Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR) TIME OF REPORT: 10 JUN 25 / 18:37 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 10 JUN 25 / 18:07 ZULU - 10 JUN 25 / 18:37 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk CLASSIFICATION: TOP SECRET / ORCON / NOFORN

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• Donetsk Oblast (Pokrovsk/Krasnoarmiysk Direction): Russian sources ("Дневник Десантника🇷🇺", 18:09Z) provide maps indicating ongoing military activity, potentially advances, in the Krasnoarmiysk (Pokrovsk) direction. This aligns with previous reports of high-intensity combat. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for continued fighting, MEDIUM for specific Russian claims on map).
• Donetsk Oblast (Konstantinovka Direction): Russian milblogger ("Военкор Котенок", 18:17Z) shares a map, indicating ongoing engagements or areas of interest. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for sustained activity).
• Zaporizhzhia Oblast (Huliaipole Sector): Russian milblogger ("Военкор Котенок", 18:33Z) provides a map showing offensive intentions or observed offensive maneuvers by Russian forces (brown/green area) targeting Ukrainian-controlled Malinoyka (Малиновка) and Malinovskiy SUM (Малиновский СУМ), implying a pincer movement or convergent attacks. Identified settlements include Poltavka, Vishnevoye, and Novozlatopol. This indicates a renewed or sustained offensive effort in this sector. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for Russian intent, MEDIUM for scale of actual advance).
• Sumy/Kharkiv/Chernihiv Border Regions: Russian sources ("Поддубный |Z|О|V| edition", 18:36Z) claim continued intense operations by "Anvar" special detachment, involving artillery and UAVs, to create a "buffer zone" along the borders, targeting Ukrainian infantry shelters, communication nodes, and temporary deployment points. This corroborates previous intelligence of escalating pressure on these axes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for sustained Russian pressure and intent).
• Snake Island (Zmiinyi Ostriv): Russian milblogger ("Colonelcassad", 18:11Z) questions the purpose of strikes on Snake Island, indicating that it remains a potential target or is subject to sporadic activity. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM, implies past or potential future strikes).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• No new specific weather data. Visuals from drone footage show dry, open terrain in some areas (e.g., Zaporizhzhia). Night-time drone strikes confirm continued operability under darkness.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces:
  • Strategic Communication: President Zelenskyy emphasizes the "vital necessity" of not remaining silent in response to Russian escalation ("РБК-Україна", 18:10Z), indicating continued efforts to rally international support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Active Counter-Offensive/Defensive: Ukrainian drone units (e.g., "STRIX" battalion, 47th Brigade) are conducting successful surprise attacks on Russian territory ("ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS", 18:14Z), demonstrating proactive defense and cross-border capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Air Defense (AD) Response: Ukrainian Air Force reports Russian tactical aviation launching KABs towards Sumy Oblast ("Повітряні Сили ЗС України", 18:12Z), indicating ongoing aerial threats and the need for AD vigilance. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Resource Constraints: The previous report's call for "VERY needed" assistance from Zaporizhzhia Oblast Military Administration (17:44Z) remains unaddressed in new data, indicating continued resource constraints. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Forces:
  • Ground Operations (Donetsk/Zaporizhzhia/Border regions): Ongoing offensive operations and attempts to advance on multiple axes (Krasnoarmiysk, Konstantinovka, Huliaipole, Sumy/Kharkiv/Chernihiv border areas) with supporting artillery and UAVs. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Tactical Aviation (Sumy): Continued use of KABs by tactical aviation on Sumy Oblast. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Drone Operations: Active use of FPV drones for strikes on personnel and reconnaissance. Claims of destroying Ukrainian UAV crews using "KUB" loitering munitions on the Valuyki direction ("Военкор Котенок", 18:22Z). Compilation videos of drone strikes emphasize their FPV capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Information Operations (IO):
    • Continued efforts to demoralize and mock Ukrainian forces ("БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС", 18:24Z, Russian quote about "Zhoriks"). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Propagandistic video of claimed destruction of Ukrainian reconnaissance/logistical capabilities by 4th Separate Motorized Rifle Brigade ("«Зона СВО»", 18:19Z). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Disinformation campaigns about "mined children's toys" ("Военкор Котенок", 18:31Z) to sow discord and fear. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Amplification of news regarding US aid reduction ("ASTRA", 18:34Z; "РБК-Україна", 18:22Z) to undermine Ukrainian morale and international confidence. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Continued promotion of Russia-US diplomatic talks ("ТАСС", 18:11Z; "Операция Z", 18:27Z; "ASTRA", 18:22Z) to project normalcy and international standing. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Strategic Air/Missile Capabilities: New footage of "Geran-2" (Shahed-136) drone strikes on Kyiv and Boryspil ("Colonelcassad", 18:21Z) confirms continued use of UAVs for saturation attacks. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Mine Warfare: Confirmed mine incidents in Kursk Oblast, injuring civilians ("ТАСС", 18:21Z; "ASTRA", 18:25Z), indicates active mine warfare on border regions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action:

• Capabilities:
  • Combined Arms Offensive: Russia maintains the capability to conduct coordinated multi-axis attacks at the tactical level, as seen in the Huliaipole sector, combining ground forces with artillery, drones, and likely air support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Persistent Air/Drone Strikes: Demonstrated capability for multi-wave drone attacks (Geran-2) on urban centers and targeted strikes with loitering munitions (KUB) against specific assets like UAV crews. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Active Mine Warfare: Confirmed use of mines in border regions, indicating a capability to create hazards and deny terrain. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Advanced Information Warfare: High capability to produce and disseminate real-time, sophisticated propaganda, including fabricated narratives, and to rapidly capitalize on perceived setbacks for Ukraine (e.g., US aid reduction). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Intentions:
  • Territorial Gains: Russia intends to continue localized ground offensives on the Donetsk axis (Krasnoarmiysk, Konstantinovka) and specifically aims for limited, but strategically important, gains in Zaporizhzhia (Malinoyka/Malinovskiy SUM). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Create Buffer Zones: On the Sumy/Kharkiv/Chernihiv border, the stated intention is to create "buffer zones," which implies sustained pressure, artillery, and potential ground incursions to push Ukrainian forces back from the border. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Degrade Ukrainian Military & Society: Continued air/drone strikes aim to exhaust Ukrainian AD and inflict casualties/damage, while comprehensive IO aims to demoralize troops, undermine public trust, and influence international perceptions of the conflict. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Project Diplomatic Standing: Maintain a facade of diplomatic engagement with the US on "irritants" to portray Russia as a rational actor and major power, despite ongoing aggression. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• Targeted Anti-UAV Operations: Russian forces are actively targeting Ukrainian UAV crews with loitering munitions, indicating an adaptation to counter Ukrainian drone advantages. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Aggressive Border Zone Shaping Operations: The intensity and stated intent behind operations in the Sumy/Kharkiv/Chernihiv border areas suggest a more aggressive approach than previously observed, moving beyond just harassing fire. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Increased Focus on Psychological Warfare: The introduction of narratives like "mined children's toys" and amplified demoralizing content (e.g., Arestovich quotes) indicates an escalating PSYOP effort. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• The continued high tempo of combined arms operations, sustained artillery use, and drone strikes across multiple axes (Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, border regions) indicate robust logistical chains. The use of KABs and loitering munitions further supports this. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Confirmed mine incidents in Kursk Oblast suggest that Russian engineer and logistical units are actively involved in mine-laying operations and have access to necessary munitions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Russian C2 appears effective in coordinating multi-domain operations: simultaneous ground pushes, sustained air/drone attacks, and integrated IO campaigns across diverse channels. The ability to produce and disseminate real-time propaganda videos supports this assessment. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• The specific mention of the "4th Separate Motorized Rifle Brigade" and "BARS-25" indicates organized unit-level operations and C2 effectiveness. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• Active Defense & Proactive Raids: Ukrainian forces are not solely reactive, conducting proactive drone strikes on Russian territory (47th Brigade "STRIX" Battalion) which demonstrates initiative and offensive capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Strategic Communication: Ukrainian leadership continues to emphasize the need for international support and vigilance against Russian escalation, reflecting a realistic assessment of the ongoing threat and resource requirements. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Morale: While not explicitly stated in new messages, the previous report's indication of elderly volunteers suggests continued strong morale and national resolve.
• AD Challenges: Continued KAB launches on Sumy underscore the ongoing AD challenges and the need for effective counter-measures. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Successes:
  • Successful deep drone strikes by the 47th Brigade's STRIX battalion on Russian territory, demonstrating effective long-range precision strike capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • The previous report confirmed successful repulsion of mechanized attacks and effective use of Switchblade 600s, indicating tactical proficiency.
• Setbacks/Challenges:
  • Renewed Russian offensive pressure in Zaporizhzhia (Huliaipole sector) and the Sumy/Kharkiv/Chernihiv border regions creates additional fronts requiring attention and resources. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • The prospect of reduced US military aid in 2026 presents a significant long-term planning and resource challenge. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Continued Russian drone/missile strikes (e.g., Geran-2 on Kyiv/Boryspil) pose an ongoing threat to civilian infrastructure and AD capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• AD Systems & Munitions: The ongoing air/drone threats and KAB launches necessitate a continuous and expedited supply of advanced AD systems and interceptor munitions, especially for the northern and eastern borders. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Long-term Military Aid: The reported reduction in US aid for 2026 is a critical long-term constraint, necessitating immediate diplomatic efforts to secure alternative funding sources and maintain military supply lines. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Counter-UAV Capabilities: Increased Russian use of loitering munitions and anti-UAV operations highlights the need for advanced counter-drone systems and tactics for Ukrainian forces. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Narratives (Ongoing/New):
  • "Russian Military Effectiveness": Highlighting claimed successes (e.g., Krasnoarmiysk maps, Huliaipole advances, destruction of Ukrainian UAV crews) to project strength and demoralize opponents. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • "Ukrainian Atrocities/False Flags": Introduction of extreme narratives like "mined children's toys" to demonize Ukraine and potentially justify further aggressive actions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • "Western Support Waning": Amplifying news of reduced US military aid budget for 2026 to foster doubt and division within Ukraine and among its international partners. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • "Diplomatic Normalization": Emphasizing US-Russia talks to project Russia as a legitimate diplomatic actor despite ongoing aggression. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ukrainian Counter-Narratives (Ongoing/New):
  • "Call for Continued Support": President Zelenskyy's emphasis on breaking silence in response to Russian escalation aims to maintain international attention and aid. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • "Ukrainian Military Prowess": Showcasing successful drone strikes by Ukrainian units (e.g., STRIX battalion) to boost morale and demonstrate offensive capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Ukrainian Morale: President Zelenskyy's call for solidarity suggests an awareness of the need to maintain public resolve amidst ongoing escalation. The demonstration by a Ukrainian woman for missing personnel reflects deep societal impact and a desire for answers, while also serving as a morale reminder for troops. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Morale: Propaganda depicting successful operations and showcasing captured/exchanged POWs aims to boost domestic support and military morale. The internal reporting of mine incidents in border regions could cause local anxiety, but likely contained by state media. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• US Aid Outlook: The statement by the US Secretary of Defense regarding reduced aid budget for 2026 presents a significant challenge for Ukraine's long-term military planning and signals potential shifts in international support dynamics. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• US-Russia Dialogue: The decision to move "irritants" talks to Moscow indicates a continuation of a constrained diplomatic channel between the two powers, which Ukraine must monitor closely for any implications on its sovereignty or peace initiatives. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Belarus Factor: Lukashenko's comments on "internal political reasons" for potato shortages (TASS, 18:31Z) might seem innocuous, but analysts should remain vigilant for any subtle indicators of internal Belarusian instability or shifts in its alignment with Russia. (CONFIDENCE: LOW, but warrants monitoring).

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• Sustained Multi-Axis Pressure: Russia will maintain continuous, localized ground offensives on the Donetsk axis (Krasnoarmiysk, Konstantinovka) and will escalate efforts to create "buffer zones" in the Sumy/Kharkiv/Chernihiv border regions, involving combined arms (artillery, drones, ground probes). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Targeted Offensive in Zaporizhzhia: Russia will continue its localized offensive in the Huliaipole sector (Malinoyka/Malinovskiy SUM), attempting to achieve tactical gains to secure objectives in Zaporizhzhia Oblast. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Routine Air/Drone Strikes with Escalated PSYOPs: Russia will conduct daily air and drone strikes (including Geran-2/Shahed variants) against Ukrainian civilian and military targets. Concurrently, they will intensify psychological operations, focusing on fabricated narratives and amplifying perceived Ukrainian setbacks (e.g., aid reduction). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Persistent Mine Warfare: Russia will continue to employ mine warfare in border regions and near active frontlines to impede Ukrainian movement and force casualties. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• Operational-Level Offensive in Sumy/Kharkiv: Russia commits significant reserves to the Sumy/Kharkiv axes, launching a coordinated, deeper offensive aimed at seizing significant territory, potentially leveraging existing "buffer zone" efforts into a broader thrust to draw and fix Ukrainian strategic reserves. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Massed Precision Strike on Critical Infrastructure/AD Network: Russia launches a coordinated, high-volume missile and drone strike, leveraging any improved KN-23 accuracy, specifically targeting key AD nodes, C2 centers, or critical energy infrastructure (e.g., power plants, grid substations) to achieve significant degradation of Ukrainian capabilities before cold weather. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Next 6-12 Hours (Immediate Threat): Continued high-intensity ground engagements on Donetsk frontlines and increased artillery/drone activity in Zaporizhzhia and Sumy/Kharkiv border areas. Expect further Russian propaganda. Decision Point: Ukrainian forces must maintain high readiness on all threatened axes, especially Zaporizhzhia (Malinoyka/Malinovskiy SUM) and Sumy/Kharkiv borders. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Next 12-24 Hours: Expect Russia to attempt to consolidate any tactical gains in Zaporizhzhia and persist with "buffer zone" operations on the northern border. Potential for new air/drone strike waves. Decision Point: Assess effectiveness of current AD deployments; consider tactical reinforcement based on confirmed Russian ground advances. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Next 24-72 Hours: Monitor for any signs of Russian operational-level force generation or concentration on the Sumy/Kharkiv axes. Decision Point: Re-evaluate allocation of strategic reserves based on confirmed enemy intent and force size. Commence immediate high-level diplomatic outreach regarding 2026 aid reduction. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

---

6. RECOMMENDATIONS

• Intelligence & Special Operations (ISR is paramount):

  1. CRITICAL PRIORITY: Immediate and continuous ISR focus on the Huliaipole sector (Malinoyka/Malinovskiy SUM) in Zaporizhzhia Oblast to confirm the scale and direction of the Russian offensive. Identify specific units, equipment, and actual ground advances. (Collection Requirement: IMINT, SIGINT, HUMINT, OSINT - especially Russian milblogger map BDA).
  2. CRITICAL PRIORITY: Maintain maximum ISR focus on the Sumy/Kharkiv/Chernihiv border regions. Prioritize detection of any build-up of Russian ground forces beyond current levels, distinguishing between localized pressure and a potential larger offensive. (Collection Requirement: IMINT, SIGINT, HUMINT).
  3. HIGH PRIORITY: Analyze all available intelligence on Russian tactics in "buffer zone" creation (e.g., "Anvar" activities) to understand the TTPs of special detachments and their integration with artillery/UAVs. (Collection Requirement: OSINT, HUMINT, BDA).
  4. URGENT: Prioritize collection and forensic analysis of any recovered Russian loitering munitions (e.g., KUB) used against Ukrainian UAV crews to understand technical characteristics and counter-measures. (Collection Requirement: TECHINT).
  5. ONGOING: Conduct thorough BDA on all claimed Russian strikes and Ukrainian counter-offensives. Rapidly verify or refute Russian claims of destroying Ukrainian assets (e.g., UAV crews, specific targets in 4th Brigade video). (Collection Requirement: OSINT, BDA).

• Ground Forces:

  1. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: Commanders in the Huliaipole sector (Malinoyka/Malinovskiy SUM) must be immediately alerted to the high probability of an impending or ongoing multi-directional assault. Reinforce positions, establish strongpoints, and prepare layered defenses, particularly on the eastern and southern approaches.
  2. URGENT: Strengthen defensive lines and prepare counter-mobility operations (e.g., mining, anti-tank obstacles) in the Sumy/Kharkiv/Chernihiv border areas to counter "buffer zone" creation efforts and potential deeper incursions.
  3. TACTICAL: Continuously adapt and disseminate counter-drone tactics, specifically for countering loitering munitions and targeted strikes against UAV crews. Develop and share best practices from units like the 47th Brigade's STRIX battalion.
  4. OPERATIONAL: Ensure all units are aware of increased mine risks in border regions and along active frontlines. Implement robust counter-mine measures and training.

• Air Defense & Force Protection:

  1. IMMEDIATE: Maintain HIGHEST AD alert, particularly for Kyiv, Kharkiv, Sumy, and major urban centers. Prioritize interception of all incoming threats, especially ballistic missiles and massed drone attacks.
  2. CRITICAL: Accelerate requests for and delivery of long-range AD systems and urgent resupply of interceptor munitions, with an emphasis on countering ballistic missile threats and maintaining layered defense.
  3. TACTICAL: Disseminate intelligence on observed TTPs of "Geran-2" (Shahed-136) drones and any new aerial threats. Develop and implement innovative, multi-layered counter-drone measures, including EW and kinetic solutions.

• Information Operations (IO):

  1. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: Proactively counter Russian narratives of "mined children's toys" and other fabricated atrocities. Provide transparent, factual updates on Russian war crimes and human rights violations, including the use of mines in border regions.
  2. IMMEDIATE: Directly and transparently address the news of reduced US military aid for 2026. Frame it as a challenge that Ukraine and its partners are committed to overcoming through sustained and diversified international support.
  3. CRITICAL: Amplify evidence of Ukrainian military successes (e.g., 47th Brigade STRIX battalion strikes) to boost national morale and counter Russian demoralization efforts.
  4. STRATEGIC: Continue to highlight the human cost of the war and the resilience of the Ukrainian people (e.g., families of missing personnel) to maintain international empathy and pressure.

• Diplomatic & Resource Management:

  1. URGENT: Initiate immediate high-level diplomatic outreach to the US and other key partners regarding the projected reduction in military aid for 2026. Articulate the critical security implications and seek alternative funding mechanisms and military supply agreements.
  2. STRATEGIC: Continuously monitor and analyze US-Russia diplomatic engagements ("irritants" talks). Ensure Ukraine's interests are explicitly represented through backchannels and public statements, preventing any decisions that could compromise its security or sovereignty.
  3. RESOURCE ALLOCATION: Conduct an urgent internal review of resource requirements and existing stockpiles given the long-term aid outlook. Prioritize allocation of available resources to critical defensive needs on active fronts (Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, northern borders) and AD.