Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - CRITICAL UPDATE

TIME: 302330Z SEP 25 AOR: Kharkiv Oblast (Primary Focus), Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, Kursk Region (RF) PERIOD: 302300Z SEP 25 – 302330Z SEP 25 ANALYST NOTE: This report focuses on the immediate escalation in the Kharkiv sector, confirming the MDCOA defined in the previous SITREP is actively underway.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) Kharkiv Under Sustained Combined Attack: Kharkiv City and its immediate surrounding areas are the focus of a coordinated RF kinetic effort involving multiple waves of Guided Aerial Bombs (KABs) and Ballistic Missile strikes. Key terrain remains urban and industrial infrastructure within Kharkiv. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) New Ballistic Launch Axis Identified: The immediate threat previously assessed from Bryansk is now supplemented by a confirmed, active threat axis originating from the Kursk region (RF), targeting Kharkiv. This expands the RF strategic launch capacity against Eastern Ukraine. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) Dnipropetrovsk UAV Threat: A new, low-speed UAV threat is confirmed heading toward Dnipropetrovsk, indicating the previously noted south-westerly vector is active and targeting Southern Central Ukraine simultaneous to the high-intensity strike on Kharkiv.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors affecting Operations

(NO CHANGE) Current weather is not assessed to be significantly impacting the effectiveness of RF kinetic strikes (Ballistic/KAB), which operate largely irrespective of local weather conditions.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) UAF AD Engaged: UAF Air Defense remains fully engaged in a high-intensity, multi-domain defensive posture. Multiple explosions confirmed in Kharkiv (Mayor Terekhov, Suspilne), indicating successful penetration of UAF AD by KABs and/or Ballistics, resulting in immediate Civilian/Structural BDA (2x casualties confirmed). (HIGH CONFIDENCE) UAF Dispersal Mandates Stressed: The need for dedicated AD coverage in Central Ukraine (Dnipropetrovsk UAV threat) versus the acute high-speed threat in Kharkiv is forcing critical resource allocation decisions under extreme pressure.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) CAPABILITY (Massed KAB/Ballistic Strike): RF has demonstrated the immediate capability to launch multiple sequential waves of KABs (at least 4 confirmed launches/impacts) alongside ballistic missiles against a single primary target (Kharkiv) within a 30-minute window. This reflects significant air and missile asset availability and high coordination. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) INTENTION (Degrade Kharkiv Defenses): The primary RF intention is to degrade UAF defensive capabilities, inflict maximal damage on critical infrastructure, and terrorize the civilian population in Kharkiv to undermine morale, potentially ahead of future ground operations on the Kupiansk/Vovchansk axes. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) Psychological Warfare Integration: RF milblogger channel НгП раZVедка posted a taunt, "Тот, кто выключает свет, уже в пути," directly referencing the ongoing strikes and suggesting power infrastructure is the target. This confirms the kinetic action is immediately integrated with psychological warfare objectives.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) Immediate Escalation via KAB/Ballistic Saturation: RF immediately escalated the threat level from the confirmed UAV vector (Ref previous SITREP) to multi-wave high-speed strikes against Kharkiv. This rapid pivot aims to exploit localized AD gaps and prevent UAF from consolidating AD coverage. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF Tactical Success (Counter-Battery Exploitation): The confirmed loss of the AN/TPQ-48 radar (Ref previous Daily Report) coupled with the current massed strike potentially degrades UAF ability to rapidly engage or suppress the launch platforms/aircraft responsible for the KAB/Ballistic attacks, confirming the validity of MDCOA 2 (Exploitation of Degraded Counter-Battery Capability).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF sustains its ability to execute complex, multi-domain kinetic strikes across large geographical areas (UAVs to Dnipro, Ballistics/KABs to Kharkiv) and multiple launch sites (Kursk, Bryansk). This suggests no immediate short-term constraint on air-delivered weapon systems.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF C2 demonstrates high effectiveness, evidenced by the synchronization of multiple weapon systems (Ballistics, KABs, UAVs) across different launch regions (Kursk, Chernihiv, Dnipro axis) aimed at distinct, simultaneous targets.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) UAF Air Force is tracking high-speed targets effectively and issuing immediate warnings. However, the confirmed BDA in Kharkiv indicates AD saturation and limited interception success against the KABs. Readiness is high, but capacity is strained.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

(CRITICAL SETBACK) The confirmed multiple impacts of KABs in Kharkiv (Kyivsky District, 2x civilian casualties confirmed) represent an immediate, confirmed tactical setback. This demonstrates RF's ability to successfully penetrate the Kharkiv AD envelope repeatedly.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

(CRITICAL) The resource constraint identified in the previous SITREP remains acute: UAF requires more integrated, high-tier AD systems (PATRIOT/NASAMS) to simultaneously cover critical infrastructure in Central Ukraine against UAV/Ballistic threats and defend Eastern cities like Kharkiv against massed KAB attacks.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) Targeted Psychological Warfare: The RF milblogger message, "Тот, кто выключает свет, уже в пути," explicitly links the kinetic strike to the goal of crippling critical infrastructure (power/utilities). This reinforces the narrative of RF dominance and aims to maximize domestic panic in Ukraine. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) Narrative Justification: RF milbloggers continue to use past alleged Ukrainian actions (e.g., the execution claims, 23:20Z) to justify current "acts of barbarism" (massed civilian strikes), aligning with the SVR "provocation" narrative (Ref previous Daily Report).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) Civilian morale in Kharkiv is under severe duress due to the confirmed combined attack (Ballistic and KAB), multiple explosions, and confirmed casualties. The repeated nature of the attacks within minutes is designed to overwhelm local authorities and induce fear (Dempster-Shafer belief: 0.113456).

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1: Sustained Kinetic Pressure on Kharkiv (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will continue to leverage its air superiority and proximity to the FLOT to launch sustained, sequential waves of KABs and Ballistic Missiles from Kursk/Belgorod/Bryansk axes against Kharkiv over the next 6-12 hours, focusing on civilian infrastructure and logistical nodes.

MLCOA 2: Multi-Vector Deep Strike Completion (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will complete its synchronized deep strike operation: UAVs currently heading toward Dnipropetrovsk will attempt to strike military or energy infrastructure there, while the main kinetic effort continues to pin AD assets in the East (Kharkiv).

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1: Successful Strike on National Grid Node (HIGH CONFIDENCE) A Ballistic Missile or a high-yield KAB successfully strikes a major energy transmission or power generation facility in the Kharkiv or Dnipropetrovsk regions, leading to large-scale, prolonged power outages (Blackout) that significantly hinder UAF mobilization and civilian operations.

MDCOA 2: Ground Offensive Post-AD Degradation (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF ground forces initiate a high-intensity localized assault (e.g., near Vovchansk or Kupiansk) following the successful saturation and degradation of UAF AD and C2 in the Kharkiv region, exploiting the operational paralysis caused by the deep strike.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Immediate Enhanced AD for Kharkiv: Immediately release and prioritize the deployment of at least one mobile high-value SHORAD battery (e.g., NASAMS, if available) to the Kharkiv sector to protect critical C2 nodes and power generation facilities from ongoing KAB saturation strikes. Risk: Drawing resources from Central Ukraine.
2. Activate Counter-IO Protocol: Immediately disseminate STRATCOM messaging exposing the coordinated, multi-domain attack on Kharkiv and Dnipro, leveraging the captured RF milblogger taunt ("Тот, кто выключает свет") to demonstrate RF intent to destroy civilian infrastructure and tie it to the SVR "provocation" pretext.
3. Optimize AD Intercept Zones: Direct UAF Air Defense Command to prioritize intercepting targets identified with the Kursk launch signature (Ballistic), as these represent the highest yield/damage potential. Accept higher risk of UAV saturation elsewhere for the next 90 minutes.
4. Harden Dnipro Assets: Immediately order all high-value military and critical energy assets in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast to increase physical and electronic hardening measures (EMCON, dispersal, local generator activation) to mitigate the confirmed UAV threat heading toward the region.