indian national mercenary by the UAF 63rd Brigade reinforces the persistent belief (0.321745 probability) that RF is actively using foreign nationals/prison recruits to man high-risk assault elements, leveraging them as expendable assault forces.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The sustained fire at the Feodosiia terminal is a Critical Logistical Interruption for RF SOF. RF reports of downing nine UAVs over the Black Sea suggests active engagement to protect remaining Black Sea Fleet assets and coastal logistics from further strikes. RF continues to utilize strategic logistics for sustainment, evidenced by the reported 2S23 Nona-SVK usage, which relies on a steady supply of specialized 120mm ammunition.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is demonstrating effective coordination of simultaneous, dispersed operations (Kupyansk, Novovasylivske, deep strike mitigation). However, the failure to rapidly extinguish the Feodosiia fire (two days) remains a critical indicator of poor strategic damage control or resource allocation deficiencies.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking) (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF posture remains defensively robust (Vovchansk, previous SITREP) and offensively capable (Sichneve capture). The rapid public procurement of 265 FPV drones, including counter-Shahed interceptors, demonstrates continued investment and agility in multi-domain capability (Drone warfare, AD augmentation).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes:

• Sustained Interdiction: Two-day confirmation of fire at Feodosiia terminal.
• Localized Offensive: Successful capture and clearing of Sichneve (141 ОМБр).
• Force Protection: Successful civilian evacuation under fire at Novohryhorivka (Presidential Brigade).

Setbacks:

• Tactical Loss: Confirmed RF claim of capturing Novovasylivske, creating a new local threat axis.
• Threat to Logistics Hub: Unconfirmed but significant RF claim regarding control of Kupyansk center, requiring immediate verification.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The primary constraint is the immediate requirement to confirm and stabilize the Kupyansk and Novovasylivske sectors. The procurement of FPV drones must be rapidly fielded to units facing the highest concentrations of RF ground assault (e.g., the Novovasylivske sector). The pending timeline for Tomahawk delivery (several months, Cherniev) confirms that UAF must rely on existing deep strike capabilities for the near-to-mid term.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain) (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO Strategy: RF aggressively pushed claims of seizing Novovasylivske and Kupyansk center immediately to project overwhelming success and momentum, intended to dominate the narrative following the Feodosiia logistics disaster. State media also continues to focus on domestic stability and minor economic reports (TASS watches, metro biometrics) to normalize the internal situation.

UAF IO Strategy: UAF channels are effectively contrasting the Feodosiia success with the successful tactical clearing of Sichneve and highlighting the use of low-quality foreign mercenaries by RF (Indian EPW).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

The capture of the Indian EPW provides a significant morale boost for UAF units and confirms the poor quality and morale of some RF combat personnel (EPW desired to serve sentence in Ukraine rather than fight). Conversely, the RF claim on Kupyansk, if left unaddressed, could temporarily degrade morale in the Northern axis.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

RF continues to utilize the legal system to target Ukrainian political figures (Arestovich added to international wanted list) and foreign journalists/critics (Lazareva sentenced). This is a persistent hybrid effort to suppress opposition and limit the influence of external criticism. Delayed Tomahawk transfer (several months) indicates continued bureaucratic friction in Western military aid delivery.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations) (IPB Step 5)

RF will focus on rapid consolidation and exploitation of the Novovasylivske gain and will maintain heavy pressure on Kupyansk while attempting to neutralize UAF deep strike capability.

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1 (Exploitation and Consolidation): RF Vostok Grouping will rapidly consolidate control over Novovasylivske and attempt a limited offensive advance (T+0 to T+24 hours) toward the next major defensive line or road intersection, supported by precision artillery (e.g., Krasnopol). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

MLCOA 2 (Kupyansk Center Pressure): RF forces will increase pressure on the rumored Kupyansk center positions, likely utilizing massed artillery and FPV/loitering munitions to verify/secure the claimed control of the town center (T+0 to T+12 hours), aiming to force UAF withdrawal east of the Oskil River. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

MLCOA 3 (Counter-Drone/Retaliation): RF Black Sea Fleet and aerospace forces will attempt a high-volume drone/missile attack (T+6 to T+18 hours) targeting the ISR/C2 infrastructure used to coordinate the Feodosiia strike, potentially coupled with continued attacks on critical infrastructure in Sumy Oblast to fix AD assets. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1 (Kupyansk Breakthrough): RF successfully isolates and defeats UAF defenders west of the Oskil River, achieving a major operational breakthrough that threatens UAF logistics and command integrity in the Northern Operational Zone. This would require immediate commitment of UAF General Reserve forces. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Northern Axis - Immediate Kupyansk Verification and Reserve Readiness (OPERATIONAL - CRITICAL):

   • Recommendation: Immediately task high-speed ISR assets to verify the RF claim of controlling Kupyansk center (DP 1). Simultaneously, place two maneuver brigades of the General Reserve on 6-hour readiness status for potential counter-attack or stabilization operations in the Northern Operational Zone (MDCOA 1).
   • Action: Conduct aggressive, sustained counter-battery fire on all known RF firing positions within 15km of Kupyansk to suppress RF preparatory fires.

2. Southern Axis - Containment and Counter-Disruption (TACTICAL - URGENT):

   • Recommendation: Utilize the successful offensive momentum from the Sichneve clearance to draw RF attention and resources away from the Novovasylivske exploitation (MLCOA 1). Prioritize defense of Uspenoivka.
   • Action: Reinforce UAF strongpoints near Uspenoivka with newly acquired FPV drones and heavy anti-tank assets to break up any RF mechanized thrust from Novovasylivske.

3. Black Sea/AD Force Protection (FORCE PROTECTION - URGENT):

   • Recommendation: In anticipation of a high-volume retaliatory strike (MLCOA 3), enforce EMCON across the former OSUV "Dnipro" C2 zones. Prioritize hardening of mobile AD positions, rotating batteries frequently.
   • Action: Disperse all high-value logistics caches (fuel, large caliber ammunition) and C2 nodes near the Southern coast, relying on previously identified low-signature storage solutions.

//END REPORT//