Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR) TIME OF REPORT: 10 JUN 25 / 16:37 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 10 JUN 25 / 16:07 ZULU - 10 JUN 25 / 16:37 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk CLASSIFICATION: TOP SECRET / ORCON / NOFORN

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• Kyiv Oblast (Kyiv City / Borispol):
  • UPDATE: Russian sources (Alex Parker Returns) are circulating old video footage (May 29-30, 2023) of missile attacks on Kyiv, accompanied by captions attempting to refute Ukrainian air defense successes. This is a clear information operation. However, a previous Russian claim (Colonelcassad, from previous ISR) regarding an ongoing fire at Borispol airfield (fuel barrels) remains unconfirmed and requires verification. Ukrainian AF reports tactical aviation activity in the NE direction. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for Russian IO; LOW for Borispol fire confirmation; HIGH for Ukrainian AF report).
  • NEW: Ukrainian source (Шеф Hayabusa) posts video showing fire suppression efforts in Kyiv after Shahed drone arrivals, indicating recent impacts despite successful intercepts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Engels (Saratov Oblast, RU):
  • CONFIRMED: Satellite imagery previously confirmed a fuel storage depot burning for 4 days (since 07 JUN 25), with 5-8 reservoirs destroyed. No new updates in this reporting period, but the significant BDA remains. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Kharkiv/Sumy Axis (Loknya, Yunakivka, Sumy Oblast, Khoten):
  • UPDATE: Russian sources (Операция Z) are amplifying Ukrainian reports of expanded mandatory evacuation zones in Kharkiv and Dnipropetrovsk Oblasts. This is consistent with previous ISR regarding pressure on the Sumy/Kharkiv border.
  • NEW: Russian source (Два майора) provides video footage from "Khoten, Sumy direction," showing what appears to be military activity (e.g., potential drone footage or ground observation of an area impacted by conflict). Details are limited but reinforce Russian focus on this axis. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Donetsk Axis (Konstantinovka-Nelepovka, Shakhtarsk direction, Toretsk):
  • UPDATE: Russian sources (Z комитет + карта СВО) continue to publish tactical maps of the Konstantinovka direction, indicating areas of RF control (Artyomovo, Kirovo) and AFU control (Pleshcheyevka, Pos. Dyleevka, Dachnoye, Druzhba, Shcherbinovka, Nelipovka), as well as grey zones (s. Dyleevka, Ozarayanovka). Russian source WarGonzo claims "RF Armed Forces entered Komar from the southern direction." (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for map content, MEDIUM for WarGonzo claim pending verification).
  • NEW: Ukrainian source (ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS) shares video titled "Cleansing Toretsk from occupiers," suggesting ongoing Ukrainian defensive/counter-offensive actions in this contested area. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (Poligon, Synelnykove):
  • NEW: Ukrainian source (ASTRA) reports a journalist killed on June 1 at a military training ground (poligon) in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast due to a Russian missile strike. This confirms a kinetic impact in the region, linking to previous MDCOA concerns about a potential push on this axis. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). Russian sources (Операция Z) are amplifying Ukrainian reports of expanded mandatory evacuation zones in Dnipropetrovsk. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• Video footage of air defense activity (Оперативний ЗСУ) and fire suppression (Шеф Hayabusa) in Kyiv confirms clear night conditions allowing for visible impacts and operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Video from Khoten (Два майора) appears to be daytime, clear, suitable for operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces:
  • Air Defense Resilience: Ukrainian Air Force (Оперативний ЗСУ) provides video of successful air defense interception at night, showcasing continued AD effectiveness. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Evacuation Measures: Expansion of mandatory evacuation zones in Kharkiv and Dnipropetrovsk Oblasts (РБК-Україна, Операция Z) indicates proactive civilian protection measures in response to perceived Russian threats or increased shelling. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • POW Management: Continued POW exchanges are confirmed by both Russian (MoD Russia, МОБИЛИЗАЦИЯ | Новости | Срочники, Colonelcassad) and Ukrainian (ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS, Шеф Hayabusa) sources, with particular emphasis on the severity of injuries among returning Ukrainian POWs. This highlights Ukraine's commitment to its personnel. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Forces:
  • Propaganda & IO Focus: Russia continues to push narratives of internal strength (e.g., TASS reporting on a new ambassador, Bryansk healthcare spending, arresting a corrupt official, or "state traitors" in Khabarovsk). They are also actively using old footage and exaggerated claims (Alex Parker Returns attempting to discredit Ukrainian AD) to shape narratives. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Training & Readiness (Propaganda): TASS publishes video of "Hero of Russia Captain Alexey Khimenko" describing assault group training for "South" grouping, featuring simulated strongpoint assaults. This is likely an IO piece to project competence and readiness. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • POW Return: Russian MoD confirms a "second group" of Russian servicemen returned from captivity, mirroring Ukrainian efforts and serving as a domestic morale booster. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Internal Political Messaging: TASS and Басурин о главном report on domestic Russian legislative developments (arrest of governor, ban on religious images without symbols) to project normalcy and focus on internal issues. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • External IO: Рыбарь engages in subtle disinformation about voting rights in Moldova, a recurring theme in Russian IO to undermine pro-Western governments. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). WarGonzo claims Russian forces entering Komar from the south, likely to project battlefield success. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action:

• Capabilities:
  • Sustained Air/Missile Campaign: Russia retains the capability to conduct sustained missile and drone attacks on Ukrainian urban centers, necessitating ongoing AD operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Adaptive Ground Tactics: Continued use of attritional tactics on Donetsk axis, with claims of localized advances (Komar), supported by propaganda videos of assault training. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Sophisticated Information Warfare: Russia demonstrates the ability to rapidly disseminate and amplify propaganda, including recycling old footage, creating misleading narratives, and exploiting humanitarian issues for domestic and international consumption. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Internal Security Control: FSB operations against alleged "state traitors" (Khabarovsk) show continued internal security apparatus effectiveness. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Intentions:
  • Degrade Ukrainian AD & Morale: Continued air/missile attacks aim to exhaust Ukrainian AD resources and instill fear among the civilian population. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Advance on Key Frontlines: Persistent ground pressure on Donetsk axis (Toretsk, Konstantinovka) indicates continued intent to seize territory. Claims on Komar suggest ongoing efforts to secure positions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Shape Information Environment: Russia aims to control domestic and international narratives through propaganda, minimizing Ukrainian successes and exaggerating its own. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Exploit Humanitarian Issues: Use of POW exchanges for propaganda purposes and attempts to discredit Ukrainian reporting. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Divert Attention: TASS reports on non-conflict news to divert attention from battlefield realities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Undermine Ukrainian Resilience: Amplifying evacuation news from Kharkiv/Dnipropetrovsk aims to suggest an inevitable Russian advance and erode civilian trust. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• Re-engagement with Old IO Footage: The use of May 2023 Kyiv attack footage by Alex Parker Returns suggests a need to re-emphasize "successful" strikes on Kyiv following the recent Engels BDA, or a lack of new impactful footage from recent strikes. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Focus on Border Regions (Sumy/Kharkiv): Continued reports and claims around Khoten and expanded evacuation zones reinforce the tactical adaptation towards increasing pressure on these border areas, potentially to draw Ukrainian reserves. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• The Engels fuel depot fire from previous ISR is a significant logistical setback that will continue to impact Russian operations in the affected region, particularly aviation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Continued air/missile attacks imply a sustained, albeit expensive, supply chain for these munitions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Russian C2: Demonstrates continued coordination between kinetic operations (air/missile strikes) and extensive IO. However, the use of old footage (Alex Parker Returns) suggests a potential lag in generating fresh, impactful propaganda following events like the Engels strike. The FSB's ability to arrest alleged "state traitors" indicates effective internal security C2. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ukrainian C2: Shows continued effective coordination of air defense efforts and civilian evacuation measures. The rapid and transparent communication regarding POW exchanges and their medical condition reflects effective humanitarian C2. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• Defensive Air Power: Ukrainian AD units demonstrate continued effectiveness in intercepting aerial targets, even under night conditions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Resilience & Humanitarian Commitment: The continued successful POW exchanges and the transparent reporting on the serious conditions of returning Ukrainian POWs reinforce national resilience and the government's commitment to its personnel. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Public Awareness & Preparedness: Proactive civilian evacuations in Kharkiv and Dnipropetrovsk Oblasts demonstrate a clear understanding of the threat and measures to protect civilians. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Strategic Capability Development: Expert commentary on potential long-range missile strikes (150-200km) by July-August (РБК-Україна) indicates an ongoing strategic focus on developing indigenous strike capabilities, directly impacting Russian territory. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - for expert statement; MEDIUM - for precise timeline).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Successes:
  • Continued high AD intercept rates, mitigating damage from Russian air attacks. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Successful ongoing POW exchanges, a significant morale boost. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Continued deep strike campaign (Engels BDA from previous ISR). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Active "cleansing" operations in Toretsk, indicating local initiative and defensive success. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Setbacks/Challenges:
  • Confirmed civilian casualties from missile strikes (e.g., journalist killed in Dnipropetrovsk training ground). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Continued need for civilian evacuations in frontline regions highlights ongoing threat. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • One returning Ukrainian POW from Mariupol unable to meet family (Шеф Hayabusa) may indicate specific circumstances or ongoing care requirements, highlighting the individual human cost of prolonged captivity. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• Air Defense Munitions: Continued mass Russian air attacks highlight the sustained high expenditure of AD interceptors and the critical need for constant resupply. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Long-Range Strike Capabilities: Ukrainian expert commentary on potential 150-200km missile strikes points to an ongoing need for resources for domestic missile development and production. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Medical & Rehabilitation Support: The reported severity of injuries among returning POWs (amputations, infections, etc.) emphasizes the ongoing need for extensive medical and rehabilitation resources. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Humanitarian Support: Continued evacuation needs in Kharkiv/Dnipropetrovsk require humanitarian aid and logistical support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Narratives (Ongoing/New):
  • "Ukrainian Lies/Ineffectiveness": Alex Parker Returns attempting to refute Ukrainian AD success in Kyiv using old footage. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • "Russian Domestic Stability/Strength": TASS and AV БогомаZ reporting on internal Russian issues (corruption arrests, healthcare improvements) and military training. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • "Russian Battlefield Gains": WarGonzo claiming entry into Komar. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
  • "Ukrainian Civilian Crisis": Amplifying Ukrainian evacuation orders to suggest widespread Ukrainian instability. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • "External Distraction/Divisiveness": Басурин о главном on California secession, Рыбарь on Moldovan voting issues, and Военкор Котенок on "Russophobia" in Western media. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • "Russian Humanitarianism": MoD Russia and Colonelcassad highlighting Russian POW returns. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • "Ukrainian Human Rights Abuses": The FSB video on "state traitors" working for Ukraine implies nefarious Ukrainian intelligence activities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ukrainian Counter-Narratives (Ongoing/New):
  • "AD Effectiveness": Оперативний ЗСУ providing videos of successful intercepts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • "Commitment to Defenders": Extensive coverage of POW returns, especially the severely wounded, emphasizing care and resilience. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • "Ongoing Combat": Reporting on "cleansing Toretsk" and journalist killed in Dnipropetrovsk highlights active fighting. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • "Developing Offensive Capabilities": Expert discussion on long-range missile development provides a future-oriented counter to Russian pressure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Ukrainian Morale:
  • Boosted by AD Success: Visual confirmation of AD intercepts helps maintain public trust in defense capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Boosted by POW Returns: Significant positive impact on morale, reinforcing national solidarity and commitment to personnel. The focus on wounded POWs may elicit sympathy and resolve. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Under Pressure from Evacuations: Expanded evacuation zones and confirmed civilian casualties (Dnipropetrovsk) will cause anxiety and stress in affected regions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Morale:
  • Boosted by POW Returns: Similar to Ukraine, the return of Russian POWs serves as a domestic morale booster, validating the state's efforts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Reinforced by Propaganda: Narratives of domestic stability, military training, and claimed battlefield gains are designed to maintain public support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Challenged by Deep Strikes (Engels): The long-term impact of the Engels fire (from previous ISR) on public confidence in state security remains a factor, despite IO efforts to deflect. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• TASS reports British Head of Armed Forces Tony Radakin refuting NATO Secretary General's words on Russia's desire to attack NATO, indicating a divergence in Western assessment of Russian intentions, which Russia will exploit for IO. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• The continued POW exchanges, involving both sides, suggest ongoing, albeit limited, humanitarian dialogue, likely facilitated by third parties. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• Sustained Air/Missile Campaign: Russia will continue its strategy of mass missile and drone strikes against Ukrainian urban centers, focusing on degrading AD, disrupting logistics, and affecting morale. Targets will likely include airfields and energy infrastructure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Continued Attritional Ground Operations: RGF will maintain high-intensity ground assaults on the Donetsk axis (Pokrovsk, Toretsk, Konstantinovka), attempting to achieve tactical breakthroughs and consolidate minor gains. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Intensified Pressure on Sumy/Kharkiv Border: Russia will likely continue probing actions and localized advances in the Sumy border regions (e.g., Khoten) to expand buffer zones and potentially draw Ukrainian reserves from other critical sectors. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Aggressive Information Warfare: Russia will intensify its IO campaign, using a mix of old and new footage, discrediting Ukrainian successes (e.g., AD, deep strikes), amplifying Ukrainian challenges (evacuations, casualties), and promoting narratives of internal Russian strength. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Increased Internal Security Measures: Russia will likely continue internal crackdowns on perceived "traitors" and dissent, maintaining a tight grip on information. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• Major Offensive on Sumy/Kharkiv Axis: Following a period of shaping operations (KAB strikes, troop transfers, IO), Russia could launch a large-scale ground offensive from the Sumy/Kharkiv border, aiming to create a significant "buffer zone," seize key cities, or force a major Ukrainian reserve commitment. This would likely be synchronized with large-scale air/missile strikes. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM-HIGH).
• Coordinated Multi-Domain Strike on Critical Nodes: Russia could execute a highly coordinated series of precision strikes using diverse missile/drone types against critical Ukrainian command and control (C2) nodes, key logistical hubs, and major energy infrastructure across the country, aiming for systemic disruption and temporary paralysis. This would be combined with cyberattacks and intensified PSYOPs. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Targeting of Western Military Aid Convoys/Depots: As Ukraine continues to develop its long-range strike capabilities, Russia could escalate efforts to interdict incoming Western military aid at or near the border, or target major storage depots, with greater risk of accidental strikes on NATO territory. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Next 6-12 Hours (Immediate Threat): High probability of continued, possibly smaller, waves of Russian drone/missile attacks as AD systems are reloaded and targets reassessed. Decision Point: Maintain heightened AD alert, prioritize defense of critical infrastructure and military assets, especially airfields. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Next 12-24 Hours: Expect Russian IO to amplify any confirmed damage or casualties from recent strikes and to continue pushing narratives about Ukrainian weakness and Russian gains in border areas. Ukrainian Decision Point: Proactively counter with confirmed BDA on Russian losses (e.g., Engels) and highlight Ukrainian AD successes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Next 24-72 Hours: Monitor Russian force concentrations and reconnaissance in Sumy and Kharkiv Oblasts. Look for increased artillery preparation, bridging equipment, or significant ground force movements. Decision Point: If indicators of a major ground offensive in the North become clear, prepare to re-allocate reserves and activate robust defensive plans. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• July-August: Monitor Ukrainian domestic long-range missile production/deployment. Decision Point: Prepare for potential Ukrainian strikes deeper into Russian territory (150-200km) and anticipate Russian retaliation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - for monitoring; LOW - for specific strike timing).

---

6. RECOMMENDATIONS

• Intelligence & Special Operations (ISR is paramount):

  1. CRITICAL PRIORITY: Expedite confirmation and BDA of Russian claims of entering Komar (Donetsk axis) and any claimed advances in the Sumy direction (e.g., Khoten). (Collection Requirement: IMINT, SIGINT, HUMINT).
  2. URGENT PRIORITY: Continue to verify Russian claims of a fire at Borispol airfield. If confirmed, conduct immediate BDA to assess damage to infrastructure and aircraft. (Collection Requirement: IMINT, OSINT, HUMINT).
  3. HIGH PRIORITY: Intensify ISR on Russian force dispositions, logistical nodes, and staging areas in the Sumy and Kharkiv Oblasts to detect any preparations for large-scale ground offensives, specifically looking for battalion tactical group (BTG) formations or significant heavy equipment transfers. (Collection Requirement: SIGINT, IMINT, HUMINT).
  4. HIGH PRIORITY: Conduct thorough BDA on the recent missile strike on the Dnipropetrovsk Oblast training ground, assessing the target's nature and the extent of damage beyond reported casualties. (Collection Requirement: IMINT, HUMINT).
  5. ONGOING: Continue to monitor Russian information channels for shifts in IO strategy, particularly their use of old footage, and their narrative around "state traitors" to prepare targeted counter-messaging. (Collection Requirement: OSINT).
  6. NEW PRIORITY: Investigate the specific context of the returned Mariupol defender unable to meet family, ensuring appropriate support and addressing any related IO concerns. (Collection Requirement: HUMINT, OSINT).

• Ground Forces:

  1. URGENT: Maintain reinforced defensive postures along the Sumy and Kharkiv axes. Focus reconnaissance efforts on distinguishing between Russian feints/IO and genuine offensive preparations. Reinforce static defenses in depth.
  2. TACTICAL: Continue to utilize and refine counter-drone measures, including EW and kinetic systems, to protect frontline positions, especially in contested areas like Toretsk and the Donetsk axis.
  3. OPERATIONAL: Ensure robust logistical support and medical evacuation capabilities for units engaged in high-intensity attritional combat, and for those in areas facing increased threat of evacuation.
  4. TACTICAL: Prepare for rapid response to potential localized breakthroughs or advances, as suggested by claims like Komar.

• Air Defense & Force Protection:

  1. IMMEDIATE: Maintain highest AD readiness across all major cities and critical infrastructure, anticipating potential follow-on missile/drone strikes. Prioritize protection of known and suspected airfields, C2 nodes, and logistics hubs.
  2. CRITICAL: Conduct an immediate review of AD coverage and capabilities around potential new targets, especially in areas where evacuation zones are being expanded.
  3. STRATEGIC: Advocate for expedited delivery of additional AD systems and interceptor munitions from international partners, emphasizing the sustained high-tempo nature of Russian air attacks.

• Information Operations (IO):

  1. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: Widely disseminate verified BDA on the Engels fuel depot strike (from previous ISR), continuing to emphasize its strategic impact on Russian logistics and bomber operations.
  2. IMMEDIATE: Continue to prominently feature the successful POW exchanges, emphasizing the humanitarian aspect and the resilience of returning Ukrainian defenders, contrasting it with Russian treatment of POWs. Actively counter Russian narratives attempting to discredit Ukrainian AD or POW management.
  3. TACTICAL: Expose and refute Russian use of old footage or misleading claims (e.g., Alex Parker Returns' Kyiv video) by providing clear factual corrections and timestamps.
  4. STRATEGIC: Highlight the proactive nature of civilian evacuations as a measure of responsible governance and civilian protection, contrasting it with the destructive nature of Russian aggression.
  5. ONGOING: Publicize expert commentary on Ukraine's long-range missile development as a sign of growing domestic capabilities and a strategic deterrent.

• Diplomatic & Resource Management:

  1. URGENT: Ensure comprehensive medical and psychological support is immediately available and sustained for all returning POWs, especially the seriously wounded and ill.
  2. STRATEGIC: Leverage international partners to pressure Russia on adherence to international humanitarian law, particularly regarding POW treatment and the targeting of training grounds with civilian presence.
  3. ONGOING: Maintain active humanitarian channels for future prisoner exchanges and advocate for full adherence to international humanitarian law.
  4. URGENT: Prioritize resource allocation for civilian protection, including support for displaced populations from expanded evacuation zones in Kharkiv and Dnipropetrovsk Oblasts.