Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - IMMEDIATE UPDATE

TIME: 302000Z SEP 25 AOR: Donbas (CRITICAL: Dobropillya), Zaporizhzhia (CRITICAL: ZNPP), Belarus Border, Strategic Rear Areas PERIOD: 301900Z SEP 25 – 302000Z SEP 25

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) DOBROPILYYA (Donetsk Oblast): RF sources (Colonelcassad) confirm heavy kinetic strikes on civilian infrastructure in Dobropillya, a city close to the LBS (301933Z). RF commentary indicates ongoing attempts to "cut off the Dobropillya salient," suggesting a concentrated RF effort to reduce a UAF tactical projection or eliminate a localized operational advantage. This confirms current high-intensity fighting in the sector.

(CRITICAL - ZNPP): The emergency situation at the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP) has worsened. President Zelenskyy confirms the emergency status has lasted seven days, and critically, one diesel generator has failed (301946Z). This increases the immediate risk of a catastrophic loss of cooling (High Confidence Fact).

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) LBS Movement: Dempster-Shafer analysis indicates a high belief (48.7%) in active RF troop movement/advance, reinforcing the tactical reports of pressure on the LBS (e.g., Dobropillya, Dnipropetrovsk front from previous report).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors affecting Operations

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) Odessa: Significant heavy rainfall and flooding reported in Odesa (301938Z), which will impede internal logistics, movement, and potentially affect port operations for the next 24 hours. This localized weather event is not currently assessed to affect front-line operations but burdens UAF civilian and logistical support infrastructure.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF forces are maintaining high-volume kinetic strikes against both frontline positions (Dobropillya) and strategic rear areas (ZNPP power lines). RF appears intent on achieving localized breakthroughs and maximizing pressure on the UAF's most vulnerable points (e.g., infrastructure and sensor network, previously confirmed AN/TPQ-48 loss). UAF leadership is publicly committing to deep strikes against RF logistics (301934Z).

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) CAPABILITY (Indirect Fire/Kinetic Strikes): RF demonstrates continued capacity for heavy kinetic strikes on population centers near the front (Dobropillya, 301933Z), necessary to support localized ground advances. RF forces maintain control over the ZNPP site and are blocking critical power line repairs. (CRITICAL INTENTION - ZNPP): RF intention remains to maintain the ZNPP in a critical, degraded state, preventing UAF/IAEA repair access, which maximizes the political and strategic leverage of the site. The failure of one diesel generator (301946Z) is a direct consequence of this policy. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) INTENTION (Sustained Ground Attack): RF forces are actively trying to eliminate the "Dobropillya salient" (301933Z), confirming that a concentrated, offensive operation is underway in this part of Donetsk Oblast, likely to gain favorable terrain before seasonal mobility issues worsen.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF forces are utilizing thermal/night vision for coordinated fire missions (301950Z), suggesting continued effective C2 and all-weather tactical capability. RF milbloggers continue to push domestic collections for tank units (301950Z), indicating continued reliance on external support networks for sustainment.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) Logistics remain a priority target for both sides. UAF President Zelenskyy’s explicit public commitment to destroy RF warehouses and fuel reserves (301934Z) indicates UAF prioritization of RF logistics interdiction, likely utilizing long-range/deep strike assets.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF C2 effectively synchronizes kinetic operations with Information Operations. The focus remains on maximizing domestic morale (via milbloggers and propaganda) while leveraging Western political uncertainty (amplifying US rhetoric, 301946Z, 301950Z).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) UAF posture is defensive-counteroffensive. Air defense remains heavily tasked in Eastern and Central Oblasts (Dnipro rescue efforts cited, 301946Z). UAF forces near Dobropillya are assessed to be holding ground under intense pressure (301933Z).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes:

• Strategic Interdiction Commitment (Judgment): UAF leadership publicly reaffirms the commitment to deep strike RF logistics (301934Z), projecting confidence and maintaining pressure on RF sustainment.
• Information Warfare (PSYOPS): New UAF PSYOPS banners deployed on the Belarusian border (301935Z) are designed to counter RF influence in Belarus and maintain a cognitive deterrent against border incursions.

Setbacks:

• ZNPP Criticality (Fact): The failure of one diesel generator at ZNPP (301946Z) constitutes a critical strategic vulnerability and setback to safety protocols.
• Kinetic Pressure: UAF forces in the Dobropillya sector are under severe pressure from high-volume kinetic strikes (301933Z).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

(CRITICAL) Immediate resources required for ZNPP intervention/repair, either diplomatic or technical. (HIGH) Increased resupply of munitions and personnel to the Dobropillya sector to prevent a potential RF breakthrough in the Donbas salient.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF Internal Focus: RF milbloggers (Rybar, Two Majors) aggregate tactical summaries and fundraising appeals (301930Z, 301950Z), maintaining a pro-war narrative and normalizing the conflict. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF External Focus (US/NATO): RF channels (Operation Z, Colonelcassad) continue to amplify external narratives focusing on US military preparation (301950Z) and statements by US political figures (301946Z), framing the conflict as a proxy war against NATO and diverting attention from RF aggression.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) Public sentiment remains resilient, supported by high-level political commitments (Zelenskyy's address, 301946Z). Morale is stressed by persistent strikes on urban centers (Dnipro, Kharkiv, and now Dobropillya) and the severe safety threat posed by ZNPP.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) The ZNPP crisis is amplified by the President's address, reinforcing the need for international pressure on RF (301946Z). The confirmed finding of an additional drone fragment in Poland (301949Z) reinforces the RF's threat to NATO territorial integrity.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1: Concentrated Attack to Reduce Dobropillya Salient (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will continue to prioritize high-intensity kinetic strikes (shelling, air support) against Dobropillya to achieve a rapid, localized operational success and eliminate the UAF salient within the next 48 hours, leveraging the confirmed high troop belief for advance (Dempster-Shafer 48.7%).

MLCOA 2: Sustained ZNPP Coercion (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will maintain denial of repair access to ZNPP, allowing the situation to further degrade. They will likely increase external information operations blaming Ukraine for the failure of the remaining diesel generators, setting conditions for the previously identified SVR "provocation" narrative.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1: Operational Breakthrough near Dobropillya (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF successfully coordinates ground maneuver and overwhelming fire support to breach UAF lines near Dobropillya, forcing a rapid, disorganized UAF withdrawal and exposing critical lines of communication further west.

MDCOA 2: Systemic Failure at ZNPP (HIGH IMPACT, MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) The remaining ZNPP diesel generators fail before external power can be restored, leading to an acute nuclear safety incident, potentially used by RF as justification for a major strategic maneuver or escalation, citing self-defense from the resulting hazard.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. ZNPP Emergency Response: Initiate immediate, high-level diplomatic communication with the IAEA and key allies to declare the ZNPP situation a Stage 4 Critical Safety Incident. Demand immediate demilitarization and technical access, citing the confirmed failure of a diesel generator (301946Z).
2. Reinforce Dobropillya Sector: Rapidly assess unit readiness and preposition a tactical reserve force to the rear of the Dobropillya salient. Utilize existing long-range artillery/rocket systems to target RF assembly areas and fire positions confirmed to be supporting the kinetic strikes (301933Z).
3. Execute Logistics Strikes: Given the public commitment (301934Z), immediately task available deep-strike assets (e.g., HIMARS/ATACMS/UAVs) against known RF fuel and ammunition depots within operational range to exploit the RF logistics weakness.
4. Counter-IO on ZNPP: Direct STRATCOM to immediately launch a comprehensive global information campaign focusing solely on the RF's active sabotage of ZNPP safety via preventing power line repair, directly linking the failed generator to RF actions.

//END REPORT//