Nightwatch logo
'Nightwatch' text with white and gray letters
HomeMapNewsMilitary PulseSituation ReportsDaily ReportsList ViewVideosCyber Threats
Sign In
Contact Support
Historical Intelligence

Situation Report

Archived operational intelligence briefing

Report Time
2025-06-16 10:09:11Z
8 months ago
Previous (2025-06-16 09:39:01Z)

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR)

TIME OF REPORT: 16 JUN 25 / 10:08 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 16 JUN 25 / 09:38 ZULU - 16 JUN 25 / 10:08 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk CLASSIFICATION: TOP SECRET // ORCON // NOFORN

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

  • Ukraine Operational Area:
    • Khotin Hromada (Sumy Oblast): Multiple video messages from "Оперативний ЗСУ" confirm the aftermath of Russian KAB (glide bomb) strikes on a residential area, causing severe structural damage and ruination. This indicates continued Russian aerial bombardment of civilian targets in border regions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Sumy Region (General - Airstrikes): Ukrainian General Staff reports Russian aviation conducted airstrikes at Petrushivka. This confirms continued Russian air activity in Sumy region. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Chernihiv Region (General - Airstrikes): Ukrainian General Staff reports Russian aviation conducted airstrikes at Krasnyy Khutir, Hremyachka. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Donetsk Region (General - Airstrikes and Ground Clashes):
      • Ukrainian General Staff reports Russian aviation conducted airstrikes at Koptyeve, Novopavlivka, Poltavka, Razine, Sukhyy Yar, Novopil, Tolstoy, Voskresenka, Myrne. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
      • Pokrovsk Axis: Ukrainian General Staff reports clashes yesterday near Malynivka, Myrolubivka, Promin, Lysivka, Novoserhiyivka, Udachne, Oleksiyivka and towards Mykolayivka, Novopavlivka, Novomykolayivka and Pokrovsk. This indicates high intensity of fighting on this critical axis. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
      • Novopavlivka Axis: Ukrainian General Staff reports clashes yesterday near Kostyantynopil, Novosilka, Vilne Pole, Novyy Komar and towards Zaporizhzhya, Novoukrayinka, Myrne, Shevchenko, Odradne, Bahatyr. This confirms ongoing engagement in the Vuhledar direction. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
      • Kramatorsk Axis: Ukrainian General Staff reports clashes yesterday near Chasiv Yar, Bila Hora, Novomarkove and Kurdumivka. Chasiv Yar remains a key point of contention. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
      • Toretsk Axis: Ukrainian General Staff reports clashes yesterday near Toretsk, towards Rusyn Yar, Novospaske, Oleksandro-Kalynove and Yablunivka. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
      • Lyman Axis: Ukrainian General Staff reports clashes yesterday near Kopanky, Novoyehorivka, Lypove and towards Shandryholove, Olhivka, Karpivka, Torske and Hryhorivka. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
      • Siversk Axis: Ukrainian General Staff reports clashes yesterday near Serebryanka and Hryhorivka. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
      • WarGonzo releases video titled "Footage of the liberation of Ulyanovka in DPR," confirming Russian claims of recent capture, supported by previous ISR. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for Russian claim/video, MEDIUM for independent verification of full capture).
    • Zaporizhzhia Oblast: Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine reports Russian KAB launches towards Zaporizhzhia Oblast. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). Ukrainian General Staff reports Russian aviation conducted airstrikes at Novodarivka, Zaliznychne. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). Zaporizhzhia Regional Military Administration shares a video on "Strong partnership - practical solutions for frontline territories," showcasing humanitarian and reconstruction efforts with international involvement, indicating resilience and continued support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Kherson Region (General - Airstrikes): Ukrainian General Staff reports Russian aviation conducted airstrikes at Odradokamyanka. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Kharkiv Axis: Ukrainian General Staff reports clashes yesterday near Vovchansk, Starytsya, Kamyanka and towards Dovhenke. Russian milblogger "Дневник Десантника🇷🇺" also posts a map titled "Kharkiv direction," indicating continued Russian focus on this axis. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Kupyansk Axis: Ukrainian General Staff reports clashes yesterday near Holubivka, Zahryzove, Stepiv Novoselivka, towards Petropavlivka and Nova Kruhlyakivka. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Kursk Region (Russia - Border Operations): Ukrainian General Staff reports Ukrainian forces repelled 24 Russian army assaults in Kursk region. This indicates continued, aggressive Russian probing/assault attempts across the border. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Lviv Oblast: RBC-Ukraine reports a mobilized serviceman fell from a truck, and an investigation is open. This points to ongoing logistical and personnel management challenges within Ukrainian forces. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Russian Internal Affairs/Occupied Territories/External:
    • LNR (Occupied territory): "Mash на Донбассе" reports mobile internet has been barely working for several days, indicating potential infrastructure damage, targeting, or maintenance issues. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Russia (Internal - Judicial): TASS reports a court sentenced former Director General of NO RAO, Igor Igin, to 11 years for bribery and illegal arms storage. This is internal Russian news, part of their efforts to project domestic rule of law. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Russia (Internal - Diplomatic): TASS reports Peskov's statement that part of Russians were evacuated from Iran via Azerbaijan, allowing them to reach safe places. This confirms the new logistical/diplomatic corridor previously identified as a GAP. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). Peskov also stated Putin will speak at the SPIEF on June 20. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Latvia (External - Russian claims/monitoring): TASS and ASTRA report Latvia banned entry to propagandist Ekaterina Andreeva and actor Pavel Priluchny, reiterating the ongoing diplomatic/cultural tensions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Iran/Israel (External - Russian amplification/manipulation):
      • "Басурин о главном" amplifies Iranian MFA's statements on non-proliferation of nuclear weapons, part of the broader Russian narrative on the Middle East. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
      • ASTRA publishes a video claiming "A third of Iran's missile launchers destroyed - IDF," which is Israeli-sourced BDA, amplified by Russian channels. This is part of the contested narrative on Israeli/Iranian capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for claim, MEDIUM for independent verification).
      • "Операция Z" (Военкоры Русской Весны) amplifies claims of US Embassy in Tel Aviv being damaged by Iranian strikes, and a number of buildings destroyed. This is a significant escalation of Russian false flag/disinformation regarding the Middle East crisis. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for Russian claim, LOW for veracity).
      • "Дневник Десантника🇷🇺" suggests Israel's actions have "cleaned up" "stagnant" elements within Iran's security structures, which will change Iran's policy. This is Russian analysis/framing of the conflict. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
      • Alex Parker Returns reports Iran executed Ismail Fakhri, accused of spying for Mossad, and providing data on strategic objects. This reinforces the "Mossad agent" narrative previously identified as a Russian pretext. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • UK (External - Russian monitoring): "Север.Реалии" reports a woman will become the head of MI6 for the first time. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

  • Russian KAB strikes in Sumy region and Zaporizhzhia suggest favorable clear weather for precision targeting using glide bombs. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Russian FPV drone footage (e.g., from Народная милиция ДНР) implies clear conditions for optical targeting. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Russian rescue operation video indicates variable terrain (damaged buildings, foliage, tripwire mines), suggesting areas of complex, contested ground. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

  • Ukrainian Forces: Actively defending across multiple axes (Kharkiv, Kupyansk, Lyman, Siversk, Kramatorsk, Toretsk, Pokrovsk, Novopavlivka, Orikhiv) and repelling significant numbers of Russian assaults in Kursk region. Continuing efforts to support veterans (online rehabilitation application) and rebuild civilian infrastructure (Zaporizhzhia). Actively engaging in IO by showcasing humane treatment of POWs. Facing significant aerial bombardment on border regions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Russian Forces: Sustaining high tempo ground assaults on multiple axes (notably Pokrovsk, Kupyansk, Lyman), attempting to break through in Kursk. Conducting widespread KAB and FPV drone strikes on both military and civilian targets across Ukrainian depth. Continuing to consolidate territorial gains (Ulyanovka). Intensifying global information operations, particularly on the Middle East, with new, highly inflammatory claims. Leveraging new logistical corridors via Azerbaijan. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (RUSSIA FOCUSED)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action (COA):

  • Capabilities (Russia):
    • Precision Strike - KAB/UAVs: Demonstrated continued capability to conduct precision KAB strikes on residential areas (Khotin Hromada, Sumy) and FPV drone strikes on military vehicles (DPR People's Militia). Ukrainian General Staff confirms widespread aviation airstrikes across all active fronts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Combined Arms Offensive Operations: Sustaining capacity for numerous ground assaults on multiple axes, as evidenced by 24 repelled assaults in Kursk and persistent attacks on all Donetsk axes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Information Warfare - Deepening Manipulation and Fabricated Claims:
      • Middle East Escalation & Diversion (CRITICAL): Intensifying efforts to manipulate and exaggerate the Middle East crisis by disseminating claims like US Embassy damage in Tel Aviv due to Iranian strikes, which is highly unlikely to be true based on available independent reporting. This aims to further destabilize the region and divert global attention/resources. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
      • Pretext/Justification: Execution of "Mossad agent" Ismail Fakhri in Iran, amplified by Russian channels, serves as a direct justification for Iran's actions and reinforces the narrative of Western/Israeli aggression. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
      • Domestic Resilience & Justification: Continued reporting on internal judicial cases (Igor Igin), diplomatic movements (Peskov's statements on Iran evacuation, Putin's SPIEF speech), and even seemingly mundane personal reports (e.g., "Two Majors" selling knives, WarGonzo recruitment video) all contribute to projecting an image of a functional, resilient state with a clear, successful military path forward, while justifying the "special military operation." (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Logistical Flexibility: The confirmed evacuation of Russian citizens from Iran via Azerbaijan (TASS/Peskov) indicates a flexible and responsive logistical network, potentially used for more than just civilian transport. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Intentions (Russia):
    • Degrade Ukrainian Defense and Force Redeployment: Continue efforts to advance on the ground, particularly on the Pokrovsk, Kupyansk, and Lyman axes, and utilize precision KAB/UAV strikes to inflict casualties, destroy equipment (e.g., Ulyanovka capture, FPV strike on truck), and exert psychological pressure on civilian populations (Khotin Hromada). Maintain aggressive probing/assaults on the border (Kursk). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Sow Discord and Justify Aggression (CRITICAL - Confirmed and Intensified, now definitively using false flag/pretext claims related to "US Embassy damage"): Intensify efforts to create pretexts for further aggression by fabricating or wildly exaggerating events in the Middle East (e.g., US Embassy damage). Continue to leverage global political developments (Latvia bans, Iran situation) to portray Western weakness or "Russophobia" and to deepen geopolitical divides. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Project Global Relevance & Domestic Stability/Unity: Utilize state media and milbloggers to project an image of global military power and diplomatic influence (Middle East involvement, SPIEF speech), successful domestic governance (judicial actions, recruitment), and military adaptation, while simultaneously undermining Ukrainian resistance by showcasing "captured" territories and tactical successes and humane treatment (POW video by Ukrainian side, but framed by Russian side as showing Ukrainian weakness). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

  • Increased KAB Use in Border Regions: The repeated KAB strikes on civilian areas in Sumy region (Khotin Hromada, Petrushivka) indicate a sustained and perhaps intensified reliance on these destructive glide bombs in border areas, likely due to reduced Ukrainian air defense coverage in these zones compared to deeper targets. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Continued Aggressive Border Probing (Kursk): The sheer number of repelled Russian assaults (24 in Kursk) demonstrates a persistent and high-tempo effort to probe and likely fix Ukrainian forces on the border, preventing redeployment to other axes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Escalation of Middle East IO with Specific False Claims: The claim of Iranian strikes damaging the US Embassy in Tel Aviv (Операция Z) represents a significant, verifiable fabrication designed to draw the US directly into the conflict narrative and escalate global tensions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for IO tactic).
  • Adaptation in Prisoner of War (POW) Exchange Narrative: Alex Parker's claim of a 6000 Russian to 27 Ukrainian POW exchange, while likely highly exaggerated, indicates an attempt to shift the POW narrative to one of Russian "success" or overwhelming numerical advantage in returned personnel. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM for claim, HIGH for IO tactic).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

  • Continued offensive operations across numerous axes and widespread KAB/UAV strikes suggest Russia's conventional ammunition and tactical drone supplies remain sufficient for the current high operational tempo. The reported mobile internet issues in LNR could indicate local infrastructure damage or targeted EW, potentially impacting tactical C2 and logistics in that specific area. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM). The need for individual crowdfunding for FPV drones (from previous ISR) suggests ongoing localized tactical shortfalls, despite overall sufficiency. The confirmed use of the Azerbaijan corridor provides additional logistical flexibility. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

  • Russian Military C2: Continues to coordinate localized combined arms operations (all Donetsk axes, Kharkiv, Kupyansk, Lyman) and high-volume border assaults (Kursk). The coordinated use of KABs and FPV drones suggests effective integration of air/drone assets with ground objectives. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Russian IO/Diplomatic C2: Remains highly agile and aggressive in responding to real-time events and shaping narratives. The rapid generation of highly inflammatory and fabricated claims (e.g., US Embassy damage in Tel Aviv) demonstrates a sophisticated and unconstrained IO apparatus. The coordinated reporting across state media (TASS/Peskov) and milbloggers (WarGonzo, Операция Z, Alex Parker, Дневник Десантника) reinforces central messaging, even if some individual milblogger analysis (e.g., Дневник Десантника on Iran) presents a slightly different angle. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (UKRAINIAN FOCUSED)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

  • Ukrainian forces are actively engaged in defensive operations across all major axes, including Kharkiv, Kupyansk, Lyman, Siversk, Kramatorsk, Toretsk, Pokrovsk, Novopavlivka, and Orikhiv. They are demonstrating strong defensive capabilities by repelling numerous Russian assaults, particularly in the Kursk border region (24 repelled attacks). Ukrainian Air Force is maintaining awareness of Russian aviation threats in southern and southeastern directions. Ukrainian forces are also demonstrating resilience and commitment to civilian welfare through reconstruction efforts (Zaporizhzhia) and social support programs (veteran rehabilitation). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

  • Success (Defense): Repelling 24 Russian assaults in Kursk region within 24 hours is a significant defensive success, demonstrating high readiness and effectiveness of border defense forces. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Success (Information Operations/Humanitarian Adherence): The video showcasing humane treatment of a captured Russian POW (Оперативний ЗСУ) is a strong counter-narrative to Russian propaganda, reinforcing Ukrainian adherence to international humanitarian law and boosting international support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Success (Civilian Resilience/International Support): The Zaporizhzhia OVA video highlights successful partnerships for reconstruction in frontline areas, demonstrating continued international aid and Ukrainian capacity to implement projects under wartime conditions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Success (Anti-Corruption/Public Confidence): The continued focus on online application for veteran rehabilitation, following previous embezzlement reports, indicates ongoing efforts to improve governance and accountability, which can boost public confidence. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Setback (Ground Forces): Russian claims of capturing Ulyanovka (WarGonzo video) suggest continued localized territorial losses in the Donetsk direction, even if Ukrainian General Staff reports only "clashes" in the area. The widespread Russian aviation airstrikes across all axes also indicate sustained pressure and the challenges of air defense. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM for specific territorial loss, HIGH for sustained pressure).
  • Setback (Logistical/Personnel Management): The incident of a mobilized serviceman falling from a truck in Lviv indicates potential issues with troop transport safety and personnel management. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

  • The high tempo of ground engagements across multiple axes, combined with sustained Russian aerial bombardment, necessitates continuous and significant supplies of ammunition, air defense systems, and artillery. The need for reconstruction in frontline areas (Zaporizhzhia) and ongoing veteran support programs also places demands on national resources and international aid. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). The incident in Lviv highlights the continued need for improving logistical safety and troop welfare. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

  • Russian Narratives (CRITICAL - HIGHLY ACTIVE, AGGRESSIVE, MANIPULATIVE, RADICALIZED & REAL-TIME RESPONSE, NOW UTILIZING EXPLICIT FALSE FLAG/PRETEXT CLAIMS, INCLUDING US EMBASSY DAMAGE):
    • Escalation of Middle East Conflict & Iranian "Resolve" (CRITICAL - Now with direct, verifiable fabrications): "Операция Z" (Военкоры Русской Весны) explicitly claims Iranian strikes damaged the US Embassy in Tel Aviv and destroyed buildings. This is a major escalation in Russian disinformation, deliberately fabricating a direct attack on US assets to exacerbate global tensions. TASS amplifies Iranian MFA on non-proliferation. Alex Parker Returns reports Iranian execution of a "Mossad spy" (Ismail Fakhri), reinforcing previous pretext claims. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for IO tactic).
    • Russian Military Successes in Ukraine: WarGonzo reinforces "liberation" claims for Ulyanovka with video. Russian MoD continues to release daily operational updates, claiming strikes on Ukrainian positions. Alex Parker's claim of 6000 Russian POWs exchanged for 27 Ukrainian (highly likely exaggerated) is an attempt to spin POW exchanges as a Russian victory. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for IO tactic).
    • Ukrainian Weakness/Internal Division/Western Aid Fragmentation: Russian channels continue to highlight any perceived Ukrainian setbacks or issues (e.g., Lviv mobilized serviceman incident indirectly used by some to paint a negative picture).
    • Domestic Resilience & Progress/Normalcy: TASS reports on Peskov's statements regarding Putin's SPIEF appearance and the evacuation of citizens from Iran via Azerbaijan. "Два майора" selling kitchen knives and WarGonzo's recruitment video are soft power attempts to portray a stable, internally focused state with a strong, unifying military effort. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Ukrainian Counter-Narratives: Ukrainian channels (Оперативний ЗСУ, Генеральний штаб ЗСУ, 🇺🇦 Запорізька обласна військова адміністрація 🇺🇦, Повітряні Сили ЗС України / Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS) are consistently reporting on Russian aggression (KAB strikes on civilians in Sumy, widespread aviation threats) while emphasizing effective Ukrainian defense (repelling 24 assaults in Kursk), resilience (Zaporizhzhia reconstruction), and adherence to international law (humane treatment of POWs). The General Staff's promotion of online rehabilitation applications directly addresses veteran welfare and good governance. "ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS" shows the severe physical impact of Russian captivity on a Ukrainian soldier, aiming to galvanize support and expose Russian brutality. Another "ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS" post on Russia receiving over 200 billion euros for energy from the EU highlights continued Russian financing of the war despite sanctions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). The "Stryzh" battalion's call for donations after losing a re-transmitter drone is a direct, urgent appeal for aid, showcasing immediate needs and operational challenges. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

  • Ukrainian Morale: Reports of civilian casualties from KAB strikes in Sumy (Khotin Hromada) will be a negative factor. However, the success in repelling numerous assaults in Kursk and the positive narrative around POW treatment and veteran support will bolster military and civilian morale. The focus on reconstruction in Zaporizhzhia also promotes hope and resilience. The stark images of a POW after 3 years of Russian captivity will evoke anger and resolve. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Russian Morale: Russian IO aims to boost domestic morale by portraying military successes (Ulyanovka, "POW exchange" statistics), diplomatic influence (Middle East), and domestic stability (Peskov statements). The fabrication of incidents like US Embassy damage in Tel Aviv aims to demonize perceived enemies and justify Russian aggression. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

  • The intense Russian amplification of the Israel-Iran conflict, now including provable fabrications like US Embassy damage, is a clear attempt to further internationalize the crisis and exhaust Western diplomatic and military resources. Russia's strategic evacuation via Azerbaijan indicates its efforts to maintain alternative channels amidst geopolitical tensions. Ukrainian diplomatic efforts, although not explicitly detailed in this slice, remain critical to counter Russian narratives and secure continued support. The news of a female MI6 head is external but contributes to the global geopolitical landscape. The report of Russia earning €200bn from EU energy sales highlights the ongoing financial support Russia receives from Europe despite sanctions, a crucial factor for international policy debates. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

  • Aggressive, Targeted, and Real-time Manipulative Narrative Campaign (CRITICAL, CONFIRMED IMMEDIATE FOCUS, NOW UTILIZING EXPLICIT FALSE FLAG/PRETEXT CLAIMS, INCLUDING ATTACKS ON US ASSETS): Russia will continue its intensified information campaign, with an immediate and sustained focus on amplifying and manipulating the Israel-Iran conflict, and directly fabricating or wildly exaggerating events (e.g., "US Embassy damage in Tel Aviv"). They will increasingly employ explicit false flag or pretext claims (e.g., "Ukrainian hostage-taking of Russian civilians" from previous ISR, "Mossad spy execution") to justify escalatory actions or to demonize Ukrainian forces, blurring the lines between real events and manipulated propaganda. They will amplify any further escalations in the Middle East. Russia will also actively attempt to control the narrative around Ukrainian tactical operations, spinning any setbacks and linking them to their own "successes" (e.g., Ulyanovka capture, exaggerated POW exchange claims), while continuing to highlight domestic stability and military adaptation (recruitment, economic forums like SPIEF), and pushing narratives of internal Ukrainian division or Western repression (e.g., Latvia bans). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Sustained Localized Ground Pressure with Exaggerated Claims and Combined Arms: Russian forces will continue localized ground pressure, particularly in the Donetsk axes (Pokrovsk, Novopavlivka, Kramatorsk, Toretsk, Lyman, Siversk) and the Kharkiv/Kupyansk axes. They will continue their aggressive probing and assault attempts along the Kursk border, aiming to fix Ukrainian forces. They will continue to use combined arms tactics (mines, FPVs, artillery, KABs) to increase attrition on Ukrainian forces and equipment. They will continue to use state media and milbloggers to claim disproportionately high Ukrainian casualties and BDA, and to exaggerate territorial gains. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Sustained UAV/Missile/Aviation Strikes on Ukrainian Cities/Infrastructure & C2: Russia will continue to launch UAVs and aviation-launched KABs against Ukrainian targets (critical infrastructure, urban centers like Sumy Oblast's Khotin Hromada, claimed military-industrial complex targets) to deplete Ukrainian long-range air defense capabilities and exert psychological pressure. They will also conduct KAB strikes on frontline areas (Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia). Russian attacks on energy infrastructure will likely continue, explicitly leveraged by Russia during periods of global distraction. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Continued Counter-Insurgency/Propaganda Operations in Occupied Territories & Tightening Domestic Control: FSB will likely continue to stage or publicize arrests of alleged "terrorists" to legitimize Russian control and demonize Ukrainian resistance. Russia will continue to tighten domestic control and conscription laws to ensure personnel availability for the war effort, including increased financial incentives for contract service. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

  • Coordinated Strategic Strike Package with Ground Offensive under Cover of Diversion Narrative & Political Pressure (Retained from previous ISR, now with intensified IO component, Middle East Crisis Amplification/Manipulation, including direct diplomatic pressure and threats, ideological radicalization, and selective denials of previous false claims, AND NOW UTILIZING EXPLICIT FALSE FLAG/PRETEXT CLAIMS FOR ESCALATION, INCLUDING FABRICATED ATTACKS ON US ASSETS): Russia executes a highly coordinated, large-scale combined arms offensive, potentially targeting the Pokrovsk axis or a renewed thrust from the north. This would involve:
    1. A massed strike of ballistic and cruise missiles in conjunction with loitering munitions against critical Ukrainian C2, logistics, and major AD sites across the entire operational depth, aimed at achieving temporary air superiority and operational paralysis, capitalizing on the psychological impact of perceived Western aid withdrawal and the intensified global distraction. The recent pattern of deep strikes and massed UAVs could be a precursor.
    2. Simultaneous major ground offensives on multiple axes (e.g., Pokrovsk, Sumy/Northern-Slobozhanskyi, Kharkiv/Southern-Slobozhanskyi), capitalizing on the psychological impact of perceived Western aid diversion and the physical degradation of Ukrainian command and control.
    3. This would be synchronized with an unprecedented surge in Russian IO, including fabricated "false flag" events in Ukraine or neighboring countries (e.g., "hostage-taking of Russian civilians") or fabricated direct attacks on Western assets in third countries (e.g., "US Embassy damaged by Iranian strikes") to justify the escalation and reinforce the narrative of Western impotence and Ukrainian collapse, especially on the back of amplified and manipulated claims of aid cessation and escalated global conflicts (e.g., Middle East, now with magnified focus on high casualties, Iranian threats, direct Russian diplomatic actions, and the introduction of highly inflammatory ideological rhetoric like NPT withdrawal claims or explicit anti-Semitism, alongside the selective denial of previous false claims to maintain credibility for future ones). The introduction of specific, fabricated "war crimes" against Russian civilians (e.g., Sumy hostage claim) and fabricated attacks on US assets could serve as a direct pretext for heightened aggression and further justify the MDCOA to a domestic Russian audience and sow maximum discord internationally. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

  • Immediate (Next 1-6 hours):
    • ISR: Continue to prioritize collection to verify or refute claims of Russian territorial gains (Ulyanovka, Komar). Continue real-time tracking of Russian milblogger and state media channels for new narratives or amplification of existing ones, particularly regarding the Israel-Iran conflict, focusing now on deeper, fabricated claims of US involvement/ties/BDA/casualties, intensified diplomatic pressure from Russia, and the highly inflammatory claims such as THAAD self-destruction due to hacking, explicit anti-Semitism, or the "exchange Ukraine for Iran" narrative, as well as the Iranian MFA's call to the UNSC. Note and analyze Russian denials of previously amplified false claims (e.g., NPT withdrawal). Critically, analyze the source and intent of the "massive explosion" videos being pushed by Russian sources, and be prepared to identify them as misattributed or false flags. Investigate the veracity and intent of the Russian Investigative Committee's claim of "Ukrainian militants taking Russian civilians hostage in Sumy." Immediately verify the Russian claim of "US Embassy damage" in Tel Aviv. Monitor for follow-on UAV/missile waves and KAB/TOS strikes into Sumy/Donetsk/Kharkiv/Dnipropetrovsk/Kyiv/Zaporizhzhia. Track any further claims regarding POW exchanges and assess their veracity. Monitor for any reports of Russian force movements towards the Sumy/Chernihiv border or further riverine training/probes on the Dnieper.
    • IO: Commanders must continue preparation for a robust counter-narrative to the "US stops aid to Ukraine" claim. Ukrainian channels should highlight the continued effectiveness of Ukrainian drone operations (including new FPV drone strike videos, deep strikes on Oryol, successful AD against Russian drones), counter-battery fire, and high air defense success rates (e.g., FPV drone intercepts, Sumy defense successes), and successful counter-intelligence operations. Prepare immediate debunking of false TASS/Russian claims regarding the Middle East crisis and Ukrainian tactical setbacks, especially the new, more insidious claims of high Israeli/Iranian casualties, Iranian threats as amplified by Russia, the THAAD self-destruction claim, and the direct Russian diplomatic actions to withdraw citizens. FORCEFULLY EXPOSE AND DEBUNK THE "MASSIVE EXPLOSION" VIDEOS AS MISATTRIBUTED OR FALSE FLAGS, highlighting Russian deception tactics. IMMEDIATELY AND FORCEFULLY DEBUNK THE RUSSIAN INVESTIGATIVE COMMITTEE'S CLAIM OF "UKRAINIAN MILITANTS TAKING RUSSIAN CIVILIANS HOSTAGE IN SUMY," presenting it as a blatant false flag operation and pretext for escalation. CRITICALLY, IMMEDIATELY AND FORCEFULLY DEBUNK THE RUSSIAN CLAIM OF "US EMBASSY DAMAGE IN TEL AVIV" AS A DELIBERATE FABRICATION DESIGNED TO ESCALATE. Proactively link the escalating Middle East crisis to Russian destabilization efforts and expose Russian amplification and manipulation. Publicly expose Russian casualties or equipment losses (e.g., from successful Ukrainian AD or FPV drone strikes, FPV strike on truck). Proactively expose Russian corruption and highlight Ukrainian efforts against internal corruption. Highlight positive aspects of Ukrainian society, such as veteran support programs and reconstruction efforts in frontline regions.

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS & COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

  • GAP 1: VERIFICATION OF "THE TELEGRAPH" REPORT ON US AID CESSATION (CRITICAL, IMMEDIATE, HYPER-PRIORITY, RETAINED): Independent, all-source verification of the "The Telegraph" report amplified by Russian sources regarding the cessation of US military aid to Ukraine. Assess the type, quantity, and operational impact of any such claims on Ukrainian defense capabilities.
    • COLLECTION REQUIREMENT (CR): Prioritize SIGINT, OSINT (direct source review of "The Telegraph" article for context, content, and accuracy), IMINT, and HUMINT from US, NATO, and Ukrainian sources to confirm or refute these reports. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
  • GAP 2: VERIFICATION OF ISRAELI/IRANIAN IMPACTS & RUSSIAN CLAIMS ON IRANIAN "HYPERSONIC" USE / AD DEFEAT / US INVOLVEMENT/TIES/BDA/CASUALTIES / NUCLEAR THREATS / IRAN NPT WITHDRAWAL / IRANIAN MFA UNSC PUSH, AND "US EMBASSY DAMAGE" (CRITICAL, IMMEDIATE, UPDATED FOCUS, RETAINED): Independent, all-source verification of all specific impact claims in Israel and the reconciliation of conflicting casualty figures. Critically, assess the veracity of claims of Iranian "hypersonic" missile use and "new methods" to defeat Israeli air defenses, as well as claims of US Embassy damage in Tel Aviv and the shooting down of a US MQ-9 Reaper drone. Verify the claim of THAAD self-destruction due to Iranian hacking. Also, verify the claim that Israel is attempting to convince the US to join military operations against Iran, the new, fabricated claims of US-Iranian consultations or an "American-Israeli war," and the specific claim of an Arrow-3/THAAD AD system being struck at Nevatim. Additionally, verify Rybar's claims of US refueling aircraft redeployment and changes in communication patterns for sea-based cruise missiles. Assess the specific impact and intent of the re-introduction of overt anti-Semitic propaganda and nuclear threats by Russian state-aligned channels, as well as the impact of direct Russian diplomatic actions (citizen warnings, embassy evacuation consideration, calls for UNSC condemnation of Israel). CONFIRM AND ANALYZE THE RUSSIAN DENIAL OF THE IRANIAN PARLIAMENT VOTE TO WITHDRAW FROM NPT. Verify claims of Tehran residents leaving and their true sentiment. Verify the execution of "Mossad agent" Ismail Fikri in Iran.
    • CR: Prioritize OSINT (cross-referencing with Israeli official reports, international news agencies, US official statements, IAEA), IMINT (satellite imagery post-strike), and HUMINT from Israeli and US sources. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
  • GAP 3: RUSSIAN INTENT & FORCE DISPOSITION ON NORTHERN AXIS (CRITICAL, RETAINED): Verification of reports of Russian troop movements to Belarus. Assess if the sustained Russian presence in Kursk border region indicates a future offensive push.
    • CR: Prioritize IMINT, SIGINT, and HUMINT on Russian force composition, logistics build-up, and intent on the Belarus border and Kursk. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
  • GAP 4: UKRAINIAN BATTLE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT (BDA) FROM RECENT DEEP STRIKES (CRITICAL, ONGOING): Full extent of damage and operational impact from recent Russian deep strikes on Ukrainian C2, logistics, and industrial sites (e.g., Dnipropetrovsk industrial enterprise from previous ISR), and civilian areas (Kyiv, Kharkiv). Also, full BDA of claimed Russian strikes on Ukrainian dugout/UAV control point near Mirnoye. Specifically, verify Russian claims of destroying a Ukrainian UAV command post in Kherson, and assess the operational impact. Assess the full extent of damage and personnel losses to the M113 APC in Donetsk. Assess the impact of claimed Russian strikes on a Ukrainian military-industrial enterprise, training center, and AD radar. Specifically, assess the BDA of the FPV strike on the Ukrainian military truck (Ural/Kamaz) and the KAB strikes in Khotin Hromada, Sumy Oblast.
    • CR: Prioritize HUMINT from affected units, OSINT (local reports, social media analysis), and IMINT (satellite imagery analysis if available) to determine operational impact and identify vulnerabilities. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
  • GAP 5: RUSSIAN ROLE IN ISRAEL-IRAN ESCALATION (CRITICAL, RETAINED, NEW FOCUS ON "HYPERSONIC" CLAIMS, ANTI-SEMITISM, NUCLEAR THREATS, NPT WITHDRAWAL, AND DIPLOMATIC PRESSURE, AND POTENTIAL FALSE FLAGS, AND FABRICATED ATTACKS ON US ASSETS): Assess the extent of direct or indirect Russian involvement in instigating or facilitating the recent missile launches from Iran towards Israel, beyond mere amplification and narrative manipulation. Is Russia providing intelligence, materiel, or political cover? Specifically, analyze the motivation and target audience for the amplification of "hypersonic" claims, nuclear threats, the introduction of overt anti-Semitic propaganda, and the initial (and now denied) claim of Iranian NPT withdrawal by Russian state-aligned channels, as well as the intent behind official Russian diplomatic warnings/evacuations and the "Ukraine for Iran" rhetoric. Analyze the impact of Russian retractions of false claims. Critically, investigate the origin and intent of the "massive explosion" videos pushed by Russian channels, assessing if they are misattributed or false flags designed to sow fear or project exaggerated power. Investigate the veracity and intent of the claim of "US Embassy damage in Tel Aviv" as a fabricated pretext.
    • CR: Prioritize SIGINT, HUMINT, and OSINT on Russia-Iran communications and coordination, and US military movements in the region. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
  • GAP 6: VERIFICATION OF RUSSIAN TACTICAL GAINS AND UKRAINIAN WITHDRAWALS (MEDIUM, UPDATED): Independent verification of Russian claims of "full clearing" of Malynivka (Ulyanovka), advances near Burlatske and Novopol, and Pushilin's claim of deep penetration into Dnipropetrovsk Oblast towards Pokrovsk. Critically, verify the Russian claim of Ukrainian forces withdrawing from Komar area to Voskresenka. Verify Russian claims of destruction of AFU equipment at Novotoretskoye. Assess the veracity of the Russian-produced "Pace of Offensive Operation" chart and its data. Verify claimed "liberation" of Ulyanovka (Malynivka) and Komar settlement.
    • CR: Prioritize HUMINT from Ukrainian units in the area, OSINT (local reports, geolocated video/photos), and IMINT. (PRIORITY: MEDIUM).
  • GAP 7: VERACITY AND INTENT OF RUSSIAN "HOSTAGE-TAKING" CLAIMS (CRITICAL, NEW): Immediately verify the Russian Investigative Committee's claim of Ukrainian militants taking Kursk Oblast residents hostage in Sumy. Assess if this is a legitimate criminal investigation or a fabricated pretext for further Russian aggression or information operations.
    • CR: Prioritize HUMINT (from Ukrainian sources, local Sumy residents), OSINT (cross-referencing with independent media, local government statements), SIGINT (monitoring Russian communications related to this claim). (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
  • GAP 8: RUSSIAN TACTICAL UAV SUPPLY SHORTFALLS AND FUNDRAISING (MEDIUM, UPDATED): Determine if the crowdfunding appeals for specific drone models by Russian units (VDV, Zaporozhye infantry) or general "Summer Campaign 2025" fundraisers indicate systemic logistical issues or localized shortages. Assess the scale of these shortfalls and their impact on Russian tactical reconnaissance and targeting capabilities. Investigate the Avito listing of an EW system from Belgorod Oblast for indications of internal corruption or supply chain issues. Assess the impact of mobile internet issues in LNR on Russian tactical UAV operations.
    • CR: Prioritize OSINT (monitoring further crowdfunding appeals, social media analysis of Russian military personnel discussions), HUMINT. (PRIORITY: MEDIUM).
  • GAP 9: VERACITY OF RUSSIAN "TERRORIST" ARRESTS (MEDIUM, RETAINED): Independent verification of the details and context surrounding the FSB's claimed arrest of a "Kyiv agent" in Kherson Oblast. Assess whether this is a legitimate counter-terrorism operation or a propaganda fabrication. Assess the veracity of the claim regarding priests being "victims of TCC".
    • CR: Prioritize HUMINT, OSINT (local reports, independent media), and review of Russian methodology. (PRIORITY: MEDIUM).
  • GAP 10: DETAILS OF POW EXCHANGES (LOW, NEW): Verify numbers, conditions, and composition of personnel involved in claimed POW exchanges, particularly Alex Parker's claim of a 6000:27 ratio.
    • CR: Prioritize OSINT (Ukrainian official reports, international organizations) and HUMINT (from released personnel). (PRIORITY: LOW).
  • GAP 11: USE OF NORTH KOREAN MATERIEL (LOW, NEW): Assess the prevalence and impact of North Korean weapons systems (e.g., Type 75 MLRS) in the Russian armed forces.
    • CR: Prioritize OSINT (imagery analysis), HUMINT. (PRIORITY: LOW).
  • GAP 12: RUSSIAN DNIEPER RIVER CROSSING CAPABILITIES/INTENT (LOW, NEW): Assess the scale, frequency, and intent behind reported Russian training exercises for Dnieper river crossings. Is this a genuine preparation for a large-scale offensive, or a localized probing/training exercise?
    • CR: Prioritize IMINT (satellite imagery of training areas), SIGINT (communications regarding riverine operations), HUMINT. (PRIORITY: LOW).
  • GAP 13: IMPACT OF RUSSIAN/BELARUSIAN FLIGHT CANCELLATIONS (LOW, NEW): Assess the strategic and economic impact of continued international flight cancellations to/from Russia and Belarus. Does this indicate worsening international isolation or specific security concerns?
    • CR: Prioritize OSINT (airline announcements, travel advisories, economic reports). (PRIORITY: LOW).
  • GAP 14: RUSSIAN USE OF AZERBAIJAN AS LOGISTICAL/DIPLOMATIC CORRIDOR (CRITICAL, NEW): Assess the full scope and purpose of the confirmed new transit route via Baku for Russian personnel and potentially materiel from Iran. Is this a one-off evacuation or the establishment of a strategic corridor for personnel and/or materiel from Iran?
    • CR: Prioritize SIGINT, HUMINT, and OSINT (monitoring air and ground traffic, diplomatic statements from Russia and Azerbaijan). (PRIORITY: CRITICAL).
  • GAP 15: IMPACT OF MOBILE INTERNET ISSUES IN LNR (LOW, NEW): Assess the cause and operational impact of the reported mobile internet issues in LNR. Does this indicate Ukrainian EW activity, infrastructure damage, or internal Russian issues?
    • CR: Prioritize OSINT (local reports, social media), SIGINT (if possible, traffic analysis). (PRIORITY: LOW).

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

  • Intelligence & Special Operations (ISR, HUMINT, OSINT critical):

    1. CRITICAL PRIORITY: IMMEDIATE VERIFICATION OF "THE TELEGRAPH" AID CESSATION CLAIM. All-source intelligence must rapidly confirm or refute the Russian-amplified report on US military aid cessation. This remains the single most critical collection requirement for the next 6-12 hours. (Supports CR 1).
    2. CRITICAL PRIORITY: IMMEDIATE VERIFICATION OF CLAIMS REGARDING IRANIAN "HYPERSONIC" USE / AD DEFEAT / US INVOLVEMENT/TIES/BDA/CASUALTIES / NUCLEAR THREATS / IRAN NPT WITHDRAWAL / IRANIAN MFA UNSC PUSH IN MIDDLE EAST, AND THE SOURCE/INTENT OF "MASSIVE EXPLOSION" VIDEOS. CRITICALLY, IMMEDIATELY VERIFY/DEBUNK "US EMBASSY DAMAGE" CLAIM. Rapidly confirm or deny claims of Iranian hypersonic missile use, AD defeat, US Embassy damage, and US MQ-9 Reaper drone shootdown. Expose any exaggeration or fabrication by Russian/Iranian sources. Critically, assess the intent and impact of nuclear threats and overt anti-Semitic slurs from Russian-aligned channels, the veracity of the THAAD self-destruction claim, and the implications of Russia's denial of the Iranian NPT withdrawal claim, as well as the impact of direct Russian diplomatic actions (citizen warnings, embassy evacuation consideration, calls for UNSC condemnation of Israel). Forcefully investigate and identify the source of the "massive explosion" videos; if misattributed or false flags, prepare immediate debunking. IMMEDIATELY AND FORCEFULLY DEBUNK THE CLAIM OF "US EMBASSY DAMAGE IN TEL AVIV" AS A DELIBERATE FABRICATION. (Supports CR 2, CR 5).
    3. CRITICAL PRIORITY: IMMEDIATE VERIFICATION OF RUSSIAN TERRITORIAL CLAIMS/ACTIVITY IN SUMY OBLAST AND DNIPROPETROVSK/POKROVSK/KRAMATORSK/ZAPORIZHZHIA AXES, INCLUDING ULYANOVKA, KOMAR, AND NOVOPAVLIYKA, AND ASSESSMENT OF M113/TRUCK LOSS. Deploy all available ISR assets to confirm or refute the scale and nature of Russian "activation" and claimed positions in Sumy Oblast and the alleged deep penetration towards Pokrovsk/Kramatorsk, particularly the claimed capture of Ulyanovka and Komar, and the strike in Novopavlivka. If verified, assess the implications for the overall defense posture. If false, prepare a robust counter-narrative. Conduct thorough BDA of the M113 loss and the FPV-struck truck. (Supports CR 3, CR 4, CR 6).
    4. CRITICAL PRIORITY: IMMEDIATE VERIFICATION AND DEBUNKING OF RUSSIAN "HOSTAGE-TAKING" CLAIMS. Task GUR/SBU to immediately investigate and gather evidence to refute the Russian Investigative Committee's claim of "Ukrainian militants taking Kursk residents hostage in Sumy." Prepare for immediate, forceful public debunking. (Supports CR 7).
    5. URGENT: VERIFY RUSSIAN "TERRORIST" ARRESTS IN KHERSON AND UKRAINIAN UAV C2 DESTRUCTION CLAIM, AND "PRIEST" NARRATIVES. Assess the veracity of FSB claims regarding the detained "Kyiv agent" and MoD claims of destroyed UAV C2 to determine if it is a legitimate operation or a propaganda pretext. Investigate the claims regarding priests and TCC. (Supports CR 4, CR 9).
    6. CRITICAL PRIORITY: INTENSIFY ISR ON POKROVSK, KHARKIV-KUPYANSK, SUMY, DNIPROPETROVSK, KRAMATORSK, ZAPORIZHZHIA AXES, AND NORTHERN BORDER WITH BELARUS, AND DNIEPER RIVER. Maintain continuous monitoring for any signs of Russian force buildup or offensive preparations. Increase monitoring of Russian riverine activity on the Dnieper. (Supports CR 3, CR 6, CR 12).
    7. URGENT: ASSESS BDA OF RECENT C2/LOGISTICS/INDUSTRIAL/CIVILIAN STRIKES. GUR/SBU to conduct immediate, granular battle damage assessment (BDA) for the Kyiv civilian damage, Oryol strikes, Kharkiv strikes, Khotin Hromada strikes, and other recent deep strikes. Identify systemic vulnerabilities and develop immediate counter-measures. (Supports CR 4).
    8. IMMEDIATE: MONITOR AND EXPLOIT RUSSIAN IO NARRATIVES (ESPECIALLY ON WESTERN AID CESSATION, MIDDLE EAST "US INVOLVEMENT/TIES/BDA/CASUALTIES," IRANIAN "HYPERSONIC" CLAIMS, NUCLEAR THREATS, IRAN NPT WITHDRAWAL (AND ITS DENIAL), "UKRAINIAN LOSSES," AND EXPLICIT ANTI-SEMITISM, AND POTENTIAL FALSE FLAG EXPLOSION VIDEOS, AND "HOSTAGE-TAKING" CLAIMS, AND "US EMBASSY DAMAGE" CLAIMS). Actively monitor for and analyze new Russian IO narratives, particularly those claiming reduced/stopped Western aid to Ukraine, exaggerating Middle East "successes" or "incidents," speculating on US involvement or ties (including specific unverified BDA/casualties), and the new, sensational claims of Iranian "hypersonic" missile use and AD defeat, explicit nuclear threats, claims of Iranian NPT withdrawal (and subsequent denial), and the use of overt anti-Semitic propaganda. Also track Russian diplomatic actions in the Middle East and the "Ukraine for Iran" rhetoric, and Iranian MFA calls to UNSC. Immediately analyze any new "massive explosion" videos for their origin and intent as potential false flags. Crucially, monitor all Russian channels for further amplification or details of the "hostage-taking" claims. IMMEDIATELY MONITOR FOR FURTHER AMPLIFICATION OR DEBUNKING OF THE "US EMBASSY DAMAGE IN TEL AVIV" CLAIM. (Supports CR 1, 2, 5, 7).
    9. CONTINUOUS COUNTER-SABOTAGE INTELLIGENCE & INTERNAL SECURITY MONITORING. Continue efforts to identify and neutralize collaborators, as demonstrated by the recent success in Mykolaiv and Donetsk. Investigate the Avito EW system listing for signs of internal corruption or diversion. Investigate the Kryvyi Rih embezzlement case for further implications on critical infrastructure resilience. Address the Lviv mobilized serviceman incident to identify systemic issues.

  • Air Defense & Force Protection:

    1. MAINTAIN HIGHEST AIR DEFENSE READINESS ACROSS ALL OBLASTS, WITH EMPHASIS ON EASTERN AIR THREAT AND INDUSTRIAL/CIVILIAN TARGETS. Anticipate Russia may increase the intensity or breadth of aerial attacks (UAVs, ballistic missiles, KABs, tactical aviation, TOS) to capitalize on global distraction and the IO narrative of Western aid cessation. Ensure layered AD coverage for critical infrastructure and population centers, particularly industrial sites and population centers, and especially in border regions (Sumy, Chernihiv). Be prepared for aviation-launched munitions in Dnipropetrovsk and Zaporizhzhia Oblasts.
    2. ADAPT TO WIDER GEOGRAPHIC DRONE/MISSILE THREAT & COUNTER DEEP STRIKES. Implement and refine TTPs to counter widespread, multi-axis attacks, including FPV drones using small arms. Prioritize resources for defending critical C2 nodes, ammunition depots, and industrial/civilian facilities against confirmed Russian deep strikes.
    3. REVIEW AND REHEARSE CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS (COOP) PLANS. All units must immediately review and rehearse COOP plans, ensuring redundant communication pathways and alternate command posts are ready, given the persistent threat of deep strikes.
    4. IMMEDIATE DISPERSAL AND CONCEALMENT. Disperse all high-value assets and personnel. Reinforce concealment measures, especially for C2 nodes and logistics hubs, against FPV drones and KABs.

  • Ground Forces:

    1. MAINTAIN DISCIPLINED DEFENSIVE POSTURE IN POKROVSK, KHARKIV-KUPYANSK, SUMY, DNIPROPETROVSK, KRAMATORSK, ZAPORIZHZHIA, AND NORTHERN BORDER DIRECTIONS. Prioritize strong defensive lines.
    2. REINFORCE DEFENSES IN SUMY OBLAST (NORTHERN-SLOBOZHANSKYI DIRECTION). Based on DPGU announcement and Russian intent, prepare for increased Russian ground activity and cross-border incursions. Continue to leverage successes in countering Russian assault attempts.
    3. CONTAIN RUSSIAN ADVANCES IN DONETSK/DNIPROPETROVSK/ZAPORIZHZHIA, ESPECIALLY AROUND ULYANOVKA/MALYNIVKA, KOMAR AREA, AND NOVOPAVLIYKA. Reinforce defensive lines. Prepare for counter-attacks to regain lost ground or consolidate defensive lines.
    4. CONTINUE FPV DRONE OPERATIONS & COUNTER-BATTERY. Leverage successes in FPV drone attacks against Russian targets (e.g., dugouts, vehicles, personnel) and continue aggressive counter-battery fire against Russian artillery and MLRS (TOS, improvised MLRS). Analyze successful targeting methods. Prioritize fundraising and acquisition for critical equipment like re-transmitter drones for units like "Stryzh" battalion.
    5. MAINTAIN DNEPR RIVER PATROLS AND INTERDICTION CAPABILITIES. Continue successful operations to prevent Russian river crossings in Kherson, and monitor any increased Russian riverine training activity.
    6. IMPROVE PERSONNEL TRANSPORT SAFETY. Address and investigate the incident in Lviv Oblast regarding the mobilized serviceman to prevent recurrence and improve troop welfare.

  • Information Operations (IO):

    1. IMMEDIATE & AGGRESSIVE: COUNTER RUSSIAN NARRATIVES ON "US AID CESSATION," MIDDLE EAST "HYPERSONIC" CLAIMS / "US INVOLVEMENT/TIES/BDA/CASUALTIES," NUCLEAR THREATS, IRAN NPT WITHDRAWAL (AND ITS DENIAL), "UKRAINIAN LOSSES," AND EXPLICIT ANTI-SEMITISM. FORCEFULLY DEBUNK "MASSIVE EXPLOSION" VIDEOS AS MISATTRIBUTED OR FALSE FLAGS. IMMEDIATELY EXPOSE "HOSTAGE-TAKING" CLAIMS AS BLATANT FALSE FLAGS. CRITICALLY, IMMEDIATELY EXPOSE "US EMBASSY DAMAGE IN TEL AVIV" CLAIMS AS BLATANT FABRICATIONS. Proactively and forcefully counter the narrative that the US is stopping aid. Immediately debunk false TASS/Russian claims regarding Iranian "hypersonic" use and advanced AD defeat, and any fabricated claims of US-Iranian consultations or an "American-Israeli war" AND the specific unverified BDA/casualty claims, including US Embassy damage, and the high Israeli/Iranian casualty figures. FORCEFULLY CONDEMN THE INTRODUCTION OF OVERT ANTI-SEMITIC PROPAGANDA, ESPECIALLY WHEN COMBINED WITH NUCLEAR THREATS, by Russian channels. IMMEDIATELY ADDRESS THE RUSSIAN DENIAL OF THE IRANIAN NPT WITHDRAWAL CLAIM, highlighting the previous amplification as evidence of Russian disinformation tactics. Immediately expose any "massive explosion" videos from Russian sources as misattributed or false flags, emphasizing Russian deception. MOST IMPORTANTLY, IMMEDIATELY AND FORCEFULLY DEBUNK THE RUSSIAN INVESTIGATIVE COMMITTEE'S CLAIM OF "UKRAINIAN MILITANTS TAKING RUSSIAN CIVILIANS HOSTAGE IN SUMY," PRESENTING IT AS A BLATANT FALSE FLAG OPERATION AND PRETEXT FOR ESCALATION. USE THE "US EMBASSY DAMAGE" CLAIM AS ANOTHER PRIME EXAMPLE OF RUSSIAN DESPERATION AND THEIR WILLINGNESS TO FABRICATE WAR CRIMES AND DIRECTLY TARGET US INTERESTS IN THE INFO SPACE. Emphasize that Russia seeks to destabilize both regions to exhaust Western resources and attention, as evidenced by the "Ukraine for Iran" rhetoric. Highlight Ukrainian successes in inflicting Russian losses (e.g., successful drone defense, artillery engagements, high AD kill rates, FPV drone intercepts, successful agent arrests, deep strikes on Oryol, FPV truck strike) and AD effectiveness. Expose the neglect of Russian war graves as a counter to their "patriotic" narrative. Expose any internal Russian corruption and Ukrainian successes in combating it (Kryvyi Rih). Counter narratives regarding Ukrainian internal divisions (priests, language use). Promote positive stories of Ukrainian veteran support and societal resilience, especially rehabilitation efforts and reconstruction in frontline areas. Publicize humane treatment of Russian POWs.
    2. RAPID DEBUNKING OF MISINFORMATION. Maintain rapid response to immediately debunk unverified and sensationalized claims propagated by Russian state media and milbloggers (e.g., fabricated Israeli/US actions, rapidly escalating and unverified casualty figures, specific BDA claims, and aggressive territorial claims like "Dnipropetrovsk bridgehead" or "Sumy breakthrough," claimed "liberation" of Ulyanovka, Komar, and claims of Tehran residents leaving). Expose Russia's use of emotionally charged propaganda and anti-Semitic rhetoric.
    3. PROMOTE UKRAINIAN RESILIENCE & AD SUCCESSES: Highlight ongoing Ukrainian AD operations and any successful intercepts to reassure the public and international partners of continued defensive capabilities. Project local control and normalcy despite civilian casualties. Publicize formalized veteran support programs to boost morale and show national resilience. Publicize successful counter-intelligence operations and anti-corruption efforts. Publicly highlight official appointments (e.g., new Prosecutor General nominee) to demonstrate governmental stability.
    4. HIGHLIGHT RUSSIAN ALLIANCES WITH PARIAH STATES & ROLE IN GLOBAL INSTABILITY. Emphasize that Russia directly benefits from and seeks to amplify and manipulate global instability, and is now using potentially unverified claims and narratives of US involvement (and fabricated US ties/BDA/casualties and anti-Semitic slurs) to further this aim. Highlight the use of North Korean materiel by Russian forces. Highlight the continued flow of Russian energy revenue from the EU.

  • Diplomatic/Inter-Agency:

    1. IMMEDIATE & PROACTIVE: ENGAGE KEY PARTNERS ON SUSTAINED SUPPORT AND COUNTERING RUSSIAN DIPLOMATIC MANIPULATION AND AID NARRATIVES. Ukrainian diplomatic missions should immediately engage with US, EU, and other key partners to address "The Telegraph" report on aid cessation. Seek clarification and a unified, strong public message of continued robust support. Emphasize that such narratives are deliberate Russian attempts to sow discord and undermine support. Leverage the confirmed Trump-Zelenskyy meeting at the G7 summit to reinforce direct communication and continued high-level engagement.
    2. COORDINATE WITH ALLIES ON IO STRATEGY: Coordinate closely with allied IO agencies to ensure a unified and consistent counter-narrative to Russian disinformation, particularly regarding aid, global conflict, and the new, more extreme and manipulative narratives, including the direct attempt to draw the US into the Middle East conflict with fabricated claims and unverified BDA/casualties, the sensational claims of "hypersonic" use, claims of Iranian NPT withdrawal (and its denial), and the introduction of overt anti-Semitic propaganda and nuclear threats. Also coordinate response to Russian diplomatic actions in the Middle East and the "Ukraine for Iran" rhetoric, and Iranian MFA calls to UNSC. Coordinate immediate debunking of any "massive explosion" videos identified as false flags/misattributed. Crucially, coordinate a unified and immediate diplomatic response to the Russian "hostage-taking" false flag claim, condemning it as a blatant fabrication designed to escalate. MOST CRITICALLY, COORDINATE IMMEDIATE, FORCEFUL DIPLOMATIC CONDEMNATION OF THE FABRICATED CLAIM OF "US EMBASSY DAMAGE IN TEL AVIV."
    3. INTERNATIONAL CONDEMNATION OF CIVILIAN/INDUSTRIAL TARGETING AND RUSSIAN ANTI-SEMITIC PROPAGANDA. Continue to highlight Russian strikes on civilian/industrial targets to maintain international pressure and secure further AD assistance. Simultaneously, seek strong international condemnation of Russia's use of overt anti-Semitic propaganda as a tool of information warfare. Condemn Russia's punitive measures against citizens in Belgorod. Engage international partners regarding the Hungarian ruling party's "discreditation" campaign.
    4. ENGAGE WITH INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS ON VETERAN SUPPORT & RECONSTRUCTION. Seek international assistance and partnerships for formal veteran support programs to ensure their sustainability and effectiveness. Actively solicit and manage international aid for reconstruction efforts in frontline regions like Zaporizhzhia.
    5. ADDRESS INTERNAL CORRUPTION WITH INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT. Seek international support and expertise for combating large-scale corruption, particularly when it impacts critical civilian infrastructure during wartime, as highlighted by the Kryvyi Rih case. This demonstrates Ukraine's commitment to good governance and strengthens its case for international aid.
Previous (2025-06-16 09:39:01Z)

We only use optional analytics cookies if you allow them. Necessary cookies stay on for sign-in and site security.

Learn more in our Privacy Policy.