Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR)

TIME OF REPORT: 12 JUN 25 / 10:50 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 12 JUN 25 / 10:20 ZULU - 12 JUN 25 / 10:50 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk CLASSIFICATION: TOP SECRET / ORCON / NOFORN

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• Eastern Ukraine (Donetsk Oblast - Pokrovsk Direction):
  • UPDATE: Russian sources (Операция Z, WarGonzo) reiterate claims of "liberating" Alekseevka and Orekhovo (Petrovskoye) in DNR. TASS explicitly states that the capture of Petrovskoye "opens the way to the main hub of Ukrainian forces — the village of Novopavlovka on the border with Dnipropetrovsk Oblast." This indicates a potential new vector of Russian advance and strategic intent towards a significant logistical/operational node. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for claims, MEDIUM for strategic intent interpretation).
• Eastern Ukraine (Kharkiv Oblast - Udy):
  • NEW: Colonelcassad posts video claiming "Northerners" (Russian forces) uncovered and struck a Ukrainian UAV control point in Udy, Kharkiv Oblast. This aligns with prior Russian focus on degrading Ukrainian drone capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - based on Russian source, requires BDA).
• Southern Ukraine (Kherson Oblast - Bilozirka):
  • NEW: Ukrainian source (Оперативний ЗСУ) reports Russian artillery shelling of Bilozirka, Kherson Oblast, as stated by Kherson ODA. This confirms continued attritional shelling on civilian areas. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Southern Ukraine (Odesa Oblast - Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi):
  • NEW: Russian source (Дневник Десантника🇷🇺) claims destruction of a "transfer and storage point for weapons" in Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi, Odesa Oblast. (CONFIDENCE: LOW - Russian claim, no corroboration, highly probable IO).
• Russian Border Regions (Kursk Oblast):
  • NEW: Поддубный |Z|О|V| edition posts video claiming awards were given to paratroopers who "liberated Kursk Oblast from Ukrainian formations." This is a clear Russian IO attempt to portray offensive success in an area where Ukraine has conducted cross-border raids and Russia has postponed elections due to insecurity. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for IO, LOW for claim of "liberation").
• Russian Deep Rear (Siberia - Novosibirsk):
  • NEW: Ukrainian source (РБК-Україна) reports GUR paralyzed the operations of one of Siberia's largest internet providers on "Russia Day." This indicates continued Ukrainian cyber/information operations deep within Russia. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • NEW: STERNENKO reports that security guards in Novosibirsk are being "armed to fight UAVs." Images show security personnel (likely civilian) with firearms at what appears to be a facility checkpoint. This highlights Russian internal security concerns and adaptation to Ukrainian drone threats in deep rear areas. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Deep Rear (Tambov Oblast - Tambov Gunpowder Plant):
  • NO CHANGE: Continued confirmed reports of sustained, multi-day, high-impact strikes on the Tambov Gunpowder Plant, causing an operational halt. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• Forecasted severe weather (strong precipitation, thunderstorms, hail, high winds) in Bryansk Oblast for June 13 remains. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). This will continue to impact Russian ground and air operations in this sector.
• General conditions elsewhere permit air activity, evidenced by continued KAB strikes and drone operations.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces:
  • Offensive Operations (Cyber/Information): Demonstrated continued capability to conduct deep cyber operations affecting Russian critical infrastructure on politically significant days (Russia Day). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Defensive and Counter-offensive Actions: Continues to repel Russian attacks and conduct deep strikes. Localized setbacks in Kharkiv are noted, but overall defensive lines hold. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Internal Security Operations: Successful SBU operation in Odesa Oblast, counter-recruitment efforts in Dnipropetrovsk, and continued efforts to counter subversion remain crucial. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • UAV Capability: Ukrainian forces (e.g., "Shadow" unit with "Shark" drone) demonstrate continued proficiency in offensive drone operations, specifically targeting Russian UAV C2 ("Navodchik-2"). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Forces:
  • Continued Ground Pressure: Active on multiple axes, with specific claims of advances in Donetsk (Petrovskoye, Alekseevka, Orekhovo). Their declared intent to push towards Novopavlovka is a significant strategic objective. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Hybrid Operations: Persistence in recruiting Ukrainian youth for sabotage, and growing concern for drone threats in deep rear areas leading to civilian security forces being armed. This highlights a broadening and deepening of their hybrid warfare and internal security adaptations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Air-Ground Integration: Claims of destroying Ukrainian UAV control points (Udy) and direct engagements with Ukrainian drone complexes ("Navodchik-2"). (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
  • Information Operations: Continued heavy focus on "Russia Day" celebrations with patriotic events, claims of Russian advances/Ukrainian losses, and exaggerated "liberation" claims (Kursk Oblast). Attempts to dehumanize Ukrainians in prisoner exchange narratives are noted. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Internal Affairs: Ongoing suppression of dissent, and adaptation to internal drone threats. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). The decree exempting CIS military students from migration requirements indicates efforts to attract/retain personnel for military education, potentially reflecting a long-term manpower strategy. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action (COA):

• Capabilities:
  • Deep Rear Security: Ability to arm and deploy civilian security forces for anti-UAV defense in deep rear areas (Novosibirsk). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Persistent Ground Offensive: Maintains capability for multi-axis ground assaults, with specific stated intent to advance on key logistical hubs (Novopavlovka). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Propaganda & PSYOPS: Highly effective at producing and disseminating propaganda, including dehumanizing narratives and inflated claims of territorial gains (Kursk "liberation"). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Internal Security Enforcement & Subversion: Capability to pursue and arrest political opponents and alleged saboteurs, and to actively recruit and direct agents (youth for arson/terrorist acts) within Ukrainian territory. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Intentions:
  • Consolidate Territorial Gains & Exploit Weaknesses: Primary intent remains to secure and expand control over occupied territories, and to exploit any breakthroughs to gain strategic advantage (e.g., push towards Novopavlovka). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Degrade Ukrainian Combat Effectiveness & C2: Continued kinetic operations (UAV C2 strikes) and cyber attacks aim to reduce Ukrainian fighting capacity and C2 resilience. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Undermine Ukrainian Stability (Deep Rear): Hybrid operations (terrorism in Odesa, drone tactics in Sumy, youth recruitment in Dnipropetrovsk, and cyber attacks on critical Russian infrastructure attributed to Ukraine) are intended to create insecurity, disrupt logistics/morale, and create internal unrest far from the frontlines, while also demonstrating Russian vulnerability. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Boost Domestic Morale & Legitimacy: Propaganda efforts, especially around "Russia Day" and claims of "liberation," are designed to rally internal support and project an image of strength and unity. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Long-Term Manpower Strategy: The decree regarding CIS military students suggests a long-term intent to bolster military personnel through recruitment and education. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Courses of Action (COA):
  • COA 1 (Sustained Attritional Offensives with Targeted Exploitation): Russia will continue high-tempo, attritional ground assaults on existing frontlines (Donetsk, Kharkiv), building on recent claimed advances and attempting to exploit towards key hubs like Novopavlovka. This will be supported by heavy artillery and sustained KAB strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • COA 2 (Enhanced Multi-Domain Hybrid Operations): Russia will increase the deployment of "waiting drones" and similar adaptive UAV tactics, especially in border regions. Russia will intensify efforts to recruit and direct agents (including youth) for sabotage, arson, and information gathering in Ukrainian rear areas. Concurrently, Russia will bolster internal counter-drone defenses, potentially arming civilian security, in response to deep Ukrainian strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • COA 3 (Persistent Cyber & Information Dominance): Russia will continue to conduct cyber operations against Ukrainian critical infrastructure while maintaining a high tempo of information operations, leveraging national holidays for domestic support and amplifying narratives of Ukrainian military weakness and internal instability, while promoting their "liberation" claims and dehumanizing narratives regarding POWs/casualties. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• Targeting of UAV Control Points: Russian claims of destroying Ukrainian UAV C2 (Udy, Kharkiv) and successful Ukrainian strikes on Russian UAV C2 ("Navodchik-2") confirm that degrading drone C2 is a high-priority tactical objective for both sides. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Deep Rear Anti-Drone Measures: Arming of civilian security personnel in Novosibirsk for anti-UAV defense is a significant adaptation, indicating Russian concern over deep Ukrainian drone strikes and a potential shift in internal security doctrine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Stated Intent for Operational Hubs: The explicit naming of Novopavlovka as a target following the alleged capture of Petrovskoye indicates a more defined Russian operational objective beyond just incremental territorial gains, and signals a potential shift in their exploitation strategy. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Cyber Attacks on Russia's "Russia Day": Ukrainian GUR's cyberattack on a Siberian internet provider on a national holiday demonstrates adaptive and targeted cyber operations to cause disruption and embarrass the Russian state. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• The reliance of an artillery reconnaissance unit on civilian-donated generators (from previous report) still suggests systemic gaps in the Russian military's ability to consistently supply all necessary non-lethal equipment. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• The confirmed strikes on the Tambov Gunpowder Plant and a fuel depot in Nova Kakhovka (from previous report) are strategic successes that will degrade Russian munitions and fuel sustainment over the mid-to-long term. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Overall logistics appear sufficient for current operational tempo, but with noted specific weaknesses and growing pressure from Ukrainian deep strikes. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Russian C2: Appears effective in coordinating multi-domain operations, including ground offensives, adapted drone tactics, and integrated information operations. The internal security apparatus (FSB/MVD) also demonstrates effective C2 in suppressing dissent and directing subversion efforts, and adapting internal security to drone threats. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ukrainian C2: Continues to effectively coordinate defensive operations, internal security, offensive drone strikes, and deep cyber operations. The timely reporting of Russian tactical adaptations (e.g., "waiting drones," youth recruitment) and successful SBU operations indicates effective intelligence gathering and responsive command. Targeting of Russian UAV C2 is a testament to effective intelligence and fire coordination. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• Resilient Defense: Despite localized Russian advances, Ukrainian forces maintain a generally strong defensive posture, continuing to inflict significant attrition on Russian forces. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Enhanced Tactical Mobility: The delivery of Toyota Hilux pickups (from previous report) significantly enhances tactical mobility. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Adaptive Drone Warfare: Ukrainian units demonstrate highly effective offensive drone capabilities, specifically targeting Russian UAV C2, indicating advanced coordination and intelligence. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Robust Internal Security & Cyber Capabilities: The SBU's successful operation against a saboteur in Odesa, the active counter-recruitment efforts highlighted by Dnipropetrovsk ODA, and the GUR's cyberattack on a Siberian internet provider underscore strong counter-terrorism, counter-intelligence, and cyber warfare capabilities crucial for maintaining stability and projecting power in rear areas. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Successes:
  • Confirmed Ukrainian GUR cyberattack disrupting a major Siberian internet provider on Russia Day. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Successful targeting of Russian UAV C2 ("Navodchik-2") by Ukrainian "Shadow" unit using a "Shark" drone. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Successful SBU operation against a saboteur in Odesa (from previous report). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Significant enhancement of tactical mobility for frontline units (from previous report). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Proactive efforts by regional administrations (Dnipropetrovsk ODA) to counter Russian intelligence recruitment of youth (from previous report). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Continued effectiveness of Ukrainian FPV drones (from previous report). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Sustained, high-impact strikes on the Tambov Gunpowder Plant and a fuel depot (from previous report). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Setbacks:
  • Reported Russian occupation of Dvorichna and advance near Dovhenke in Kharkiv Oblast (from previous report) represent localized territorial losses. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
  • Persistent Russian shelling resulting in civilian casualties in Donetsk and Kherson Oblasts underscores ongoing attritional pressure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Potential for Russian advance towards Novopavlovka, if confirmed, represents a significant threat to a logistical hub. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• Counter-Hybrid Capabilities (CRITICAL): Resources are urgently needed to counter evolving Russian hybrid tactics, including "waiting drones" and deepening subversion efforts like agent recruitment (youth for terror acts). This requires enhanced electronic warfare (EW) for drones, and increased intelligence-sharing and specialized training for internal security forces to detect and neutralize recruitment networks.
• Cyber Defense: Continued investment in robust cyber defense capabilities to protect critical infrastructure from sophisticated Russian cyberattacks.
• Air Defense Munitions: Continuous Russian air attacks maintain a high demand for air defense munitions.
• Personnel Management: Sustained combat operations necessitate continuous manning efforts and robust medical/rehabilitation support.
• Ammunition & Equipment: Continued, predictable supply of artillery ammunition and modern equipment from international partners.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Narratives:
  • "Russia Day" Reinforcement: Continued use of "Russia Day" as a central theme for national unity and strength, exemplified by propaganda videos and messages promoting patriotic poems and youth ceremonies for passport issuance (AV БогомаZ, Басурин о главном). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Territorial Gains & Ukrainian Losses: Russian MoD and milbloggers continue to claim liberation of villages (Alekseevka, Orekhovo/Petrovskoye) and significant Ukrainian losses, including highly dubious claims of "liberating Kursk Oblast" (Поддубный |Z|О|V| edition). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Assertion of Control: The drone flying the Russian flag over Kherson (from previous report) and claims of striking Ukrainian C2 (Udy) continue. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Dehumanization of Ukrainians: Continued use of derogatory terms ("хохлов") when discussing POW/casualty exchanges (Поддубный |Z|О|V| edition), aiming to dehumanize and undermine Ukrainian morale. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Internal Security Narratives: Reports of "armed security guards" in Novosibirsk fighting UAVs are likely intended for domestic consumption to demonstrate the state's response to threats, while also implicitly acknowledging vulnerabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ukrainian Counter-Narratives:
  • Strategic Successes & Resilience: Ukrainian GUR's cyberattack on a Siberian internet provider on Russia Day is a powerful counter-narrative, demonstrating capability to project power into Russian deep rear. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Exposing Enemy Tactics & Vulnerabilities: Reports of successful targeting of Russian UAV C2 and the arming of civilian security in Novosibirsk are valuable intelligence for both friendly forces and international partners, highlighting Russian adaptations and their internal concerns. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Highlighting Enemy Attrition: The 5th Separate Assault Kyiv Brigade's "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire" video (from previous report) continues to be effective. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Exposing Hybrid Threats: Official reporting of SBU operations (Odesa terror plot) and Dnipropetrovsk ODA's public warning about youth recruitment (from previous report) demonstrate Ukrainian capacity to identify and neutralize internal threats. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Ukrainian Morale: Likely sustained by strategic cyber and drone successes, but pressured by continued civilian casualties and localized territorial losses. The ongoing visibility of Russian intelligence efforts to recruit Ukrainian youth (Dnipropetrovsk ODA) will likely increase public anxiety and vigilance. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Morale: Actively boosted by "Russia Day" celebrations and state propaganda, including false claims of "liberating" Kursk. However, reliance on volunteer support for basic equipment and the arming of civilian security for drone defense might signal underlying issues of resource allocation and heightened internal insecurity to the Russian population. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). The postponement of municipal elections in Kursk due to insecurity (from previous report) also undermines the narrative of stability. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• UPDATE: TASS confirms at least 133 fatalities in the Air India plane crash in India. This remains a civilian incident with no direct military significance for the conflict, but has humanitarian implications. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• NO CHANGE: EU Council approved duties on Russian and Belarusian agricultural products and fertilizers (from previous report), indicative of continued Western economic pressure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• No other significant new international support or diplomatic developments regarding the conflict itself were reported in this period.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• Intensified Ground Pressure on Donetsk Axes with Focus on Novopavlovka (Next 24-48 hours): Russia will likely continue to concentrate ground assaults, particularly on the Pokrovsk and Toretsk axes, leveraging claimed gains in Petrovskoye/Orekhovo to apply pressure towards Novopavlovka, a key logistical hub. This will be supported by heavy artillery and sustained KAB strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Expanded Multi-Domain Hybrid Operations (Next 24-72 hours): Russia will increase the deployment of "waiting drones" and other adaptive UAV tactics, especially in border regions. Russia will intensify efforts to recruit and direct agents (including vulnerable youth) for sabotage, arson, and information gathering in Ukrainian rear areas. Concurrently, Russia will bolster internal counter-drone defenses, potentially arming civilian security, in response to deep Ukrainian strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Persistent Cyber & Information Campaigns (Next 24-72 hours): Russia will maintain a high tempo of information operations, leveraging national holidays for domestic support and amplifying narratives of Ukrainian military weakness and internal instability, while promoting their "liberation" claims and dehumanizing narratives regarding POWs/casualties. Russia will also likely attempt retaliatory cyberattacks against Ukrainian targets in response to the GUR's recent success. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Sustained Economic Pressure from West: The EU will likely follow through on new duties on Russian/Belarusian agricultural products, intensifying economic pressure, potentially leading to Russian countermeasures. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• Significant Breakthrough Towards Novopavlovka (Next 48-72 hours): Russia achieves a substantial, sustained breakthrough on the Donetsk axes, particularly in the direction of Novopavlovka. This exploitation could disrupt critical Ukrainian logistics and threaten a major operational setback. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM-HIGH)
• Coordinated Mass Hybrid Strike (Kinetic & Cyber) in Key Rear Areas (Next 24-48 hours): Russia conducts a series of coordinated hybrid attacks including: 1) high-impact kinetic strikes (missiles/drones) on critical infrastructure (energy, transport nodes) in major urban centers (e.g., Kyiv, Dnipro, Odesa); and 2) synchronized, large-scale cyberattacks against Ukrainian government networks or essential services. This could be coupled with internal sabotage attempts by newly recruited agents to maximize disruption and panic. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Escalated Cross-Border Ground Offensive from Sumy/Kursk Direction (Next 72 hours): Russia transitions its current shaping operations in Sumy Oblast into a full-scale ground offensive, potentially synchronized with attacks from Kursk Oblast, aiming to create a significant "buffer zone" and draw Ukrainian strategic reserves away from the main Donetsk axes. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Immediate (Next 1-3 hours):
  • CRITICAL: Monitor Pokrovsk and Toretsk axes for any signs of intensified Russian ground assaults or breakthroughs, especially towards Novopavlovka. Decision Point: Ready tactical reserves and prepare for immediate counter-fire operations if a localized breakthrough becomes imminent. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • CRITICAL: Heighten awareness and vigilance for "waiting drones" in Sumy and Kharkiv Oblasts. Decision Point: Implement real-time adjustments to counter-drone TTPs, focusing on post-engagement surveillance and electronic warfare. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • CRITICAL: Disseminate immediate warnings regarding Russian intelligence attempts to recruit Ukrainian youth for sabotage/terrorist acts, especially in Dnipropetrovsk, Odesa, and other major rear areas. Emphasize vigilance among youth and parents. Decision Point: Launch public awareness campaigns immediately. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Short Term (Next 6-12 hours):
  • CRITICAL: Conduct immediate geolocational analysis of claimed Russian advances in Petrovskoye, Alekseevka, Dvorichna, and Dovhenke to verify claims and assess the actual extent of Russian gains. Confirm Russian presence/intent in Udy, Kharkiv. Decision Point: Adjust defensive lines and fire support plans based on confirmed enemy positions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • CRITICAL: Analyze the reported arming of security guards in Novosibirsk. Assess implications for Russian internal security posture and potential for similar measures in other Russian regions/occupied territories. Decision Point: Advise Ukrainian forces on potential Russian adaptations for protecting high-value targets. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT: Prepare and disseminate immediate counter-narratives to Russian claims of "liberated" villages and exaggerated Ukrainian losses, emphasizing Ukrainian defensive successes and resilience, and highlighting the impact of Ukrainian deep strikes (e.g., Tambov). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Mid Term (Next 24-72 hours):
  • Assess the impact of recent vehicle deliveries on Ukrainian unit capabilities and readiness. Decision Point: Identify additional units requiring similar mobility enhancements and prioritize future procurement. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
  • Monitor internal Russian developments related to manpower and dissent for indicators of internal instability, including the impact of the CIS military student decree. Decision Point: Adjust HUMINT/OSINT collection accordingly. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
  • Evaluate the threat posed by forecasted severe weather in Bryansk Oblast for potential impacts on Russian operations along that border. Decision Point: Adjust friendly force posture for potential changes in enemy activity. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
  • ECONOMIC: Monitor the implementation and impact of new EU duties on Russian/Belarusian agricultural products. Decision Point: Assess potential for Russian retaliatory economic measures. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

6. RECOMMENDATIONS

• Intelligence & Special Operations (ISR & HUMINT critical):

  1. CRITICAL PRIORITY: Intensify ISR (IMINT, SIGINT, OSINT, HUMINT) on the Pokrovsk and Toretsk axes, with specific focus on the claimed advances towards Petrovskoye/Orekhovo and the named strategic objective of Novopavlovka. Confirm/deny Russian control and assess force composition/intent. (Collection Requirement: IMINT, SIGINT, HUMINT, OSINT)
  2. HIGH PRIORITY: Focus ISR on Sumy and Kharkiv border regions to characterize the deployment and effectiveness of Russian "waiting drones" and other adaptive UAV tactics, including any claimed UAV C2 strikes (e.g., Udy). Develop and disseminate immediate counter-drone TTPs. (Collection Requirement: SIGINT, ELINT, IMINT)
  3. CRITICAL PRIORITY: HUMINT/OSINT: Intensify intelligence collection on Russian intelligence services' efforts to recruit Ukrainian youth and other individuals for sabotage, arson, and information leakage in rear areas (e.g., Dnipropetrovsk, Odesa). Develop and disseminate specific indicators and warnings (I&W) for these activities, including targeting methods and incentives. (Collection Requirement: HUMINT, OSINT)
  4. CYBER INTELLIGENCE: Continue to monitor Russian cyber infrastructure for vulnerabilities and opportunities for disruption. Analyze the impact of the recent GUR cyberattack on the Siberian internet provider and identify potential follow-on targets. (Collection Requirement: CYBINT, OSINT)
  5. HUMINT: Continue to exploit POWs for information on Russian logistical shortfalls, unit morale, and the impact of Ukrainian drone strikes on their personnel, and insights into new drone tactics. (Collection Requirement: HUMINT)
  6. OSINT: Closely monitor Russian state media and milbloggers for narratives around "Russia Day" and exaggerated claims of Ukrainian losses, especially false "liberation" claims (Kursk). Prepare targeted counter-narratives showcasing Ukrainian resilience and effective defense, and highlight Russian logistical/internal security weaknesses. (Collection Requirement: OSINT)
  7. ISR: Conduct BDA on all claimed Russian strikes (e.g., on UAV C2, "Baba Yaga" drones) to verify claims and assess the actual impact on Ukrainian capabilities. Conversely, conduct BDA on Ukrainian strikes (e.g., Tambov Gunpowder Plant, Russian UAV C2) to confirm effectiveness. (Collection Requirement: IMINT, SIGINT)

• Air Defense & Force Protection:

  1. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: Disseminate intelligence on Russian "waiting drone" tactics to all frontline units, particularly in Sumy and Kharkiv Oblasts. Emphasize immediate post-engagement surveillance and rapid repositioning/dispersal.
  2. FORCE PROTECTION: Reinforce static positions and personnel deployment points with enhanced camouflage and deception measures to mitigate drone detection and attack. Prioritize EW systems to counter drone threats, especially against new Russian adaptations.
  3. AD ASSET ALLOCATION: Maintain high air defense alert for major urban centers (e.g., Odesa, Kyiv, Dnipro) and critical infrastructure in rear areas, given the ongoing threat of hybrid attacks and missile/drone strikes, including potential retaliatory cyberattacks. Prioritize AD for key logistical nodes.
  4. TACTICAL ADAPTATION: Develop and disseminate TTPs for countering civilian security personnel armed with anti-drone capabilities in Russian rear areas, should such an encounter occur.

• Ground Forces:

  1. IMMEDIATE: Commanders on the Pokrovsk, Toretsk, and Kharkiv axes must conduct aggressive patrolling and reconnaissance to confirm enemy positions and assess the intent behind any recent claimed advances, especially towards Novopavlovka. Prepare for immediate counter-attacks if a breakthrough is confirmed.
  2. ONGOING: Integrate new mobility assets (e.g., Toyota Hilux pickups) into frontline units immediately, prioritizing their use for rapid logistics, reconnaissance, and personnel transport to enhance operational flexibility.
  3. TACTICAL ADAPTATION: Review and update standard operating procedures (SOPs) for small unit tactics to specifically address Russian "waiting drone" tactics, emphasizing rapid disengagement, dispersion, and avoidance of predictable patterns.
  4. PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT: Continue aggressive recruitment and training efforts, ensuring new personnel are adequately prepared for the demanding combat environment and familiarized with both friendly and enemy multi-domain tactics (drone, cyber, hybrid).

• Information Operations (IO):

  1. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: Publicize the strategic impact of the GUR cyberattack on the Siberian internet provider, linking it directly to Russia's "Russia Day" celebrations to undermine Russian state legitimacy and demonstrate Ukrainian deep strike capabilities.
  2. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: Develop and disseminate public awareness campaigns (through all available media channels) warning Ukrainian youth and parents about Russian intelligence recruitment efforts for sabotage and information gathering. Provide clear channels for reporting suspicious contacts and highlight the negative consequences for those recruited.
  3. COUNTER-DISINFORMATION: Expose Russian false claims of "liberating" Kursk Oblast and other exaggerated territorial gains. Highlight the actual situation (e.g., postponed elections in Kursk due to insecurity) to undermine Russian propaganda.
  4. STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION: Vigorously publicize SBU operations against saboteurs in rear areas (e.g., Odesa) to demonstrate Ukrainian internal security capabilities and counter Russian attempts at destabilization.
  5. GLOBAL FOCUS: Provide timely and accurate updates on battlefield developments to international partners, emphasizing the intensity of Russian attacks and the need for continued military assistance, particularly air defense and mobility assets, and support for cyber defense.
  6. DEHUMANIZATION COUNTER: Proactively address Russian dehumanizing narratives about Ukrainian casualties/POWs by highlighting the humane treatment of Russian POWs and adherence to international conventions.

• Diplomatic/Inter-Agency:

  1. CRITICAL: Leverage diplomatic channels to highlight Russian development of new hybrid tactics (e.g., "waiting drones") and their expanded attempts to destabilize Ukrainian rear areas through agent recruitment, advocating for increased EW and intelligence-sharing support.
  2. INTER-AGENCY COORDINATION: Ensure seamless coordination between military, SBU, National Police, and regional administrations to counter internal security threats and hybrid operations, particularly in sensitive regions like Odesa and Dnipropetrovsk. Share intelligence and best practices for countering youth recruitment. Strengthen cross-agency efforts for cyber defense.
  3. INTERNATIONAL ENGAGEMENT: Brief international partners on the continued challenges of sustaining forces amidst high attrition rates and the need for consistent, predictable military aid shipments, especially for mobility platforms, counter-drone systems, and cyber defense capabilities.
  4. ECONOMIC: Advocate for further international sanctions and economic pressure on Russia, specifically highlighting their continued hybrid warfare efforts and disregard for civilian safety.

---