Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR) TIME OF REPORT: 10 JUN 25 / 18:07 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 10 JUN 25 / 17:37 ZULU - 10 JUN 25 / 18:07 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk CLASSIFICATION: TOP SECRET / ORCON / NOFORN

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• Donetsk Oblast (Pokrovsk Direction): High-intensity combat operations continue around Pokrovsk. Russian sources ("Операция Z," 17:38Z) claim mass destruction of NATO-supplied equipment, infantry, and artillery by "🅾️тважные" (likely Vostok Group). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for sustained heavy fighting, MEDIUM for Russian BDA claims).
• Donetsk Oblast (Toretsk Direction): Ukrainian forces (БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС, 17:39Z) report "cleansing" operations, indicating ongoing engagements and efforts to dislodge Russian forces. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Kharkiv Oblast: Russian sources ("«Зона СВО»," 17:45Z) use a map to highlight mandatory evacuation in 7 settlements in Kharkiv Oblast, framing it as a failure of Ukraine's "Kursk Operation." This indicates active Russian pressure on the Kharkiv axis and efforts to create a humanitarian crisis/information narrative. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for evacuation reports, MEDIUM for Russian narrative framing).
• Sumy/Kursk/Belgorod Border Region: Map analysis from Russian sources ("«Зона СВО»," 17:45Z) confirms strategic importance of transportation networks (E38, E39, M-2) and river systems (Psel, Seim) in the border region. This area remains a focal point for Russian information operations and potential ground activities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Donetsk People's Republic (Volnoye Pole): Russian MoD (18:02Z) claims "liberation" of Volnoye Pole by Vostok Group tankmen, suggesting localized Russian advances. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM for specific claim, HIGH for ongoing Russian ground operations in DPR).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• No new specific weather data in this reporting period. Visuals from drone footage suggest dry, possibly arid, and partially wooded terrain. Conditions remain suitable for continued aerial and ground operations.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces:
  • Offensive/Counter-Offensive Operations (Toretsk): Active "cleansing" operations (БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС, 17:39Z) demonstrate Ukrainian intent to reclaim or stabilize positions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Defensive Posture (Kharkiv): Mandatory evacuations in Kharkiv Oblast (Russian sources, 17:45Z) indicate Ukrainian authorities are managing civilian populations in response to Russian pressure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Resource Requirements: Call for "VERY needed" assistance from Zaporizhzhia Oblast Military Administration (17:44Z) highlights ongoing resource constraints. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Air Defense (AD) & Counter-Drone Efforts: Ukrainian leadership acknowledges ongoing AD challenges against ballistic missiles (North Korean) and drones, emphasizing the need for strengthening AD and counter-drone capabilities. (Запорізька ОВА, 17:55Z). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Strategic Messaging: Ukrainian leadership (Zaporizhzhia Oblast Military Administration, 17:55Z) is actively engaging international partners by linking North Korean/Iranian drone tech proliferation to broader European and Asian security, urging immediate response. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Forces:
  • Ground Operations (Donetsk): Claims of destroying NATO equipment near Pokrovsk (Операция Z, 17:38Z) and liberation of Volnoye Pole (MoD Russia, 18:02Z) indicate continued attritional and localized offensive operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Information Operations (IO):
    • Propaganda videos (Операция Z, 17:38Z) are actively used to showcase claimed successes and demoralize Ukrainian forces. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Mapping tools are used to frame Ukrainian civilian evacuations as military failures (Зона СВО, 17:45Z). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Continued efforts to discredit Telegram and suggest FSB ties (ASTRA, 17:55Z; Alex Parker Returns, 18:02Z) are part of a broader IO campaign to control information space. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Spreading demoralizing narratives using Ukrainian figures (Операция Z, 17:59Z, quoting Arestovich). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Strategic Air/Missile Capabilities: Animated map of strikes 9-10 June (Colonelcassad, 17:51Z) reinforces Russian capability to conduct widespread air/missile attacks across Ukraine. Confirmed use of North Korean ballistic missiles (Запорізька ОВА, 17:55Z). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action:

• Capabilities:
  • Precision Strike (UAV/FPV): Russian forces demonstrate continued capability to employ FPV drones for precision strikes against dismounted infantry, armored vehicles, artillery, and C2 nodes (Операция Z, 17:38Z). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Tank Operations: Russian tank units, specifically Vostok Group, are capable of conducting offensive operations and claiming territorial gains (MoD Russia, 18:02Z). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Ballistic Missile Strikes: Russia continues to utilize North Korean-supplied ballistic missiles, indicating a sustained capability to conduct deep strikes against Ukrainian territory. (Запорізька ОВА, 17:55Z). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Information Warfare: Russian channels are highly capable of generating and disseminating real-time propaganda and disinformation, including doctored videos, false claims, and psychological operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Intentions:
  • Sustain Ground Pressure: Russia intends to continue localized ground offensives on the Donetsk axis (Pokrovsk, Volnoye Pole) and maintain pressure on the Kharkiv axis, possibly to fix Ukrainian forces. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Degrade Ukrainian Defenses: Continued use of ballistic missiles and drones aims to exhaust Ukrainian AD capabilities and damage critical infrastructure or military targets. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Control Information Space: Russia's IO efforts are intended to demoralize Ukrainian forces and population, justify their actions, and sow distrust in pro-Ukrainian information sources. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Maintain Diplomatic Channels (Selective): While hostile toward Western states, Russia seeks to maintain limited diplomatic engagement (e.g., talks with US on "irritants") to project normalcy. (TASS, 18:00Z). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• Russian milbloggers are increasingly using compilation videos of drone strikes, emphasizing their FPV capabilities and BDA claims, as a form of tactical propaganda. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Continued integration of North Korean ballistic missiles into their strike packages. Ukrainian leadership highlights this as a significant, evolving threat. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• The volume of Russian claimed strikes (e.g., 98 precision strikes in previous report, multiple targets in new drone video) and sustained ground operations indicates adequate logistical support for kinetic operations. The continued use of North Korean missiles implies ongoing supply of these specific munition types. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Russian C2 demonstrates effectiveness in coordinating localized ground offensives, large-scale air/missile strikes, and a synchronized information campaign. The rapid deployment of propaganda videos synchronized with claimed operations suggests effective IO C2. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• Active Defense/Counter-Offensive: Ukrainian forces maintain an active posture, conducting counter-offensive operations (Toretsk) and managing defensive lines under pressure (Kharkiv). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• AD Challenges: Ukrainian leadership openly acknowledges challenges with countering ballistic missiles and drones, signifying a realistic assessment and continued need for AD reinforcement. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Public Support: Reports of Ukrainians over 60 volunteering for military service ("Україна 24/7 новини," 17:59Z) indicate continued high morale and national resolve, despite the war's toll. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Urgent Resource Needs: The call for "VERY needed" assistance from Zaporizhzhia (17:44Z) highlights ongoing resource constraints and the need for continued international support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Successes:
  • Successful "cleansing" operations in Toretsk direction (БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС, 17:39Z). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Effective use of FPV drones by Ukrainian forces (STERNENKO, 18:05Z). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Setbacks/Challenges:
  • Mandatory evacuations in Kharkiv Oblast due to Russian pressure (Зона СВО, 17:45Z) indicate a deteriorating humanitarian and security situation in those specific settlements. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Continued use of North Korean ballistic missiles by Russia poses a significant and evolving threat to Ukrainian AD. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Ongoing requirement for external assistance (Запорізька ОВА, 17:44Z) remains a critical constraint. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• AD Munitions & Systems: Urgent need for robust AD capabilities, particularly against ballistic missiles and advanced drones, and the munitions to support them. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• General Military Aid: The call for "VERY needed" assistance suggests ongoing shortages across various domains, requiring sustained international military and financial support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Narratives (Ongoing/New):
  • "Ukrainian Military Failure": Framing Kharkiv evacuations as a failure of Ukrainian operations (Зона СВО, 17:45Z). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • "Destruction of NATO Equipment": Proliferation of videos claiming destruction of Western-supplied equipment (Операция Z, 17:38Z) to demoralize and deter aid. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • "Internal Ukrainian Division/Corruption": Amplifying derogatory statements from Ukrainian figures (e.g., Arestovich via Операция Z, 17:59Z) to sow discord. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • "Telegram as FSB Tool": Continued attempts to discredit Telegram and suggest FSB connections (ASTRA, 17:55Z; Alex Parker Returns, 18:02Z), possibly to justify future control or undermine trust in the platform. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ukrainian Counter-Narratives (Ongoing/New):
  • "Ukrainian Resilience/Patriotism": Highlighting the patriotism of older Ukrainians volunteering (Воин DV, 17:59Z) to counter narratives of dwindling manpower. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • "Russian War Crimes/International Threat": German Chancellor condemning Russian strikes as war crimes (ЦАПЛІЄНКО, 17:56Z) and Ukrainian leadership linking NK-Iranian drone tech proliferation to global threats (Запорізька ОВА, 17:55Z) to maintain international pressure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • "Transparency of Needs": Openly communicating the need for aid (Запорізька ОВА, 17:44Z) to rally support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Ukrainian Morale:
  • Resilience and Patriotism: Reports of elderly volunteers indicate strong national spirit. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Concern over AD & Aid: Open discussions by leadership about AD challenges and need for help reflect realistic public sentiment and potential anxieties. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Morale:
  • Reinforced by Perceived Successes: Propaganda videos of destroyed equipment and claimed territorial gains aim to boost domestic morale and support for the war. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • External Distractions: Russian media continues to highlight US military technological advancements (SMASH sights for drones, Два майора, 17:59Z) and regional conflicts (Houthi strikes, Colonelcassad, 17:58Z), potentially to divert attention from challenges in Ukraine or project a broader global conflict. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• Continued Western Condemnation: German Chancellor's condemnation of Russian strikes (ЦАПЛІЄНКО, 17:56Z) reaffirms strong political support from key NATO allies. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• US-Russia Dialogue: Preliminary decision to move diplomatic talks between US and Russia from Istanbul to capitals (TASS, 18:00Z) suggests a complex diplomatic landscape where limited communication channels remain open despite ongoing conflict. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• North Korea Link: Ukrainian leadership's public linking of Russian-North Korean military-technical cooperation to global security is a strategic diplomatic maneuver to galvanize broader international action. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• Sustained Attritional Ground Operations: Russia will continue high-tempo, attritional assaults on the Donetsk axis (Pokrovsk, Toretsk), focusing on localized gains and fixing Ukrainian forces. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Increased Pressure on Kharkiv Axis: Russia will likely maintain or increase pressure on the Kharkiv border region through artillery, drone strikes, and potentially limited ground incursions, aimed at creating buffer zones and forcing further evacuations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Routine Air/Missile Strikes with NK Ballistics: Russia will continue to conduct daily air and missile strikes across Ukraine, integrating North Korean ballistic missiles to test AD capabilities and target critical infrastructure/military assets. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Aggressive Information Warfare & PSYOPs: Russia will intensify IO campaigns focusing on perceived Ukrainian failures, destruction of Western aid, and internal Ukrainian divisions to demoralize and undermine support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• Concentrated Offensive on Kharkiv/Sumy: Russia, observing Ukrainian resource constraints and potential fatigue, could commit significant reserves to a concentrated, multi-axis offensive on the Kharkiv or Sumy axes, aiming for a deeper penetration than currently observed, potentially exploiting perceived AD weaknesses. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Massed Ballistic Missile Strikes with Enhanced Accuracy: Russia could launch a massed strike using a high volume of North Korean ballistic missiles with improved accuracy, targeting high-value AD systems, C2 nodes, or strategic military-industrial facilities to severely degrade Ukraine's defensive capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Next 6-12 Hours (Immediate Threat): Continued localized ground engagements on Donetsk frontlines. Expect further Russian propaganda highlighting claimed successes. Decision Point: Maintain vigilance on all axes; conduct rapid BDA on Russian claims. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Next 12-24 Hours: Expect Russia to continue kinetic activity on the Kharkiv border and potentially escalate ground probes in Sumy. Ukrainian Decision Point: Prioritize AD and ground force readiness in these areas, and continue strategic messaging on international support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Next 24-72 Hours: Monitor for any significant shifts in Russian force concentration or major ground offensives on Kharkiv/Sumy, especially following major claimed successes. Decision Point: Re-evaluate force posture and potential need for reserve reallocation if larger offensive materializes. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

---

6. RECOMMENDATIONS

• Intelligence & Special Operations (ISR is paramount):

  1. CRITICAL PRIORITY: Maintain maximum ISR focus on the Kharkiv and Sumy border regions to detect any build-up or pre-positioning of Russian ground forces indicative of a larger offensive. (Collection Requirement: IMINT, SIGINT, HUMINT).
  2. HIGH PRIORITY: Conduct thorough BDA on all claimed Russian strikes (e.g., Pokrovsk video) and Ukrainian counter-offensives (Toretsk) to provide accurate assessments of tactical gains/losses. (Collection Requirement: OSINT, BDA).
  3. URGENT: Prioritize collection and forensic analysis of any recovered North Korean ballistic missile debris to definitively assess improved accuracy claims and technical characteristics. (Collection Requirement: TECHINT, HUMINT, OSINT).
  4. NEW PRIORITY: Monitor Russian military-technical cooperation with North Korea and China for any indicators of increased military supply or technology transfer beyond current assessments. (Collection Requirement: SIGINT, OSINT, Diplomatic Intelligence).
  5. ONGOING: Continue deep strike operations against high-value Russian military targets, prioritizing logistics, C2, and strategic bomber bases, learning from successes like the Engels fuel depot. (Collection Requirement: OSINT, BDA).

• Ground Forces:

  1. URGENT: Maintain and strengthen defensive lines in Kharkiv Oblast, especially around settlements subject to evacuation. Develop contingency plans for managing displaced civilians and securing key infrastructure.
  2. TACTICAL: Continue aggressive FPV drone operations and other precision strikes against Russian ground forces, artillery, and C2 nodes as demonstrated in recent successful engagements. Share best practices broadly.
  3. OPERATIONAL: Conduct a comprehensive review of combat experience from the Donetsk axis to adapt defensive and offensive tactics against Russian attritional assaults and combined arms usage (e.g., TOS-1A).
  4. MANPOWER: Explore and implement effective integration of civilian volunteers (e.g., over 60s) into appropriate support roles, potentially for training, rear-area security, or specialized tasks, to maximize overall national effort.

• Air Defense & Force Protection:

  1. IMMEDIATE: Maintain HIGHEST AD alert, particularly for Kyiv, Kharkiv, and other major urban centers. Prioritize interception of ballistic missiles, especially given the confirmed use of North Korean variants.
  2. CRITICAL: Advocate for accelerated delivery of long-range AD systems capable of intercepting ballistic missiles, alongside an urgent resupply of interceptor munitions.
  3. TACTICAL: Disseminate intelligence on observed TTPs of North Korean missiles and any new drone types. Develop and implement innovative counter-drone measures, including EW and kinetic solutions for all units.

• Information Operations (IO):

  1. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: Proactively counter Russian narratives of Ukrainian military failures in Kharkiv. Provide transparent, factual updates on the humanitarian situation and Ukrainian defensive efforts.
  2. IMMEDIATE: Amplify international condemnation of Russian war crimes and human rights violations, specifically highlighting indiscriminate strikes on civilian targets.
  3. CRITICAL: Continue to highlight and condemn Russia's reliance on North Korean ballistic missiles, framing it as a desperate measure that undermines global security and non-proliferation efforts.
  4. STRATEGIC: Develop and disseminate positive narratives about Ukrainian resilience, the patriotism of its citizens (including volunteers), and the strength of international partnerships to counter Russian demoralization efforts.
  5. TACTICAL: Rapidly debunk Russian disinformation efforts regarding Telegram and other communication platforms, reassuring the public about secure communication channels.

• Diplomatic & Resource Management:

  1. URGENT: Leverage statements from Ukrainian leadership (e.g., Zaporizhzhia OBA) to intensify diplomatic engagement with international partners, explicitly linking Russian aggression and proliferation activities to broader global security threats, thereby increasing pressure for continued aid.
  2. STRATEGIC: Engage with US and other partners regarding the strategic implications of the US-Russia diplomatic dialogue, ensuring Ukraine's interests are represented and no agreements are made at its expense.
  3. RESOURCE ALLOCATION: Continuously assess and prioritize internal resource allocation given the ongoing call for assistance, ensuring critical areas like AD and frontline units are adequately supplied.