Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR) TIME OF REPORT: 11 JUN 25 / 20:41 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 11 JUN 25 / 20:11 ZULU - 11 JUN 25 / 20:41 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk CLASSIFICATION: TOP SECRET / ORCON / NOFORN

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• Southern Ukraine (Odesa Oblast):
  • CRITICAL NEW: Ukrainian Air Force reports a large group of Russian UAVs detected over the Black Sea, heading towards Odesa Oblast. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). This indicates a new axis of a multi-directional drone attack.
• Southern Ukraine (Zaporizhzhia Oblast):
  • UPDATE: Zaporizhzhia Oblast Administration confirms a ballistic missile threat for regions under air alert. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). This confirms continued Russian multi-domain targeting.
  • UPDATE: Ukrainian Air Force confirms the lifting of the ballistic threat alert for affected regions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Southern Ukraine (Mykolaiv Oblast):
  • NEW: Russian source "Alex Parker Returns" claims McDonald's is leaving Mykolaiv, citing "lack of quality water" and "possibility of Russian advance on the region." (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for the report; LOW for the attributed reasons being the primary factor, as it aligns with Russian IO narratives). This aligns with ongoing Russian efforts to influence perception of their operational progress.
• Eastern Ukraine (Donetsk Oblast):
  • UPDATE: Colonelcassad (Russian milblogger) publishes video purporting to show a Russian Mi-28 helicopter strike on a Ukrainian Armed Forces temporary deployment point (PVD) of the 63rd Mechanized Brigade near Kirovsk. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for Russian claim/video; MEDIUM for confirmed accuracy of target/unit without further Ukrainian BDA). This suggests continued Russian close air support operations against Ukrainian positions.
• Russian Territory (Bryansk Oblast):
  • NEW: TASS reports two civilians wounded in Bryansk Oblast due to a Ukrainian UAV attack, as stated by the governor. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for Russian claim of attack/casualties; MEDIUM for details of attack origin/intent, as this is a consistent Russian narrative).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• No new significant weather or environmental factors reported. Conditions remain conducive for continued drone operations and ballistic missile launches. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces:
  • Air Defense: Actively tracking and reporting large UAV groups heading towards Odesa Oblast and issuing ballistic threat alerts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). Demonstrated rapid threat assessment and dissemination.
  • Ground Forces: A Ukrainian source "Оперативний ЗСУ" posted a video of a deceased Russian soldier, indicating ongoing close combat and successful engagements. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for ongoing combat; LOW for specific location/unit).
• Russian Forces:
  • Aerial Attack Posture: Russian forces are launching a new wave of drones, with a large group targeting Odesa Oblast. Ballistic missile threats have been issued and then lifted. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Close Air Support: Continued use of rotary-wing aircraft (Mi-28) in close proximity to frontlines, as indicated by claimed strike on 63rd OMBr PVD. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Information Operations: Russian milbloggers continue to publish combat footage (Mi-28 strike) and push narratives about Ukrainian leaders' failures (Syrskyi banning defenses), McDonald's withdrawal from Mykolaiv, and general dehumanization ("чубатая алькаида" for Kharkiv). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). MoD Russia posting "Top News Today" indicates centralized messaging efforts.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action:

• Capabilities:
  • Multi-axis Drone & Ballistic Strike: Russia maintains the capability to launch simultaneous drone attacks from multiple directions (Kherson to Mykolaiv, Black Sea to Odesa) and employ ballistic missiles, demonstrating a coordinated aerial threat. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Helicopter Close Air Support: Russian forces are capable of deploying attack helicopters (Mi-28) for direct engagement of Ukrainian ground targets, providing close air support to ground operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Deep Information Influence: Russia continues to demonstrate sophisticated information operations capabilities, linking tactical claims (e.g., McDonald's leaving Mykolaiv) to broader operational narratives of Russian success and Ukrainian decline. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Intentions:
  • Degrade Ukrainian Air Defense & Infrastructure in Southern Ukraine: The new large drone wave towards Odesa and ongoing threats to Mykolaiv and Zaporizhzhia aim to exhaust AD and damage critical infrastructure or port facilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Support Ground Operations with Air Assets: Continued use of attack helicopters indicates an intention to directly support ground forces and suppress Ukrainian resistance. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Exploit Perceived Internal Divisions within Ukraine: The Russian milblogger claim about Syrskyi banning defenses in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast intends to sow distrust and undermine Ukrainian leadership. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Dehumanize and Demoralize Ukrainian Population: The use of terms like "чубатая алькаида" for Kharkiv residents, and focusing on civilian casualties in Bryansk, aims to justify attacks and shift blame. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• Expanded Drone Attack Axis: The large group of UAVs targeting Odesa Oblast from the Black Sea indicates an expansion or shifting of Russian drone attack vectors, potentially to circumvent previously identified AD corridors or to target port infrastructure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Exploitation of Internal Ukrainian Narratives: Russian milbloggers are increasingly picking up on and amplifying purported internal Ukrainian political disagreements or criticisms (e.g., Syrskyi's alleged actions), indicating an adaptation to leverage domestic Ukrainian discourse for IO purposes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• No new information indicating significant changes to Russian logistics or sustainment status in this period. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Russian C2: Appears effective in coordinating multi-axis drone operations and close air support for ground units. Strategic C2 for information operations remains highly integrated, with state media and milbloggers echoing consistent narratives. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ukrainian C2: Continues to demonstrate effective C2 for air defense, rapidly issuing alerts and tracking threats. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• Air Defense: Highly alert and responsive to multi-layered threats (drones, ballistic missiles) across southern and central Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ground Forces: Continue to engage Russian forces in close combat, inflicting casualties. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Overall Posture: Remains defensively oriented, with AD assets positioned to counter ongoing aerial attacks.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Successes:
  • Timely detection and warning of new large drone group towards Odesa. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Confirmed lifting of ballistic threat. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Continued engagement and attrition of Russian ground forces. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Setbacks/Challenges:
  • Continued expenditure of AD munitions against persistent drone waves. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Dealing with Russian IO that attempts to leverage internal Ukrainian political discourse. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• Air Defense Munitions: Continued, high-tempo drone and missile attacks maintain the critical requirement for a sustained supply of AD interceptors. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Information Warfare Capabilities: Need to rapidly identify and counter Russian narratives that exploit internal Ukrainian political discourse. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Narratives:
  • False Flag/Blame Shifting: TASS reporting on Ukrainian UAV attacks in Bryansk Oblast with civilian casualties serves to justify Russian retaliatory strikes and portray Ukraine as targeting civilians. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Dehumanization: "НгП раZVедка" calling Kharkiv "чубатая алькаида" is a clear attempt to dehumanize the population and justify attacks on civilian areas. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Internal Division Amplification: "Операция Z" amplifying claims about Syrskyi banning defenses in Dnipropetrovsk is a direct attempt to sow distrust between Ukrainian leadership and local populations/military. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Economic Impact Spin: Alex Parker Returns' claim about McDonald's leaving Mykolaiv due to "Russian advance" is an attempt to create a perception of Russian military success and impending collapse of Ukrainian cities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Diplomatic Pressure/Dismissal: TASS reporting Orban's advice to Zelenskyy not to threaten Hungary reinforces the narrative of Ukrainian ingratitude and attempts to create friction between Ukraine and its partners. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Historical Revisionism: Colonelcassad's comment on NATO SecGen Stoltenberg's "Ukraine XII century" remark aims to delegitimize Ukraine's historical statehood and justify Russian aggression. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ukrainian Counter-Narratives:
  • Transparency and Alertness: The prompt and continuous updates from Ukrainian Air Force on aerial threats demonstrates transparency and reinforces public trust in national defense. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Highlighting Enemy Attrition: "Оперативний ЗСУ" posting a video of a deceased Russian soldier highlights Ukrainian tactical successes and counters Russian narratives of overwhelming superiority. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Ukrainian Morale: The continuous aerial threats to Odesa, Mykolaiv, and Zaporizhzhia, coupled with the previous mass attack on Kharkiv, will test civilian resilience. However, the effective AD response and confirmation of F-16 deliveries (from previous report) will provide some reassurance. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Morale: The continued focus on "victories" (Mi-28 strike) and dehumanizing Ukrainian forces is designed to maintain high morale among pro-war segments and justify ongoing aggression. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). The need to consistently counter Ukrainian deep strikes with narratives like the Bryansk incident also indicates internal pressure.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• Hungary's Stance: Orban's comments, as reported by TASS, indicate continued diplomatic friction with Hungary, which aligns with their historically nuanced stance on the conflict. This could be a point of tension within EU/NATO efforts to present a united front. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• NATO Discourse: Stoltenberg's reported comment and Medinsky's response highlight an ongoing battle over historical narratives that can influence international perceptions and support for Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• Continued Massed Drone Attacks on Southern & Central Ukraine: Russia will continue to launch large groups of UAVs, particularly targeting Odesa, Mykolaiv, and Zaporizhzhia, potentially varying launch vectors to challenge Ukrainian AD. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Sustained Ground Operations with Air Support: Russia will maintain attritional ground operations, heavily integrating helicopter and fixed-wing close air support against Ukrainian strongholds, particularly in Donetsk Oblast. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Intensified Information Operations Targeting Internal Ukrainian Unity: Russia will likely increase efforts to amplify any perceived internal Ukrainian disagreements or criticisms of leadership, aiming to undermine public trust and morale. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Persistent Blame-Shifting and Justification of Attacks: Russia will continue to frame any Ukrainian strikes on Russian territory as "terrorist attacks" on civilians, to justify their own retaliatory actions and deflect international criticism. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• Coordinated Maritime/Air Strike on Odesa Port Infrastructure: A large, multi-domain attack (massed drones, cruise missiles from Black Sea/Mediterranean, potentially anti-ship missiles) specifically targeting critical port infrastructure in Odesa, aiming to severely disrupt Ukraine's maritime exports and naval capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Expanded Use of Attack Helicopters in New Offensive Sectors: Russian forces could rapidly escalate the use of attack helicopters (Mi-28, Ka-52) in support of potential new ground offensives (e.g., Sumy, Dnipropetrovsk), increasing their battlefield effectiveness if Ukrainian air defenses are stretched. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Major Cyberattack Synchronized with Kinetic Strikes: Russia could launch a crippling cyberattack against Ukrainian critical infrastructure (energy, communications, banking) synchronized with mass kinetic strikes, aiming to create widespread disruption and chaos ahead of any major ground maneuver. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Immediate (Next 3-6 hours):
  • Expect active engagement of Russian UAVs over Odesa Oblast. Decision Point: Ensure full AD readiness and consider preemptive measures if specific launch platforms are identified. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Monitor for any follow-on ballistic missile launches or additional drone waves after the initial Odesa threat. Decision Point: Maintain vigilance. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Short Term (Next 12-24 hours):
  • Assess the impact of Russian close air support (helicopter strikes) on Ukrainian ground forces. Decision Point: Adapt counter-air tactics at the tactical edge. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Monitor Russian IO efforts to manipulate narratives about Ukrainian leadership. Decision Point: Prepare proactive counter-narratives. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Medium Term (Next 24-48 hours):
  • Observe if the increased drone activity towards Odesa indicates a strategic shift in Russian aerial targeting. Decision Point: Adjust AD asset allocation accordingly. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Continue to monitor and assess the impact of diplomatic friction (e.g., Hungary) on broader international support for Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

---

6. RECOMMENDATIONS

• Intelligence & Special Operations (ISR is paramount):

  1. CRITICAL PRIORITY: Enhance ISR (SIGINT, IMINT, OSINT) on Russian drone launch sites and C2 nodes in Crimea and Black Sea regions. This is crucial for predicting and countering the large drone waves targeting Odesa and other southern regions. (Collection Requirement: Maritime ISR, ELINT on drone C2 frequencies, OSINT on Russian social media for launch reports).
  2. HIGH PRIORITY: Intensify ISR on Russian ground units operating with close air support (helicopters) in Donetsk Oblast. Characterize helicopter sortie rates, targeting patterns, and the effectiveness of their integration with ground maneuvers. (Collection Requirement: Aerial ISR, HUMINT from frontline units).
  3. IMMEDIATE: Task OSINT analysts to track and analyze Russian milblogger claims related to internal Ukrainian political/military dynamics (e.g., Syrskyi allegations). Identify specific narratives and their intended psychological effects. (Collection Requirement: OSINT monitoring of Russian Telegram channels, state media).
  4. Targeting: Maintain dynamic targeting for Russian drone launch sites, C2 nodes, and logistics hubs supporting their multi-directional drone attacks. Prioritize counter-battery fire against Russian artillery on all active fronts, especially in South Donetsk.

• Air Defense & Force Protection:

  1. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: Re-allocate and prioritize AD assets to protect Odesa port infrastructure and other critical assets in southern Ukraine from massed drone attacks. Implement layered defenses to maximize interception rates.
  2. URGENT: Review and update TTPs for countering large, multi-directional drone swarms, especially those launched from maritime platforms. This includes optimizing radar coverage and multi-sensor integration.
  3. CRITICAL FORCE PROTECTION: Reiterate and enforce enhanced force protection measures for all personnel and critical infrastructure in southern and central Ukraine, given the persistent and expanding aerial threat.
  4. HELICOPTER COUNTERMEASURES: Ensure frontline units are equipped with and proficient in using man-portable air-defense systems (MANPADS) to counter Russian attack helicopters operating close to the front.

• Ground Forces:

  1. TACTICAL: Continue to develop and disseminate best practices for mitigating the impact of Russian close air support on ground operations. This includes improved camouflage, dispersion, and rapid redeployment.
  2. TRAINING: Prioritize training for frontline units on tactics to identify and counter Russian propaganda elements embedded in combat footage, to prevent demoralization.

• Information Operations (IO):

  1. CRITICAL/IMMEDIATE: Proactively counter Russian narratives aiming to sow distrust within Ukraine (e.g., Syrskyi claims). Provide clear, factual rebuttals from official Ukrainian sources to maintain public trust and cohesion.
  2. IMMEDIATE: Aggressively counter Russian claims of "Ukrainian" attacks on Russian civilian infrastructure. Emphasize Ukraine's adherence to laws of armed conflict and expose Russia's consistent targeting of civilians.
  3. STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION: Frame Russian attempts to use diplomatic statements (e.g., Orban) for their own benefit as deliberate efforts to divide international support for Ukraine. Emphasize the broad base of international solidarity.
  4. COUNTER-PROPAGANDA: Develop and promote campaigns that highlight the resilience of Ukrainian cities and the ongoing functioning of critical infrastructure despite Russian attacks, directly countering narratives of cities being "abandoned" (e.g., Mykolaiv).

• Diplomatic/Inter-Agency:

  1. CRITICAL: Engage international partners to highlight the expanding axis of Russian drone attacks (e.g., Odesa from Black Sea) and reiterate the urgent need for advanced AD systems and munitions.
  2. ONGOING: Maintain diplomatic pressure on nations that provide ambiguous or pro-Russian statements, emphasizing the importance of a unified stance against aggression.
  3. INTER-AGENCY COORDINATION: Ensure seamless coordination between military intelligence, Air Force, Navy, and diplomatic channels for real-time information sharing regarding evolving maritime and aerial threats and any associated IO efforts.

---