Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR) TIME OF REPORT: 10 JUN 25 / 16:07 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 10 JUN 25 / 15:37 ZULU - 10 JUN 25 / 16:07 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk CLASSIFICATION: TOP SECRET / ORCON / NOFORN

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• Kyiv Oblast (Borispol):
  • NEW: Russian sources (Colonelcassad) claim an ongoing fire in Borispol, near an airfield, involving fuel barrels since last night. If confirmed, this indicates a successful deep strike by Ukraine on a strategically significant logistics/air asset. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - Russian claim; HIGH - if confirmed by friendly sources).
• Engels (Saratov Oblast, RU):
  • NEW: Satellite imagery analysis (Оперативний ЗСУ) confirms a fuel storage depot in Engels has been burning for 4 days (since 07 JUN 25), with 5-8 reservoirs destroyed. The smoke plume has diminished as of 10 JUN 25. This is highly significant as Engels hosts a major strategic bomber base. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Kharkiv/Sumy Axis (Loknya, Yunakivka, Sumy Oblast):
  • UPDATE: Previous reports of Russian presence in Loknya and troop transfers to Sumy Axis are reinforced by a new Russian source (Colonelcassad) claiming "new units in Sumy Oblast." Further, a missing Ukrainian servicemember is reported lost near Yunakivka, Sumy Oblast, around 30 MAY 25, belonging to the "156th Brigade." This suggests ongoing low-level combat or reconnaissance activity in the border region. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - for "new units"; HIGH - for localized activity).
• Donetsk Axis (Konstantinovka-Nelepovka, Shakhtarsk direction):
  • UPDATE: Russian sources (Сливочный каприз, Воин DV) continue to release drone footage depicting FPV drone and artillery strikes against Ukrainian positions (bunkers, trenches) and personnel. One video claims the destruction of a Swedish PBV-302 APC on the Shakhtarsk direction. This indicates continued high-intensity attritional combat. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for claimed attacks; MEDIUM for BDA on specific equipment).
• DNR-Controlled Areas (Selidovo, Blagodatnoye, Sverdlovsk/Dovzhansk, Krasnoye):
  • NEW: A Russian source (Операция Z) published a list of Ukrainian citizens with names, dates of birth, and locations, including Selidovo (currently Ukrainian-controlled). This list appears to be a formal registry, potentially for mobilization or detention, by DNR entities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for document authenticity; MEDIUM for exact purpose).
• Kryvyi Rih (Dnipropetrovsk Oblast):
  • NEW: Local head Oleksandr Vilkul provides an update on the construction of a 4-story building (likely civilian hospital/medical facility) in Kryvyi Rih, with 1st-4th floors nearing completion. This indicates continued civilian infrastructure development despite proximity to the front line. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• Satellite imagery for Engels on 07 JUN 25 shows a large smoke plume, consistent with clear skies allowing for unimpeded observation of the fire. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Video footage from Donetsk axis shows generally clear conditions, suitable for drone operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian claims of a fire in Borispol suggest clear weather conditions for aerial observation of the fire. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces:
  • Deep Strike Capability: The confirmed sustained fire at the Engels fuel depot reinforces Ukraine's capability to conduct deep strikes against strategic Russian logistics targets far behind the front lines, using long-range UAVs or other means. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • POW Exchange: Multiple sources (Рыбарь, Координаційний штаб, Олексій Білошицький, Шеф Hayabusa) confirm the ongoing prisoner exchange, with Ukrainian POWs, including seriously wounded and ill personnel, returning home. This underscores ongoing humanitarian cooperation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Adaptive Training: Video from Presidential Brigade shows Ukrainian forces engaged in machine gun training, highlighting continuous combat readiness efforts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Civilian Infrastructure Resilience: Continued construction in Kryvyi Rih despite ongoing conflict demonstrates Ukraine's commitment to maintaining civilian infrastructure and services. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Forces:
  • Airfield Protection Concerns: A Russian source (АРХАНГЕЛ СПЕЦНАЗА) shared images of what appears to be a hardened, underground aircraft hangar, potentially housing a dated fighter jet (F-104 or similar, likely for propaganda or a non-RU asset), with captions discussing "increasing the protection of military airfields." This likely reflects growing Russian concern over Ukrainian deep strikes (e.g., Savasleyka, Engels) and serves as an IO message of resilience. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for Russian concern; MEDIUM for specific aircraft type).
  • Continued Attritional Tactics: Drone footage from Donetsk axis shows continued use of FPV drones and artillery against Ukrainian positions, demonstrating persistent attritional tactics. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Information Operations (IO):
    • Discrediting Ukraine: Colonelcassad continues to push narratives of Ukrainian "defeats" and "new units in Sumy Oblast" to portray Ukrainian weakness. Операция Z pushes a narrative about Ukraine not recovering bodies, aimed at sowing distrust. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Domestic Focus/Distraction: TASS reports on a new Russian ambassador to the US, and AV БогомаZ posts on increased healthcare spending in Bryansk Oblast, likely aimed at domestic audiences to project normalcy and focus on internal improvements. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Countering Western Aid: Старше Эдды dismisses the impact of potential Patriot transfers from Israel, claiming they are "temporary and non-critical." (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action:

• Capabilities:
  • Sustained Deep Strike Vulnerability: The Engels fuel depot fire highlights Russia's persistent vulnerability to Ukrainian long-range strikes on critical logistics and strategic assets. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Persistent Frontline Pressure: Russian forces maintain high-tempo ground operations, supported by drones and artillery, on key axes like Donetsk. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Robust IO & Counter-IO: Russia demonstrates sophisticated capabilities to quickly generate and disseminate propaganda, including exploiting humanitarian issues (POW exchanges, body recovery) and countering narratives around Western military aid. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Hardened Infrastructure: The imagery of an underground aircraft hangar suggests Russia's investment in hardened facilities to protect high-value assets, though the specific aircraft type and national affiliation in the image requires further verification. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Intentions:
  • Degrade Ukrainian Combat Effectiveness: Continued attritional attacks on frontline positions and personnel. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Protect Strategic Assets: Emphasis on airfield protection and denial of Western aid (Patriots) indicates Russia's intent to mitigate Ukrainian deep strike capabilities and maintain air superiority/deterrence. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Control Domestic Narrative: Use of POW exchanges, internal economic news, and claims of battlefield success to maintain public support and project strength. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Information Maneuver: Continue to use information as a weapon, specifically to sow discord and undermine trust in Ukrainian authorities and international support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Potential for Mobilization/Control of Occupied/Contested Territories: The DNR list of Ukrainian citizens from Selidovo indicates an intent to register and potentially mobilize or exert control over populations in contested or recently occupied areas, even those technically under Ukrainian control. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• Increased Focus on Airfield Hardening (IO Component): The explicit Russian propaganda regarding hardened airfields suggests a strategic adaptation to mitigate Ukrainian deep strike success, at least in the information domain. This may or may not reflect actual new construction or significant protective measures beyond existing ones. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Continued Hybrid Approach: The simultaneous use of kinetic strikes, deep strikes (claimed by Ukraine), and sophisticated IO on multiple fronts (POWs, battlefield claims, internal issues) demonstrates a continued hybrid warfare approach. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• The Engels fuel depot fire will significantly impact Russian fuel supply for military operations, particularly those originating from that region. The scale of destruction (5-8 reservoirs) suggests a substantial logistical setback. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Continued FPV drone and artillery usage indicates sustained munitions supply to frontline units. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Russian C2: Appears functional in coordinating IO with ongoing operations and reacting to Ukrainian successes (e.g., deep strikes prompting airfield hardening narratives). However, the Engels fire suggests a failure in defensive C2 or intelligence. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for IO; LOW for Engels defense).
• Ukrainian C2: Continues to demonstrate effective coordination in executing complex deep strikes and managing humanitarian operations (POW exchanges). Rapid dissemination of information regarding POW returns confirms effective internal C2. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• Offensive Deep Strike Capability: Ukraine's confirmed BDA on the Engels fuel depot signifies a potent and growing long-range strike capability, capable of inflicting significant logistical and strategic damage. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Morale and Resilience: The continued success of POW exchanges, with positive media coverage, is a major morale boost for both military personnel and the civilian population, countering Russian dehumanization efforts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Training and Preparedness: Ongoing machine gun training indicates Ukrainian forces are maintaining combat readiness and continuously adapting to battlefield needs. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Resource Strain: While not directly mentioned in new data, the persistent Russian attacks and the need for deep strikes imply a continued high expenditure of munitions and resources, necessitating sustained international support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH, based on previous ISR).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Major Success: Confirmed significant damage to Engels fuel depot (5-8 reservoirs destroyed) is a critical operational success, impacting Russian logistics and strategic bomber operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ongoing Success: Continued POW exchanges demonstrate successful diplomatic and humanitarian efforts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Setbacks (Attribution Unconfirmed): The Russian claim of an ongoing fire at Borispol airfield (fuel barrels) suggests a potential successful Russian strike if confirmed, or a Ukrainian deep strike on their own logistics. (CONFIDENCE: LOW for attribution, HIGH for incident).
• Challenges: Persistent Russian drone and artillery attacks on the front lines (Donetsk axis) continue to inflict casualties and require constant defensive effort. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). The missing servicemember near Yunakivka highlights risks in border regions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• Long-Range Strike Assets: Continued success of deep strikes requires sustained supply of long-range UAVs or other precision strike munitions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Air Defense & Counter-Drone Systems: Persistent Russian drone and artillery threats (as seen in Donetsk footage) underscore the continuous need for advanced AD systems and robust counter-drone capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Medical & Psychological Support: The return of seriously wounded and ill POWs increases the demand for specialized medical care and psychological support services. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Humanitarian Aid/Infrastructure Repair: Continued civilian infrastructure development in Kryvyi Rih, while positive, indicates a long-term resource commitment for reconstruction and maintaining civilian life. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Narratives (Ongoing/New):
  • "Russian Victory/Ukrainian Defeat": Continued drone footage of destroyed Ukrainian positions and claimed APC destruction (PBV-302) serves to portray Russian battlefield success and Ukrainian losses. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • "Ukrainian Incompetence/Disarray": The claim that Ukraine is not collecting bodies at the border (Операция Z) and narratives about Kyiv's regime "justifying its defeats" (Colonelcassad) are designed to undermine Ukrainian government legitimacy and demoralize the population. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • "Russian Defensive Measures": Images of hardened hangars and claims of "increased airfield protection" are direct responses to Ukrainian deep strikes, aimed at showing Russian resilience and deterring further attacks. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • "Western Aid is Futile": Старше Эдды's dismissal of Patriot transfers aims to discourage further Western military aid and sow doubt about its effectiveness. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • "Internal Russian Stability": News about Russian healthcare spending and a new ambassador to the US serve to project a stable, functioning government to domestic audiences. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • "Ukrainian Civilian Control/Mobilization Issues": The DNR list from Selidovo is a subtle but potent narrative, implying Russian/DNR administrative control even over Ukrainian-held territory and highlighting potential Ukrainian civilian vulnerability. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ukrainian Counter-Narratives (Ongoing/New):
  • "Successful Deep Strikes": Prompt reporting and satellite imagery confirmation of the Engels fuel depot fire is a powerful counter-narrative, showcasing Ukraine's offensive capabilities and ability to strike strategic targets. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • "Humanitarian Success & Commitment": Extensive coverage of the POW exchange, particularly the return of wounded and ill defenders, powerfully reinforces Ukrainian commitment to its personnel and contrasts with Russian alleged abuses. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • "Resilience and Development": Updates on civilian construction in Kryvyi Rih signal a commitment to normalcy and development despite the war, directly contradicting Russian narratives of Ukrainian collapse. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • "Ongoing Combat Readiness": Videos of training emphasize that Ukrainian forces remain professional and capable. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Ukrainian Morale:
  • Boosted by POW Return: The POW exchange continues to be a major positive event, fostering national unity and trust in the government. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Boosted by Deep Strikes: Success at Engels will significantly boost morale, demonstrating Ukraine's ability to retaliate and inflict pain on the aggressor. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Stress from Frontline Pressure: Persistent Russian attacks and drone footage of battlefield losses (from Russian sources) could cause concern, though likely mitigated by overall positive news. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Russian Morale:
  • Mitigated by IO: Russian narratives about battlefield success, airfield protection, and internal stability are designed to maintain domestic morale and support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Impact of Deep Strikes: The Engels fire is a significant setback that will likely require considerable spin from Russian state media to minimize its impact on public confidence in state security. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• The 18th EU sanctions package (ASTRA) indicates continued international economic pressure on Russia, which will impact Russia's ability to sustain its war effort in the long term. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• The continued POW exchanges, even as fighting rages, highlight the limited but critical channels for humanitarian negotiation between the belligerents, potentially involving third-party mediation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian concern and counter-IO regarding Patriot transfers from Israel underscore the significance of advanced Western military aid. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• Sustained Attritional Ground Operations: Russia will continue high-tempo, attritional assaults on the Donetsk axis (Pokrovsk, Chasiv Yar) and potentially intensify localized probing in the Sumy border regions, leveraging continued air and drone support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Retaliatory Deep Strikes: In response to the Engels fire and other Ukrainian deep strikes, Russia will likely attempt to conduct further retaliatory missile and drone attacks on Ukrainian military infrastructure, logistics, and critical energy facilities, potentially targeting airfields. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Escalated Information Warfare: Russia will continue its multi-pronged IO campaign, intensifying efforts to demoralize Ukrainians, discredit the government, and counter narratives of Ukrainian success. Expect continued exploitation of humanitarian issues and attempts to sow division. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Increased Force Generation/Control in Contested Areas: Russia/DNR entities will likely continue efforts to register and mobilize personnel in occupied and contested Ukrainian territories, including areas near the front lines, to bolster their combat strength. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• Escalated Border Offensive (Sumy/Kharkiv): Following reported troop transfers and increased air/drone activity, Russia could launch a multi-pronged ground offensive into Sumy or Kharkiv Oblast, aiming to expand buffer zones, divert Ukrainian reserves from Donbas, or seize key terrain. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM-HIGH).
• Integrated Multi-Domain Disruption: Russia could execute a highly coordinated multi-domain operation, combining large-scale air/missile strikes designed to overwhelm AD with simultaneous cyberattacks on critical infrastructure (power, communications) and intensified psychological operations to create widespread panic and confusion, aimed at disrupting Ukrainian C2 and societal resilience. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Targeting of Strategic Infrastructure (Black Sea): Russia could escalate strikes on critical Black Sea infrastructure (ports, energy assets) in conjunction with naval maneuvers, to further choke Ukrainian maritime trade and project dominance in the region. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Next 6-12 Hours (Immediate Threat): High probability of retaliatory air/missile/drone attacks across Ukraine, potentially targeting airfields or energy infrastructure in response to the Engels strike. Decision Point: Maintain highest AD readiness, particularly for strategic targets and airfields. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Next 12-24 Hours: Expect intensified Russian IO regarding alleged Ukrainian casualties/ineffectiveness and Russian airfield protection. Ukrainian Decision Point: Proactively counter these narratives with verified information on POW returns, Engels BDA, and AD successes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Next 24-72 Hours: Monitor Russian force dispositions and ISR in Sumy and Kharkiv Oblasts for signs of offensive preparations. Decision Point: Assess whether recent air/drone activity and troop movements indicate a genuine shift in ground operations. Continue BDA on Engels and Borispol. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

---

6. RECOMMENDATIONS

• Intelligence & Special Operations (ISR is paramount):

  1. CRITICAL PRIORITY: Expedite BDA and full assessment of the Engels fuel depot strike. Analyze satellite imagery to confirm damage extent and impact on Russian logistics. (Collection Requirement: IMINT, OSINT).
  2. URGENT PRIORITY: Verify Russian claims of a fire at Borispol airfield. If confirmed, conduct immediate BDA to assess damage to infrastructure and aircraft. (Collection Requirement: IMINT, OSINT, HUMINT).
  3. HIGH PRIORITY: Intensify ISR on Russian force dispositions and logistics nodes in the Sumy and Kharkiv Oblasts to detect any preparations for large-scale ground offensives or intensified border activity. (Collection Requirement: SIGINT, IMINT, HUMINT).
  4. HIGH PRIORITY: Analyze the "DNR list" of Ukrainian citizens from Selidovo to understand its purpose, the extent of data collection, and potential implications for civilian control and mobilization efforts in contested areas. (Collection Requirement: OSINT, TECHINT, HUMINT).
  5. ONGOING: Continue to monitor Russian information channels for shifts in IO strategy, especially regarding airfield protection and the narrative surrounding Western military aid, to preemptively counter their messaging. (Collection Requirement: OSINT, HUMINT).
  6. NEW PRIORITY: Investigate the "156th Brigade" mentioned in the missing person report near Yunakivka, Sumy Oblast, to clarify its status, composition, and operational area. (Collection Requirement: OSINT, HUMINT).

• Ground Forces:

  1. URGENT: Maintain reinforced defensive postures along the Sumy and Kharkiv axes, prioritizing intelligence-driven responses to any Russian probing actions. Avoid over-committing reserves based solely on Russian IO.
  2. TACTICAL: Continue to utilize and refine counter-drone measures, including EW and kinetic systems, to protect frontline positions from FPV drone and UAV-borne munition attacks, as seen on the Donetsk axis.
  3. OPERATIONAL: Ensure robust logistical support and medical evacuation capabilities for units engaged in high-intensity attritional combat on the Donetsk axis.

• Air Defense & Force Protection:

  1. IMMEDIATE: Maintain highest AD readiness across all major cities and critical infrastructure, anticipating potential retaliatory strikes following the Engels success. Prioritize protection of airfields and fuel depots.
  2. CRITICAL: Conduct an immediate review of AD coverage and capabilities around key energy infrastructure and military airfields, prioritizing any gaps exposed by recent events.
  3. STRATEGIC: Advocate for expedited delivery of additional AD systems and interceptor munitions from international partners, emphasizing the proven threat of Russian air attacks.

• Information Operations (IO):

  1. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: Widely disseminate verified BDA on the Engels fuel depot strike, emphasizing the strategic impact on Russian logistics and bomber operations. Use satellite imagery and expert commentary.
  2. IMMEDIATE: Continue to prominently feature the successful POW exchanges, focusing on the humanitarian aspect and the resilience of returning Ukrainian defenders. Actively counter Russian narratives attempting to discredit Ukrainian POW management.
  3. TACTICAL: Expose and refute Russian claims of "Ukrainian chaos" or "uncollected bodies" by providing transparent information on casualty management and repatriation efforts.
  4. STRATEGIC: Leverage the continued construction in Kryvyi Rih and other cities to highlight Ukraine's resilience and commitment to rebuilding and normal life, contrasting it with Russian destructive aggression.
  5. ONGOING: Develop and disseminate counter-narratives to Russian claims regarding airfield protection and the futility of Western aid, emphasizing the effectiveness of Ukrainian deep strikes and the necessity of international support.

• Diplomatic & Resource Management:

  1. URGENT: Ensure comprehensive medical and psychological support is immediately available for all returning POWs, especially the seriously wounded and ill.
  2. STRATEGIC: Continue to engage with EU partners to ensure the full implementation of the 18th sanctions package and advocate for further measures to cripple Russia's war economy.
  3. ONGOING: Maintain active humanitarian channels for future prisoner exchanges and advocate for full adherence to international humanitarian law.
  4. URGENT: Prioritize resource allocation for critical infrastructure repair and continued development in areas like Kryvyi Rih to support civilian resilience and long-term recovery.