Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR)

TIME OF REPORT: 12 JUN 25 / 10:11 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 12 JUN 25 / 09:41 ZULU - 12 JUN 25 / 10:11 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk CLASSIFICATION: TOP SECRET / ORCON / NOFORN

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• Eastern Ukraine (Donetsk Oblast - Pokrovsk Direction):
  • NEW: Russian sources (Dva Mayora) release drone footage claiming to be from the Pokrovsk direction, showing destruction of armored vehicles and a building. This aligns with Ukrainian General Staff reports of continued clashes in this sector. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH, confirmed by previous reporting and new visual intelligence).
  • NEW: Russian MoD (via TASS) claims liberation of Petrovskoye and Alekseevka in DNR. This is likely referring to villages within the broader Donetsk Oblast, potentially near the Pokrovsk or Toretsk directions. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM, unverified Russian claim, requires geolocational analysis).
• Eastern Ukraine (Donetsk Oblast - General):
  • NEW: Ukrainian National Police (via Operatyvnyi ZSU) reports 2 fatalities from shelling in Donetsk Oblast. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • NEW: Russian milblogger "Воин DV" claims 29th Combined Arms Army destroyed a UAV control point near Yalta (likely in Donetsk Oblast, not Crimea), four Ukrainian personnel deployment points (Zirka, Piddubne, Tolstoye), two pickups, three "Baba Yaga" hexacopters, a tank, and an armored vehicle. (CONFIDENCE: LOW, unverified Russian claim, likely exaggerated).
• Eastern Ukraine (Kharkiv Oblast - General):
  • NEW: DeepState (via Tsaplienko) claims Russian forces occupied Dvorichna and advanced near Dovhenke. This indicates continued Russian pressure and localized gains in Kharkiv Oblast. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM, DeepState is generally reliable but requires further verification).
• Southern Ukraine (Kherson Oblast - Kherson City):
  • NEW: Russian milblogger Colonelcassad posts video claiming a Russian flag-carrying drone flew over "enemy-occupied Kherson" and installed a flag on a city building. This is a clear information operation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH, visual evidence).
• Southern Ukraine (Odesa Oblast):
  • NEW: Ukrainian Office of Prosecutor General and Operatyvnyi ZSU report a terrorist act near a Military Law Enforcement unit in Odesa Oblast, and the detention of a woman who made the explosive device. This indicates internal security threats and hybrid operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH, confirmed by official Ukrainian sources and video of arrest).
• Russian Border Regions (Bryansk Oblast):
  • NEW: Russian source AV Bogomaz reports strong precipitation, thunderstorms, hail, and wind gusts (15-18 m/s) for June 13 in Bryansk Oblast. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Border Regions (Belgorod Oblast):
  • NEW: ASTRA reports 3 casualties (including a child) from Ukrainian attack in Belgorod Oblast, citing the governor. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM, unverified Russian claim, part of ongoing cross-border shelling).
• International Incidents (India):
  • UPDATE: TASS and ASTRA update casualty figures for the Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner crash, reporting "at least 40 people" and "at least 110 people" dead respectively. Moscow News claims no Russians were on board. RBK-Ukraina reports Ukrainian MFA is clarifying if Ukrainian citizens were on board. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • NO MILITARY SIGNIFICANCE: This remains a civilian incident, however, the differing casualty counts (40 vs 110) from Russian sources indicate potential for misreporting or early estimates. Ukrainian MFA inquiry is a standard diplomatic procedure.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• Forecasted severe weather (strong precipitation, thunderstorms, hail, high winds) in Bryansk Oblast for June 13 could significantly impact Russian ground and air operations in this sector, potentially reducing UAV and aviation activity. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Continued KAB strikes in Sumy region (previous report) and drone operations (new Russian claims of "Baba Yaga" interception) indicate current weather conditions generally permit air activity across various front lines.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces:
  • Defensive and Counter-offensive Actions: Continues to repel Russian attacks (previous reports) and conducts deep strikes (Tambov, Engels – previous report). The report of Russian occupation of Dvorichna and advance near Dovhenke (Kharkiv) indicates localized setbacks, but overall defensive lines hold. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Internal Security Operations: Successful SBU operation in Odesa Oblast, apprehending a suspect for a terrorist act, highlights ongoing counter-subversion efforts and internal security capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Logistical Reinforcement: Kharkiv Oblast Administration (via Oleh Syniehubov) shows a significant delivery of white Toyota Hilux pickup trucks to Ukrainian defenders, likely the 92nd Mechanized Brigade ("Code 9.2"). This boosts tactical mobility. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • UAV Capability: Ukrainian forces demonstrate continued proficiency in offensive drone operations, as evidenced by a propaganda video from the 5th Separate Assault Kyiv Brigade showcasing FPV drone strikes against Russian personnel. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Forces:
  • Continued Ground Pressure: Active on multiple axes, with specific claims of advances in Donetsk (Petrovskoye, Alekseevka) and Kharkiv (Dvorichna, Dovhenke). The large number of attacks on the Novopavlivka axis (previous report) and the drone footage from Pokrovsk indicate sustained ground operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Hybrid Operations: Deployment of "ждуни" (waiting drones) in Sumy Oblast, designed to loiter and strike after initial engagements, indicates an adaptation in Russian drone tactics for harassment and secondary strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Air-Ground Integration: Claims of destroying Ukrainian UAV control points and "Baba Yaga" hexacopters with artillery, air defense, and FPV drones, if true, indicate ongoing efforts to counter Ukrainian drone advantages. (CONFIDENCE: LOW-MEDIUM).
  • Logistical Challenges/Volunteer Reliance: Russian artillery reconnaissance unit expressing gratitude for donated civilian generators (Dva Mayora) highlights reliance on volunteer networks for essential non-lethal equipment, suggesting gaps in official supply chains. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Information Operations: Continued heavy focus on "Russia Day" celebrations with patriotic events, and claims of Russian advances/Ukrainian losses. The drone footage over Kherson is a direct PSYOP. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Internal Affairs: Russia's Ministry of Internal Affairs declared former "Golos" coordinator Inna Karezina and "Vot Tak" editor Sergey Kovalchenko wanted. This signals continued suppression of dissenting voices and political opponents. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action (COA):

• Capabilities:
  • Hybrid Drone Tactics: Demonstrated capability to deploy "loitering/waiting" drones ("ждуни") to exploit post-strike opportunities or ambush. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Persistent Ground Offensive: Maintains capability for multi-axis ground assaults, particularly in Donetsk and Kharkiv Oblasts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Propaganda & PSYOPS: Highly effective at producing and disseminating propaganda (e.g., "Russia Day" celebrations, drone over Kherson) to bolster domestic support and demoralize Ukrainian population. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Internal Security Enforcement: Capability to pursue and arrest political opponents and alleged saboteurs. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Intentions:
  • Consolidate Territorial Gains: Primary intent remains to secure and expand control over occupied territories, particularly in Donetsk and Kharkiv Oblasts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Degrade Ukrainian Combat Effectiveness: Continued drone and artillery strikes (e.g., targeting UAV control points, personnel deployment points) aim to reduce Ukrainian fighting capacity. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Undermine Ukrainian Stability: Hybrid operations (terrorism in Odesa, drone tactics in Sumy) are intended to create insecurity and disrupt Ukrainian logistics/morale. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Boost Domestic Morale & Legitimacy: Propaganda efforts, especially around "Russia Day," are designed to rally internal support and project an image of strength and unity. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Courses of Action (COA):
  • COA 1 (Sustained Attritional Offensives): Russia will continue high-tempo, attritional ground assaults on existing frontlines (Donetsk, Kharkiv), with a likely focus on areas where recent localized gains have been reported (Dvorichna, Dovhenke, Petrovskoye, Alekseevka). These will be supported by KABs and adapted drone tactics. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • COA 2 (Enhanced Hybrid Drone Operations): Russia will increase the deployment of "waiting drones" and similar adaptive UAV tactics, especially in border regions like Sumy, to harass, ambush, and exploit tactical situations. This will be integrated with artillery and FPV drone operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • COA 3 (Information Dominance & Internal Cohesion): Russia will continue to heavily promote nationalistic narratives ("Russia Day"), propagate claims of Ukrainian losses and internal instability, while actively suppressing domestic dissent. The use of symbolic acts like drone flag placements will increase. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• "Waiting Drones" (Дрони-«ждуни»): This new Russian drone tactic in Sumy Oblast indicates an adaptation to overcome initial Ukrainian air defense/response, by remaining dormant before striking. This suggests a shift from immediate, reactive strikes to more deliberate, patient engagements, possibly for secondary targets or to exploit a perceived sense of security. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Targeting of UAV Control Points: Russian claims of destroying Ukrainian UAV C2 suggests a growing focus on degrading Ukrainian drone capabilities, acknowledging their tactical significance. (CONFIDENCE: LOW-MEDIUM, as claims are unverified).
• Hybrid Warfare in Odesa: The reported terrorist act and arrest of a saboteur in Odesa highlights ongoing Russian attempts to destabilize rear areas through clandestine means, beyond direct military engagement. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• The reliance of an artillery reconnaissance unit on civilian-donated generators (Dva Mayora) suggests that while combat units are receiving vital equipment, there may be systemic gaps in the Russian military's ability to consistently supply all necessary non-lethal equipment, especially at the unit level. This indicates a sustained reliance on civilian support networks. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• The ability to sustain multi-axis ground assaults and continuous drone operations suggests overall Russian logistics are sufficient for current operational tempo, but with noted specific weaknesses. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Russian C2: Appears effective in coordinating multi-domain operations, including ground offensives, adapted drone tactics, and integrated information operations. The internal security apparatus (FSB/MVD) also demonstrates effective C2 in suppressing dissent. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ukrainian C2: Continues to effectively coordinate defensive operations, internal security, and offensive drone strikes. The timely reporting of Russian tactical adaptations (e.g., "waiting drones") and successful SBU operations indicates effective intelligence gathering and responsive command. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• Resilient Defense: Despite localized Russian advances (Dvorichna, Dovhenke), Ukrainian forces maintain a generally strong defensive posture, as evidenced by continued repelling of numerous assaults (previous reports). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Enhanced Tactical Mobility: The delivery of Toyota Hilux pickups to units like the 92nd Mechanized Brigade significantly enhances their tactical mobility and logistical flexibility, improving their ability to maneuver and resupply on the battlefield. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Adaptive Drone Warfare: Ukrainian units like the 5th Separate Assault Kyiv Brigade demonstrate highly effective offensive drone capabilities, emphasizing precision strikes against enemy personnel. This indicates ongoing adaptation and innovation in drone warfare. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Robust Internal Security: The SBU's successful operation in Odesa against a suspected saboteur highlights strong counter-terrorism and counter-intelligence capabilities, crucial for maintaining stability in rear areas. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Successes:
  • Successful SBU operation against a saboteur in Odesa, preventing potential terrorist attacks. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Significant enhancement of tactical mobility for frontline units (e.g., 92nd Brigade) through vehicle deliveries. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Continued effectiveness of Ukrainian FPV drones in inflicting personnel losses on Russian forces, as showcased by the 5th Separate Assault Kyiv Brigade. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Setbacks:
  • Reported Russian occupation of Dvorichna and advance near Dovhenke in Kharkiv Oblast represent localized territorial losses. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
  • Persistent Russian shelling resulting in civilian casualties in Donetsk Oblast underscores ongoing attritional pressure on population centers. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• Continued Mobility Support: While new vehicles are arriving, the sheer scale of the conflict necessitates continuous procurement and maintenance of tactical vehicles to replace losses and support dispersed operations.
• Counter-Hybrid Capabilities: Resources are needed to counter evolving Russian hybrid tactics, including "waiting drones" and sabotage/terrorist activities in rear areas. This includes electronic warfare (EW) for drones and increased intelligence-sharing for internal security.
• Personnel Management: While current recruitment efforts are ongoing, sustained combat operations will necessitate continuous manning efforts and robust medical/rehabilitation support.
• Air Defense Munitions: Continuous Russian air attacks (KABs, drones) across various oblasts maintain a high demand for air defense munitions.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Narratives:
  • "Russia Day" Reinforcement: Continued use of "Russia Day" as a central theme for national unity and strength, projecting a narrative of Russia defending "truth and justice" and "traditional values" (Putin via TASS). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Territorial Gains & Ukrainian Losses: Russian MoD and milbloggers (TASS, Dva Mayora, Воин DV) claim liberation of villages and significant Ukrainian losses (e.g., 1 million personnel, drone control points, armored vehicles). These are intended to boost Russian morale and portray Ukrainian forces as suffering heavy losses. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH, as an IO tactic).
  • Assertion of Control: The drone flying the Russian flag over Kherson is a direct act of symbolic assertion of control and a psychological operation aimed at demoralizing the local Ukrainian population and supporters. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Focus on Civilian Incidents: Continued extensive reporting on the Indian plane crash, with conflicting casualty figures, likely serves as a global distraction from the ongoing war. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Internal Criticism of Ukraine: Russian milbloggers (Alex Parker Returns) continue to mock Ukrainian leadership (Zelenskyy comparing himself to Churchill), using derogatory language ("военный диктатор Зеленский," "хохлы") to undermine their legitimacy and morale. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Propaganda of Civilian Protection (Domestic): Discussion of "safe rooms" in new apartments in Lviv (Alex Parker Returns) is framed by Russian sources as proof of Ukrainian fear/vulnerability to Russian strikes, attempting to normalize the conflict's impact on civilians and justify attacks. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ukrainian Counter-Narratives:
  • Resilience and Effectiveness: Ukrainian General Staff and regional administrations (Kharkiv ODA) continue to report successful defensive actions and logistical support, directly countering Russian claims of overwhelming success. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Highlighting Enemy Attrition: The 5th Separate Assault Kyiv Brigade's "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire" video is a highly effective, albeit macabre, psychological operation, leveraging a popular format to highlight Russian personnel losses and boost Ukrainian morale. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Exposing Hybrid Threats: Official reporting of SBU operations (Odesa terror plot) demonstrates Ukrainian capacity to identify and neutralize internal threats, countering Russian destabilization attempts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Exposing Russian Tactical Adaptations: The report of "waiting drones" in Sumy is a proactive counter-disinformation effort, alerting both military and civilian populations to new threats. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Ukrainian Morale: Likely sustained by successful defensive operations, visible logistical support (new pickups), and effective PSYOPs (5th Brigade video). However, civilian casualties from shelling in Donetsk and reported territorial losses in Kharkiv (Dvorichna) will place pressure on morale in affected regions. The internal security threat in Odesa could also increase public anxiety. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Morale: Actively boosted by "Russia Day" celebrations and state propaganda emphasizing success and national unity. Claims of Ukrainian losses (even if exaggerated) likely reinforce a sense of progress. However, continued reliance on volunteer support for basic equipment (generators) might signal underlying issues to some within Russia. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). Internal dissent continues to be suppressed, as evidenced by the "wanted" declarations for opposition figures. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• No significant new international support or diplomatic developments regarding the conflict itself were reported in this period. The focus on the civilian plane crash remains a global media event. Ukrainian MFA's query about citizens on board is a standard consular action.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• Intensified Ground Pressure on Donetsk and Kharkiv Axes (Next 24-48 hours): Russia will likely continue to concentrate ground assaults, particularly on the Pokrovsk, Toretsk, and potentially the Siversk axes, building on recent claimed advances (Petrovskoye, Alekseevka, Dvorichna, Dovhenke). This will be supported by heavy artillery and sustained KAB strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Expanded Hybrid Drone Operations (Next 24-72 hours): Russia will increase the use of "waiting drones" and other adaptive UAV tactics, especially in border regions like Sumy and Kharkiv, to maximize attrition and disrupt Ukrainian responses. Expect more FPV drone attacks on personnel and light vehicles. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Persistent Information Campaigns (Next 24-72 hours): Russia will maintain a high tempo of information operations, leveraging national holidays (Russia Day) for domestic support and amplifying narratives of Ukrainian military weakness and internal instability, while promoting their "liberation" claims. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Continued Internal Security Crackdown: Russia will continue to identify and prosecute individuals deemed subversive or disloyal to the state, maintaining internal control. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• Localized Breakthrough and Exploitation (Next 48-72 hours): Russia achieves a significant, sustained breakthrough on one of the key Donetsk axes (e.g., Pokrovsk or Toretsk), rapidly exploiting the breach with armored reserves, forcing Ukrainian forces into a significant withdrawal or costly counter-attack. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM-HIGH)
• Coordinated Hybrid Strike in Key Rear Areas (Next 24-48 hours): Russia conducts a series of coordinated hybrid attacks (e.g., targeted assassinations, major sabotage of critical infrastructure, high-impact IEDs, or mass disinformation campaigns) in Ukrainian rear oblasts (e.g., Odesa, Kyiv, Dnipro) to create widespread panic and divert military resources from the front. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Large-Scale UAV/Missile Barrage with New Capabilities (Next 24-48 hours): Russia launches a massed, multi-wave strike using confirmed new drone types (e.g., "Geran-3" with improved speed/AI), coupled with ballistic/cruise missiles, specifically targeting Ukrainian command centers, air defense nodes, and logistics hubs to achieve strategic paralysis. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Immediate (Next 1-3 hours):
  • CRITICAL: Monitor Pokrovsk and Toretsk axes for any signs of intensified Russian ground assaults or breakthroughs, given recent claimed advances. Decision Point: Ready tactical reserves and prepare for immediate counter-fire operations if a localized breakthrough becomes imminent. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • CRITICAL: Heighten awareness and vigilance for "waiting drones" in Sumy and Kharkiv Oblasts. Decision Point: Implement real-time adjustments to counter-drone TTPs, focusing on post-engagement surveillance and electronic warfare. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Short Term (Next 6-12 hours):
  • CRITICAL: Conduct immediate geolocational analysis of claimed Russian advances in Petrovskoye, Alekseevka, Dvorichna, and Dovhenke to verify claims and assess the actual extent of Russian gains. Decision Point: Adjust defensive lines and fire support plans based on confirmed enemy positions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT: Prepare and disseminate immediate counter-narratives to Russian claims of "liberated" villages and exaggerated Ukrainian losses, emphasizing Ukrainian defensive successes and resilience. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Mid Term (Next 24-72 hours):
  • Assess the impact of recent vehicle deliveries on Ukrainian unit capabilities and readiness. Decision Point: Identify additional units requiring similar mobility enhancements and prioritize future procurement. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
  • Monitor internal Russian developments related to manpower (mobilization, volunteer reliance) and dissent (arrests of opposition figures) for indicators of internal instability that could impact military operations. Decision Point: Adjust HUMINT/OSINT collection accordingly. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
  • Evaluate the threat posed by forecasted severe weather in Bryansk Oblast for potential impacts on Russian operations along that border. Decision Point: Adjust friendly force posture for potential changes in enemy activity. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

---

6. RECOMMENDATIONS

• Intelligence & Special Operations (ISR & HUMINT critical):

  1. CRITICAL PRIORITY: Intensify ISR (IMINT, SIGINT, OSINT, HUMINT) on the Pokrovsk and Toretsk axes to confirm/deny Russian claims of village capture (Petrovskoye, Alekseevka) and assess the scale of any advances. Identify specific units involved and their combat effectiveness. (Collection Requirement: IMINT, SIGINT, HUMINT, OSINT)
  2. HIGH PRIORITY: Focus ISR on Sumy and Kharkiv border regions to characterize the deployment and effectiveness of Russian "waiting drones" and other adaptive UAV tactics. Develop and disseminate immediate counter-drone TTPs. (Collection Requirement: SIGINT, ELINT, IMINT)
  3. HUMINT: Continue to exploit POWs for information on Russian logistical shortfalls (e.g., reliance on civilian generators), unit morale, and the impact of Ukrainian drone strikes on their personnel. (Collection Requirement: HUMINT)
  4. OSINT: Closely monitor Russian state media and milbloggers for narratives around "Russia Day" and exaggerated claims of Ukrainian losses. Prepare targeted counter-narratives showcasing Ukrainian resilience and effective defense. (Collection Requirement: OSINT)
  5. ISR: Conduct BDA on all claimed Russian strikes (e.g., on UAV C2, "Baba Yaga" drones) to verify claims and assess the actual impact on Ukrainian capabilities. (Collection Requirement: IMINT, SIGINT)

• Air Defense & Force Protection:

  1. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: Disseminate intelligence on Russian "waiting drone" tactics to all frontline units, particularly in Sumy and Kharkiv Oblasts. Emphasize immediate post-engagement surveillance and rapid repositioning/dispersal.
  2. FORCE PROTECTION: Reinforce static positions and personnel deployment points with enhanced camouflage and deception measures to mitigate drone detection and attack. Prioritize EW systems to counter drone threats.
  3. AD ASSET ALLOCATION: Maintain high air defense alert for major urban centers (e.g., Odesa) and critical infrastructure in rear areas, given the ongoing threat of hybrid attacks and missile/drone strikes.

• Ground Forces:

  1. IMMEDIATE: Commanders on the Pokrovsk, Toretsk, and Kharkiv axes must conduct aggressive patrolling and reconnaissance to confirm enemy positions and assess the intent behind any recent claimed advances. Prepare for immediate counter-attacks if a breakthrough is confirmed.
  2. ONGOING: Integrate new mobility assets (e.g., Toyota Hilux pickups) into frontline units immediately, prioritizing their use for rapid logistics, reconnaissance, and personnel transport to enhance operational flexibility.
  3. TACTICAL ADAPTATION: Review and update standard operating procedures (SOPs) for small unit tactics to specifically address Russian "waiting drone" tactics, emphasizing rapid disengagement, dispersion, and avoidance of predictable patterns.
  4. PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT: Continue aggressive recruitment and training efforts, ensuring new personnel are adequately prepared for the demanding combat environment and familiarized with both friendly and enemy drone tactics.

• Information Operations (IO):

  1. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: Publicize the tactical effectiveness of Ukrainian FPV drones, especially the "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire" video, to demoralize Russian forces and boost domestic and international morale. Highlight precise targeting and enemy personnel losses.
  2. COUNTER-DISINFORMATION: Expose Russian reliance on civilian volunteer aid for basic military equipment (e.g., generators) to highlight their logistical weaknesses and counter narratives of self-sufficiency.
  3. STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION: Vigorously publicize SBU operations against saboteurs in rear areas (e.g., Odesa) to demonstrate Ukrainian internal security capabilities and counter Russian attempts at destabilization.
  4. GLOBAL FOCUS: Provide timely and accurate updates on battlefield developments to international partners, emphasizing the intensity of Russian attacks and the need for continued military assistance, particularly air defense and mobility assets.

• Diplomatic/Inter-Agency:

  1. CRITICAL: Leverage diplomatic channels to highlight Russian development of new hybrid tactics (e.g., "waiting drones") and their continued attempts to destabilize Ukrainian rear areas, advocating for increased EW and intelligence-sharing support.
  2. INTER-AGENCY COORDINATION: Ensure seamless coordination between military, SBU, and law enforcement agencies to counter internal security threats and hybrid operations, particularly in sensitive regions like Odesa.
  3. INTERNATIONAL ENGAGEMENT: Brief international partners on the continued challenges of sustaining forces amidst high attrition rates and the need for consistent, predictable military aid shipments, especially for mobility platforms and counter-drone systems.

---