Situation Report

SITUATION REPORT

TIME: 040024Z JUL 25

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Kyiv Oblast: RUF continues a massed, multi-domain attack on Kyiv. Multiple ballistic missile launches from Bryansk Oblast (RUF territory) towards Kyiv confirmed. "Another two rockets" and "more ballistic missiles" were reported by UAF sources. "НгП раZVедка" (RUF source) explicitly claimed "Now Iskanders!" KVMVA reports a male casualty in Holosiivskyi district. Drone debris was found at four locations in Shevchenkivskyi, Solomianskyi, and Holosiivskyi districts, near residential buildings. Medical teams are responding to calls in Shevchenkivskyi, Solomianskyi, and Darnytskyi districts. Colonelcassad (RUF source) claims an Iskander missile strike on Vasylkiv airfield south of Kyiv. This suggests continued targeting of military infrastructure in addition to urban centers. New reports indicate enemy strike UAVs continue to approach Kyiv from the north and south, currently observed in northern Chernihiv Oblast (moving south), and eastern/southern Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (moving west). Confidence: HIGH.

• Donetsk Oblast: RUF continues high-intensity offensive operations along the Pokrovsk (Krasnoarmiisk) axis. Colonelcassad (RUF source) shared drone footage purportedly showing "ornithologists of the Center grouping dealing with UAF transport in the Krasnoarmiisk direction," with video showing military vehicles, explosions, and damage to infrastructure and a civilian car. This indicates continued RUF pressure and close-range engagement capabilities, likely involving FPV drones, against UAF logistics and forward positions. Confidence: HIGH.

• Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (Dnipro): New reports indicate enemy strike UAVs are currently observed in eastern and southern Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, moving west. This suggests an ongoing or renewed threat of RUF drone activity in the region. Confidence: HIGH.

• Chernihiv Oblast: Enemy strike UAVs are currently observed in northern Chernihiv Oblast, moving south. This indicates an active RUF drone threat extending beyond the traditional eastern front. Confidence: HIGH.

• Russian Territory:

  • High-Value Target (HVT) Loss (RUF): The cancellation of the Far Eastern Sabantuy festival in Vladivostok on July 4 due to mourning for Deputy Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy Gudkov further confirms his death. This reinforces the significant impact of the UAF strike on a senior naval officer.
  • Internal Security: TASS reports that Rosfinmonitoring (Russia's financial intelligence unit) has added a minor (born 2011) to its list of extremists and terrorists. This signals continued aggressive internal security measures and potentially the lowering of the age threshold for such designations. TASS also reports Russian citizens detained in Azerbaijan and their families are still unaware of the accusations, indicating ongoing geopolitical friction with Azerbaijan. Confidence: HIGH.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• Russia: The cancellation of the Far Eastern Sabantuy festival in Vladivostok for mourning (HVT loss) highlights the psychological impact of UAF deep strikes on Russian domestic events. Confidence: HIGH.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RUF Dispositions:

  • Ballistic Missiles: Confirmed repeated ballistic missile launches from Bryansk Oblast towards Kyiv. RUF sources claim Iskander strikes on Vasylkiv airfield, indicating continued targeting of key military infrastructure near the capital.
  • UAVs: Continued widespread use of Shahed (Geranium) UAVs for deep strikes. Current reports indicate active RUF strike UAVs in northern Chernihiv, Kyiv (approaching from north and south), and eastern/southern Dnipropetrovsk Oblasts. This demonstrates RUF's ability to sustain multi-directional drone attacks. RUF sources (НгП раZVедка) are amplifying claims of successful strikes on Kyiv, stating "We said we'd f*** them today, like punks," indicating a high degree of confidence and aggressive intent.
  • Ground Forces: "Center" grouping continues offensive operations in the Krasnoarmiisk (Pokrovsk) direction, employing drones for targeting UAF transport. Confidence: HIGH.

• Control Measures: RUF continues aggressive internal security measures, as evidenced by the designation of a minor as an extremist/terrorist. Cancellation of public events due to military losses further demonstrates the impact of UAF strikes on Russian society. Confidence: HIGH.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

• Capabilities:

  • Precision Strikes: RUF maintains and actively employs its capability for long-range precision strikes using ballistic missiles (Iskander) and massed Shahed UAVs. The claimed Iskander strike on Vasylkiv airfield demonstrates the intent to degrade Ukrainian air defense and air force assets around Kyiv.
  • UAV Operations: RUF has demonstrated the capability to conduct sustained, multi-axis, massed UAV attacks across various oblasts simultaneously, putting significant pressure on UAF air defense. RUF's use of drones for close-range targeting of UAF transport in the Krasnoarmiisk direction highlights their integrated tactical UAV capabilities.
  • Information Warfare: RUF sources are actively engaged in psychological operations, amplifying claims of widespread and successful strikes on Kyiv, often with exaggerated or highly aggressive rhetoric, to demoralize the Ukrainian populace and project an image of overwhelming force. Confidence: HIGH.

• Intentions:

  • Degrade UAF Air Defense: The primary intent of the current multi-domain attack on Kyiv and surrounding oblasts is to overwhelm and deplete UAF air defense systems, thereby opening corridors for future, potentially more devastating, missile strikes.
  • Inflict Casualties and Damage: RUF seeks to inflict maximum damage on Ukrainian civilian and military infrastructure, including logistics nodes, command centers, and airfields, while also causing civilian casualties to generate panic and demoralization.
  • Sustain Offensive Pressure: RUF will continue high-intensity ground assaults, particularly in Donetsk Oblast, supported by air and drone assets, to achieve territorial gains and tie down UAF forces.
  • Internal Consolidation (RU): RUF leadership continues to prioritize internal security and control measures within Russia, reacting to perceived threats and consolidating power, while managing the domestic fallout of military losses. Confidence: HIGH.

• Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

  • Sustained Ballistic Missile Volleys: The repeated rapid launches of ballistic missiles at Kyiv indicate a shift to more sustained, high-intensity missile barrages rather than single-strike events, aiming to overcome AD saturation.
  • Multi-Directional UAV Approaches: The observed UAV approaches from multiple cardinal directions (north, south, west) simultaneously across different oblasts demonstrates an adaptation to stretch and confuse UAF air defense assets. Confidence: HIGH.

• Logistics and Sustainment Status:

  • RUF demonstrates continued capacity to produce and launch significant numbers of Shahed UAVs and ballistic missiles. The ability to launch repeated ballistic missiles from Bryansk indicates sustained missile production or a substantial existing inventory. Confidence: HIGH.

• Command and Control Effectiveness:

  • RUF's ability to coordinate simultaneous multi-domain attacks across various oblasts indicates effective command and control for strategic strike operations. Tactical C2 for ground operations in Donetsk also appears functional. Confidence: HIGH.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Air Defense: UAF Air Defense remains active and engaged in repelling massed RUF UAV and missile attacks. However, the sheer volume and multi-directional nature of the attacks are designed to stress AD capabilities. Casualties in Kyiv (1 male wounded) and confirmed impacts indicate some saturation of AD. Confidence: HIGH.

• Ground Forces: UAF forces in Donetsk Oblast continue to defend against high-intensity RUF assaults. The targeting of UAF transport in the Krasnoarmiisk direction highlights logistics and mobility under continuous threat. Confidence: HIGH.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Successes: UAF confirmed liquidation of a very senior RUF naval officer (Deputy Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy, Mikhail Gudkov) via deep strike, validated by RUF's public mourning. This indicates continued UAF capability to conduct effective deep strikes against High-Value Targets within Russian territory. Confidence: HIGH.
• Setbacks: The ongoing massed missile and drone attack on Kyiv and other central/western oblasts represents a significant challenge to UAF AD, resulting in civilian casualties and damage. Confidence: HIGH.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• Air Defense Munitions: The sustained high-volume RUF aerial attacks will continue to deplete UAF air defense missile stocks. This remains a critical constraint.
• Medical/Emergency Response: Increased requirements for emergency services and medical personnel in affected areas, particularly Kyiv, due to ongoing strikes. Confidence: HIGH.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RUF sources (e.g., НгП раZVедка, Colonelcassad) are actively engaged in aggressive psychological operations, using highly charged language and exaggerated claims (e.g., "We said we'd f*** them today," "Iskander strike on Vasylkiv airfield") to amplify perceived RUF successes and demoralize Ukrainian forces and civilians. They aim to project an image of overwhelming RUF capability and Ukrainian AD failure. Confidence: HIGH.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• The sustained, massed attacks on major population centers like Kyiv, causing casualties and damage, are intended to erode public morale and create fear. However, the cancellation of public events in Russia due to UAF deep strikes suggests internal morale impacts on the Russian side as well. Confidence: MEDIUM.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• Dempster-Shafer beliefs indicate a high degree of uncertainty regarding diplomatic initiatives or geopolitical shifts, with 20% dedicated to uncertainty. While "Diplomatic Initiative: Agreement on [Issue] between [Actors]" holds the highest belief at 56%, without specifics, this does not directly impact current operational picture. The detention of a Russian citizen in Azerbaijan signals continued geopolitical friction, potentially diverting some RUF diplomatic attention. Confidence: LOW (regarding impact on current operations).

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

• Sustain High-Intensity Strikes (Kyiv/Central Ukraine): RUF will continue to launch massed UAV and ballistic missile attacks on Kyiv and other strategic cities (e.g., Chernihiv, Dnipropetrovsk) over the next 24-48 hours, aiming to exhaust UAF air defense systems and maintain psychological pressure. This will likely include targeting military and critical infrastructure, as well as civilian areas. Confidence: HIGH.
• Continued Ground Offensives (Donetsk): RUF will maintain its high-intensity offensive operations in Donetsk Oblast, particularly along the Pokrovsk axis, attempting to exploit any perceived UAF weakness or diversion of resources due to the deep strikes. Integrated drone and air support for ground units will continue. Confidence: HIGH.
• Information Warfare Amplification: RUF will continue to heavily promote its perceived successes in deep strikes and ground operations through state media and Telegram channels, aiming to demoralize Ukraine and project strength domestically and internationally. Confidence: HIGH.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

• Follow-on Manned Aviation Strikes: After sustained AD suppression via missile/UAV attacks, RUF could attempt to launch more daring manned aviation strikes (e.g., fighter-bombers, strategic bombers) against critical infrastructure or UAF troop concentrations, potentially with stand-off missiles if AD is sufficiently degraded. Confidence: LOW, HIGH IMPACT.
• New Front Opening/Significant Reinforcement: While currently low probability, a sudden commitment of significant RUF reserves to a new axis (e.g., Sumy, as previously assessed) or a decisive reinforcement of the current main efforts (e.g., Chasiv Yar, Pokrovsk) following a period of AD degradation could lead to operational breakthroughs. Confidence: LOW, HIGH IMPACT.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

• Next 6-12 Hours: Continuation of massed aerial attacks on central and western Ukraine. UAF decision point on prioritizing AD assets across multiple oblasts.
• Next 24-48 Hours: Evaluation of sustained AD effectiveness against massed strikes. Decision point on potential resource requests from allies based on ammunition expenditure and AD system strain. RUF will assess the impact of their current strikes to determine the next phase of deep operations.
• Long-Term (72+ Hours): Potential for RUF to re-evaluate strategic strike targets based on AD response. Continued high-intensity ground engagements in Donetsk will remain a priority for RUF.

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS

• Specific RUF Strike Intent: While general intent to degrade AD is clear, the specific target sequencing and long-term objectives (e.g., pre-positioning for future large-scale air operations) of the current massed aerial attacks require further assessment.
• RUF Missile/UAV Stockpile Levels: Ongoing assessment of RUF production rates and current inventory of ballistic missiles and Shahed UAVs is critical to predict sustainability of current strike tempo.
• Impact on UAF AD System Readiness: Detailed real-time assessment of UAF AD system integrity, readiness, and ammunition levels following sustained barrages.
• Detailed Damage Assessment: Comprehensive battle damage assessment (BDA) for all targeted sites, particularly military and critical infrastructure, to understand the true operational impact.

7. RECOMMENDATIONS

1. AIR DEFENSE PRIORITY: Prioritize maximum interception of incoming ballistic missiles and strike UAVs, particularly those targeting Kyiv and other critical infrastructure. Implement dynamic AD asset reallocation based on real-time threat vectors.
2. DAMAGE ASSESSMENT (BDA): Rapidly deploy BDA teams to all impact sites, especially Vasylkiv airfield and other military facilities, to assess damage and operational impact.
3. ISR REALLOCATION (Deep Strikes): Increase ISR focus on RUF launch areas in Bryansk Oblast and other potential missile/UAV launch sites to gain early warning of future strike waves. Focus on identifying specific missile types and launch patterns.
4. RESILIENCE MEASURES: Advise local authorities to enforce strict adherence to air raid alerts and pre-position emergency response resources in likely target areas.
5. ALLIED COORDINATION: Inform allies of the increased intensity and multi-domain nature of RUF strikes, reiterating the urgent need for additional air defense systems and munitions.

---

END OF REPORT