Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR) TIME OF REPORT: 11 JUN 25 / 14:37 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 11 JUN 25 / 14:08 ZULU - 11 JUN 25 / 14:37 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk CLASSIFICATION: TOP SECRET / ORCON / NOFORN

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• Eastern Ukraine (Donetsk Oblast):
  • "Поддубный |Z|О|V| edition" (Russian milblogger) reports continued Russian drone activity on the "Красноармейское направление" (Pokrovsk direction), indicating persistent pressure and the use of UAVs to clear routes for infantry. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - regarding enemy claim).
• Southern Ukraine (Zaporizhzhia Oblast):
  • "Kadyrov_95" (Russian milblogger) claims "ВОСТОК-АХМАТ" (Vostok-Akhmat) battalion maintains positions on the "Запорожском фронте" (Zaporizhzhia front), suggesting ongoing localized engagements in this sector. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - regarding enemy claim).
  • "Mash на Донбассе" (Russian milblogger) reports a civilian drowning incident in "Васильевского муниципального округа (Запорожская область)" (Vasylivskyi municipal district, Zaporizhzhia Oblast), confirming Russian administrative control over parts of the oblast. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Northern Ukraine (Sumy Oblast):
  • CRITICAL UPDATE: "Повітряні Сили ЗС України / Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine" reports "КАБи на Сумщину!" (KABs on Sumy Oblast!), indicating continued Russian aerial bombardment with guided glide bombs, suggesting ongoing ground pressure or preparatory fires. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ukrainian Territory (Operational Picture):
  • "Оперативний ЗСУ" (Ukrainian milblogger) shares a video of "Оператори БПЛА 15 БрОП НГУ «Кара-Даг»" (UAV operators of 15th Separate Brigade of National Guard of Ukraine "Kara-Dag") eliminating Russian infantry and motorcyclists, confirming effective Ukrainian counter-UAV and anti-personnel operations, particularly against rapid assault tactics. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Territory (Internal Affairs/Border Regions):
  • TASS reports "Силы ПВО уничтожили четыре украинских БПЛА над Белгородской областью, еще один — над Крымом" (Air defense forces destroyed four Ukrainian UAVs over Belgorod Oblast, one over Crimea), confirming continued Ukrainian deep strikes and Russian AD activity. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). ASTRA independently confirms this report. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • TASS reports that the Investigative Committee opened a terrorism case following a Ukrainian attack on "поселок Марьино в Курской области" (Maryino settlement in Kursk Oblast) which injured children, indicating Russian efforts to frame Ukrainian cross-border actions as terrorism. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• No new significant weather or environmental factors affecting operations reported in this period.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces:
  • ISR/UAVs: The "Оперативний ЗСУ" video highlights continued effective use of Ukrainian FPV drones and counter-UAV measures by NGU units against Russian ground forces, including infantry and light vehicles (motorcycles). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Air Defense: "Повітряні Сили ЗС України / Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine" continues to issue general air warnings ("⚠ Увага!") and specific warnings about incoming KABs ("КАБи на Сумщину!"), indicating ongoing aerial threats and active AD monitoring. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Civilian Administration: "🇺🇦 Запорізька обласна військова адміністрація 🇺🇦" reports on professional training for residents, demonstrating continued focus on civilian support and resilience in rear areas. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Forces:
  • UAV Operations: "Kotsnews" (Russian milblogger) shares a video titled "Охота на Бабу Ягу" (Hunt for Baba Yaga), likely referring to footage of Russian forces targeting Ukrainian "Baba Yaga" style heavy FPV drones, indicating Russian adaptation and counter-UAV efforts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Ground Operations: Russian forces continue to employ small assault groups (ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS citing "Офіцер➕") and motorcycles (Оперативний ЗСУ) in attempts to penetrate Ukrainian defenses, suggesting flexible, light-infantry tactics. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Border Security/AD: Active AD engagements over Belgorod and Crimea confirm Russian efforts to defend its border regions and annexed territories from Ukrainian drone attacks. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Propaganda: "Colonelcassad" and "Alex Parker Returns" continue to disseminate propaganda related to internal Russian narratives and attempts to discredit Ukraine. TASS promotes "Intervision" participation, possibly for cultural influence. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action:

• Capabilities:
  • Air-to-Ground Strikes: Russia continues to possess the capability to employ KABs (guided glide bombs) against frontline positions and rear areas, as evidenced by strikes on Sumy Oblast. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Border Defense: Russia maintains active air defense systems over its border regions and annexed Crimea, demonstrating a capability to intercept a portion of Ukrainian UAV attacks. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Small Unit Infiltration: Russian forces are capable of deploying small assault groups (4-5 personnel) for localized infiltration or reconnaissance, particularly in areas like the Dnipropetrovsk border region. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Propaganda Generation: Russia retains a robust propaganda apparatus capable of generating rapid, targeted disinformation campaigns, including narratives around "terrorism" and discrediting Ukrainian institutions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Intentions:
  • Sustain Pressure on Dnipropetrovsk Border: The unconfirmed STERNENKO report (from previous ISR) and the new information from ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS (citing "Офіцер➕") about small Russian assault groups entering Dnipropetrovsk Oblast suggest a continued intention to probe or establish a presence in this new area, likely to fix Ukrainian resources or exploit perceived vulnerabilities. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
  • Maintain Offensive on Eastern Front: Russian forces intend to continue attritional ground assaults on the Pokrovsk (Krasnoarmiysk) direction, utilizing drones for tactical support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Defend Border Regions: Russia intends to continue defending its territory and annexed areas from Ukrainian deep strikes, as evidenced by AD activity over Belgorod and Crimea. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Shape Information Environment: Russia intends to weaponize civilian casualties (e.g., Kursk incident) for propaganda purposes, aiming to discredit Ukraine and justify their actions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• Small Unit Infiltration/Reconnaissance: The reported use of small (4-5 person) Russian assault groups on the Dnipropetrovsk axis, as reported by "Офіцер➕" via ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS, suggests a tactical adaptation for probing defenses or light reconnaissance, possibly to preserve larger unit strength or to exploit specific terrain features. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Counter-UAV Focus: Russian milbloggers' focus on "hunting Baba Yaga" drones indicates an increased emphasis on developing and deploying counter-UAV measures against larger Ukrainian FPV drones. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Motorcycle Assaults: The Ukrainian report of successful engagement against Russian motorcyclists confirms continued, albeit high-risk, Russian attempts at rapid, light infantry assaults. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• No new information on Russian logistics or sustainment status in this reporting period. Previous ISR highlighted ongoing impact at Engels, which remains relevant.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Russian C2 for Border Defense: The rapid reporting by MO RF and TASS of AD engagements over Belgorod and Crimea indicates functional and coordinated C2 for border defense and information dissemination. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian C2 for Offensive Operations: The continued multi-axis ground operations, including reported small group infiltrations and tactical drone use, suggest a functioning, albeit adaptive, C2 for localized offensive actions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• Effective Counter-UAV/Anti-Personnel: Ukrainian National Guard (15th Separate Brigade "Kara-Dag") demonstrates high readiness and effectiveness in neutralizing Russian infantry and light vehicles (motorcycles) using UAVs. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Vigilant Air Defense: The Ukrainian Air Force continues to provide timely warnings about incoming KABs and general air threats, indicating active monitoring and readiness. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Resilience & Support: The Zaporizhzhia Oblast Military Administration's report on vocational training highlights ongoing efforts to maintain civilian life and support the population in rear areas, which contributes to overall national resilience. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Successes:
  • Effective Anti-Infiltration: Ukrainian forces are successfully destroying small Russian assault groups attempting to enter Dnipropetrovsk Oblast using drones, demonstrating effective local defense and rapid response. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Countering Motorcycle Assaults: Ukrainian UAV operators successfully neutralized Russian motorcyclists, confirming effective countermeasures against this specific Russian tactic. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Deep Strike Effectiveness: Continued Russian AD activity over their territory (Belgorod, Crimea) confirms the ongoing effectiveness of Ukrainian deep strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Setbacks/Challenges:
  • Continued Aerial Bombardment: Russian KAB strikes on Sumy Oblast pose an ongoing threat and challenge to defensive lines and civilian infrastructure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Persistent Probing on New Axes: The continued reported attempts by small Russian groups to penetrate Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (even if successfully countered) indicates persistent Russian pressure on new axes, requiring constant vigilance and resource allocation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• ISR for New Axes: The repeated reporting of Russian activity near the Dnipropetrovsk Oblast border, even in small groups, necessitates continuous and high-resolution ISR to prevent any larger build-up or deeper penetration. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Counter-UAV/FPV Drone Capabilities: The demonstrated effectiveness of Ukrainian FPV drones against Russian infantry and motorcyclists, and Russian efforts to counter "Baba Yaga" drones, underscores the critical need for continued supply, training, and innovation in this domain. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Air Defense Munitions: The continued use of KABs by Russia on Sumy Oblast highlights the ongoing demand for air defense systems capable of intercepting glide bombs or suppressing launch platforms. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Narratives:
  • Blame-Shifting/Terrorism: TASS's reporting on the Kursk incident, framing it as a "terrorist act" and highlighting injured children, is a clear attempt to demonize Ukraine and justify Russian retaliatory actions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Discrediting Ukraine: "Alex Parker Returns" shares a derogatory post about Ukrainian higher education, aimed at undermining public trust and discrediting Ukrainian institutions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Internal Control/Normalization: Colonelcassad continues to promote internal narratives, and TASS reports on Poland's government, aimed at maintaining domestic focus and projecting normalcy. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Military Success Claims: Kadyrov and Poddubny promote specific unit successes (Vostok-Akhmat, drone operations) to boost morale and project an image of military effectiveness. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ukrainian Counter-Narratives:
  • Highlighting Russian Attrition: "Оперативний ЗСУ" directly counters Russian narratives of progress by showcasing successful elimination of Russian troops and light vehicles. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Transparency/Warning: The Ukrainian Air Force's timely warnings about KABs demonstrate transparency and vigilance, building public trust. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Focus on Resilience: Zaporizhzhia Oblast's report on training highlights resilience and focus on the future, countering narratives of collapse. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Ukrainian Morale: The successful targeting of Russian assault groups (Dnipropetrovsk border) and tactical victories against light infantry assaults (motorcyclists) likely boost morale. Continued KAB strikes on Sumy, however, represent a persistent threat that could cause anxiety. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Morale: Reports of successful AD engagements over Belgorod and Crimea aim to reassure the Russian populace. However, internal reports of soldier abuse ("МОБИЛИЗАЦИЯ | Новости | Срочники") and General SVR's enigmatic posts could sow discontent or anxiety, though their reach is limited. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• International Sentiment: TASS reports on Trump and Poland's government, and ASTRA's report on global conflicts, hint at a complex international environment. Russian attempts to frame Ukrainian actions as "terrorism" aim to influence international opinion. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• US Political Landscape: "РБК-Україна" reports on Trump's supposed deal with China, and "Операция Z" cites the Finnish President on Trump's intentions regarding Ukraine talks, indicating continued Ukrainian and Russian monitoring of US political developments and their potential impact on the conflict. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• European Stability: TASS reports on a vote of confidence for Tusk's government in Poland, a relevant development for regional stability and NATO's eastern flank. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Diplomatic Outreach: TASS reporting on US participation in "Intervision" suggests a continued Russian attempt to maintain some cultural and diplomatic ties, despite global isolation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• Continued Probing on New Axes: Russia will continue to probe the Dnipropetrovsk Oblast border area with small, agile assault groups, likely aiming to identify weak points for potential future exploitation or to draw Ukrainian reserves. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Sustained KAB Strikes on Sumy: Russia will maintain a high tempo of KAB (glide bomb) strikes on Sumy Oblast to degrade Ukrainian defensive infrastructure, suppress artillery, and support localized ground probes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Attritional Ground Operations on Eastern Front: Persistent, drone-supported, attritional ground assaults will continue on the Pokrovsk (Krasnoarmiysk) direction, focusing on exhausting Ukrainian defenses. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Intensified Cross-Border Retaliation & IO: Russia will likely continue retaliatory strikes against Ukrainian border regions and intensify its information campaign, framing Ukrainian cross-border actions as "terrorism" and generating further narratives to discredit Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• Exploitation of Dnipropetrovsk Border Penetration: If the small Russian groups probing Dnipropetrovsk Oblast manage to find an unreinforced sector or create a local breach, Russia could rapidly commit larger follow-on forces (e.g., a reinforced battalion tactical group) to exploit this penetration, aiming to establish a forward operating base or seize a critical logistical node. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM-HIGH).
• Combined Air and Ground Assault on Sumy Axis: Russia could escalate the current KAB strikes and localized ground probes on the Sumy axis into a more significant combined arms assault, aiming to create a substantial "buffer zone" or draw a large portion of Ukrainian reserves away from the Donbas. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Cyber/Hybrid Attacks on Key Infrastructure: Synchronized with kinetic operations, Russia could launch significant cyberattacks against Ukrainian critical infrastructure (energy, communications, transportation) in an attempt to disrupt C2, spread panic, and degrade Ukraine's ability to respond to ground threats. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Immediate (Next 6-12 hours):
  • CRITICAL: Continue real-time monitoring and immediate engagement of any Russian small groups attempting to infiltrate Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. Decision Point: Assess if these probes are intensifying or expanding in scope. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Maintain high AD readiness for KAB strikes on Sumy Oblast. Decision Point: Prioritize AD assets based on identified threat patterns. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Short Term (Next 24-48 hours):
  • Expect continued Russian propaganda efforts centered on the Kursk incident and attempts to discredit Ukraine. Decision Point: Proactively counter these narratives. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Observe if Russian forces attempt to consolidate any gains on the Pokrovsk direction. Decision Point: Adjust defensive lines and fire support accordingly. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Medium Term (Next 3-5 days):
  • Continue to monitor for any significant shift in Russian force posture or massing on the Sumy axis, which would indicate a larger offensive intent. Decision Point: Prepare for potential redeployment of reserves if a major offensive is confirmed. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

---

6. RECOMMENDATIONS

• Intelligence & Special Operations (ISR is paramount):

  1. CRITICAL PRIORITY: Maintain constant, high-resolution ISR (IMINT, SIGINT, ELINT, HUMINT) on the Dnipropetrovsk Oblast border region. Focus on identifying any larger Russian force concentrations, logistics build-up, or more significant units attempting to follow probing groups. (Collection Requirement: Aerial reconnaissance, forward observation, local HUMINT, and rapid drone deployment for any detected movement.)
  2. HIGH PRIORITY: Intensify BDA on all Russian KAB strike locations in Sumy Oblast. Determine precise targets (military vs. civilian), damage assessment, and identify potential patterns or shifts in Russian targeting strategy. (Collection Requirement: Post-strike IMINT, local damage reports, survivor interviews.)
  3. HIGH PRIORITY: Increase SIGINT collection on Russian ground unit communications on the Pokrovsk (Krasnoarmiysk) direction and Sumy axis. Seek indicators of offensive preparations, reserve movements, or changes in command intent.
  4. TECHINT: Continue analyzing Russian counter-UAV measures (e.g., "Baba Yaga" hunting footage) and shared TTPs. Develop and disseminate countermeasures to Ukrainian drone units.
  5. OSINT: Closely monitor Russian milblogger channels for early indicators of new offensive intentions, tactical adaptations, or changes in internal morale.

• Air Defense & Force Protection:

  1. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: Maintain highest AD readiness across all border oblasts, particularly Sumy and Dnipropetrovsk (if threatened), given the sustained threat of KABs and potential for deeper penetration strikes.
  2. URGENT: Prioritize deployment of mobile air defense systems (e.g., short-range AD systems, man-portable air-defense systems (MANPADS), anti-drone guns) to counter small, low-altitude Russian UAVs and to protect against small infiltration groups.
  3. FORCE PROTECTION (Civilian & Military): Reinforce public awareness campaigns in Sumy Oblast regarding KAB threats, emphasizing shelter procedures. Prepare local authorities for potential quick reaction to small Russian ground incursions, particularly in areas near the Dnipropetrovsk border.

• Ground Forces:

  1. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: Commanders in the Dnipropetrovsk Oblast border region must reinforce observation posts, conduct aggressive reconnaissance-in-force, and be prepared for immediate tactical responses to any Russian probing groups. Focus on identifying and eliminating these groups before they can establish a foothold. Utilize anti-personnel drones extensively.
  2. TACTICAL: Continue to exploit the effectiveness of Ukrainian FPV drones against Russian infantry and light vehicles (including motorcycles). Prioritize training and supply for drone operators and units.
  3. TACTICAL: Maintain robust, layered defenses on the Pokrovsk (Krasnoarmiysk) direction, ensuring prepared positions, effective indirect fire support, and rapid response capabilities against sustained Russian pressure.
  4. ENGINEERING: Prioritize the construction of anti-vehicle and anti-personnel obstacles along vulnerable sectors, especially in the Dnipropetrovsk border area, to channel any potential Russian advances.

• Information Operations (IO):

  1. CRITICAL/IMMEDIATE: Proactively counter Russian narratives framing Ukrainian border actions as "terrorism" (e.g., Kursk incident). Highlight the defensive nature of Ukrainian actions and the indiscriminate targeting of civilians by Russian forces.
  2. URGENT: Publicize all confirmed instances of Ukrainian forces successfully destroying Russian small assault groups or light vehicle attacks, particularly on new axes (e.g., Dnipropetrovsk border). This boosts internal morale and demonstrates effective defense.
  3. STRATEGIC: Continue to highlight the strategic impact of Ukrainian deep strikes on Russian military targets, such as the Engels airbase, to maintain international confidence in Ukraine's capabilities.
  4. INTERNAL FOCUS: Reinforce messaging about the resilience and adaptation of Ukrainian forces in the face of evolving Russian tactics (e.g., small groups, motorcycles).