Nightwatch logo
'Nightwatch' text with white and gray letters
Historical Intelligence

Situation Report

Archived operational intelligence briefing

Report Time
2025-06-16 09:39:01Z
8 months ago
Previous (2025-06-16 09:09:10Z)

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR)

TIME OF REPORT: 16 JUN 25 / 09:38 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 16 JUN 25 / 09:08 ZULU - 16 JUN 25 / 09:38 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk CLASSIFICATION: TOP SECRET // ORCON // NOFORN


1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

  • Ukraine Operational Area:
    • Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (Novopavlivka, Synelnykivskyi district): Russian MoD claims to have struck Ukrainian personnel and equipment. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for Russian claim, LOW for independent verification of BDA/location). Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine reports a threat of aviation-launched munitions in Synelnykivskyi district. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). This indicates continued Russian focus on the central-eastern front.
    • Komar Settlement (Donetsk Oblast, likely near Vuhledar/Volnovakha direction): "Военкор Котенок" (Russian milblogger) publishes drone footage claiming to show two targeted strikes on "PVD" (forward deployment positions or air defense points), followed by Russian soldiers carrying a naval flag through the village, implying capture or control. This reinforces previous claims of Russian advances in this specific area. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for Russian claim/video, MEDIUM for BDA).
    • Ulyanovka (Malynivka), Donetsk Oblast: "Поддубный |Z|О|V| edition" (Russian milblogger) shares drone footage of multiple aerial attacks (precision strikes) on an armored vehicle, personnel, and residential areas, claiming it's part of the "liberation" of Ulyanovka. This reiterates prior Russian claims of seizing Ulyanovka/Malynivka and shows the destructive methods used. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for Russian claim/video, MEDIUM for BDA).
    • Kryvyi Rih (Dnipropetrovsk Oblast): Олександер Вілкул (Head of Kryvyi Rih Military Administration) posts images and details about the installation of 8 modern block-modular boiler houses, 5 of which are in hospitals, as part of a city heating system modernization program. This directly follows up on the previous report of embezzlement and demonstrates ongoing efforts to restore and improve civilian infrastructure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Unspecified Location (Ukrainian Counter-IO): "Шеф Hayabusa🫡🇺🇦" posts a screenshot of a text message, noting that "Rashists whine that 'blessed fire' increasingly falls on their heads." This is Ukrainian counter-propaganda, likely referring to successful Ukrainian strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Russian Internal Affairs/Occupied Territories/External:
    • Far East (Pacific Fleet Exercise): Russian MoD releases video of a planned exercise of the Pacific Fleet, showing naval vessels (destroyer, corvettes, medical ship) and Il-38 maritime patrol aircraft. This is typical Russian military posturing, projecting capability and normalcy. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Russia (General - Recruitment): "Север.Реалии" (BBC-affiliated) reports at least 26 Russian regions have increased contract payments for joining the MoD. This indicates ongoing efforts to incentivize military service amidst manpower needs. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • LNR (Occupied territory): "Mash на Донбассе" shares a non-military video of "two fighters saving cygnets from a dog," attempting to portray Russian soldiers positively. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for IO, LOW for military relevance).
    • Chelyabinsk (Russia): ASTRA reports three participants in a fight with a "war with Ukraine participant" were found guilty of hooliganism. This suggests growing internal social tensions in Russia related to the war. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Sumy (Ukraine - Russian claim): TASS reports the Russian Investigative Committee (SK) has opened a case alleging Ukrainian militants took residents of Kursk Oblast hostage, claiming they were held in a cell in Sumy. This is a Russian information operation, likely a false flag/pretext claim. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for Russian claim, LOW for veracity).
    • Latvia (External - Russian claims/monitoring): TASS reports a Riga City Council deputy, Aleksey Roslikov, was detained for defending the Russian language. Colonelcassad amplifies this. This is part of Russia's broader narrative of "persecution" of Russian speakers in the Baltics. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • EU (External - Russian claims/monitoring): "Операция Z" (Военкоры Русской Весны) amplifies a Financial Times report that the EU is preparing measures to abandon Russian fossil and nuclear fuels. This highlights ongoing economic pressure on Russia. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

  • Overcast and foggy conditions observed during Russian Pacific Fleet exercises, consistent with maritime operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Drone footage (Komar, Ulyanovka) indicates clear enough visibility for precision targeting, suggesting favorable conditions for UAV operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

  • Ukrainian Forces: Maintaining defensive posture in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, facing aviation threats. Sustaining efforts to repair and modernize civilian infrastructure (Kryvyi Rih). Actively countering Russian narratives. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Russian Forces: Actively conducting strikes in Dnipropetrovsk, pushing ground advances and targeting Ukrainian positions (Komar, Ulyanovka/Malynivka). Continuing large-scale military exercises in the Far East. Intensifying internal recruitment efforts. Continually amplifying and shaping narratives regarding internal Russian issues, Baltic states, and EU energy policies. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (RUSSIA FOCUSED)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action (COA):

  • Capabilities (Russia):
    • Precision Strike: Demonstrated continued capability to conduct precision drone and aviation strikes against Ukrainian positions (Komar, Ulyanovka, Novopavlivka). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Information Warfare - Multi-faceted and Deepening:
      • Dehumanization/Justification: The creation of false narratives (e.g., "Ukrainian militants took Kursk residents hostage in Sumy") aims to dehumanize Ukrainian forces and justify Russian actions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
      • Exploiting Internal Western Divisions: Amplification of issues like the detention of a Russian-language advocate in Latvia aims to portray Western countries as repressive and to fuel grievances among Russian diaspora. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
      • Global Diversion/Normalization: Continued Pacific Fleet exercises and focus on trivial internal news (actor's health, book VAT) aim to project an image of a powerful, stable, and "normal" state, contrasting with the chaos they seek to sow elsewhere. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
      • Countering Economic Pressure: Amplification of EU fuel abandonment reports serves to acknowledge but also frame external economic pressures. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Intentions (Russia):
    • Degrade Ukrainian Defense and Force Redeployment: Continue efforts to advance on the ground (Ulyanovka/Malynivka, Komar) and utilize precision strikes to inflict casualties and destroy equipment. Maintain pressure in key sectors. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Sow Discord and Justify Aggression (CRITICAL - Confirmed and Intensified, now definitively using false flag/pretext claims related to "hostage-taking"): Intensify efforts to create pretexts for further aggression (e.g., claiming Ukrainian forces took Russian civilians hostage in Sumy). Continue to leverage global political developments (Latvia, EU energy) to portray Western weakness or "Russophobia." (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Project Global Relevance & Domestic Stability/Unity: Utilize state media and milbloggers to project an image of global military power (Pacific Fleet exercise), successful domestic governance (recruitment efforts, civil issues), and military adaptation, while simultaneously undermining Ukrainian resistance by showcasing "captured" territories and tactical successes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

  • Deepening Pretext Operations: The claim by the Russian Investigative Committee about Ukrainian forces taking Russian civilians hostage in Sumy represents an escalation in pretext generation, moving from general "nationalist" claims to specific alleged war crimes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for IO tactic).
  • Continued Focus on Recruitment Incentives: Increased payments in 26 regions highlight a sustained, localized effort to boost military recruitment. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Shift in Iran Narrative: Alex Parker's photo message "Didn't like all these statements from the Iranian Foreign Ministry this morning. Perhaps it should hang for now. Did the missiles only last three days?" suggests a quick pivot or dissatisfaction within some Russian milblogger circles regarding the latest Iranian diplomatic posture (e.g., denying nuclear weapon ambitions). This indicates a dynamic and sometimes contradictory, but still centrally directed, IO environment. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

  • Continued offensive operations (Novopavlivka, Komar, Ulyanovka) and precision strikes suggest Russia's conventional ammunition and tactical drone supplies remain sufficient for current operational tempo. The persistent need for increased recruitment payments points to ongoing challenges in human resource sustainment, despite their overall capacity. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

  • Russian Military C2: Continues to coordinate localized combined arms operations (Donetsk, Dnipropetrovsk axes) and large-scale strategic exercises (Pacific Fleet). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Russian IO/Diplomatic C2: Remains highly agile and aggressive in responding to real-time events and shaping narratives. The rapid generation of pretext claims ("Sumy hostages") and the dynamic adaptation of the Iran narrative (Alex Parker's implied criticism) demonstrate a sophisticated, albeit sometimes internally contradictory, IO apparatus. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (UKRAINIAN FOCUSED)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

  • Ukrainian forces are maintaining defensive posture in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast against aviation threats. They are actively engaged in defending against Russian ground advances and precision strikes in Donetsk. Ukraine is committed to strengthening civilian infrastructure, as demonstrated by the Kryvyi Rih heating system modernization. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). The Ukrainian military continues to emphasize veteran support and rehabilitation, as seen in the "МІНВЕТЕРАНІВ" / "суспільна та громадянська безбар'єрність" initiative promoting sports for veterans with prosthetics, which boosts morale and projects resilience. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

  • Success (Civilian Resilience/Infrastructure): Kryvyi Rih's initiative to install modern boiler houses demonstrates active steps to improve critical civilian infrastructure, even under wartime conditions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Success (Counter-IO/Morale): Ukrainian channels are actively countering Russian narratives and maintaining a positive morale posture (e.g., "blessed fire" falling on "Rashists," veteran support). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Success (Military Operations - Historical Context): BUtUSOV PLUS shares a heroic story of the "Svoboda" battalion, showcasing individual and unit bravery, which serves as a morale booster and reinforces national identity. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Setback (Ground Forces): Russian claims of seizing Komar and Ulyanovka/Malynivka, supported by drone footage, indicate continued localized territorial losses or heavy fighting in these areas. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for Russian claims/video, MEDIUM for independent verification of full capture). The MoD Russia claim of strikes in Novopavlivka, Dnipropetrovsk, also points to ongoing pressure in the eastern sector. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

  • The continuous strikes and ground engagements necessitate sustained supplies of precision munitions and defensive capabilities. The need to rebuild/modernize civilian infrastructure (Kryvyi Rih) further stresses national resources. Support for veteran rehabilitation programs also requires dedicated funding and resources. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

  • Russian Narratives (CRITICAL - HIGHLY ACTIVE, AGGRESSIVE, MANIPULATIVE, RADICALIZED & REAL-TIME RESPONSE, NOW UTILIZING FALSE FLAG/PRETEXT CLAIMS):
    • Escalation of Middle East Conflict & Iranian "Resolve" (CRITICAL - Ongoing, but with slight internal contradiction): Alex Parker's photo message questioning Iran's stance ("Did the missiles only last three days?") highlights a degree of disappointment or critical assessment within Russian milblogger circles regarding Iran's diplomatic posturing (e.g., denying nuclear weapons ambition). However, "Два майора" continues to highlight Iran-Israel. This suggests a dynamic but still aggressive push on the Middle East narrative, with some internal self-correction or adjustment. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Russian Military Successes in Ukraine (NEW - Uses specific false flag/pretext claims): Russian MoD claims strikes on "Novopavlivka," "enterprise of Ukrainian military-industrial complex," "AFU training center," and "air defense radar station." "Военкор Котенок" and "Поддубный |Z|О|V| edition" reinforce "liberation" claims for Komar and Ulyanovka/Malynivka with drone footage. Crucially, TASS's report of the Russian Investigative Committee opening a case about Ukrainian militants taking Kursk residents hostage in Sumy is a significant false flag/pretext operation, designed to create justification for further actions or to demonize Ukrainian forces. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for IO tactic).
    • Ukrainian Weakness/Internal Division/Western Aid Fragmentation: TASS's report on Latvia detaining a Russian-language advocate serves to portray Western democracies as repressive and to rally Russian-speaking populations. "Операция Z" highlighting EU plans to abandon Russian fuels is framed to show Western economic pressure on Russia, implicitly suggesting it's not working, or that Russia is adapting. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Domestic Resilience & Progress/Normalcy: Russian MoD's video of Pacific Fleet exercises, TASS's report on an actor's health, and "Mash на Донбассе"'s "cygnet rescue" story are all attempts to portray normalcy and a functional state, while "Север.Реалии" reporting on increased contract payments highlights ongoing recruitment efforts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Ukrainian Counter-Narratives: Ukrainian channels (Олександер Вілкул, Шеф Hayabusa🫡🇺🇦, РБК-Україна, Оперативний ЗСУ, БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС) are consistently reporting on Russian aggression (aviation threats in Dnipropetrovsk) and emphasizing effective Ukrainian counter-operations, resilience, and efforts to maintain civilian life and support veterans. Олександер Вілкул's post on Kryvyi Rih heating system modernization directly counters narratives of Ukrainian collapse and internal corruption, showing practical steps taken. "Шеф Hayabusa🫡🇺🇦" uses humor to counter Russian aggression. The Ministry of Veterans Affairs (МІНВЕТЕРАНІВ) and "суспільна та громадянська безбар'єрність" initiative highlight strong support for veterans. BUtUSOV PLUS's heroic story promotes national pride and military valor. RBC-Ukraine continues to announce international meetings, projecting continued diplomatic engagement and support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

  • Ukrainian Morale: Reports of infrastructure modernization (Kryvyi Rih), veteran support programs (prosthetics), and heroic military stories (BUtUSOV PLUS) will positively impact public and military morale. The continuous aviation threats and Russian territorial claims are negative factors, but countered by proactive Ukrainian messaging. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Russian Morale: Russian IO aims to boost domestic morale by portraying Russia as globally powerful (Pacific Fleet), militarily effective (Komar, Ulyanovka), and a state that effectively manages its population (recruitment, civilian news). The false narrative of Ukrainian "hostage-taking" aims to demonize Ukraine and justify the invasion, potentially galvanizing support. Internal tensions related to war veterans (Chelyabinsk fight) indicate some societal strain. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

  • The continued Russian amplification of the Israel-Iran conflict, despite some internal contradiction within milbloggers, remains a strategy to divert global attention. Russian claims of EU measures to abandon fossil and nuclear fuels highlight ongoing international economic pressure. Ukrainian diplomatic efforts, as indicated by RBC-Ukraine's announcement of upcoming international meetings with Zelenskyy, underscore Ukraine's continued need to maintain international attention and support. The detention of a pro-Russian deputy in Latvia, as amplified by Russian media, is aimed at portraying Western countries as hostile to Russian interests, potentially impacting public opinion in some Western circles. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

  • Aggressive, Targeted, and Real-time Manipulative Narrative Campaign (CRITICAL, CONFIRMED IMMEDIATE FOCUS, NOW UTILIZING EXPLICIT FALSE FLAG/PRETEXT CLAIMS): Russia will continue its intensified information campaign, with an immediate and sustained focus on amplifying and manipulating the Israel-Iran conflict. They will increasingly employ explicit false flag or pretext claims (e.g., "Ukrainian hostage-taking of Russian civilians") to justify escalatory actions or to demonize Ukrainian forces, blurring the lines between real events and manipulated propaganda. While they may show internal contradictions on some narratives (e.g., Alex Parker on Iran), the overall direction remains consistent. They will amplify any further escalations in the Middle East. Russia will also actively attempt to control the narrative around Ukrainian tactical operations, spinning any setbacks and linking them to their own "successes" (e.g., Komar capture, Ulyanovka), while continuing to highlight domestic stability and military adaptation (recruitment incentives, Pacific Fleet exercises), and pushing narratives of internal Ukrainian division or Western repression. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Sustained Localized Ground Pressure with Exaggerated Claims and Combined Arms: Russian forces will continue localized ground pressure, particularly in the Donetsk axes (Pokrovsk direction, including Novopavlivka, Ulyanovka/Malynivka, Komar, and the Siversk/Severkoye direction). They will continue to use combined arms tactics (mines, FPVs, artillery) to increase attrition on Ukrainian forces and equipment. They will continue to use state media and milbloggers to claim disproportionately high Ukrainian casualties and BDA, and to exaggerate territorial gains. Russian riverine training indicates a potential for continued, albeit likely small-scale, probing actions across the Dnieper. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Sustained UAV/Missile/Aviation Strikes on Ukrainian Cities/Infrastructure & C2: Russia will continue to launch UAVs and potentially aviation-launched munitions against Ukrainian targets (critical infrastructure, urban centers like Dnipropetrovsk Oblast's Synelnykivskyi district, claimed military-industrial complex targets) to deplete Ukrainian long-range air defense capabilities and exert psychological pressure. They will also conduct KAB strikes on frontline areas (Donetsk). Russian attacks on energy infrastructure will likely continue, explicitly leveraged by Russia during periods of global distraction. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Continued Counter-Insurgency/Propaganda Operations in Occupied Territories & Tightening Domestic Control: FSB will likely continue to stage or publicize arrests of alleged "terrorists" to legitimize Russian control and demonize Ukrainian resistance. Russia will continue to tighten domestic control and conscription laws to ensure personnel availability for the war effort, including increased financial incentives for contract service. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

  • Coordinated Strategic Strike Package with Ground Offensive under Cover of Diversion Narrative & Political Pressure (Retained from previous ISR, now with intensified IO component, Middle East Crisis Amplification/Manipulation, including direct diplomatic pressure and threats, ideological radicalization, and selective denials of previous false claims, AND NOW UTILIZING EXPLICIT FALSE FLAG/PRETEXT CLAIMS FOR ESCALATION): Russia executes a highly coordinated, large-scale combined arms offensive, potentially targeting the Pokrovsk axis or a renewed thrust from the north. This would involve:
    1. A massed strike of ballistic and cruise missiles in conjunction with loitering munitions against critical Ukrainian C2, logistics, and major AD sites across the entire operational depth, aimed at achieving temporary air superiority and operational paralysis, capitalizing on the psychological impact of perceived Western aid withdrawal and the intensified global distraction. The recent pattern of deep strikes and massed UAVs could be a precursor.
    2. Simultaneous major ground offensives on multiple axes (e.g., Pokrovsk, Sumy/Northern-Slobozhanskyi, Kharkiv/Southern-Slobozhanskyi), capitalizing on the psychological impact of perceived Western aid diversion and the physical degradation of Ukrainian command and control.
    3. This would be synchronized with an unprecedented surge in Russian IO, including fabricated "false flag" events in Ukraine or neighboring countries (e.g., "hostage-taking of Russian civilians") to justify the escalation and reinforce the narrative of Western impotence and Ukrainian collapse, especially on the back of amplified and manipulated claims of aid cessation and escalated global conflicts (e.g., Middle East, now with magnified focus on high casualties, Iranian threats, direct Russian diplomatic actions, and the introduction of highly inflammatory ideological rhetoric like NPT withdrawal claims or explicit anti-Semitism, alongside the selective denial of previous false claims to maintain credibility for future ones). The introduction of specific, fabricated "war crimes" against Russian civilians (e.g., Sumy hostage claim) could serve as a direct pretext for heightened aggression and further justify the MDCOA to a domestic Russian audience. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

  • Immediate (Next 1-6 hours):
    • ISR: Continue to prioritize collection to verify or refute claims of Russian territorial gains (Komar, Ulyanovka/Malynivka, Novopavlivka). Continue real-time tracking of Russian milblogger and state media channels for new narratives or amplification of existing ones, particularly regarding the Israel-Iran conflict, focusing now on deeper, fabricated claims of US involvement/ties/BDA/casualties, intensified diplomatic pressure from Russia, and the highly inflammatory claims such as THAAD self-destruction due to hacking, explicit anti-Semitism, or the "exchange Ukraine for Iran" narrative, as well as the Iranian MFA's call to the UNSC. Note and analyze Russian denials of previously amplified false claims (e.g., NPT withdrawal). Critically, analyze the source and intent of the "massive explosion" videos being pushed by Russian sources, and be prepared to identify them as misattributed or false flags. Investigate the veracity and intent of the Russian Investigative Committee's claim of "Ukrainian militants taking Russian civilians hostage in Sumy." Monitor for follow-on UAV/missile waves and KAB/TOS strikes into Sumy/Donetsk/Kharkiv/Dnipropetrovsk/Kyiv. Track any further claims regarding POW exchanges. Monitor for any reports of Russian force movements towards the Sumy border or further riverine training/probes on the Dnieper.
    • IO: Commanders must continue preparation for a robust counter-narrative to the "US stops aid to Ukraine" claim. Ukrainian channels should highlight the continued effectiveness of Ukrainian drone operations (including new FPV drone strike videos, deep strikes on Oryol, successful AD against Russian drones), counter-battery fire, and high air defense success rates (e.g., FPV drone intercepts, Sumy defense successes), and successful counter-intelligence operations. Prepare immediate debunking of false TASS/Russian claims regarding the Middle East crisis and Ukrainian tactical setbacks, especially the new, more insidious claims of high Israeli/Iranian casualties, Iranian threats as amplified by Russia, the THAAD self-destruction claim, and the direct Russian diplomatic actions to withdraw citizens. FORCEFULLY EXPOSE AND DEBUNK THE "MASSIVE EXPLOSION" VIDEOS AS MISATTRIBUTED OR FALSE FLAGS, highlighting Russian deception tactics. IMMEDIATELY AND FORCEFULLY DEBUNK THE RUSSIAN INVESTIGATIVE COMMITTEE'S CLAIM OF "UKRAINIAN MILITANTS TAKING RUSSIAN CIVILIANS HOSTAGE IN SUMY," presenting it as a blatant false flag operation and pretext for escalation. Proactively link the escalating Middle East crisis to Russian destabilization efforts and expose Russian amplification and manipulation. Publicly expose Russian casualties or equipment losses (e.g., from successful Ukrainian AD or FPV drone strikes). Proactively expose Russian corruption (e.g., EW system on Avito) and highlight Ukrainian efforts against internal corruption (Kryvyi Rih). Highlight positive aspects of Ukrainian society, such as veteran support programs.

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS & COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

  • GAP 1: VERIFICATION OF "THE TELEGRAPH" REPORT ON US AID CESSATION (CRITICAL, IMMEDIATE, HYPER-PRIORITY, RETAINED): Independent, all-source verification of the "The Telegraph" report amplified by Russian sources regarding the cessation of US military aid to Ukraine. Assess the type, quantity, and operational impact of any such claims on Ukrainian defense capabilities.
    • COLLECTION REQUIREMENT (CR): Prioritize SIGINT, OSINT (direct source review of "The Telegraph" article for context, content, and accuracy), IMINT, and HUMINT from US, NATO, and Ukrainian sources to confirm or refute these reports. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
  • GAP 2: VERIFICATION OF ISRAELI/IRANIAN IMPACTS & RUSSIAN CLAIMS ON IRANIAN "HYPERSONIC" USE / AD DEFEAT / US INVOLVEMENT/TIES/BDA/CASUALTIES / NUCLEAR THREATS / IRAN NPT WITHDRAWAL / IRANIAN MFA UNSC PUSH (CRITICAL, IMMEDIATE, UPDATED FOCUS, RETAINED): Independent, all-source verification of all specific impact claims in Israel and the reconciliation of conflicting casualty figures. Critically, assess the veracity of claims of Iranian "hypersonic" missile use and "new methods" to defeat Israeli air defenses, as well as claims of US Embassy damage in Tel Aviv and the shooting down of a US MQ-9 Reaper drone. Verify the claim of THAAD self-destruction due to Iranian hacking. Also, verify the claim that Israel is attempting to convince the US to join military operations against Iran, the new, fabricated claims of US-Iranian consultations or an "American-Israeli war," and the specific claim of an Arrow-3/THAAD AD system being struck at Nevatim. Additionally, verify Rybar's claims of US refueling aircraft redeployment and changes in communication patterns for sea-based cruise missiles. Assess the specific impact and intent of the re-introduction of overt anti-Semitic propaganda and nuclear threats by Russian state-aligned channels, as well as the impact of direct Russian diplomatic actions (citizen warnings, embassy evacuation consideration, calls for UNSC condemnation of Israel). CONFIRM AND ANALYZE THE RUSSIAN DENIAL OF THE IRANIAN PARLIAMENT VOTE TO WITHDRAW FROM NPT. Verify claims of Tehran residents leaving and their true sentiment. Verify the execution of "Mossad agent" Ismail Fikri in Iran.
    • CR: Prioritize OSINT (cross-referencing with Israeli official reports, international news agencies, US official statements, IAEA), IMINT (satellite imagery post-strike), and HUMINT from Israeli and US sources. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
  • GAP 3: RUSSIAN INTENT & FORCE DISPOSITION ON NORTHERN AXIS (CRITICAL, RETAINED): Verification of reports of Russian troop movements to Belarus. Assess if the sustained Russian presence in Kursk border region indicates a future offensive push.
    • CR: Prioritize IMINT, SIGINT, and HUMINT on Russian force composition, logistics build-up, and intent on the Belarus border and Kursk. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
  • GAP 4: UKRAINIAN BATTLE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT (BDA) FROM RECENT DEEP STRIKES (CRITICAL, ONGOING): Full extent of damage and operational impact from recent Russian deep strikes on Ukrainian C2, logistics, and industrial sites (e.g., Dnipropetrovsk industrial enterprise from previous ISR), and civilian areas (Kyiv, Kharkiv). Also, full BDA of claimed Russian strikes on Ukrainian dugout/UAV control point near Mirnoye. Specifically, verify Russian claims of destroying a Ukrainian UAV command post in Kherson, and assess the operational impact. Assess the full extent of damage and personnel losses to the M113 APC in Donetsk. Assess the impact of claimed Russian strikes on a Ukrainian military-industrial enterprise, training center, and AD radar.
    • CR: Prioritize HUMINT from affected units, OSINT (local reports, social media analysis), and IMINT (satellite imagery analysis if available) to determine operational impact and identify vulnerabilities. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
  • GAP 5: RUSSIAN ROLE IN ISRAEL-IRAN ESCALATION (CRITICAL, RETAINED, NEW FOCUS ON "HYPERSONIC" CLAIMS, ANTI-SEMITISM, NUCLEAR THREATS, NPT WITHDRAWAL, AND DIPLOMATIC PRESSURE, AND POTENTIAL FALSE FLAGS): Assess the extent of direct or indirect Russian involvement in instigating or facilitating the recent missile launches from Iran towards Israel, beyond mere amplification and narrative manipulation. Is Russia providing intelligence, materiel, or political cover? Specifically, analyze the motivation and target audience for the amplification of "hypersonic" claims, nuclear threats, the introduction of overt anti-Semitic propaganda, and the initial (and now denied) claim of Iranian NPT withdrawal by Russian state-aligned channels, as well as the intent behind official Russian diplomatic warnings/evacuations and the "Ukraine for Iran" rhetoric. Analyze the impact of Russian retractions of false claims. Critically, investigate the origin and intent of the "massive explosion" videos pushed by Russian channels, assessing if they are misattributed or false flags designed to sow fear or project exaggerated power.
    • CR: Prioritize SIGINT, HUMINT, and OSINT on Russia-Iran communications and coordination, and US military movements in the region. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
  • GAP 6: VERIFICATION OF RUSSIAN TACTICAL GAINS AND UKRAINIAN WITHDRAWALS (MEDIUM, UPDATED): Independent verification of Russian claims of "full clearing" of Malynivka (Ulyanovka), advances near Burlatske and Novopol, and Pushilin's claim of deep penetration into Dnipropetrovsk Oblast towards Pokrovsk. Critically, verify the Russian claim of Ukrainian forces withdrawing from Komar area to Voskresenka. Verify Russian claims of destruction of AFU equipment at Novotoretskoye. Assess the veracity of the Russian-produced "Pace of Offensive Operation" chart and its data. Verify claimed "liberation" of Ulyanovka (Malynivka) and Komar settlement.
    • CR: Prioritize HUMINT from Ukrainian units in the area, OSINT (local reports, geolocated video/photos), and IMINT. (PRIORITY: MEDIUM).
  • GAP 7: VERACITY AND INTENT OF RUSSIAN "HOSTAGE-TAKING" CLAIMS (CRITICAL, NEW): Immediately verify the Russian Investigative Committee's claim of Ukrainian militants taking Kursk Oblast residents hostage in Sumy. Assess if this is a legitimate criminal investigation or a fabricated pretext for further Russian aggression or information operations.
    • CR: Prioritize HUMINT (from Ukrainian sources, local Sumy residents), OSINT (cross-referencing with independent media, local government statements), SIGINT (monitoring Russian communications related to this claim). (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
  • GAP 8: RUSSIAN TACTICAL UAV SUPPLY SHORTFALLS AND FUNDRAISING (MEDIUM, UPDATED): Determine if the crowdfunding appeals for specific drone models by Russian units (VDV, Zaporozhye infantry) or general "Summer Campaign 2025" fundraisers indicate systemic logistical issues or localized shortages. Assess the scale of these shortfalls and their impact on Russian tactical reconnaissance and targeting capabilities. Investigate the Avito listing of an EW system from Belgorod Oblast for indications of internal corruption or supply chain issues.
    • CR: Prioritize OSINT (monitoring further crowdfunding appeals, social media analysis of Russian military personnel discussions), HUMINT. (PRIORITY: MEDIUM).
  • GAP 9: VERACITY OF RUSSIAN "TERRORIST" ARRESTS (MEDIUM, RETAINED): Independent verification of the details and context surrounding the FSB's claimed arrest of a "Kyiv agent" in Kherson Oblast. Assess whether this is a legitimate counter-terrorism operation or a propaganda fabrication. Assess the veracity of the claim regarding priests being "victims of TCC".
    • CR: Prioritize HUMINT, OSINT (local reports, independent media), and review of Russian methodology. (PRIORITY: MEDIUM).
  • GAP 10: DETAILS OF POW EXCHANGES (LOW, NEW): Verify numbers, conditions, and composition of personnel involved in claimed POW exchanges.
    • CR: Prioritize OSINT (Ukrainian official reports, international organizations) and HUMINT (from released personnel). (PRIORITY: LOW).
  • GAP 11: USE OF NORTH KOREAN MATERIEL (LOW, NEW): Assess the prevalence and impact of North Korean weapons systems (e.g., Type 75 MLRS) in the Russian armed forces.
    • CR: Prioritize OSINT (imagery analysis), HUMINT. (PRIORITY: LOW).
  • GAP 12: RUSSIAN DNIEPER RIVER CROSSING CAPABILITIES/INTENT (LOW, NEW): Assess the scale, frequency, and intent behind reported Russian training exercises for Dnieper river crossings. Is this a genuine preparation for a large-scale offensive, or a localized probing/training exercise?
    • CR: Prioritize IMINT (satellite imagery of training areas), SIGINT (communications regarding riverine operations), HUMINT. (PRIORITY: LOW).
  • GAP 13: IMPACT OF RUSSIAN/BELARUSIAN FLIGHT CANCELLATIONS (LOW, NEW): Assess the strategic and economic impact of continued international flight cancellations to/from Russia and Belarus. Does this indicate worsening international isolation or specific security concerns?
    • CR: Prioritize OSINT (airline announcements, travel advisories, economic reports). (PRIORITY: LOW).

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

  • Intelligence & Special Operations (ISR, HUMINT, OSINT critical):

    1. CRITICAL PRIORITY: IMMEDIATE VERIFICATION OF "THE TELEGRAPH" AID CESSATION CLAIM. All-source intelligence must rapidly confirm or refute the Russian-amplified report on US military aid cessation. This remains the single most critical collection requirement for the next 6-12 hours. (Supports CR 1).
    2. CRITICAL PRIORITY: IMMEDIATE VERIFICATION OF CLAIMS REGARDING IRANIAN "HYPERSONIC" USE / AD DEFEAT / US INVOLVEMENT/TIES/BDA/CASUALTIES / NUCLEAR THREATS / IRAN NPT WITHDRAWAL / IRANIAN MFA UNSC PUSH IN MIDDLE EAST, AND THE SOURCE/INTENT OF "MASSIVE EXPLOSION" VIDEOS. Rapidly confirm or deny claims of Iranian hypersonic missile use, AD defeat, US Embassy damage, and US MQ-9 Reaper drone shootdown. Expose any exaggeration or fabrication by Russian/Iranian sources. Critically, assess the intent and impact of nuclear threats and overt anti-Semitic slurs from Russian-aligned channels, the veracity of the THAAD self-destruction claim, and the implications of Russia's denial of the Iranian NPT withdrawal claim, as well as the impact of direct Russian diplomatic actions (citizen warnings, embassy evacuation consideration, calls for UNSC condemnation of Israel). Forcefully investigate and identify the source of the "massive explosion" videos; if misattributed or false flags, prepare immediate debunking. (Supports CR 2, CR 5).
    3. CRITICAL PRIORITY: IMMEDIATE VERIFICATION OF RUSSIAN TERRITORIAL CLAIMS/ACTIVITY IN SUMY OBLAST AND DNIPROPETROVSK/POKROVSK/KRAMATORSK/ZAPORIZHZHIA AXES, INCLUDING ULYANOVKA, KOMAR, AND NOVOPAVLIYKA, AND ASSESSMENT OF M113 LOSS. Deploy all available ISR assets to confirm or refute the scale and nature of Russian "activation" and claimed positions in Sumy Oblast and the alleged deep penetration towards Pokrovsk/Kramatorsk, particularly the claimed capture of Ulyanovka and Komar, and the strike in Novopavlivka. If verified, assess the implications for the overall defense posture. If false, prepare a robust counter-narrative. Conduct thorough BDA of the M113 loss. (Supports CR 3, CR 4, CR 6).
    4. CRITICAL PRIORITY: IMMEDIATE VERIFICATION AND DEBUNKING OF RUSSIAN "HOSTAGE-TAKING" CLAIMS. Task GUR/SBU to immediately investigate and gather evidence to refute the Russian Investigative Committee's claim of "Ukrainian militants taking Kursk residents hostage in Sumy." Prepare for immediate, forceful public debunking. (Supports CR 7).
    5. URGENT: VERIFY RUSSIAN "TERRORIST" ARRESTS IN KHERSON AND UKRAINIAN UAV C2 DESTRUCTION CLAIM, AND "PRIEST" NARRATIVES. Assess the veracity of FSB claims regarding the detained "Kyiv agent" and MoD claims of destroyed UAV C2 to determine if it is a legitimate operation or a propaganda pretext. Investigate the claims regarding priests and TCC. (Supports CR 4, CR 9).
    6. CRITICAL PRIORITY: INTENSIFY ISR ON POKROVSK, KHARKIV-KUPYANSK, SUMY, DNIPROPETROVSK, KRAMATORSK, ZAPORIZHZHIA AXES, AND NORTHERN BORDER WITH BELARUS, AND DNIEPER RIVER. Maintain continuous monitoring for any signs of Russian force buildup or offensive preparations. Increase monitoring of Russian riverine activity on the Dnieper. (Supports CR 3, CR 6, CR 12).
    7. URGENT: ASSESS BDA OF RECENT C2/LOGISTICS/INDUSTRIAL/CIVILIAN STRIKES. GUR/SBU to conduct immediate, granular battle damage assessment (BDA) for the Kyiv civilian damage, Oryol strikes, Kharkiv strikes, and other recent deep strikes. Identify systemic vulnerabilities and develop immediate counter-measures. (Supports CR 4).
    8. IMMEDIATE: MONITOR AND EXPLOIT RUSSIAN IO NARRATIVES (ESPECIALLY ON WESTERN AID CESSATION, MIDDLE EAST "US INVOLVEMENT/TIES/BDA/CASUALTIES," IRANIAN "HYPERSONIC" CLAIMS, NUCLEAR THREATS, IRAN NPT WITHDRAWAL (AND ITS DENIAL), "UKRAINIAN LOSSES," AND EXPLICIT ANTI-SEMITISM, AND POTENTIAL FALSE FLAG EXPLOSION VIDEOS, AND "HOSTAGE-TAKING" CLAIMS). Actively monitor for and analyze new Russian IO narratives, particularly those claiming reduced/stopped Western aid to Ukraine, exaggerating Middle East "successes" or "incidents," speculating on US involvement or ties (including specific unverified BDA/casualties), and the new, sensational claims of Iranian "hypersonic" missile use and AD defeat, explicit nuclear threats, claims of Iranian NPT withdrawal (and subsequent denial), and the use of overt anti-Semitic propaganda. Also track Russian diplomatic actions in the Middle East and the "Ukraine for Iran" rhetoric, and Iranian MFA calls to UNSC. Immediately analyze any new "massive explosion" videos for their origin and intent as potential false flags. Crucially, monitor all Russian channels for further amplification or details of the "hostage-taking" claims. (Supports CR 1, 2, 5, 7).
    9. CONTINUOUS COUNTER-SABOTAGE INTELLIGENCE & INTERNAL SECURITY MONITORING. Continue efforts to identify and neutralize collaborators, as demonstrated by the recent success in Mykolaiv and Donetsk. Investigate the Avito EW system listing for signs of internal corruption or diversion. Investigate the Kryvyi Rih embezzlement case for further implications on critical infrastructure resilience.
  • Air Defense & Force Protection:

    1. MAINTAIN HIGHEST AIR DEFENSE READINESS ACROSS ALL OBLASTS, WITH EMPHASIS ON EASTERN AIR THREAT AND INDUSTRIAL/CIVILIAN TARGETS. Anticipate Russia may increase the intensity or breadth of aerial attacks (UAVs, ballistic missiles, KABs, tactical aviation, TOS) to capitalize on global distraction and the IO narrative of Western aid cessation. Ensure layered AD coverage for critical infrastructure and population centers, particularly industrial sites and population centers. Be prepared for aviation-launched munitions in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast.
    2. ADAPT TO WIDER GEOGRAPHIC DRONE/MISSILE THREAT & COUNTER DEEP STRIKES. Implement and refine TTPs to counter widespread, multi-axis attacks, including FPV drones using small arms. Prioritize resources for defending critical C2 nodes, ammunition depots, and industrial/civilian facilities against confirmed Russian deep strikes.
    3. REVIEW AND REHEARSE CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS (COOP) PLANS. All units must immediately review and rehearse COOP plans, ensuring redundant communication pathways and alternate command posts are ready, given the persistent threat of deep strikes.
    4. IMMEDIATE DISPERSAL AND CONCEALMENT. Disperse all high-value assets and personnel. Reinforce concealment measures, especially for C2 nodes and logistics hubs, against FPV drones and KABs.
  • Ground Forces:

    1. MAINTAIN DISCIPLINED DEFENSIVE POSTURE IN POKROVSK, KHARKIV-KUPYANSK, SUMY, DNIPROPETROVSK, KRAMATORSK, ZAPORIZHZHIA, AND NORTHERN BORDER DIRECTIONS. Prioritize strong defensive lines.
    2. REINFORCE DEFENSES IN SUMY OBLAST (NORTHERN-SLOBOZHANSKYI DIRECTION). Based on DPGU announcement and Russian intent, prepare for increased Russian ground activity and cross-border incursions. Continue to leverage successes in countering Russian assault attempts.
    3. CONTAIN RUSSIAN ADVANCES IN DONETSK/DNIPROPETROVSK/ZAPORIZHZHIA, ESPECIALLY AROUND ULYANOVKA/MALYNIVKA, KOMAR AREA, AND NOVOPAVLIYKA. Reinforce defensive lines. Prepare for counter-attacks to regain lost ground or consolidate defensive lines.
    4. CONTINUE FPV DRONE OPERATIONS & COUNTER-BATTERY. Leverage successes in FPV drone attacks against Russian targets (e.g., dugouts, vehicles, personnel) and continue aggressive counter-battery fire against Russian artillery and MLRS (TOS, improvised MLRS). Analyze successful targeting methods.
    5. MAINTAIN DNEPR RIVER PATROLS AND INTERDICTION CAPABILITIES. Continue successful operations to prevent Russian river crossings in Kherson, and monitor any increased Russian riverine training activity.
  • Information Operations (IO):

    1. IMMEDIATE & AGGRESSIVE: COUNTER RUSSIAN NARRATIVES ON "US AID CESSATION," MIDDLE EAST "HYPERSONIC" CLAIMS / "US INVOLVEMENT/TIES/BDA/CASUALTIES," NUCLEAR THREATS, IRAN NPT WITHDRAWAL (AND ITS DENIAL), "UKRAINIAN LOSSES," AND EXPLICIT ANTI-SEMITISM. FORCEFULLY DEBUNK "MASSIVE EXPLOSION" VIDEOS AS MISATTRIBUTED OR FALSE FLAGS. IMMEDIATELY EXPOSE "HOSTAGE-TAKING" CLAIMS AS BLATANT FALSE FLAGS. Proactively and forcefully counter the narrative that the US is stopping aid. Immediately debunk false TASS/Russian claims regarding Iranian "hypersonic" use and advanced AD defeat, and any fabricated claims of US-Iranian consultations or an "American-Israeli war" AND the specific unverified BDA/casualty claims, including US Embassy damage, and the high Israeli/Iranian casualty figures. FORCEFULLY CONDEMN THE INTRODUCTION OF OVERT ANTI-SEMITIC PROPAGANDA, ESPECIALLY WHEN COMBINED WITH NUCLEAR THREATS, by Russian channels. IMMEDIATELY ADDRESS THE RUSSIAN DENIAL OF THE IRANIAN NPT WITHDRAWAL CLAIM, highlighting the previous amplification as evidence of Russian disinformation tactics. Immediately expose any "massive explosion" videos from Russian sources as misattributed or false flags, emphasizing Russian deception. MOST IMPORTANTLY, IMMEDIATELY AND FORCEFULLY DEBUNK THE RUSSIAN INVESTIGATIVE COMMITTEE'S CLAIM OF "UKRAINIAN MILITANTS TAKING RUSSIAN CIVILIANS HOSTAGE IN SUMY," PRESENTING IT AS A BLATANT FALSE FLAG OPERATION AND PRETEXT FOR ESCALATION. Use this as a prime example of Russian desperation and their willingness to fabricate war crimes. Emphasize that Russia seeks to destabilize both regions to exhaust Western resources and attention, as evidenced by the "Ukraine for Iran" rhetoric. Highlight Ukrainian successes in inflicting Russian losses (e.g., successful drone defense, artillery engagements, high AD kill rates, FPV drone intercepts, successful agent arrests, deep strikes on Oryol) and AD effectiveness. Expose the neglect of Russian war graves as a counter to their "patriotic" narrative. Expose any internal Russian corruption (e.g., EW system on Avito) and Ukrainian successes in combating it (Kryvyi Rih). Counter narratives regarding Ukrainian internal divisions (priests, language use). Promote positive stories of Ukrainian veteran support and societal resilience.
    2. RAPID DEBUNKING OF MISINFORMATION. Maintain rapid response to immediately debunk unverified and sensationalized claims propagated by Russian state media and milbloggers (e.g., fabricated Israeli/US actions, rapidly escalating and unverified casualty figures, specific BDA claims, and aggressive territorial claims like "Dnipropetrovsk bridgehead" or "Sumy breakthrough," claimed "liberation" of Ulyanovka, Komar, and claims of Tehran residents leaving). Expose Russia's use of emotionally charged propaganda and anti-Semitic rhetoric.
    3. PROMOTE UKRAINIAN RESILIENCE & AD SUCCESSES: Highlight ongoing Ukrainian AD operations and any successful intercepts to reassure the public and international partners of continued defensive capabilities. Project local control and normalcy despite civilian casualties. Publicize formalized veteran support programs to boost morale and show national resilience. Publicize successful counter-intelligence operations and anti-corruption efforts. Publicly highlight official appointments (e.g., new Prosecutor General nominee) to demonstrate governmental stability.
    4. HIGHLIGHT RUSSIAN ALLIANCES WITH PARIAH STATES & ROLE IN GLOBAL INSTABILITY. Emphasize that Russia directly benefits from and seeks to amplify and manipulate global instability, and is now using potentially unverified claims and narratives of US involvement (and fabricated US ties/BDA/casualties and anti-Semitic slurs) to further this aim. Highlight the use of North Korean materiel by Russian forces.
  • Diplomatic/Inter-Agency:

    1. IMMEDIATE & PROACTIVE: ENGAGE KEY PARTNERS ON SUSTAINED SUPPORT AND COUNTERING RUSSIAN DIPLOMATIC MANIPULATION AND AID NARRATIVES. Ukrainian diplomatic missions should immediately engage with US, EU, and other key partners to address "The Telegraph" report on aid cessation. Seek clarification and a unified, strong public message of continued robust support. Emphasize that such narratives are deliberate Russian attempts to sow discord and undermine support. Leverage the confirmed Trump-Zelenskyy meeting at the G7 summit to reinforce direct communication and continued high-level engagement.
    2. COORDINATE WITH ALLIES ON IO STRATEGY: Coordinate closely with allied IO agencies to ensure a unified and consistent counter-narrative to Russian disinformation, particularly regarding aid, global conflict, and the new, more extreme and manipulative narratives, including the direct attempt to draw the US into the Middle East conflict with fabricated claims and unverified BDA/casualties, the sensational claims of "hypersonic" use, claims of Iranian NPT withdrawal (and its denial), and the introduction of overt anti-Semitic propaganda and nuclear threats. Also coordinate response to Russian diplomatic actions in the Middle East and the "Ukraine for Iran" rhetoric, and Iranian MFA calls to UNSC. Coordinate immediate debunking of any "massive explosion" videos identified as false flags/misattributed. Crucially, coordinate a unified and immediate diplomatic response to the Russian "hostage-taking" false flag claim, condemning it as a blatant fabrication designed to escalate.
    3. INTERNATIONAL CONDEMNATION OF CIVILIAN/INDUSTRIAL TARGETING AND RUSSIAN ANTI-SEMITIC PROPAGANDA. Continue to highlight Russian strikes on civilian/industrial targets to maintain international pressure and secure further AD assistance. Simultaneously, seek strong international condemnation of Russia's use of overt anti-Semitic propaganda as a tool of information warfare. Condemn Russia's punitive measures against citizens in Belgorod. Engage international partners regarding the Hungarian ruling party's "discreditation" campaign.
    4. ENGAGE WITH INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS ON VETERAN SUPPORT. Seek international assistance and partnerships for formal veteran support programs to ensure their sustainability and effectiveness.
    5. ADDRESS INTERNAL CORRUPTION WITH INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT. Seek international support and expertise for combating large-scale corruption, particularly when it impacts critical civilian infrastructure during wartime, as highlighted by the Kryvyi Rih case. This demonstrates Ukraine's commitment to good governance and strengthens its case for international aid.
Previous (2025-06-16 09:09:10Z)

We only use optional analytics cookies if you allow them. Necessary cookies stay on for sign-in and site security.

Learn more in our Privacy Policy.