Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR) TIME OF REPORT: 11 JUN 25 / 21:11 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 11 JUN 25 / 20:41 ZULU - 11 JUN 25 / 21:11 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk CLASSIFICATION: TOP SECRET / ORCON / NOFORN

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• Southern Ukraine (Odesa Oblast):
  • CRITICAL UPDATE: Ukrainian Air Force reports multiple groups of Russian Shahed UAVs approaching Odesa coastline from the Black Sea, moving towards Vylkove and Tatarbunary. Previous report indicated "large group"; current intel confirms multiple groups and specific vectors. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). This indicates a renewed, focused mass drone attack on southern Odesa, potentially targeting maritime infrastructure or key logistics nodes in the region.
• Eastern Ukraine (Donetsk Oblast - Toretsk Direction):
  • NEW: Ukrainian "Оперативний ЗСУ" channel publishes video footage claiming engagements by the 2nd Mechanized Battalion of the Separate Presidential Brigade on the Toretsk direction. Video depicts multiple FPV drone strikes on Russian personnel and at least one armored vehicle (likely BMP), resulting in confirmed killed (200) and wounded (300). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for Ukrainian engagement and successful strikes; MEDIUM for specific unit and precise location without further corroboration). This confirms continued intense combat and effective Ukrainian tactical UAV employment on this axis.
• Russian Territory (Yelets, Yelets District):
  • NEW: Governor Igor Artamonov issues a UAV attack threat alert for Yelets and Yelets District, Lipetsk Oblast. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for Russian alert; MEDIUM for actual attack or origin). This indicates continued Ukrainian deep strike capabilities and Russian internal security concerns.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• No new significant weather or environmental factors reported. Conditions remain conducive for continued drone operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces:
  • Air Defense: Actively tracking and reporting incoming Shahed UAVs towards Odesa. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). Demonstrates continued vigilance and effective early warning.
  • Ground Forces (Toretsk Direction): Engaged in close combat, utilizing FPV drones effectively against Russian personnel and armor. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). Suggests robust tactical-level drone integration.
  • Overall Posture: Remains defensively oriented, with AD assets concentrated in threatened areas and ground forces actively defending key axes.
• Russian Forces:
  • Aerial Attack Posture: Russian forces are executing a new wave of massed Shahed drones against Odesa, specifically targeting the southern coastal regions from the Black Sea. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Ground Forces (Toretsk Direction): Actively engaged in offensive operations or holding defensive lines, suffering casualties from Ukrainian FPV drone attacks. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Information Operations: Russian state media (TASS) and milbloggers (Colonelcassad, НгП раZVедка) continue to push narratives of Western involvement in Ukrainian strikes, internal Ukrainian discord, and Russian historical claims. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action:

• Capabilities:
  • Massed Drone Attack (Southern Axis): Russia maintains the capability to launch multiple groups of Shahed UAVs simultaneously from the Black Sea, targeting specific coastal areas in Odesa Oblast. This suggests refined targeting and ingress routes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Ground Operations (Donetsk): Russian forces continue to conduct ground operations in Donetsk Oblast, accepting significant casualties from FPV drone strikes, indicating sustained offensive pressure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Deep Information Influence: Russia is leveraging state media and proxy channels to push narratives that sow doubt in Ukraine's international support and legitimacy, and blame Western entities for Ukrainian actions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Intentions:
  • Degrade Maritime Infrastructure & Exhaust AD (Odesa): The renewed mass drone attack on Odesa, particularly targeting southern coastal regions, aims to damage port infrastructure, disrupt maritime activities, and further deplete Ukrainian AD munitions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Sustain Pressure on Donetsk Fronts: Russian forces intend to maintain relentless pressure on key axes like Toretsk, attempting to achieve tactical breakthroughs despite heavy losses. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Discredit Ukraine & Western Allies: The narrative of Western special services being behind Ukrainian airfield attacks (Jeffrey Sachs via Tucker Carlson, TASS) aims to delegitimize Ukrainian actions and drive wedges between Ukraine and its partners. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Reinforce Historical Claims & Justify Aggression: НгП раZVедка's comment about Suvorov and Izmail targets Ukrainian historical identity and reinforces the Russian colonial narrative for seized territories. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• Refined Drone Ingress (Odesa): The specific mention of "Vylkove, Tatarbunary" as drone vectors indicates Russia is adapting its drone approach to target key port/logistics nodes in the southern Odesa region, possibly seeking less defended corridors or specific high-value targets. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Continued Acceptance of FPV Drone Attrition: Russian forces on the ground continue to operate in a manner that exposes them to significant FPV drone losses, suggesting either a lack of effective counter-drone measures at the tactical edge or a willingness to absorb high attrition for operational objectives. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• No new information indicating significant changes to Russian logistics or sustainment status in this period. The continued high-tempo drone operations suggest an adequate supply of Shahed UAVs. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Russian C2: Appears effective in coordinating massed drone attacks and maintaining ground pressure despite tactical losses. C2 for information operations remains highly integrated. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ukrainian C2: Continues to demonstrate effective C2 for air defense, rapidly issuing alerts. Tactical C2 for FPV drone integration on the ground is highly effective. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• Air Defense: Highly alert and actively tracking the new mass drone threat to Odesa Oblast. AD posture remains reactive to these aerial threats. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ground Forces (Toretsk): Actively engaged in defense, demonstrating high proficiency in FPV drone employment for precision strikes against enemy personnel and equipment. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Overall Posture: Remains defensively oriented, successfully inflicting casualties on Russian ground forces and providing timely alerts for aerial threats.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Successes:
  • Timely detection and warning of mass drone groups towards Odesa. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Confirmed tactical success in FPV drone strikes against Russian personnel and armored vehicles on the Toretsk direction. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Successful deep strikes on Russian territory (Yelets alert) indicates maintained offensive pressure beyond the frontlines. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Setbacks/Challenges:
  • Continued need to expend AD munitions against persistent mass drone attacks, highlighting the sustainment challenge. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• Air Defense Munitions: The persistent mass drone attacks on Odesa underscore the critical requirement for a sustained supply of AD interceptors. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Counter-Drone Capabilities: Continued need for FPV drones and other tactical UAVs, as well as counter-drone systems, to maintain battlefield advantage. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Narratives:
  • Blame Shifting/Conspiracy: TASS amplifying Jeffrey Sachs' claim of Western special services behind Ukrainian airfield attacks aims to shift blame from Ukraine to its allies and create disunity. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Internal Affairs Focus (Diversion): TASS reporting on a civilian car accident in Irkutsk or the Brent oil price exceeding $70 could be an attempt to divert attention from military developments or domestic issues by focusing on mundane news. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Historical Imperialism: НгП раZVедка's reference to Suvorov and Izmail explicitly states Russia's imperialistic claims over Ukrainian territory and denies Ukrainian sovereignty. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Judicial Control/Propaganda: Colonelcassad's video about a "state treason" verdict by the "Kherson Oblast Court" (under Russian occupation) aims to demonstrate Russian control and legality in occupied territories, while depicting Ukrainian citizens as traitors. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Soft Power/Patriotism: TASS video of cosmonauts congratulating Russians on "Russia Day" aims to boost national morale and pride. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Diplomatic Division/Pressure: Colonelcassad repeating Orban's advice to Zelenskyy reinforces attempts to create friction between Ukraine and its partners. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ukrainian Counter-Narratives:
  • Transparency & Resilience: Ukrainian Air Force updates demonstrate transparency and public trust in their defense efforts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Highlighting Enemy Attrition: "Оперативний ЗСУ" video of successful FPV drone strikes highlights Ukrainian military effectiveness and counters Russian narratives of battlefield dominance. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Leadership Contrast: Zelenskyy's reported statement, "People are not firewood, which we throw into the fire. We do not treat our people like Russians do," directly contrasts Ukrainian and Russian military ethics and casualty acceptance, aiming to bolster domestic morale and differentiate Ukraine internationally. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Ukrainian Morale: The renewed mass drone attack on Odesa will cause anxiety, but the active defense and successful FPV drone operations on the ground will reinforce resilience. Zelenskyy's statement on valuing lives aims to strengthen public trust. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Morale: Continued push of patriotic narratives and justifications for aggression, coupled with minor diversions, aims to maintain pro-war sentiment. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• US Sanctions/Economic Pressure: The TASS report on the US Treasury's warning against tightening sanctions indicates ongoing debate within US policy circles regarding the effectiveness and impact of sanctions on Russia. This could be a point of Russian leverage in information operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• US Political Climate: The reported meeting between the Russian Ambassador and Trump could be exploited by Russian IO to suggest a shift in US foreign policy or to create uncertainty among Ukraine's allies. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• Sustained Massed Drone Attacks on Odesa Oblast: Russia will continue to launch large groups of Shahed UAVs from the Black Sea, varying ingress points and targeting critical infrastructure in Odesa, with a focus on port facilities and power grid components. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Continued Attritional Ground Operations in Donetsk: Russian forces will maintain high-tempo attritional assaults on axes like Toretsk and Pokrovsk, integrating ground attacks with artillery and potentially close air support, despite sustained losses from Ukrainian FPV drones. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Escalated Information Operations Targeting Western Support: Russia will intensify narratives blaming Western special services for Ukrainian deep strikes and amplify any perceived divisions within the Western alliance, particularly related to sanctions policy or upcoming elections. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Continued Deep Strikes on Russian Territory (Ukrainian): Ukrainian forces will likely continue to execute deep strikes against military targets and infrastructure within Russia, prompting further Russian air defense alerts and retaliatory IO. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• Multi-Domain Attack on Odesa (Maritime & Air): Russia could combine massed drone attacks with cruise missile strikes (e.g., Kalibrs from the Mediterranean or Black Sea Fleet) and potentially even covert maritime operations against critical Odesa port facilities, aiming for a catastrophic disruption of Ukraine's maritime export capabilities and access to the Black Sea. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Increased Use of Advanced Air/Missile Assets: Russia could deploy more advanced or previously unconfirmed missile systems (e.g., new variants) or increase the tempo of ballistic missile strikes (Iskander-M) in conjunction with drone attacks to overwhelm Ukrainian AD, especially if AD munitions are perceived to be low. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Exploitation of Deep Strike for "False Flag" or Justification: Russia could engineer or falsely attribute a significant incident within its borders to a Ukrainian strike, potentially involving civilian casualties, to generate a pretext for a major, devastating retaliatory attack on Ukrainian cities or critical infrastructure. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Immediate (Next 3-6 hours):
  • Expect active engagement of Russian UAVs over Odesa Oblast. Decision Point: Ensure maximum AD readiness, especially targeting coastal approaches. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Monitor for any secondary waves of drones or follow-on ballistic missile launches aimed at Odesa or other southern cities. Decision Point: Maintain vigilance and adapt AD asset deployment. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Short Term (Next 12-24 hours):
  • Assess the impact of Ukrainian FPV drone strikes on Russian ground forces in Donetsk. Decision Point: Replicate successful tactics and continue resource allocation for tactical UAVs. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Monitor Russian IO responses to Ukrainian successes (e.g., FPV strikes, deep strikes) and Zelenskyy's statements. Decision Point: Prepare and deploy rapid counter-narratives. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Medium Term (Next 24-48 hours):
  • Observe if the persistent drone attacks on Odesa signal a more sustained campaign to blockade or isolate the city. Decision Point: Review strategic AD allocation for southern Ukraine and explore additional maritime defense measures. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Continue to monitor and assess the impact of diplomatic friction (e.g., US sanctions debate, Trump meeting) on international support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

---

6. RECOMMENDATIONS

• Intelligence & Special Operations (ISR is paramount):

  1. CRITICAL PRIORITY: Enhance multi-source ISR (SIGINT, IMINT, OSINT) on Russian drone launch and C2 nodes in Crimea and the Black Sea region, particularly focusing on new patterns of life or deployment indicating specific target sets within Odesa Oblast. This is crucial for predicting and countering the renewed mass drone attacks. (Collection Requirement: Maritime ISR, ELINT on drone C2 frequencies, OSINT on Russian social media for launch reports).
  2. HIGH PRIORITY: Intensify ISR on Russian ground units and their tactical C2 in the Toretsk direction. Characterize Russian force generation and deployment in response to heavy FPV drone attrition. (Collection Requirement: Aerial ISR, HUMINT from frontline units).
  3. IMMEDIATE: Task OSINT analysts to rapidly identify and analyze Russian narratives stemming from foreign policy statements (e.g., Jeffrey Sachs, Orban, Trump meeting) and their potential impact on international support. (Collection Requirement: OSINT monitoring of Russian state media, foreign policy blogs, and related narratives).
  4. Targeting: Maintain dynamic targeting for Russian drone launch sites, C2 nodes, and logistics hubs supporting their multi-directional drone attacks in the Black Sea/Crimea region. Prioritize counter-battery fire against Russian artillery on all active fronts, especially in Donetsk.

• Air Defense & Force Protection:

  1. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: Re-allocate and prioritize AD assets to protect Odesa port infrastructure and other critical assets in southern Odesa Oblast from the specific, newly identified drone ingress routes (Vylkove, Tatarbunary). Implement layered defenses to maximize interception rates.
  2. URGENT: Distribute and brief updated TTPs for countering massed drone swarms launched from maritime platforms. This includes optimizing radar coverage, multi-sensor integration, and coordinated engagement.
  3. CRITICAL FORCE PROTECTION: Reiterate and enforce enhanced force protection measures for all personnel and critical infrastructure in southern and central Ukraine, given the persistent and expanding aerial threat.
  4. TACTICAL AD: Continue aggressive proliferation of MANPADS and tactical counter-UAV systems (EW, anti-drone guns) to frontline units to mitigate Russian FPV drone threats against demining teams and ground personnel.

• Ground Forces:

  1. TACTICAL: Continue to exploit the demonstrated effectiveness of FPV drones in inflicting casualties on Russian personnel and light armor. Ensure sustained supply chain for drones and munitions to tactical units.
  2. TRAINING: Develop and disseminate specific training for frontline units on tactics to mitigate exposure to FPV drones, including rapid concealment and countermeasures.
  3. LOGISTICS: Prioritize logistical support for tactical units engaged in high-attrition combat on the Donetsk axis, ensuring resupply of ammunition, medical supplies, and FPV drones.

• Information Operations (IO):

  1. CRITICAL/IMMEDIATE: Proactively counter Russian narratives that seek to blame Western special services for Ukrainian actions or create diplomatic friction between Ukraine and its partners. Issue clear, factual statements from official Ukrainian sources.
  2. IMMEDIATE: Widely disseminate video evidence of Ukrainian tactical successes (e.g., FPV drone strikes on Toretsk) to bolster domestic morale and demonstrate battlefield effectiveness.
  3. STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION: Amplify President Zelenskyy's statements emphasizing the value of Ukrainian lives in contrast to Russian disregard for their personnel. Use this as a core message for both domestic and international audiences.
  4. COUNTER-PROPAGANDA: Develop and promote campaigns that highlight the resilience of Ukrainian cities and the ongoing functioning of critical infrastructure despite Russian attacks, directly countering narratives of collapse. Counter Russian attempts to legitimize their judicial processes in occupied territories.

• Diplomatic/Inter-Agency:

  1. CRITICAL: Engage international partners to highlight the expanding axis of Russian drone attacks against Odesa and reiterate the urgent need for advanced AD systems and munitions, particularly for maritime defense.
  2. ONGOING: Maintain diplomatic pressure on nations that provide ambiguous or pro-Russian statements, emphasizing the importance of a unified stance against aggression. Actively counter Russian efforts to use political statements from other nations to undermine Ukraine's position.
  3. INTER-AGENCY COORDINATION: Ensure seamless coordination between military intelligence, Air Force, Navy, and diplomatic channels for real-time information sharing regarding evolving maritime and aerial threats and any associated IO efforts.

---