Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - OPERATIONAL UPDATE

TIME: 302300Z SEP 25 AOR: Central/Northern Ukraine (Chernihiv), Kharkiv Oblast, Bryansk Region (RF), Zaporizhzhia Front PERIOD: 302200Z SEP 25 – 302300Z SEP 25

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) Northern AD Evasion Confirmed and Intensified: UAF Air Force confirms multiple UAV groups in Northern and Central Chernihiv Oblast, moving South and South-West. This confirms the persistent RF intent to bypass dense AD coverage in the Kyiv area and target critical rear-area logistics nodes. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) Immediate Ballistic Threat Axis (Bryansk): The announcement of a ballistic missile threat from the Bryansk region (RF) targeting areas under alarm indicates RF is prepared to follow up UAV saturation efforts with high-speed kinetic strikes. This threat specifically targets the North-Central operational zone. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) Kharkiv Under Immediate Air Attack: Simultaneous reporting of a Ballistic Missile Threat (Bryansk) and an air-delivered threat ("КАБ на Харків" - Guided Aerial Bomb on Kharkiv) suggests RF is attempting to pin UAF AD and forces in the Kharkiv sector, likely using stand-off weapons.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors affecting Operations

(NO CHANGE) Severe flooding in Odesa Oblast continues to constrain UAF engineer and logistical assets, prioritizing route clearance and aid over tactical mobility.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) UAF AD Stressed: UAF Air Defense is currently engaged in a highly reactive posture across Chernihiv, Dnipropetrovsk (Ref previous SITREP), and now Kharkiv, responding to coordinated multi-domain (UAV, Ballistic, Guided Bomb) attacks. The need for mobile SHORAD/EW reallocation is acute. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) Zaporizhzhia Alert: Zaporizhzhia Oblast Military Administration issued an alert (2256Z), correlating with the general rise in kinetic activity. While specific details are absent, this indicates perceived immediate threat in the Southern Operational Zone, likely related to the high-level air threat.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) CAPABILITY (Coordinated Deep Strike): RF possesses the confirmed capability to synchronize UAV saturation (Chernihiv) with Ballistic Missile launch preparation (Bryansk) and Guided Aerial Bomb deployment (Kharkiv). This represents a highly coordinated, multi-layered deep strike attempt designed to overwhelm UAF AD systems simultaneously across multiple axis points. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) INTENTION (Kinetic Escalation): RF intends to escalate the kinetic conflict by immediately following up on the previously noted UAV vector adaptations with high-value, high-speed ballistic and guided bomb strikes. The primary intent is to degrade UAF defensive capabilities and inflict maximal damage on industrial/military targets in Central and Eastern Ukraine.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) Ballistic Threat Integration: The integration of the Ballistic Missile threat from Bryansk with the established UAV south-west vector (Chernihiv) is an immediate tactical escalation. This forces UAF AD to cover both low-speed/low-altitude threats (UAVs) and high-speed/high-altitude threats (Ballistic), significantly reducing engagement opportunities.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

(LOW CONFIDENCE) RF milblogger traffic continues to demonstrate minor internal strain: The recorded roadside conflict involving a civilian driver challenging GIBDD authority (2229Z) and the general complaint about "drones and parasites" (2248Z) point to low-level societal friction and internal discipline issues, though this does not impact immediate military sustainment. TASS reporting of high bankruptcy figures (2231Z) indicates economic stress.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) The rapid, synchronized deployment of UAVs, Ballistic, and Guided Bomb threats confirms that RF C2 remains effective in coordinating complex, multi-layered deep strike operations across theater boundaries (Chernihiv, Bryansk, Kharkiv).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) UAF Air Force is demonstrating immediate readiness by rapidly tracking and reporting new ballistic and guided bomb threats in real-time. AD personnel are operating under conditions of high engagement intensity and fatigue due to the multi-vector attacks.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

(CRITICAL SETBACK IN PROGRESS) The simultaneous multi-domain threat (UAVs, Ballistic, KAB) poses an immediate critical setback risk by severely straining AD resources. Failure to effectively counter the combined threat will lead to confirmed BDA on high-value targets.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

(CRITICAL) The immediate constraint is the lack of dedicated, integrated theater AD assets (PATRIOT/NASAMS) that can simultaneously cover the broad geographic area now under attack by high-speed threats (Ballistic, KAB) and the low-speed saturation threats (UAVs).

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) Domestic Russian Nationalism Amplification: RF channels (Operation Z) are heavily promoting nationalist narratives, exemplified by a figure skater performing to the Imperial Russian Anthem ("God Save the Tsar!") (2251Z). This aims to reinforce domestic support for an imperialist war goal and provide a powerful, emotional counter-narrative to internal strain indicators (bankruptcy, GIBDD conflict). (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) Deep State Narratives: RF milbloggers continue to promote niche anti-establishment theories (Durov poisoning claims, 2251Z) which, while not directly related to the SVO, feed into a broader narrative of external enemies and internal purity required for the war effort.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) While official RF morale messaging is high (nationalist figure skating), the candid internal milblogger conversations (GIBDD conflict, 'parasite' comments) suggest a growing undercurrent of frustration and status anxiety within the RF domestic security and pro-war groups.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1: Integrated Deep Strike Execution (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will execute the currently threatened coordinated strike: UAVs targeting logistics/AD decoys in Chernihiv/Central Ukraine, while Ballistic Missiles (from Bryansk) and Guided Bombs (Kharkiv axis) target high-value C2, industrial, or military concentration points in the East and Central regions.

MLCOA 2: Sustained Pressure on Kharkiv and Northern Front (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will leverage the confirmed KAB and Ballistic threats to maintain severe pressure on the Kharkiv sector, seeking to degrade UAF defensive positions and infrastructure, preparing the ground for potential future offensive action on the ground FLOT (Vovchansk/Kupiansk).

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1: Ballistic Strike on Critical Infrastructure in Central Ukraine (HIGH CONFIDENCE) The most dangerous COA remains the successful penetration of UAF AD by one or more Ballistic Missiles from Bryansk, striking a critical energy node, C2 facility, or logistics hub in a high-density population area (e.g., Kyiv, Dnipro, Poltava) that is currently under simultaneous UAV saturation attack.

MDCOA 2: Exploitation of Degraded Counter-Battery Capability (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF will use the localized indirect fire superiority gained from the recent destruction of the AN/TPQ-48 radar to initiate a major ground assault (likely near Verbove or Huliaipole) under the cover of massed, uncontested artillery fire.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Prioritize Ballistic Defense: Immediately elevate the readiness status of all high-value SAM systems (PATRIOT/NASAMS) within range of the Bryansk launch zone. Command must prioritize the defense of critical national infrastructure (Power, C2 facilities) over dispersed force protection, accepting risk against UAVs if necessary.
2. Reinforce Kharkiv AD: Immediately allocate mobile SHORAD assets (e.g., MANPADS teams, Gepard) to key high-value areas within the Kharkiv sector to rapidly mitigate the confirmed KAB threat and increase interception odds against future air attacks.
3. Halt Planned SHORAD/EW Shift: Hold the planned redeployment of SHORAD/EW assets to Dnipropetrovsk (Ref previous SITREP) until the current multi-domain kinetic threat (Ballistic/UAVs) is resolved. Current AD assets must remain concentrated to manage the imminent Ballistic threat.
4. Counter-IO - Ballistic Threat: Prepare STRATCOM messaging to immediately attribute the Ballistic Missile threat from Bryansk to RF aggressive escalation, linking it directly to the previous SVR "provocation" narrative as a self-fulfilling prophecy or pretext.