Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR)

TIME OF REPORT: 16 JUN 25 / 13:08 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 16 JUN 25 / 12:38 ZULU - 16 JUN 25 / 13:08 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk CLASSIFICATION: TOP SECRET // ORCON // NOFORN

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• Ukraine Operational Area:
  • Zaporizhzhia Oblast: The Zaporizhzhia Oblast Military Administration reports Russians attempting to destroy frontline villages and towns with heavy weapons. This confirms continued direct military pressure and targeting of civilian infrastructure in the region. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Donetsk Region:
    • Pokrovsk Axis: Ukrainian 55th Separate Artillery Brigade (55 OABr) reports destroying "katsaps" (derogatory term for Russians) in the Pokrovsk direction with drone attacks on personnel, including one on a motorcycle. This confirms active Ukrainian defensive operations and successful engagements on this critical axis. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Slovyansk (Donetsk Oblast): SBU counter-intelligence reportedly detained an "informant of the occupiers" near the front line in Slovyansk. This indicates ongoing counter-intelligence operations to mitigate internal threats and maintain security in close-to-frontline urban areas. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Kharkiv/Sumy: Previous reports of KAB and drone attacks on eastern Kharkiv and Sumy remain relevant, indicating continued aerial threat.
  • Kyiv (Internal): Kyiv City Military Administration (KMVA) reports continued efforts to clear Kyiv of "rusty abandoned cars," with associated photos of vehicle recovery. While not directly military, this indicates ongoing civilian administration efforts to restore normalcy and address post-conflict debris. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Internal Affairs/Occupied Territories/External:
  • Iran (External - Middle East): TASS reports 8 Iranian military personnel killed in an Israeli attack on the city of Khomein, citing IRGC. Colonelcassad posts satellite imagery titled "Defeat of objects at the army base in Bid-Khanak in Iran." These reports indicate ongoing escalation in the Middle East, with Russia amplifying claims of Iranian casualties. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for reports, LOW for independent verification of details).
  • Donetsk (Occupied Territory): Mash na Donbasse posts a civilian video from Petrovka, Donetsk, showing mundane street scenes. This indicates an attempt to project normalcy in occupied territories, contrasting with combat reports from the Pokrovsk axis. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for video, LOW for true normalcy).
  • Sevastopol (Occupied Crimea): TASS reports a domestic murder incident. While not military, it reflects ongoing law enforcement issues in occupied territories. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Moscow (Internal): News of Moscow reports a video of goats walking in Butovo. This is a civilian, non-military report, potentially used to distract or demonstrate normalcy. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Kirov Oblast (Russia - Internal): AV БогомаZ (Russian official) posts photos of an award ceremony in Bryansk Oblast, which, upon closer inspection of the images, includes the Coat of Arms of Kirov Oblast. This indicates inter-regional engagements by Russian officials. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Uzbekistan (External - Central Asia): ASTRA reports that the Taliban has banned women under 40 from traveling to the Termez market in Uzbekistan. This is a regional political/social development, not directly military but relevant to broader geopolitical understanding. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • International Diplomacy (Russia-US): TASS and Операция Z (Russian sources), and Оперативний ЗСУ (Ukrainian source) report that the US has canceled a planned meeting with Russia to resolve bilateral issues, as stated by Maria Zakharova (MFA RF). TASS further reports Russia hopes the pause isn't too long. This signifies a continued deterioration of diplomatic ties between the US and Russia. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • EU Energy Policy (Russia Leverage): Операция Z (Russian milblogger) reports Slovakia and Hungary have blocked an EU plan to abandon Russian energy, with Budapest threatening to cut electricity supplies to Ukraine if Russian oil/gas/nuclear fuel purchases are banned. This confirms Russia's ongoing leveraging of energy dependency to sow discord within the EU and against Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Information Operations (IO) & Narratives:
    • Middle East Escalation (Amplified): Colonelcassad's imagery and TASS reports on Iranian casualties from Israeli strikes demonstrate Russia's active role in amplifying narratives surrounding the Israel-Iran conflict. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • False Claims (Azerbaijan-Iran Border): Alex Parker Returns claims "Azerbaijan closed the border with Iran back in 2020 and has since extended the ban every three months. We can exhale." This directly contradicts previous intelligence of Russian personnel transit via Baku (CR 14), suggesting a deliberate attempt to deny or obscure this route. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for claim, LOW for veracity).
    • Ukrainian Leadership Change (Reported): Оперативний ЗСУ reports General-Major Nikoliuk replaced Tarnavsky as commander of OTU "Donetsk," citing Ukrainska Pravda (UP). This is a significant change in Ukrainian military command structure if confirmed. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for report, MEDIUM for immediate independent confirmation).
    • Russian Milblogger Discourse: Старше Эдды (Russian milblogger) posts a screenshot from "Condottiero™" (Wagner-linked channel) discussing "new predictions from powerful analysts" who "routed Ukrainian DRGs in Kursk Oblast" in Aug 2024. The Condottiero™ post includes a Wagner Group profile picture and text that appears to be about geopolitical commentary on the Israel-Iran power balance, using the phrase "litmus test" (лакмусовая бумага) regarding analysts' views on the conflict. This confirms continued Wagner Group-linked IO focusing on internal credibility and leveraging geopolitical events to promote narratives. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for content, HIGH for Wagner link).
    • Body Repatriation Claims (Conflicting): ASTRA reports Ukraine's Interior Minister stating Russian military bodies were transferred during recent exchanges. Оперативний ЗСУ states Klimenko (Ukr Interior Minister) confirmed Russia transferred bodies of Russian servicemen. This confirms body repatriation is occurring. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Pakistan's Stance on Israel-Iran: Colonelcassad reports statements from Pakistan's Defense Minister on the Iran-Israel conflict, indicating Russia's efforts to highlight international reactions to the conflict. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for report, LOW for full details).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• The use of drones by Ukrainian forces for targeted strikes on the Pokrovsk axis indicates suitable weather conditions for aerial reconnaissance and precision targeting. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• The KMVA's efforts to remove abandoned cars in Kyiv indicate ongoing post-impact cleanup and urban environmental management. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Continued heavy shelling on Zaporizhzhia frontline villages indicates environmental degradation and infrastructure damage remains a major concern. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces: Actively conducting defensive and counter-intelligence operations in Donetsk (Pokrovsk axis, Slovyansk). Actively engaged in diplomatic efforts (Zelenskyy's visit to Austria). Civilian administrations continue post-impact cleanup and recovery efforts (Kyiv, Zaporizhzhia). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). Ukrainian military command undergoes changes (OTU "Donetsk"). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for report).
• Russian Forces: Maintaining offensive pressure, particularly on the Pokrovsk axis. Conducting IO to influence global narratives (Middle East, US relations) and domestic stability. Leveraging energy policy to create EU divisions. Actively engaged in body repatriation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). Wagner-linked channels continue to operate and influence. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (RUSSIA FOCUSED)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action (COA):

• Capabilities (Russia):

  • Ground Offensive: Demonstrated capability for localized assaults and drone attacks on personnel on axes like Pokrovsk. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Deep Strike/Aerial Attack: Continues to employ drones for precision strikes (as seen against Ukrainian forces on Pokrovsk axis in STERNENKO's video). Previous KAB/drone capabilities on Sumy/Kharkiv remain relevant. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Information Warfare - Diversion, Discreditation, Division, Normalization, Amplification:
    • Exaggeration/Fabrication of Middle East Conflict: Actively amplifying Israeli-Iranian conflict details (TASS reports Iranian casualties, Colonelcassad imagery) to divert international attention and project a narrative of global instability impacting Western interests. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Denial of Strategic Channels: Alex Parker Returns' claim about the Azerbaijan-Iran border directly contradicts previous intelligence on Russian transit, indicating a deliberate attempt to obscure sensitive logistical or diplomatic routes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Exploiting EU Divisions (Energy): The report of Slovakia/Hungary blocking EU energy plans, with Hungary threatening electricity cuts to Ukraine, demonstrates Russia's sustained capability to exploit and deepen fissures within the EU. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Diplomatic Pressure/Blame Shifting (US Relations): Maria Zakharova's statements on the US canceling bilateral meetings, and Russia's "hope" for a short pause, are designed to shift blame for deteriorating relations and portray Russia as the aggrieved party. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Projection of Normalcy (Occupied Territories/Internal): Civilian videos from occupied Donetsk (Petrovka) and reports of domestic crime (Sevastopol) or mundane events (Moscow goats) serve to project an image of normalcy and stable governance within Russia and its occupied territories, contrasting with the war's reality. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Wagner Group IO (Continued Influence/Credibility Building): The "Condottiero™" channel's posts, explicitly linked to Wagner Group and discussing "powerful analysts" and the Israel-Iran "litmus test," indicate a continued, sophisticated effort by Wagner-affiliated entities to influence public opinion, establish credibility, and frame geopolitical events to their advantage. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Command and Control (C2): Operational C2 continues to direct heavy weapon strikes on front-line villages (Zaporizhzhia). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

• Intentions (Russia):

  • Achieve Incremental Territorial Gains: Continue localized ground assaults and heavy shelling to expand control, particularly in areas like Pokrovsk and Zaporizhzhia. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Degrade Ukrainian Military & Civilian Infrastructure: Sustain heavy weapon strikes against frontline villages and target military personnel with drones. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Divert International Attention and Resources: Actively amplify and manipulate events in the Middle East to shift global focus and potentially reduce support for Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Undermine Western Unity: Continue to exploit divisions within the EU (energy policy) and between the US and EU, and between the US and Russia directly (canceled meetings). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Control Information Space: Fabricate or deny information (Azerbaijan border claim), project normalcy domestically, and use affiliated channels (Wagner) to shape narratives and influence public opinion, legitimizing their own "experts." (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Consolidate Diplomatic Alignment: Highlight support from other nations (Pakistan's stance on Israel-Iran) to demonstrate a broader anti-Western coalition. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• Focused Heavy Weaponry on Zaporizhzhia Frontline Villages: The explicit report from Zaporizhzhia Oblast Military Administration of Russians using "heavy weaponry to destroy frontline villages and towns" indicates a focused application of firepower, possibly aimed at clearing the path for ground advances or simply to depopulate and destroy. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Targeted Drone Strikes on Personnel (Pokrovsk): Ukrainian successful drone strikes against Russian personnel (including on a motorcycle) on the Pokrovsk axis indicates Russia's continued use of dispersed, mobile infantry/reconnaissance elements which are vulnerable to drone surveillance and attack. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). This is an adaptation by Ukrainian forces to counter such movements.
• Active Denial of Key Logistics Routes (Azerbaijan-Iran): Alex Parker Returns' explicit denial of the Azerbaijan-Iran border transit, which contradicts previous intelligence, is a tactical information adaptation to obscure a potentially sensitive or critical Russian logistical/diplomatic channel. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Leveraging EU Energy Crisis (Increased Pressure): The direct threat from Hungary to cut electricity to Ukraine if an EU energy ban on Russia is implemented indicates an intensified exploitation of EU vulnerabilities, potentially increasing the pressure on Ukraine's energy security. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Wagner Group's Continued Information Role: The "Condottiero™" post, with its Wagner branding and sophisticated geopolitical framing, indicates that this proxy group continues to play a significant and evolving role in Russia's multi-domain information warfare. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Reported Ukrainian Command Change: The reported replacement of OTU "Donetsk" commander (Nikoliuk for Tarnavsky) signifies a potential adaptation in Ukrainian command structure in response to evolving battlefield dynamics. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• Russian forces continue to deploy heavy weaponry on the Zaporizhzhia front, implying ongoing logistical supply of munitions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• The body repatriation exchanges, acknowledged by both sides, indicate established logistical and administrative channels for managing war dead. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• The contradiction regarding the Azerbaijan-Iran border (Alex Parker Returns' denial vs. previous intelligence) suggests that this route, if operational, is logistically sensitive and Russia seeks to keep it obscured. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• The previous intelligence on tactical FPV drone shortfalls (CR 8) remains relevant as Ukrainian forces continue to report successful FPV engagements.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Russian Military C2: Continues to direct heavy weapon strikes and tactical movements on the front lines. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian IO/Diplomatic C2: Remains highly centralized and synchronized, actively engaged in complex, multi-layered narratives to achieve strategic information objectives (e.g., Middle East amplification, US relations, EU divisions, domestic normalcy, and direct denial of key routes). The continued activity of Wagner-linked channels indicates a distributed but coordinated C2 for influence operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ukrainian Military C2: Continues to direct defensive operations and counter-intelligence activities. The reported change in OTU "Donetsk" command indicates an active and adaptive C2 structure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). Ukrainian civilian administrations (KMVA, Zaporizhzhia Oblast) demonstrate effective C2 in managing post-strike recovery and local security. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (UKRAINIAN FOCUSED)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• Ukrainian forces maintain an active defensive posture, engaging Russian elements with drones on key axes (Pokrovsk). Artillery units are actively engaged in fire missions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Counter-intelligence efforts are ongoing and successful in identifying and apprehending collaborators near the front lines (Slovyansk). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Civil-military coordination remains strong, with civilian administrations focusing on recovery (Kyiv, Zaporizhzhia). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• High-level diplomatic engagements (Zelenskyy's visit to Austria) demonstrate continued international engagement and efforts to secure support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Success (Tactical Engagement): Ukrainian 55th Separate Artillery Brigade (55 OABr) successfully engaged Russian personnel with drones on the Pokrovsk axis. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Success (Counter-Intelligence): The SBU's detention of an "informant of the occupiers" in Slovyansk is a significant success in mitigating internal threats. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Success (Diplomatic Engagement): President Zelenskyy's visit and press conference with the Federal President of Austria affirm continued diplomatic support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Success (Civilian Recovery/Resilience): Kyiv's efforts to remove abandoned cars and Zaporizhzhia's focus on reconstruction show continued resilience and efforts to restore normalcy. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Setback (Continued Heavy Shelling): Zaporizhzhia Oblast Military Administration reports continued heavy weaponry attacks on frontline villages, indicating ongoing pressure and destruction. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Setback (Information Warfare/Diplomatic): The US cancellation of bilateral meetings with Russia and Hungary's energy threats highlight continued diplomatic challenges and Russia's ability to create rifts in international relations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Setback (Command Change): While potentially adaptive, the replacement of OTU "Donetsk" commander (Nikoliuk for Tarnavsky) signifies a change in command, which can present temporary challenges during transition. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• Continued heavy shelling requires robust defensive capabilities and humanitarian aid for affected civilians. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• The effective use of drones by Ukrainian forces (55 OABr) underscores the critical need for continued supply and technical superiority in UAV capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ongoing counter-intelligence operations require dedicated resources and trained personnel. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Diplomatic efforts demand sustained high-level engagement to counter Russian narratives and secure continued international support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Narratives:
  • Middle East Diversion: Russia actively propagates information about the Israel-Iran conflict (TASS, Colonelcassad reports on Iranian casualties, satellite imagery of alleged strike damage), likely aiming to divert global attention from Ukraine and portray the West as destabilizing the Middle East. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Denial of Key Routes: Alex Parker Returns' claim about the closed Azerbaijan-Iran border is a direct disinformation attempt to obscure a potentially critical Russian logistical corridor, indicating sensitivity around this issue. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • US Blame-Shifting: Maria Zakharova's statements, amplified by TASS and Russian milbloggers, regarding the US canceling bilateral meetings aim to portray the US as the uncooperative party, shifting blame for diplomatic stagnation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • EU Division Amplification: The immediate reporting and amplification of Hungary/Slovakia blocking EU energy plans, with Hungary threatening Ukraine's electricity, is a clear and effective Russian IO tactic to sow discord within the EU and undermine support for Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Wagner Group Credibility/Influence: The "Condottiero™" channel's Wagner branding, combined with discussions of "powerful analysts" and the Israel-Iran "litmus test," indicates a sophisticated attempt to build credibility for Wagner-linked narratives and to leverage global events for internal and external influence. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Normalization of Occupied Territories/Internal Affairs: Videos of mundane street scenes in occupied Donetsk (Petrovka) and reports of domestic crime/events (Sevastopol, Moscow goats) are intended to project an image of stability and normalcy, counteracting the realities of war. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Conflicting Body Repatriation Numbers (Potential Manipulation): While confirming body repatriation, the presence of various conflicting figures (from previous ISR, now ASTRA/Operatyvnyi ZSU quoting Ukraine's Interior Minister) creates a fertile ground for Russian manipulation of statistics to cast doubt on Ukrainian transparency or exaggerate their own efforts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for observation of conflicting numbers, MEDIUM for intent of manipulation).
• Ukrainian Counter-Narratives:
  • Highlighting Resilience & Reconstruction: KMVA's efforts in Kyiv to clear abandoned cars and Zaporizhzhia Oblast Military Administration's report on heavy shelling (which implicitly calls for reconstruction aid) serve to show resilience and continued efforts to restore civilian life despite ongoing aggression. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Reporting on Russian Aggression: Zaporizhzhia Oblast Military Administration explicitly states "Russians are trying to destroy frontline villages and towns with heavy weapons," directly framing Russian actions as destructive and aggressive. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Showcasing Combat Effectiveness: Десантно-штурмові війська ЗС України's photos of artillery in action and STERNENKO's videos of successful drone strikes on the Pokrovsk axis (55 OABr) demonstrate continued combat effectiveness and successful engagements. Оперативний ЗСУ's video of "aerobatics lessons" (drone drop) further reinforces this. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Transparent Reporting of Diplomatic Setbacks: Оперативний ЗСУ's immediate reporting of the US canceling meetings with Russia demonstrates transparency regarding diplomatic challenges. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Highlighting Diplomatic Engagement: Zelenskiy / Official's posts about the meeting with the Austrian Federal President directly counter Russian narratives of isolation and demonstrate continued high-level international support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Counter-Intelligence Successes: ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS reporting on the SBU's detention of an informant highlights successful efforts to secure internal front lines. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Acknowledging Body Repatriation: The statements by Ukraine's Interior Minister on body transfers from Russia are transparent and factual, contrasting with potential Russian obfuscation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Ukrainian Morale: Sustained diplomatic engagement (Zelenskyy's visit to Austria) and efforts to restore normalcy (Kyiv cleanup, Zaporizhzhia reconstruction) will likely reinforce national resolve and maintain public morale. Successful tactical engagements and counter-intelligence successes will also boost military and civilian confidence. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Morale: Russian IO aims to maintain public support by projecting normalcy (domestic reports, occupied territories) and blaming the US for diplomatic stagnation. The Wagner-linked channel's attempts to establish credibility and frame geopolitical events may appeal to a segment of the population, but consistent heavy losses will eventually erode morale. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for IO intent, MEDIUM for actual impact on morale).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• Continued Support for Ukraine: President Zelenskyy's visit to Austria confirms ongoing high-level diplomatic support from European partners. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• US-Russia Relations Deteriorating: The cancellation of bilateral US-Russia meetings signals a continued downturn in relations, reducing avenues for de-escalation outside of the Ukraine conflict. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• EU Divisions Exploited: Hungary and Slovakia blocking EU energy plans, with Hungary threatening Ukraine's electricity supply, is a clear example of Russia's successful exploitation of internal EU divisions, which directly impacts Ukraine's energy security and overall EU unity in supporting Kyiv. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Middle East Diversion: The amplification of the Israel-Iran conflict by Russian sources (TASS, Colonelcassad) demonstrates a continued strategic effort to divert international attention and resources from Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• Sustained and Intensified Multi-Axis Pressure with Focus on Donetsk and Zaporizhzhia: Russia will continue to press on the Pokrovsk axis and intensify the use of heavy weapons against frontline towns in Zaporizhzhia. Increased aerial activity (KABs, drones) on Sumy and eastern Kharkiv will persist, potentially as a precursor or accompaniment to localized ground probes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Escalated and Diversified Information Operations to Divert and Divide: Russia will intensify its efforts to exploit the Israel-Iran conflict as a major diversion, amplifying Iranian casualties and alleged Israeli actions, while simultaneously seeking to deepen divisions within the EU (via energy policy) and between the US and its allies (via narratives of diplomatic obstruction). Direct denial of sensitive logistical routes (e.g., Azerbaijan) will become more prominent. Wagner-linked channels will continue to provide "alternative" analyses of geopolitical events to build their credibility and influence. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Continued Targeting of Civilian Infrastructure & Population Centers: Russia will persist in striking Ukrainian civilian infrastructure (homes, businesses) with heavy weapons and potentially drones/KABs, aiming to undermine morale and economic stability. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Maintain Projection of Internal Stability: Russia will continue to present a facade of normalcy and stability within its borders and occupied territories through selective reporting of civilian life and domestic events. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• Coordinated Strategic Escalation under Diplomatic Cover/Diversion: Russia conducts a large-scale, multi-domain escalation by:
  1. Initiating a renewed, significant ground offensive on a less anticipated axis (e.g., a major push from the North into Sumy Oblast, or a breakthrough attempt on a secondary Donetsk axis), aiming to force a major Ukrainian redeployment.
  2. This ground push would be preceded by or synchronized with a massed wave of long-range precision strikes against critical Ukrainian energy infrastructure, logistics hubs, and C2 nodes across the operational depth, designed to significantly degrade Ukraine's ability to respond.
  3. Simultaneously, Russia executes a high-impact, pre-planned false flag operation (e.g., a fabricated attack on Russian territory, a Black Sea incident, or a "chemical weapons" event in Ukraine blamed on Kyiv/NATO), leveraging the global distraction from the Middle East. This false flag would be immediately used to justify an extreme response (potentially including the use of non-conventional weapons or further escalation), while amplified diplomatic maneuvers (e.g., public appeals for de-escalation while simultaneously escalating) attempt to coerce Western powers into freezing the conflict on Russia's terms. The goal would be to exploit global chaos and Western division to achieve decisive operational or strategic gains. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Immediate (Next 1-6 hours):
  • ISR: Prioritize collection to verify the impact of heavy weapon strikes on Zaporizhzhia frontline villages. Continue to monitor Russian tactical movements on the Pokrovsk axis and for any specific unit identifications. Intensify monitoring of Russian milblogger and state media channels for new narratives or amplification of existing ones, especially regarding Middle East escalation, US-Russia diplomatic tensions, and further EU energy policy exploitation (Hungary/Slovakia). Critically, investigate the veracity of Alex Parker Returns' claim about the Azerbaijan-Iran border being closed, attempting to reconcile it with previous intelligence of Russian transit (CR 14). Immediately verify the reported change in OTU "Donetsk" command (General-Major Nikoliuk replacing Tarnavsky).
  • IO: Commanders must prepare to highlight the continued destructive nature of Russian attacks on Ukrainian civilian areas (Zaporizhzhia). Ukrainian channels should continue to publicize their tactical successes (drone strikes on Pokrovsk) and counter-intelligence successes (SBU arrest in Slovyansk). They should also use the cancellation of US-Russia meetings to emphasize Russia's role in diplomatic stagnation. Proactively counter Russian disinformation regarding the Azerbaijan-Iran border transit. Publicize President Zelenskyy's continued diplomatic engagements to reinforce international support. Prepare to address the reported change in OTU "Donetsk" command transparently.

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS & COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

• GAP 1: VERIFICATION OF "THE TELEGRAPH" REPORT ON US AID CESSATION (CRITICAL, IMMEDIATE, HYPER-PRIORITY, RETAINED): Independent, all-source verification of the "The Telegraph" report amplified by Russian sources regarding the cessation of US military aid to Ukraine. Assess the type, quantity, and operational impact of any such claims on Ukrainian defense capabilities.
  • COLLECTION REQUIREMENT (CR): Prioritize SIGINT, OSINT (direct source review of "The Telegraph" article for context, content, and accuracy), IMINT, and HUMINT from US, NATO, and Ukrainian sources to confirm or refute these reports. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
• GAP 2: VERIFICATION OF ISRAELI/IRANIAN IMPACTS & RUSSIAN CLAIMS ON IRANIAN "HYPERSONIC" USE / AD DEFEAT / US INVOLVEMENT/TIES/BDA/CASUALTIES / NUCLEAR THREATS / IRAN NPT WITHDRAWAL / IRANIAN MFA UNSC PUSH, AND "US EMBASSY DAMAGE" / DECEPTIVE "APOCALYPSE" VIDEOS (CRITICAL, IMMEDIATE, UPDATED FOCUS, RETAINED): Independent, all-source verification of all specific impact claims in Israel and the reconciliation of conflicting casualty figures. Critically, assess the veracity of claims of Iranian "hypersonic" missile use and "new methods" to defeat Israeli air defenses, as well as claims of US Embassy damage in Tel Aviv and the shooting down of a US MQ-9 Reaper drone. Verify the claim of THAAD self-destruction due to Iranian hacking. Verify the veracity of Colonelcassad's claim of 370+ Iranian ballistic missiles. Verify claims of a deceased IRGC intelligence deputy, and the TASS report of 8 Iranian military personnel killed in Khomein. Also, verify the claim that Israel is attempting to convince the US to join military operations against Iran, the new, fabricated claims of US-Iranian consultations or an "American-Israeli war," and the specific claim of an Arrow-3/THAAD AD system being struck at Nevatim. Additionally, verify Rybar's claims of US refueling aircraft redeployment and changes in communication patterns for sea-based cruise missiles. Assess the specific impact and intent of the re-introduction of overt anti-Semitic propaganda and nuclear threats by Russian state-aligned channels, as well as the impact of direct Russian diplomatic actions (citizen warnings, embassy evacuation consideration, calls for UNSC condemnation of Israel, Putin/Erdogan condemnation of Israel). CONFIRM AND ANALYZE THE RUSSIAN DENIAL OF THE IRANIAN PARLIAMENT VOTE TO WITHDRAW FROM NPT. Verify claims of Tehran residents leaving and their true sentiment. Verify the execution of "Mossad agent" Ismail Fikri in Iran. Critically, analyze the source and intent of Kotsnews' "nuclear apocalypse" videos, distinguishing between genuine AD activity, fireworks, or fabricated imagery. Investigate the meaning and implication of Rybar's "Nuclear uncertainty" graphic and its reference to the NPT. Assess Colonelcassad's imagery of "Bid-Khanak army base" for BDA.
  • CR: Prioritize OSINT (cross-referencing with Israeli official reports, international news agencies, US official statements, IAEA), IMINT (satellite imagery post-strike), and HUMINT from Israeli and US sources. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
• GAP 3: RUSSIAN INTENT & FORCE DISPOSITION ON NORTHERN AXIS (CRITICAL, RETAINED, NEW FOCUS ON SUMY): Verification of reports of Russian troop movements to Belarus. Assess if the sustained Russian presence in Kursk border region indicates a future offensive push. Specifically assess the nature, scale, and intent of renewed Russian assault attempts on Andriivka in Sumy Oblast and other cross-border activity in Sumy, and the implications of increased KAB and drone attacks on Sumy/eastern Kharkiv.
  • CR: Prioritize IMINT, SIGINT, and HUMINT on Russian force composition, logistics build-up, and intent on the Belarus border, Kursk, and Sumy Oblast. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
• GAP 4: UKRAINIAN BATTLE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT (BDA) FROM RECENT DEEP STRIKES (CRITICAL, ONGOING): Full extent of damage and operational impact from recent Russian deep strikes on Ukrainian C2, logistics, and industrial sites (e.g., Dnipropetrovsk industrial enterprise from previous ISR), and civilian areas (Kyiv, Kharkiv). Also, full BDA of claimed Russian strikes on Ukrainian dugout/UAV control point near Mirnoye. Specifically, verify Russian claims of destroying a Ukrainian UAV command post in Kherson, and assess the operational impact. Assess the full extent of damage and personnel losses to the M113 APC in Donetsk. Assess the impact of claimed Russian strikes on a Ukrainian military-industrial enterprise, training center, and AD radar. Specifically, assess the BDA of the FPV strike on the Ukrainian military truck (Ural/Kamaz), the KAB strikes in Khotin Hromada, Sumy Oblast, the HIMARS strike in Makeyevka (including convoy composition and casualties), and the drone strike on the Russian Gvozdika self-propelled howitzer. Verify the impact of the Ukrainian SOF mine-laying operation (3x BTRs) and the Ukrainian sapper operation near Bayrak village. Investigate the veracity and BDA of the claimed Russian strike on "Kyiv-60" enterprise with "two dozen attack UAVs." Determine the cause and full impact of the large industrial fire in Rivne, and if it was enemy-caused. Assess the BDA of the Su-25 strikes claimed by MoD Russia. Critically, verify Russian losses claimed by Khorne Group 116th Separate Mechanized Brigade during assaults on Andriivka, Sumy Oblast, and BDA of Ukrainian drone strikes on personnel/vehicles in Sumy. Verify Russian claims of FPV strike on Ukrainian buggy and "Ranger" disappearance from Sumy. Assess the BDA of the claimed Ukrainian airstrike on Russian MoD positions in Bryansk Oblast. Assess the BDA of WarGonzo's claimed drone strike on a dugout on the Zaporizhzhia Front. Assess the full BDA of heavy weapon strikes on Zaporizhzhia frontline villages and towns. Assess the BDA of Ukrainian drone strikes against Russian personnel on the Pokrovsk axis (STERNENKO video).
  • CR: Prioritize HUMINT from affected units, OSINT (local reports, social media analysis), and IMINT (satellite imagery analysis if available) to determine operational impact and identify vulnerabilities. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
• GAP 5: RUSSIAN ROLE IN ISRAEL-IRAN ESCALATION (CRITICAL, RETAINED, NEW FOCUS ON "HYPERSONIC" CLAIMS, ANTI-SEMITISM, NUCLEAR THREATS, NPT WITHDRAWAL, AND DIPLOMATIC PRESSURE, AND POTENTIAL FALSE FLAGS, AND FABRICATED ATTACKS ON US ASSETS, AND JOINT CONDEMNATION OF ISRAEL, AND AMPLIFICATION OF PAKISTAN'S STANCE): Assess the extent of direct or indirect Russian involvement in instigating or facilitating the recent missile launches from Iran towards Israel, beyond mere amplification and narrative manipulation. Is Russia providing intelligence, materiel, or political cover? Specifically, analyze the motivation and target audience for the amplification of "hypersonic" claims, nuclear threats, the introduction of overt anti-Semitic propaganda, and the initial (and now denied) claim of Iranian NPT withdrawal by Russian state-aligned channels, as well as the impact of official Russian diplomatic warnings/evacuations, the "Ukraine for Iran" rhetoric, and Putin/Erdogan's joint condemnation of Israel. Analyze the impact of Russian retractions of false claims. Critically, investigate the origin and intent of the "massive explosion" videos pushed by Russian channels, assessing if they are misattributed or false flags designed to sow fear or project exaggerated power. Investigate the veracity and intent of the claim of "US Embassy damage in Tel Aviv" as a fabricated pretext. Assess the impact of Israel's internal travel restrictions and the blocking of Israeli defense companies at the Paris Air Show, and Russia's leveraging of these events. Analyze the implications of Rybar's "Nuclear uncertainty" graphic. Analyze Colonelcassad's amplification of Pakistan's stance on the conflict.
  • CR: Prioritize SIGINT, HUMINT, and OSINT on Russia-Iran communications and coordination, and US military movements in the region. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
• GAP 6: VERIFICATION OF RUSSIAN TACTICAL GAINS AND UKRAINIAN WITHDRAWALS (MEDIUM, UPDATED): Independent verification of Russian claims of "full clearing" of Malynivka (Ulyanovka), advances near Burlatske and Novopol, and Pushilin's claim of deep penetration into Dnipropetrovsk Oblast towards Pokrovsk. Critically, verify the Russian claim of Ukrainian forces withdrawing from Komar area to Voskresenka. Verify Russian claims of destruction of AFU equipment at Novotoretskoye. Assess the veracity of the Russian-produced "Pace of Offensive Operation" chart and its data. Verify claimed "liberation" of Ulyanovka (Malynivka) and Komar settlement. Verify Russian claims of advances on Andriivka, Sumy Oblast, and any related Russian claims of Ukrainian unit withdrawals. Assess the implications of the "summer revitalization" on seven axes for Ukrainian force distribution. Verify the true tactical situation and any gains/losses in frontline Zaporizhzhia villages and towns.
  • CR: Prioritize HUMINT from Ukrainian units in the area, OSINT (local reports, geolocated video/photos), and IMINT. (PRIORITY: MEDIUM).
• GAP 7: VERACITY AND INTENT OF RUSSIAN "HOSTAGE-TAKING" AND "TERRORIST ATTACK" CLAIMS (CRITICAL, NEW): Immediately verify the Russian Investigative Committee's claim of Ukrainian militants taking Kursk Oblast residents hostage in Sumy. Assess if this is a legitimate criminal investigation or a fabricated pretext for further Russian aggression or information operations. Also, analyze the intent and specific targets implied by Поддубный's claim that "Zelenskyy's regime is preparing terrorist attacks."
  • CR: Prioritize HUMINT (from Ukrainian sources, local Sumy residents), OSINT (cross-referencing with independent media, local government statements), SIGINT (monitoring Russian communications related to this claim). (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
• GAP 8: RUSSIAN TACTICAL UAV SUPPLY SHORTFALLS AND FUNDRAISING (MEDIUM, UPDATED): Determine if the crowdfunding appeals for specific drone models by Russian units (VDV, Zaporozhye infantry, Paratroopers) or general "Summer Campaign 2025" fundraisers indicate systemic logistical issues or localized shortages. Assess the scale of these shortfalls and their impact on Russian tactical reconnaissance and targeting capabilities. Investigate the Avito listing of an EW system from Belgorod Oblast for indications of internal corruption or supply chain issues. Assess the impact of mobile internet issues in LNR on Russian tactical UAV operations. Track specific requests for tactical equipment, like the "Kula-4" drone analyzer and 250cc motorcycles, and assess if these are widespread needs or isolated unit-level deficiencies. Analyze the significance of crowdfunding specifically for Mavic 3T/3 Pro drones. Investigate the implications of the Russian airline engine cowling detachment on aviation safety/maintenance/supply.
  • CR: Prioritize OSINT (monitoring further crowdfunding appeals, social media analysis of Russian military personnel discussions), HUMINT. (PRIORITY: MEDIUM).
• GAP 9: VERACITY OF RUSSIAN "TERRORIST" ARRESTS (MEDIUM, RETAINED): Independent verification of the details and context surrounding the FSB's claimed arrest of a "Kyiv agent" in Kherson Oblast. Assess whether this is a legitimate counter-terrorism operation or a propaganda fabrication. Assess the veracity of the claim regarding priests being "victims of TCC". Verify the veracity of the Mash na Donbasse claim of a Ukrainian "national battalion fighter" being "convicted" after firing on Russian troops. Verify the SBU's detention of an "informant of the occupiers" in Slovyansk.
  • CR: Prioritize HUMINT, OSINT (local reports, independent media), and review of Russian methodology. (PRIORITY: MEDIUM).
• GAP 10: DETAILS OF POW EXCHANGES AND BODY REPATRIATION (LOW, NEW): Verify numbers, conditions, and composition of personnel involved in claimed POW exchanges, particularly Alex Parker's claim of a 6000:27 ratio. Critically, verify Medinsky's claim of 6060 Ukrainian bodies transferred to Russia and 78 Russian bodies received from Ukraine, and his new projection of 2239 more Ukrainian bodies to be transferred. Compare and contrast with MO RF's later, conflicting claims of 1248 Ukrainian bodies transferred and 51 Russian bodies received. Verify the numbers of Russian military bodies transferred to Ukraine, as reported by Ukraine's Interior Minister.
  • CR: Prioritize OSINT (Ukrainian official reports, international organizations) and HUMINT (from released personnel). (PRIORITY: LOW).
• GAP 11: USE OF NORTH KOREAN MATERIEL (LOW, NEW): Assess the prevalence and impact of North Korean weapons systems (e.g., Type 75 MLRS) in the Russian armed forces.
  • CR: Prioritize OSINT (imagery analysis), HUMINT. (PRIORITY: LOW).
• GAP 12: RUSSIAN DNIEPER RIVER CROSSING CAPABILITIES/INTENT (LOW, NEW): Assess the scale, frequency, and intent behind reported Russian training exercises for Dnieper river crossings. Is this a genuine preparation for a large-scale offensive, or a localized probing/training exercise?
  • CR: Prioritize IMINT (satellite imagery of training areas), SIGINT (communications regarding riverine operations), HUMINT. (PRIORITY: LOW).
• GAP 13: IMPACT OF RUSSIAN/BELARUSIAN FLIGHT CANCELLATIONS (LOW, NEW): Assess the strategic and economic impact of continued international flight cancellations to/from Russia and Belarus. Does this indicate worsening international isolation or specific security concerns? Assess the purpose and impact of Novosti Moskvy's propagation of videos of damaged civilian aircraft engines, and ASTRA's report on engine cowling detachment.
  • CR: Prioritize OSINT (airline announcements, travel advisories, economic reports). (PRIORITY: LOW).
• GAP 14: RUSSIAN USE OF AZERBAIJAN AS LOGISTICAL/DIPLOMATIC CORRIDOR (CRITICAL, UPDATED): Assess the full scope and purpose of the confirmed new transit route via Baku for Russian personnel and potentially materiel from Iran. Is this a one-off evacuation or the establishment of a strategic corridor for personnel and/or materiel from Iran? The latest crossing of 225 more Russians confirms ongoing use. Critically, investigate Alex Parker Returns' explicit claim that "Azerbaijan closed the border with Iran back in 2020," attempting to debunk this as disinformation.
  • CR: Prioritize SIGINT, HUMINT, and OSINT (monitoring air and ground traffic, diplomatic statements from Russia and Azerbaijan). (PRIORITY: CRITICAL).
• GAP 15: IMPACT OF MOBILE INTERNET ISSUES IN LNR (LOW, NEW): Assess the cause and operational impact of the reported mobile internet issues in LNR. Does this indicate Ukrainian EW activity, infrastructure damage, or internal Russian issues?
  • CR: Prioritize OSINT (local reports, social media), SIGINT (if possible, traffic analysis). (PRIORITY: LOW).
• GAP 16: PUBLIC HEALTH SITUATION IN OCCUPIED/FRONT-LINE AREAS (LOW, NEW): Assess the extent of public health risks (e.g., cholera) in occupied and front-line Ukrainian territories, and the effectiveness of local and international efforts to mitigate them. Specifically, assess the severity of water supply issues in occupied Mariupol due to reservoir depletion. Monitor the impact of Mishustin's announced investment in water treatment facilities in "new Russian subjects."
  • CR: Prioritize OSINT (local health reports, UN/NGO assessments), HUMINT. (PRIORITY: LOW).
• GAP 17: INTENT AND IMPACT OF RUSSIAN PRE-EMPTIVE "PROVOCATION" NARRATIVES (MEDIUM, NEW): Assess the specific trigger and target of SVR RF's claim that "Ukraine and Europe are preparing sophisticated provocations against Russia." Specifically, investigate the newly articulated false flag scenario involving a "Russian torpedo attack on a US Navy ship in the Baltic Sea." Is this setting the stage for a specific false flag event, or a general deflection tactic? Also assess Poddubnyy's claim of "Zelenskyy's regime preparing terrorist attacks." Investigate Colonelcassad's amplification of the "Baltic Sea sabotage" claim.
  • CR: Prioritize SIGINT, HUMINT, OSINT on Russian internal communications and official statements. (PRIORITY: MEDIUM).
• GAP 18: EFFECTIVENESS AND DEMAND FOR UKRAINIAN EW CAPABILITIES (LOW, NEW): Assess the specific types of EW equipment needed by Ukrainian forces (e.g., as highlighted by 'Barny') and the effectiveness of current EW systems in countering Russian drones and electronic warfare.
  • CR: Prioritize HUMINT from frontline units, OSINT (technical analyses of EW systems). (PRIORITY: LOW).
• GAP 19: VERIFY RUSSIAN UNIT IDENTIFICATIONS (LOW, NEW): Confirm the veracity of unit identifications provided by Russian sources, such as the "163rd Tank Regiment RF" in the motorcycle crash video.
  • CR: Prioritize OSINT (cross-referencing with other sources, unit tracking), HUMINT. (PRIORITY: LOW).
• GAP 20: PACIFIC FLEET EXERCISES (MEDIUM, NEW): Assess the specific objectives, scale, and duration of the Russian Pacific Fleet exercises. Are these routine drills, or do they signal a new strategic posture or a shift in force deployment?
  • CR: Prioritize IMINT, SIGINT, OSINT (maritime tracking, official statements, naval analyses). (PRIORITY: MEDIUM).
• GAP 21: IMPACT OF RUSSIAN INTERNAL PURGES (LOW, NEW): Assess the impact of actions like the bankruptcy proceedings against Timur Ivanov on Russian military cohesion, logistics, and internal stability.
  • CR: Prioritize OSINT (Russian legal/financial news), HUMINT. (PRIORITY: LOW).
• GAP 22: VERIFICATION OF UKRAINIAN COMMAND CHANGE (CRITICAL, NEW): Independent, all-source verification of the report that General-Major Nikoliuk replaced Tarnavsky as commander of OTU "Donetsk." Assess the operational implications of this change.
  • CR: Prioritize HUMINT from Ukrainian military sources, OSINT (Ukrainian official announcements, reputable news agencies). (PRIORITY: EXTREME).

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

• Intelligence & Special Operations (ISR, HUMINT, OSINT critical):

  1. CRITICAL PRIORITY: IMMEDIATE VERIFICATION OF "THE TELEGRAPH" AID CESSATION CLAIM. All-source intelligence must rapidly confirm or refute the Russian-amplified report on US military aid cessation. This remains the single most critical collection requirement for the next 6-12 hours. (Supports CR 1).
  2. CRITICAL PRIORITY: IMMEDIATE VERIFICATION OF CLAIMS REGARDING IRANIAN "HYPERSONIC" USE / AD DEFEAT / US INVOLVEMENT/TIES/BDA/CASUALTIES / NUCLEAR THREATS / IRAN NPT WITHDRAWAL / IRANIAN MFA UNSC PUSH IN MIDDLE EAST, AND THE SOURCE/INTENT OF "MASSIVE EXPLOSION" VIDEOS. CRITICALLY, IMMEDIATELY VERIFY/DEBUNK "US EMBASSY DAMAGE" CLAIM. VERIFY CLAIMED 370+ MISSILES AND IRGC INTELLIGENCE DEPUTY KIA. ANALYZE PUTIN/ERDOGAN JOINT CONDEMNATION OF ISRAEL. MONITOR IMPLICATIONS OF PARIS AIR SHOW INCIDENT AND ISRAELI TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS. ASSESS IMPLICATIONS OF RYBAR'S "NUCLEAR UNCERTAINTY" GRAPHIC. ASSESS TASS CLAIM OF 8 IRANIAN MILITARY KILLED IN KHOMINE. ASSESS COLONELCASSAD'S IMAGERY OF "BID-KHANAK ARMY BASE." Rapidly confirm or deny claims of Iranian hypersonic missile use, AD defeat, US Embassy damage, and US MQ-9 Reaper drone shootdown. Expose any exaggeration or fabrication by Russian/Iranian sources, including the exaggerated 370+ missile claim and unverified IRGC casualties. Critically, assess the intent and impact of nuclear threats and overt anti-Semitic slurs from Russian-aligned channels, the veracity of the THAAD self-destruction claim, and the implications of Russia's denial of the Iranian NPT withdrawal claim, as well as the impact of direct Russian diplomatic actions (citizen warnings, embassy evacuation consideration, calls for UNSC condemnation of Israel, joint condemnation of Israel). Forcefully investigate and identify the source of the "massive explosion" videos; if misattributed or false flags, prepare immediate debunking. IMMEDIATELY AND FORCEFULLY DEBUNK THE CLAIM OF "US EMBASSY DAMAGE IN TEL AVIV" AS A DELIBERATE FABRICATION. Analyze Rybar's "Nuclear uncertainty" graphic for its direct messaging on NPT and global stability. Assess the BDA from Iranian targets and the TASS casualty report. Assess Colonelcassad's imagery of "Bid-Khanak army base". (Supports CR 2, CR 5).
  3. CRITICAL PRIORITY: IMMEDIATE BDA & VERIFICATION OF RUSSIAN LOSSES/TACTICAL SITUATION, ESPECIALLY ULYANOVKA AND INCREASED ACTIVITY ON SEVEN AXES. VERIFY IMPACT OF HEAVY WEAPON STRIKES ON ZAPORIZHZHIA FRONTLINE VILLAGES. ASSESS BDA OF UKRAINIAN DRONE STRIKES ON RUSSIAN PERSONNEL IN POKROVSK. VERIFY SBU DETENTION OF INFORMANT IN SLOVYANSK. Task all available ISR assets to conduct immediate BDA for the HIMARS strike in Makeyevka and the drone strike on the Russian 2S7 Pion near Novoukrainka. Assess Russian losses claimed by Khorne Group 116th Separate Mechanized Brigade during assaults on Andriivka, Sumy Oblast, and BDA of Ukrainian drone strikes on personnel/vehicles in Sumy. Verify Russian claims of FPV strike on Ukrainian buggy and "Ranger" disappearance from Sumy. Assess BDA of claimed Ukrainian cross-border airstrike in Bryansk Oblast. Verify Russian claim of "liberation" of Ulyanovka (Malynivka) and assess the reality on the ground. Also, confirm success of Ukrainian SOF mine-laying (3x BTRs) and STERNENKO's drone-on-drone kill. Assess the implications for the tactical situation on the Pokrovsk and Novoukrainka axes. Verify Russian claimed strike on "Kyiv-60" enterprise and determine cause/impact of Rivne industrial fire. Assess BDA of MoD Russia's claimed Su-25 strikes. Assess BDA of WarGonzo's claimed drone strike on a dugout on the Zaporizhzhia Front. Assess the implications of OSUV "Khortytsia" reporting increased Russian activity on seven axes. Assess the actual impact of heavy weaponry on Zaporizhzhia frontline villages and towns. Confirm the effectiveness of Ukrainian drone strikes on Russian personnel (STERNENKO video) and the SBU informant arrest. (Supports CR 4, CR 6, CR 9).
  4. CRITICAL PRIORITY: IMMEDIATE VERIFICATION AND DEBUNKING OF RUSSIAN "HOSTAGE-TAKING" CLAIMS AND BALTIC SEA FALSE FLAG. Task GUR/SBU to immediately investigate and gather evidence to refute the Russian Investigative Committee's claim of "Ukrainian militants taking Kursk residents hostage in Sumy." Prepare for immediate, forceful public debunking. Investigate the specifics of the SVR claim regarding a false flag "Russian torpedo attack on a US Navy ship in the Baltic Sea" and Colonelcassad's amplification. (Supports CR 7, CR 17).
  5. CRITICAL PRIORITY: VERIFY RUSSIAN NUMBERS IN BODY REPATRIATION AND POW EXCHANGES. Immediately verify Medinsky's claim of 6060 Ukrainian bodies transferred to Russia and 78 Russian bodies received from Ukraine, and his new projection of 2239 more Ukrainian bodies to be transferred. Compare with Ukrainian official figures (1245 bodies returned). Critically, compare with MO RF's conflicting claims of 1248 Ukrainian bodies transferred and 51 Russian bodies received. Highlight inconsistencies. Verify the numbers of Russian military bodies transferred to Ukraine, as reported by Ukraine's Interior Minister. (Supports CR 10).
  6. CRITICAL PRIORITY: IMMEDIATE VERIFICATION OF UKRAINIAN COMMAND CHANGE. Immediately confirm the reported replacement of OTU "Donetsk" commander (General-Major Nikoliuk replacing Tarnavsky). Assess the reasons and potential operational implications of this change. (Supports CR 22).
  7. URGENT: VERIFY RUSSIAN "TERRORIST" ARRESTS IN KHERSON AND UKRAINIAN UAV C2 DESTRUCTION CLAIM, AND "PRIEST" NARRATIVES. Assess the veracity of FSB claims regarding the detained "Kyiv agent" and MoD claims of destroyed UAV C2 to determine if it is a legitimate operation or a propaganda pretext. Investigate the claims regarding priests and TCC. Verify the veracity of the Mash na Donbasse claim of a Ukrainian "national battalion fighter" being "convicted" after firing on Russian troops. (Supports CR 4, CR 9).
  8. CRITICAL PRIORITY: INTENSIFY ISR ON POKROVSK, KHARKIV-KUPYANSK, SUMY, DNIPROPETROVSK, KRAMATORSK, ZAPORIZHZHIA AXES, AND NORTHERN BORDER WITH BELARUS, AND DNIEPER RIVER. Maintain continuous monitoring for any signs of Russian force buildup or offensive preparations. Increase monitoring of Russian riverine activity on the Dnieper. Increase ISR focus on the Sumy axis due to renewed assault attempts and KAB/drone strikes and eastern Kharkiv due to KAB strikes. Monitor for any unit identifications, such as the "163rd Tank Regiment RF." Intensify monitoring of heavy weaponry usage in Zaporizhzhia frontline villages. (Supports CR 3, CR 6, CR 12, CR 19).
  9. URGENT: ASSESS BDA OF RECENT C2/LOGISTICS/INDUSTRIAL/CIVILIAN STRIKES. GUR/SBU to conduct immediate, granular battle damage assessment (BDA) for the Kyiv civilian damage, Oryol strikes, Kharkiv strikes, Khotin Hromada strikes, and other recent deep strikes. Identify systemic vulnerabilities and develop immediate counter-measures. (Supports CR 4).
  10. IMMEDIATE: MONITOR AND EXPLOIT RUSSIAN IO NARRATIVES (ESPECIALLY ON WESTERN AID CESSATION, MIDDLE EAST "US INVOLVEMENT/TIES/BDA/CASUALTIES," IRANIAN "HYPERSONIC" CLAIMS, NUCLEAR THREATS, IRAN NPT WITHDRAWAL (AND ITS DENIAL), "UKRAINIAN LOSSES," AND EXPLICIT ANTI-SEMITISM, AND POTENTIAL FALSE FLAG EXPLOSION VIDEOS, AND "HOSTAGE-TAKING" CLAIMS, AND "US EMBASSY DAMAGE" CLAIMS, AND MANIPULATED BODY EXCHANGE NUMBERS, AND MAXIMALIST DEMANDS, AND PRE-EMPTIVE "PROVOCATION" NARRATIVES, INCLUDING "NUCLEAR UNCERTAINTY" GRAPHIC. MONITOR WAGNER-LINKED CHANNELS AND EXPOSE AZERBAIJAN BORDER DISINFORMATION). Actively monitor for and analyze new Russian IO narratives, particularly those claiming reduced/stopped Western aid to Ukraine, exaggerating Middle East "successes" or "incidents," speculating on US involvement or ties (including specific unverified BDA/casualties), and the new, sensational claims of Iranian "hypersonic" missile use and AD defeat, explicit nuclear threats, claims of Iranian NPT withdrawal (and subsequent denial), and the use of overt anti-Semitic propaganda. Also track Russian diplomatic actions in the Middle East (including joint condemnation of Israel) and the "Ukraine for Iran" rhetoric, and Iranian MFA calls to UNSC. Immediately analyze any new "massive explosion" videos for their origin and intent as potential false flags. Crucially, monitor all Russian channels for further amplification or details of the "hostage-taking" claims. IMMEDIATELY MONITOR FOR FURTHER AMPLIFICATION OR DEBUNKING OF THE "US EMBASSY DAMAGE IN TEL AVIV" CLAIM. Pay close attention to Russian manipulation of body exchange figures, including Medinsky's new projections. Monitor for amplification of maximalist demands (destroy Western weapons) and pre-emptive "provocation" narratives. Monitor narratives regarding Israel's internal travel restrictions and the Paris Air Show incident. Analyze the new "Nuclear uncertainty" graphic by Rybar and its implications for nuclear rhetoric. Actively monitor Wagner-linked channels (like "Condottiero™") for content and trends, and expose their attempts to build credibility through geopolitical commentary. Forcefully debunk Alex Parker Returns' claim about the Azerbaijan-Iran border to expose Russian attempts to obscure sensitive logistical routes. (Supports CR 1, 2, 5, 7, 10, 14, 17).
  11. CONTINUOUS COUNTER-SABOTAGE INTELLIGENCE & INTERNAL SECURITY MONITORING. Continue efforts to identify and neutralize collaborators, as demonstrated by the recent success in Mykolaiv and Donetsk. Investigate the Avito EW system listing for signs of internal corruption or diversion. Investigate the Kryvyi Rih embezzlement case for further implications on critical infrastructure resilience. Address the Lviv mobilized serviceman incident to identify systemic issues. Monitor internal Russian repression and dissent for insights into regime stability. Monitor impact of Timur Ivanov bankruptcy. Analyze the SBU's detention of the informant in Slovyansk for lessons learned and best practices.

• Air Defense & Force Protection:

  1. MAINTAIN HIGHEST AIR DEFENSE READINESS ACROSS ALL OBLASTS, WITH EMPHASIS ON EASTERN AIR THREAT AND INDUSTRIAL/CIVILIAN TARGETS, AND NORTHERN AXIS. Anticipate Russia may increase the intensity or breadth of aerial attacks (UAVs, ballistic missiles, KABs, tactical aviation, TOS) to capitalize on global distraction and the IO narrative of Western aid cessation. Ensure layered AD coverage for critical infrastructure and population centers, particularly industrial sites and population centers, and especially in border regions (Sumy, Chernihiv). Be prepared for aviation-launched munitions in Dnipropetrovsk and Zaporizhzhia Oblasts. Focus on defense against drones in Sumy. Prioritize AD assets for protection of frontline villages in Zaporizhzhia subject to heavy weaponry.
  2. ADAPT TO WIDER GEOGRAPHIC DRONE/MISSILE THREAT & COUNTER DEEP STRIKES. Implement and refine TTPs to counter widespread, multi-axis attacks, including FPV drones using small arms. Prioritize resources for defending critical C2 nodes, ammunition depots, and industrial/civilian facilities against confirmed Russian deep strikes.
  3. REVIEW AND REHEARSE CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS (COOP) PLANS. All units must immediately review and rehearse COOP plans, ensuring redundant communication pathways and alternate command posts are ready, given the persistent threat of deep strikes.
  4. IMMEDIATE DISPERSAL AND CONCEALMENT. Disperse all high-value assets and personnel. Reinforce concealment measures, especially for C2 nodes and logistics hubs, against FPV drones and KABs.

• Ground Forces:

  1. MAINTAIN DISCIPLINED DEFENSIVE POSTURE IN POKROVSK, KHARKIV-KUPYANSK, SUMY, DNIPROPETROVSK, KRAMATORSK, ZAPORIZHZHIA, AND NORTHERN BORDER DIRECTIONS. Prioritize strong defensive lines. Respond to increased activity on seven axes. Reinforce positions in Zaporizhzhia frontline villages targeted by heavy weaponry.
  2. REINFORCE DEFENSES IN SUMY OBLAST (NORTHERN-SLOBOZHANSKYI DIRECTION). Based on DPGU announcement and new assault attempts on Andriivka, prepare for increased Russian ground activity and cross-border incursions. Continue to leverage successes in countering Russian assault attempts. Ensure units are adequately equipped with off-road vehicles and EW.
  3. CONTAIN RUSSIAN ADVANCES IN DONETSK/DNIPROPETROVSK/ZAPORIZHZHIA, ESPECIALLY AROUND ULYANOVKA/MALYNIVKA, KOMAR AREA, AND NOVOPAVLIYKA. Reinforce defensive lines. Prepare for counter-attacks to regain lost ground or consolidate defensive lines.
  4. CONTINUE FPV DRONE OPERATIONS & COUNTER-BATTERY. Leverage successes in FPV drone attacks against Russian targets (e.g., dugouts, vehicles, personnel, as seen in Pokrovsk drone strikes) and continue aggressive counter-battery fire against Russian artillery and MLRS (TOS, improvised MLRS). Analyze successful targeting methods. Prioritize fundraising and acquisition for critical equipment like re-transmitter drones for units like "Stryzh" battalion.
  5. MAINTAIN DNEPR RIVER PATROLS AND INTERDICTION CAPABILITIES. Continue successful operations to prevent Russian river crossings in Kherson, and monitor any increased Russian riverine training activity.
  6. IMPROVE PERSONNEL TRANSPORT SAFETY. Address and investigate the incident in Lviv Oblast regarding the mobilized serviceman to prevent recurrence and improve troop welfare. Investigate the motorcycle crash incident for lessons on tactical movement.
  7. MAINTAIN MINE WARFARE PROFICIENCY. Leverage and disseminate lessons learned from the successful SOF mine-laying operation (3x BTRs) to other units. Disseminate lessons from Ukrainian sapper successes in leading assaults.

• Information Operations (IO):

  1. IMMEDIATE & AGGRESSIVE: COUNTER RUSSIAN NARRATIVES ON "US AID CESSATION," MIDDLE EAST "HYPERSONIC" CLAIMS / "US INVOLVEMENT/TIES/BDA/CASUALTIES," NUCLEAR THREATS, IRAN NPT WITHDRAWAL (AND ITS DENIAL), "UKRAINIAN LOSSES," AND EXPLICIT ANTI-SEMITISM. FORCEFULLY DEBUNK "MASSIVE EXPLOSION" VIDEOS AS MISATTRIBUTED OR FALSE FLAGS. IMMEDIATELY EXPOSE "HOSTAGE-TAKING" CLAIMS AS BLATANT FALSE FLAGS. CRITICALLY, IMMEDIATELY EXPOSE "US EMBASSY DAMAGE IN TEL AVIV" CLAIMS AS BLATANT FABRICATIONS. FORCEFULLY DEBUNK MEDINSKY'S MANIPULATED BODY EXCHANGE NUMBERS (6060 VS 1245) AND MO RF'S INCONSISTENT NUMBERS (1248 VS 1245). EXPOSE RUSSIAN MAXIMALIST DEMANDS AND PRE-EMPTIVE "PROVOCATION" NARRATIVES (INCLUDING BALTIC SEA FALSE FLAG AND "NUCLEAR UNCERTAINTY" GRAPHIC). HIGHLIGHT ZELENSKYY'S DIPLOMATIC VISITS. EXPOSE WAGNER IO CHANNELS AND DEBUNK AZERBAIJAN BORDER DISINFORMATION. PUBLICIZE UKRAINIAN COMMAND CHANGES. Proactively and forcefully counter the narrative that the US is stopping aid. Immediately debunk false TASS/Russian claims regarding Iranian "hypersonic" use and advanced AD defeat, and any fabricated claims of US-Iranian consultations or an "American-Israeli war" AND the specific unverified BDA/casualty claims, including US Embassy damage, and the high Israeli/Iranian casualty figures (e.g., 370+ missiles). FORCEFULLY CONDEMN THE INTRODUCTION OF OVERT ANTI-SEMITIC PROPAGANDA, ESPECIALLY WHEN COMBINED WITH NUCLEAR THREATS, by Russian channels. IMMEDIATELY ADDRESS THE RUSSIAN DENIAL OF THE IRANIAN NPT WITHDRAWAL CLAIM, highlighting the previous amplification as evidence of Russian disinformation tactics. Immediately expose any "massive explosion" videos from Russian sources as misattributed or false flags, emphasizing Russian deception. MOST IMPORTANTLY, IMMEDIATELY AND FORCEFULLY DEBUNK THE RUSSIAN INVESTIGATIVE COMMITTEE'S CLAIM OF "UKRAINIAN MILITANTS TAKING RUSSIAN CIVILIANS HOSTAGE IN SUMY," PRESENTING IT AS A BLATANT FALSE FLAG OPERATION AND PRETEXT FOR ESCALATION. USE THE "US EMBASSY DAMAGE" CLAIM AS ANOTHER PRIME EXAMPLE OF RUSSIAN DESPERATION AND THEIR WILLINGNESS TO FABRICATE WAR CRIMES AND DIRECTLY TARGET US INTERESTS IN THE INFO SPACE. IMMEDIATELY AND FORCEFULLY DEBUNK MEDINSKY'S EXAGGERATED CLAIMS OF UKRAINIAN BODY TRANSFERS (6060, plus 2239 projected), HIGHLIGHTING UKRAINE'S VERIFIABLE FIGURES (1245) AND THE INCONSISTENCY OF RUSSIAN OFFICIAL FIGURES (1248). Emphasize that Russia seeks to destabilize both regions to exhaust Western resources and attention, as evidenced by the "Ukraine for Iran" rhetoric. Highlight Ukrainian successes in inflicting Russian losses (e.g., successful drone defense, artillery engagements, high AD kill rates, FPV drone intercepts, successful agent arrests, deep strikes on Oryol, FPV truck strike, HIMARS on Makeyevka, DeepState's Pion strike, SOF BTRs, sapper ops, drone strikes in Sumy, reported Bryansk strike, WarGonzo dugout strike, motorcycle crash incident, drone strikes on personnel in Pokrovsk). Expose the neglect of Russian war graves as a counter to their "patriotic" narrative. Expose any internal Russian corruption and Ukrainian successes in combating it (Kryvyi Rih). Counter narratives regarding Ukrainian internal divisions (priests, language use). Promote positive stories of Ukrainian veteran support and societal resilience, especially rehabilitation efforts and reconstruction in frontline areas, and public health efforts (cholera prevention in Zaporizhzhia, water issues in Mariupol). Publicize Ukrainian government's digital services for veterans. Highlight Russian demands for Ukraine to disarm Western weapons as proof of aggressive intent. Publicize President Zelenskyy's visit to Austria as evidence of continued international support. Use stories like 'Barny' to highlight the resolve of Ukrainian defenders. Expose Russian aviation safety issues. Publicize successful fundraising efforts. Expose the Wagner-linked "Condottiero™" channel as an influence operation. Immediately and forcefully debunk Alex Parker Returns' claim about the Azerbaijan-Iran border to counter disinformation on a sensitive logistical route. Publicly confirm and explain the changes in Ukrainian military command (OTU "Donetsk").
  2. RAPID DEBUNKING OF MISINFORMATION. Maintain rapid response to immediately debunk unverified and sensationalized claims propagated by Russian state media and milbloggers (e.g., fabricated Israeli/US actions, rapidly escalating and unverified casualty figures, specific BDA claims, and aggressive territorial claims like "Dnipropetrovsk bridgehead" or "Sumy breakthrough," claimed "liberation" of Ulyanovka, Komar, and claims of Tehran residents leaving). Expose Russia's use of emotionally charged propaganda and anti-Semitic rhetoric, and nuclear threats.
  3. PROMOTE UKRAINIAN RESILIENCE & AD SUCCESSES: Highlight ongoing Ukrainian AD operations and any successful intercepts to reassure the public and international partners of continued defensive capabilities. Project local control and normalcy despite civilian casualties. Publicize formalized veteran support programs to boost morale and show national resilience. Publicize successful counter-intelligence operations and anti-corruption efforts. Publicly highlight official appointments (e.g., new Prosecutor General nominee) to demonstrate governmental stability.
  4. HIGHLIGHT RUSSIAN ALLIANCES WITH PARIAH STATES & ROLE IN GLOBAL INSTABILITY. Emphasize that Russia directly benefits from and seeks to amplify and manipulate global instability, and is now using potentially unverified claims and narratives of US involvement (and fabricated US ties/BDA/casualties and anti-Semitic slurs) to further this aim. Highlight the use of North Korean materiel by Russian forces. Highlight the continued flow of Russian energy revenue from the EU. Highlight Russian exploitation of EU internal divisions (Hungary/Slovakia energy block, Paris Air Show incident). Condemn the use of combined Russian-Serbian flags for IO. Expose the purpose of large-scale Russian military exercises (Pacific Fleet) as global power projection and intimidation.

• Diplomatic/Inter-Agency:

  1. IMMEDIATE & PROACTIVE: ENGAGE KEY PARTNERS ON SUSTAINED SUPPORT AND COUNTERING RUSSIAN DIPLOMATIC MANIPULATION AND AID NARRATIVES. Ukrainian diplomatic missions should immediately engage with US, EU, and other key partners to address "The Telegraph" report on aid cessation. Seek clarification and a unified, strong public message of continued robust support. Emphasize that such narratives are deliberate Russian attempts to sow discord and undermine support. Leverage the confirmed Trump-Zelenskyy meeting at the G7 summit and President Zelenskyy's visit to Austria to reinforce direct communication and continued high-level engagement.
  2. COORDINATE WITH ALLIES ON IO STRATEGY: Coordinate closely with allied IO agencies to ensure a unified and consistent counter-narrative to Russian disinformation, particularly regarding aid, global conflict, and the new, more extreme and manipulative narratives, including the direct attempt to draw the US into the Middle East conflict with fabricated claims and unverified BDA/casualties, the sensational claims of "hypersonic" use, claims of Iranian NPT withdrawal (and its denial), and the introduction of overt anti-Semitic propaganda and nuclear threats, and the "Nuclear uncertainty" graphic. Also coordinate response to Russian diplomatic actions in the Middle East (including Putin/Erdogan joint condemnation of Israel) and the "Ukraine for Iran" rhetoric, and Iranian MFA calls to UNSC. Coordinate immediate debunking of any "massive explosion" videos identified as false flags/misattributed. Crucially, coordinate a unified and immediate diplomatic response to the Russian "hostage-taking" false flag claim, condemning it as a blatant fabrication designed to escalate. MOST CRITICALLY, COORDINATE IMMEDIATE, FORCEFUL DIPLOMATIC CONDEMNATION OF THE FABRICATED CLAIM OF "US EMBASSY DAMAGE IN TEL AVIV" AND THE SVR'S CLAIM OF A FALSE FLAG "RUSSIAN TORPEDO ATTACK ON A US NAVY SHIP IN THE BALTIC SEA." Coordinate on exposing Medinsky's manipulation of body exchange numbers (6060, plus 2239 projected) and MO RF's inconsistency (1248) and compare to Ukrainian verified figures (1245). Coordinate to counter the Russian narrative on US-Russia diplomatic meeting cancellations.
  3. INTERNATIONAL CONDEMNATION OF CIVILIAN/INDUSTRIAL TARGETING AND RUSSIAN ANTI-SEMITIC PROPAGANDA. Continue to highlight Russian strikes on civilian/industrial targets to maintain international pressure and secure further AD assistance. Simultaneously, seek strong international condemnation of Russia's use of overt anti-Semitic propaganda as a tool of information warfare. Condemn Russia's punitive measures against citizens in Belgorod. Engage international partners regarding the Hungarian ruling party's "discreditation" campaign and the blocking of EU energy plans. Highlight the blocking of Israeli defense companies at the Paris Air Show and its broader implications. Condemn Russia's attempts to project power globally through military exercises while prosecuting an illegal war. Seek strong condemnation of Russia's heavy weaponry attacks on Zaporizhzhia frontline villages and towns.
  4. ENGAGE WITH INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS ON VETERAN SUPPORT & RECONSTRUCTION. Seek international assistance and partnerships for formal veteran support programs to ensure their sustainability and effectiveness. Actively solicit and manage international aid for reconstruction efforts in frontline regions like Zaporizhzhia.
  5. ADDRESS INTERNAL CORRUPTION WITH INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT. Seek international support and expertise for combating large-scale corruption, particularly when it impacts critical civilian infrastructure during wartime, as highlighted by the Kryvyi Rih case. This demonstrates Ukraine's commitment to good governance and strengthens its case for international aid.
  6. ADDRESS PUBLIC HEALTH RISKS IN CONFLICT ZONES. Coordinate with international humanitarian organizations (WHO, Red Cross) to address and mitigate public health risks such as cholera in front-line and occupied territories, advocating for safe access to water and sanitation. Highlight severe water supply issues in occupied Mariupol.