Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR)

TIME OF REPORT: 18 JUN 25 / 03:35 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 18 JUN 25 / 03:15 ZULU - 18 JUN 25 / 03:35 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk CLASSIFICATION: TOP SECRET // ORCON // NOFORN

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• Zaporizhzhia Oblast: Multiple sources (Zaporizhzhia Oblast Military Administration, Operatyvnyi ZSU, RBC-Ukraine) confirm a drone attack on Zaporizhzhia city, resulting in widespread damage to civilian/commercial infrastructure, including multi-story residential buildings, warehouses, and numerous vehicles. At least nine UAVs were involved. This reinforces previous reporting of continued Russian long-range strike capabilities against urban centers. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). The visual evidence indicates civilian targets and commercial areas were impacted.
• Sea of Azov / Black Sea: Ukrainian Naval Forces (via RBC-Ukraine and General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine) report on current naval dispositions. As of 06:00 (local), one Russian warship is in the Sea of Azov, one in the Black Sea, and none in the Mediterranean. No Kalibr missile carriers are currently observed in the Black or Azov Seas. This indicates a low immediate naval missile threat from these fleets at this time, though the situation can change rapidly. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

1.2. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces:
  • Defense: UAF continues to defend against Russian long-range strikes. Immediate response and damage control evident in Zaporizhzhia, highlighting robust civilian emergency services.
  • Naval Presence: Ukrainian Navy actively monitoring Russian naval movements in key maritime zones, demonstrating operational awareness.
• Russian Forces:
  • Long-Range Fire: Demonstrated capability for effective UAV strikes on urban centers (Zaporizhzhia). The use of at least nine UAVs in a single attack highlights a coordinated effort.
  • Naval Presence: Maintaining minimal naval presence in Black Sea and Sea of Azov with no current Kalibr carriers observed. This does not preclude missile launches from other platforms or future redeployment.
  • Information Operations (IO): Continued focus on amplifying narratives of Russian geopolitical influence (expansion of air travel to three continents), and exploiting international conflicts (Israel-Iran).

1.3. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• No new specific weather updates. The aftermath videos and photos from Zaporizhzhia show clear conditions, facilitating emergency response. The drone attack occurred at night, indicating standard operational tempo regardless of light conditions.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (RUSSIA FOCUSED)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action (COA):

• Capabilities (Russia):
  • UAV Strike (Area): Demonstrated capability to conduct massed drone attacks (at least nine UAVs) against Ukrainian urban centers, resulting in significant civilian infrastructure damage. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Information Warfare (Global Exploitation/Economic Projection): Continues to leverage state media (TASS) and milblogger channels to promote geopolitical narratives, including economic "successes" (expanded air travel routes) and amplifying international conflicts (Israel-Iran). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Intentions (Russia):
  • Degrade Civilian Morale/Infrastructure: Intent to continue terrorizing Ukrainian population centers and damaging critical/commercial infrastructure via long-range UAV strikes. The targeting of civilian residential areas (Zaporizhzhia) explicitly supports this. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Divert Global Attention: Intent to continually amplify and sensationalize international conflicts (e.g., US-Iran war possibility, Israeli "hostile aircraft" incursions) to divert global attention and resources away from Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Project Economic Resilience: Promotion of expanded international air travel by the Transport Ministry aims to project an image of a resilient Russian economy despite sanctions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• The confirmed use of at least nine UAVs in a single attack on Zaporizhzhia indicates a consistent pattern of drone swarm tactics to overwhelm localized air defenses. No immediate tactical shifts beyond previously observed patterns.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• No new direct intelligence on logistics. The TASS report on expanding civilian air travel is not militarily relevant to sustainment, though it aims to project an image of normalcy and economic function.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Military C2: Appears capable of coordinating massed UAV strikes on urban targets. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). Naval C2 appears to maintain operational awareness of fleet dispositions.
• IO C2: Highly effective in rapidly integrating global events into their narrative and attempting to shape international perceptions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (UKRAINIAN FOCUSED)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• Defensive Posture: UAF remains in a defensive posture, responding to UAV attacks on urban centers. Naval forces maintain active monitoring.
• Emergency Response: Demonstrated rapid and effective emergency response in Zaporizhzhia following attacks, with prompt damage assessment and public reporting.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Setbacks: Confirmed significant damage to civilian infrastructure in Zaporizhzhia due to enemy drone strikes represents a localized setback in civilian protection. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Successes: Continued efforts to monitor Russian naval activity and transparently report on enemy actions and their consequences.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• Air Defense: Continued critical requirement for AD systems to protect urban centers from ongoing long-range UAV/missile strikes. The scale of the Zaporizhzhia attack (9+ UAVs) highlights the persistent threat.
• Reconstruction/Aid: Significant ongoing need for resources for humanitarian aid and reconstruction in heavily damaged urban areas.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Narratives (Geopolitical Influence, Economic Resilience, Middle East Exploitation):
  • Economic Resilience/Global Reach: TASS promoting the Russian Transport Ministry's plans for expanding aviation links to Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, China, and Vietnam aims to project an image of Russia overcoming sanctions and maintaining global economic ties. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Middle East Exploitation: TASS immediately amplifying Israeli reports of "hostile aircraft" incursions in Northern Israel aims to escalate and sustain global focus on the Middle East, diverting attention from Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). This is directly supported by the previous "Trump hints at war with Iran" narrative amplified by ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS (a Ukrainian source reporting on Russian narratives).
  • Military Efficacy (Long-Range Strikes): The confirmed drone attack on Zaporizhzhia, though not explicitly claimed by Russia in this timeframe, aligns with their broader narrative of inflicting damage on Ukrainian infrastructure and morale.
• Ukrainian Narratives (Resilience, Documenting Aggression, Situational Awareness):
  • Aftermath Documentation: Zaporizhzhia videos and photos (Operatyvnyi ZSU, Zaporizhzhia Oblast Military Administration, RBC-Ukraine) provide concrete evidence of Russian attacks and civilian suffering, supporting Ukrainian narratives of unprovoked aggression and war crimes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Transparency/Situational Awareness: Ukrainian Naval Forces and General Staff reporting on naval dispositions reflects commitment to transparency and maintaining awareness of the maritime threat. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Ukrainian Morale: Sustained drone attacks on urban centers (Zaporizhzhia) will negatively impact civilian morale, particularly given the targeting of residential areas. However, the continuous documentation of damage and emergency response efforts may foster resilience and a sense of collective purpose.
• Russian Morale: Narratives of economic resilience (expanded air travel) are aimed at maintaining domestic support. The amplification of external conflicts like the Israel-Iran situation is a deliberate attempt to redirect public anxiety and rally support against a perceived common enemy (the West).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• Middle East Diversion (CRITICAL THREAT): Russia's immediate amplification of new tensions in the Middle East (Israeli "hostile aircraft" incursions) is a clear and present threat to international focus on Ukraine. This continues a pattern of exploiting regional instability to its advantage. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Armenia/Internal Russian Issues: The TASS report on the arrest of a Russian company president in Armenia is a minor, non-Ukraine-related internal Russian/regional issue, likely aimed at demonstrating rule of law or addressing internal power dynamics. Its impact on Ukraine is negligible.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• Sustained Long-Range UAV/Missile Strikes on Urban Centers: Russia will continue to launch drone and missile attacks on Ukrainian cities, including Zaporizhzhia, targeting civilian and commercial infrastructure to terrorize populations and degrade the economy. The pattern of multi-UAV attacks will persist. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Intensified Global Information Operations (Middle East Focus): Russia will continue to aggressively exploit and amplify international conflicts, particularly the Middle East situation, to divert global attention and diplomatic resources away from Ukraine. They will seek to frame the US/West as destabilizing forces in other regions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Continued Projection of Economic Resilience: Russian state media will continue to promote narratives of economic stability and growth (e.g., expanded international trade and transport links) to counter the effects of sanctions and maintain domestic support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• Combined-Arms Long-Range Strikes: Russia could escalate long-range attacks by combining sustained UAV swarms with high-precision cruise or ballistic missiles (e.g., Kalibr, Kinzhal, Kh-101 with cluster munitions, as seen in previous reporting) to maximize damage and overwhelm AD systems, particularly if naval assets with Kalibr capabilities re-enter the Black Sea. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Hybrid Operation Leveraging Middle East Crisis: Russia might attempt to directly link Ukrainian forces or support to fabricated incidents in the Middle East, using sophisticated hybrid operations to further fracture international support and create direct diplomatic crises for Kyiv. This could involve false flag operations or leveraging proxies. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Immediate (Next 1-6 hours):
  • IO: Monitor for further Russian amplification of Middle East tensions and any new narratives attempting to link Ukraine to these events.
  • Air Threat: Maintain vigilance for follow-on UAV or missile attacks, especially given the confirmed damage in Zaporizhzhia.
• Short-term (Next 6-24 hours):
  • Strategic/Diplomatic: Observe international reactions to the heightened Middle East narrative pushed by Russia.
  • Naval: Monitor for any redeployment of Russian Kalibr-capable naval assets into the Black or Azov Seas.
• Medium-term (Next 24-72 hours):
  • IO: Evaluate the overall effectiveness of Russia's strategy to divert global attention from Ukraine.
  • Air Defense: Assess the impact of sustained drone attacks on UAF AD resources and civilian morale.

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS & COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

• GAP 88 (UPDATED): RUSSIAN ADVANCES IN NOVYI MYR, KHARKIV OBLAST (CRITICAL, IMMEDIATE): Previous intelligence noted unverified Russian claims of combat for Novyi Myr. No new information has emerged to verify or refute this. This remains a critical gap.
  • URGENTLY VERIFY Russian claims of initiating combat for Novyi Myr.
  • Determine the scale of Russian forces involved, their specific objectives, and UAF defensive posture/response.
  • Assess if this is a tactical probing action or the start of a sustained offensive. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
• NEW GAP 90: UAV STRIKE BDA IN ZAPORIZHZHIA (CRITICAL, IMMEDIATE):
  • Conduct comprehensive Battle Damage Assessment (BDA) of the Zaporizhzhia drone attack.
  • Determine target selection patterns (e.g., specific infrastructure types, residential areas, military targets).
  • Identify the types of UAVs used and their flight paths to refine air defense strategies. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
• NEW GAP 91: RUSSIAN NAVAL MISSILE CARRIER DEPLOYMENT (CRITICAL, IMMEDIATE):
  • Continuously monitor for the presence and movement of Russian Kalibr-capable naval assets in the Black Sea and Sea of Azov.
  • Assess readiness levels and potential for immediate missile launches. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
• GAP 89 (UPDATED): KELLOGG-LUKASHENKO MEETING DETAILS AND OBJECTIVES (CRITICAL, IMMEDIATE): No new information from this update, remains critical.
• GAP 67 (UPDATED): RUSSIAN INTERNAL PROPAGANDA / DISINFORMATION (HIGH, UPDATED FOCUS):
  • Continue to monitor Russian state media (TASS) and milblogger channels for narratives related to Middle East tensions, and any further attempts to link Ukraine to global crises.
  • Monitor the effectiveness of Russian narratives promoting economic resilience. (PRIORITY: HIGH).

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

• Intelligence & Special Operations (ISR, HUMINT, OSINT critical):

  1. CRITICAL PRIORITY: VERIFY NOVYI MYR OPERATIONS. Task all-source ISR to immediately verify the Russian claim of combat for Novyi Myr, Kharkiv Oblast. Determine the tactical situation, enemy disposition, and UAF response. (Supports CR 88).
  2. CRITICAL PRIORITY: ZAPORIZHZHIA BDA. Task immediate and thorough BDA of the Zaporizhzhia drone attack. This includes drone type identification, impact analysis, and confirmation of civilian targeting to support war crimes documentation. (Supports CR 90).
  3. CRITICAL PRIORITY: NAVAL MISSILE THREAT MONITORING. Maintain 24/7 ISR coverage of Russian naval assets in the Black and Azov Seas, specifically looking for the deployment or redeployment of Kalibr-capable vessels. (Supports CR 91).
  4. ONGOING: Continue rapid analysis and monitoring of Russian information operations, specifically their exploitation of the Middle East situation and any attempts to undermine Western unity.

• Air Defense & Force Protection:

  1. IMMEDIATE: Reinforce AD coverage in and around Zaporizhzhia and other vulnerable urban centers. Analyze the BDA from the latest attack to identify strike patterns and adapt AD deployment accordingly, potentially emphasizing low-altitude drone defense.
  2. ONGOING: Maintain high AD alert posture. Emphasize dispersal and concealment of AD assets to minimize vulnerability to follow-on strikes. Prepare for multi-vector attacks combining UAVs and missiles.

• Ground Forces:

  1. URGENT: Commander of forces in Kharkiv Oblast to provide immediate, ground-level assessment of the situation in Novyi Myr to confirm or deny Russian claims and assess the threat. Reinforce or adjust defensive lines as required.
  2. ONGOING: Maintain readiness for localized ground assaults across all axes. Emphasize intelligence sharing between units regarding observed Russian tactics and adaptations.

• Information Operations & Diplomatic:

  1. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: COUNTER MIDDLE EAST DIVERSION. Proactively release clear and consistent messaging that highlights Russia's deliberate attempt to divert global attention from its aggression in Ukraine by hyping other conflicts. Emphasize that Russia's actions in Ukraine remain the primary threat to European and global security.
  2. IMMEDIATE: DOCUMENT WAR CRIMES. Continue to document and disseminate evidence of Russian attacks on civilian infrastructure and residential areas (e.g., Zaporizhzhia video/photos) to international partners and media, emphasizing war crimes and violations of international law.
  3. ONGOING: Leverage verified naval intelligence to provide transparent updates on Russian naval posture, countering any potential Russian narratives about their maritime control or threat projection.

---