Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR) TIME OF REPORT: 10 JUN 25 / 09:07 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 10 JUN 25 / 08:37 ZULU - 10 JUN 25 / 09:07 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk CLASSIFICATION: TOP SECRET / ORCON / NOFORN

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• Kyiv Oblast:
  • Kyiv City: New air raid alert issued. Reports of damage to the former British visa center (Colonelcassad, Операция Z) and, critically, to St. Sophia Cathedral (РБК-Україна, Оперативний ЗСУ) and Odesa Film Studio (РБК-Україна) from overnight drone attacks. This indicates an escalation in targeting of historical/cultural sites. Kyiv City Military Administration (КМВА) reports the recent air alarm was a planned technical check, not a new attack. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for reports of damage; MEDIUM for specific cause/weapon, HIGH for KCMCA statement).
  • Boryspil Community: Ongoing damage assessment and firefighting (previous report).
• Donetsk Oblast (Konstantinovka Direction): Pro-Russian milblogger maps (Z комитет + карта СВО) indicate ongoing Russian offensive operations. Claims of recent Russian gains in light pink areas around Malinovka. Settlements of Popova Yar, Novaya Poltavka, Ignatovka, Romanovka under Russian control. Vladimirovka, Poltavka, Koptevo, Shevchenko 1-e, Mirnoye, Malinovka, Mirlyubovka, Dolgaya Balka, Ilyinovka, Stepanovka, Yablonovka, Zarya, Tarasovka under Ukrainian control. Novoolenovka is designated as a grey zone. Extensive Ukrainian fortifications (dragon's teeth, trenches) noted behind current lines. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for Russian claims, LOW for independent verification of territorial changes).
• Zaporizhzhia Oblast (Southern Direction): Russian sources claim destruction of Ukrainian vehicles (2 pick-ups, 1 ATV) and UAV control point near Yalta, Zirka, and Zaporizhzhia by 29th Combined Arms Army. Claims of downing of Ukrainian UAVs including "Baba Yaga" hexacopter and "Jupiter-Hunter" reconnaissance/strike UAV. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM for BDA, HIGH for claim).
• Odesa Oblast: Ukrainian Air Force reports destruction of 7 "Shahed" UAVs by mobile fire groups of Odesa Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade overnight (10 June 2025). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Internal Territories:
  • Nizhnekamsk Airport (RU): Rosaviatsiya reports temporary restrictions on aircraft reception/departure have been lifted. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). This potentially indicates the previous AD activity or alert posture has decreased.
  • Cheboksary (Chuvashia, RU) / Savasleyka Airbase (Nizhny Novgorod Oblast, RU): Confirmed drone strikes remain in effect, production halted/aircraft damaged (previous report).
  • Kaliningrad Oblast (RU): Russian milblogger "Дневник Десантника🇷🇺" posts images related to the " обстановки в Калининградской области на фоне СВО и активной деятельности со стороны НАТО" (situation in Kaliningrad region amid SVO and active NATO activity). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for Russian perception, LOW for specific threats).
  • Sukhum Airport (Abkhazia, GE - Russian-occupied): FSB claims arrest of airport employee, a Russian citizen, recruited by Ukrainian intelligence and involved in preparing a terrorist attack. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for Russian claim, LOW for independent verification).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• Smoke and debris from fires in Kyiv (Boryspil) continue to impact localized visibility and air quality (previous report).
• Drone videos showing clear nighttime conditions in Odesa suggest favorable weather for drone operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces (Air Defense/Emergency Services): Active and successful in combating Russian drone attacks in Odesa Oblast. Damage assessment and response in Kyiv ongoing. Ukrainian General Staff issues advisory on dangers of urban warfare, emphasizing booby-trapped buildings and deceptive silence. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ukrainian Forces (Ground Defensive): Actively defending against Russian advances on the Konstantinovka axis, with fortifications in place. DeepState confirms enemy attempts to enter "Sicheslavshchyna" (Dnipropetrovsk region), indicating continued Russian pressure or probing in that direction. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ukrainian Forces (Deep Strike/Asymmetric): Continued successful deep strikes within Russia targeting military-industrial and air assets (previous report). FPV drone operations active, demonstrated by footage of BM-21 Grad destruction (Оперативний ЗСУ). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Forces (Air): Continued activity of tactical aviation in the southeastern direction (Ukrainian Air Force). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). Threat of aviation weapon use in Synelnykove district, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Forces (Ground Offensive): Continued offensive pressure on the Konstantinovka axis, indicated by claimed territorial gains. Russian 36th Army fiber optic operators claim destruction of a Ukrainian BMP-1TS north of Komar, South Donetsk direction. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM for BDA, HIGH for claim).
• Russian Forces (Internal Security): FSB actively engaged in counter-terrorism operations, claiming disruption of Ukrainian-backed terror plot in Sukhum. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for Russian claim).

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action:

• Capabilities:
  • Ballistic Missiles: Confirmed improved accuracy of North Korean KN-23 ballistic missiles (Budanov, previous report).
  • Shahed UAV Production: Budanov states Russia is assisting DPRK in launching "Shahed" production, suggesting a long-term intent to increase UAV supply. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for Budanov's statement, HIGH for implications).
  • Precision Guided Munitions: Continued use of heavy aerial bombs (ODAB-1500) and claims of precise strikes on Ukrainian positions (Kupyansk, previous report).
  • ISR/Targeting: Russian forces demonstrate ISR capabilities to identify and target Ukrainian vehicles and UAV control points at night. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
  • Ground Offensive: Sustained capability to conduct offensive operations on the Donetsk axis, consolidating gains and establishing new strongholds. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Counter-Intelligence/Internal Security: FSB demonstrates capability to detect and apprehend alleged Ukrainian agents within Russian-controlled territories. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for capability, LOW for veracity of specific case).
• Intentions:
  • Degrade Ukrainian Air Defense: Continued missile/drone strikes aim to exhaust and degrade Ukrainian AD capabilities, particularly around Kyiv and Odesa, allowing more accurate strikes on critical infrastructure and cultural sites. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Increase UAV Supply: Assisting DPRK in "Shahed" production indicates a long-term intent to secure and expand UAV supplies, reducing reliance on direct Iranian imports. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Sustain Ground Offensive: Continued advances on the Konstantinovka axis reflect an intent to consolidate control over Donetsk Oblast. The persistent pressure on Dnipropetrovsk (DeepState) also suggests an intent to probe defenses or compel Ukrainian reserve allocation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Exploit IO/Psychological Effects: Targeting cultural sites aims to inflict psychological damage and potentially prompt international outcry. The Sukhum airport "terrorist plot" narrative aims to delegitimize Ukrainian intelligence operations and justify Russian internal security crackdowns. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Project Control/Security: TASS statements on internal security and general news (culture, etc.) aim to project an image of normalcy and control within Russia. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• Diversification of Drone Sourcing/Production: The reported Russia-DPRK "Shahed" production assistance indicates a shift in sustainment strategy for UAVs. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Targeting Cultural Heritage: Strikes impacting St. Sophia Cathedral and Odesa Film Studio demonstrate a widening of target sets to include symbolic cultural sites, possibly to increase psychological pressure or demonstrate precision targeting capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Integrated Russian IO with Ground Operations: The ongoing narrative around a Dnipropetrovsk offensive, coupled with DeepState's confirmation of Russian attempts, suggests Russia is trying to create ambiguity and force Ukrainian reactions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• Missile/Drone Supply: Continued use of Shaheds and reported efforts to establish DPRK production indicate sustained and possibly growing supply of these systems. The availability of improved KN-23s confirms continued supply of foreign ballistic missiles. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ground Force Sustainment: Offensive operations on the Konstantinovka axis suggest adequate logistical support for localized advances. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Internal Security Resources: FSB demonstrates resources for extensive counter-intelligence operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Strategic C2: Clear intent and coordination in missile/drone attacks on Kyiv and Odesa, indicating centralized control. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• IO Synchronization: The coordinated push of the Dnipropetrovsk narrative, including high-level political statements, demonstrates effective C2 over information operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Tactical C2: Russian claims of successful BDA by specific units (e.g., 36th Army, 29th Combined Arms Army) suggest effective tactical C2 and intelligence dissemination at the unit level. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• Air Defense & Emergency Response: Highly effective in intercepting Shaheds in Odesa (7/7 downed). Rapid response to damage in Kyiv. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ground Forces: Maintaining defensive lines on the Konstantinovka axis, with substantial fortifications in place. Demonstrating the ability to destroy Russian MLRS systems (Оперативний ЗСУ). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). Alerted to aviation threats in Dnipropetrovsk, indicating vigilance. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Combat Effectiveness: 5th Assault Brigade claims downing a new Russian AI-equipped V2U kamikaze drone. This highlights continued adaptation and effectiveness against emerging threats. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Urban Operations Awareness: General Staff messaging on urban warfare risks demonstrates awareness of operational environment and intent to prepare troops. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Public Morale: Images of Zaporizhzhia athletes training indicate efforts to maintain civilian morale despite ongoing conflict. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Successes:
  • High Shahed Interception Rate: 7/7 Shaheds downed in Odesa indicates high effectiveness of mobile fire groups.
  • Destruction of Russian MLRS: Confirmed destruction of a Russian BM-21 Grad (Оперативний ЗСУ).
  • Downing of Advanced Russian Drone: 5th Assault Brigade claims downing of AI-equipped V2U kamikaze drone, demonstrating adaptation.
  • Deep Strikes: Continued successful degradation of Russian military-industrial complex (previous report).
• Setbacks:
  • Damage to Cultural/Civilian Sites: Strikes impacting St. Sophia Cathedral, British Visa Center, and Odesa Film Studio cause significant cultural and civilian damage, indicating a failure to fully protect all targets from Russian strikes.
  • Continued Ground Losses: Russian claims of territorial gains on the Konstantinovka axis, though unverified, suggest ongoing pressure and potential tactical setbacks.
  • Persistent Air Threat: Continued Russian tactical aviation activity and threat of aviation weapon use, particularly in Dnipropetrovsk, indicates the persistence of Russian air dominance efforts.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• Air Defense: The increased accuracy of KN-23s and potential for more "Shahed" production necessitates a sustained high rate of AD munition expenditure. Continued need for advanced interceptors and mobile fire group equipment. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Reconstruction/Restoration: Damage to cultural heritage sites (St. Sophia Cathedral) will require significant resources for damage assessment, stabilization, and potential restoration, competing with other reconstruction needs. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Force Protection: Continued need for robust individual and unit-level force protection measures, especially in urban environments, given Russian targeting patterns and tactics. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Narratives:
  • Claiming Success: Russian milbloggers (Colonelcassad, Z комитет + карта СВО, Воин DV) actively post videos and maps claiming battlefield successes, BDA, and territorial gains to project an image of continuous advance and superior combat power. "Сливочный каприз" (Creamy Whim) publishes charts claiming significant Russian territorial gains in Avdeevka-Krasnoarmeysk (1272.87 km²), Velikaya Novoselka-Ugledar (1221.09 km²), and Maryinka-Kurakhovo (861.22 km²) since 2023. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for claims, LOW for verification).
  • Framing Ukraine as Terrorist: FSB claims of preventing a Ukrainian-backed terrorist attack at Sukhum airport continue the narrative of Ukraine as a terrorist state, justifying Russian internal security measures. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Distraction/Normalization: TASS continues to publish non-military news (US-RU talks on "irritants," film news, charity awards) to normalize the situation and distract from war realities. Maria Zakharova's comment on Karabakh context is a deflection. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Discrediting Ukrainian Leadership: Kotsnews's comment "Умеров уже должен мазать лоб зеленкой" (Umerov should already be smearing his forehead with brilliant green) is a mocking, demeaning attack on Ukrainian Defense Minister Umerov, designed to undermine his credibility. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Downplaying Losses/Emphasizing Sacrifice: While one Russian channel "МОБИЛИЗАЦИЯ | Новости | Срочники" shows a cemetery with the caption "Сколько ребят..." ("How many guys..."), it is generally framed as sacrifice rather than failure, aimed at internal resilience. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Ukrainian Counter-Narratives:
  • Exposing Russian War Crimes: РБК-Україна and Оперативний ЗСУ immediately report damage to St. Sophia Cathedral, former British visa center, and Odesa Film Studio, framing these as Russian war crimes against Ukrainian culture and civilian infrastructure. Anatoliy Shtefan "Shtirlitz" posts video with caption "Яскравий доказ що ніякого миру росія не хоче. Не військові об'єкти, а будинки мирних жителів." (Clear proof that Russia wants no peace. Not military objects, but houses of peaceful residents). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Highlighting Ukrainian Successes: Ukrainian Air Force reports successful Shahed interceptions. 5th Assault Brigade reports downing of AI drone. Оперативний ЗСУ shows destruction of Grad MLRS. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Maintaining Public Trust: KCMCA clarifies the air alarm in Kyiv was a technical check, countering potential panic or Russian discrediting of air raid warnings. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Transparency on Threat: Budanov's statement on DPRK "Shahed" production partnership informs public and international partners of evolving threat. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Promoting Resilience: Zaporizhzhia military administration posts video of athletes training, promoting a sense of normalcy and resilience. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Ukrainian Morale:
  • Resilience and Anger: Attacks on cultural/historical sites (St. Sophia Cathedral) will fuel public anger and reinforce resolve against Russia, but also cause distress. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Vigilance: Persistent air alerts and confirmed threats from tactical aviation maintain a high state of public vigilance. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Confidence in AD: High interception rates in Odesa provide a morale boost and confidence in AD capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Morale:
  • Reinforced "Victory" Narrative: Continual claims of territorial gains and BDA (e.g., "Сливочный каприз" charts) are designed to bolster domestic support and morale. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Internal Security Narrative: FSB claims of preventing terror plots reinforce the image of a strong, secure state protecting its citizens, likely boosting trust in security services. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• International Condemnation: Damage to St. Sophia Cathedral (UNESCO World Heritage Site buffer zone) will likely draw strong international condemnation and calls for accountability, potentially leading to increased pressure on Russia. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Sanctions Evasion/Military-Technical Cooperation: Budanov's statement on Russia-DPRK "Shahed" production is a significant development, highlighting deeper military-technical cooperation and likely prompting increased international scrutiny and potential new sanctions on both Russia and DPRK. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• US-Russia Dialogue: TASS report on upcoming US-Russia talks on "irritants" suggests limited diplomatic channels remain open, but the focus on "irritants" rather than broader peace initiatives implies no immediate breakthrough. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Implications for Aid: The new information on "Shahed" production and continued ballistic missile threat underscores the ongoing need for comprehensive, long-term Western military aid, particularly air defense systems and counter-drone capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• Sustained, Multi-Modal Air Attacks: Russia will continue massed and diversified air attacks (drones, various missiles) targeting critical infrastructure, military assets, and increasingly, cultural/historical sites, aiming to exhaust Ukrainian AD and inflict psychological damage. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Persistent Ground Offensive in Donetsk: Russian forces will maintain high-tempo, attritional ground assaults on the Donetsk axis (e.g., Konstantinovka, Pokrovsk, Chasiv Yar directions), attempting to consolidate claimed gains and push deeper. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Probing Operations/IO on Dnipropetrovsk/Sumy: Russia will continue to use information operations to feign or amplify limited ground movements on the Dnipropetrovsk and Sumy axes to force Ukrainian reserve reallocation. Actual ground attacks on these axes will likely remain probing or limited in scale. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Intensified Counter-Intelligence/Security Operations: Russia will increase internal security measures and publicize arrests of alleged Ukrainian agents to deter deep strikes and maintain domestic control. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Deepening Russia-DPRK Military-Technical Cooperation: Russia will continue efforts to secure long-term UAV supply by assisting DPRK in production, potentially expanding to other military systems. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• Targeted Destruction of Cultural Heritage and Civilian Morale: Russia deliberately and accurately targets multiple iconic cultural sites and civilian population centers in a single, large-scale strike using improved KN-23s and other precision munitions, aiming to break Ukrainian will and provoke a massive international crisis. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Combined Arms Breakthrough on Dnipropetrovsk: Following extensive aerial shaping operations (including aviation weapons in Synelnykove district) and successful deception, Russia launches a genuine, large-scale ground offensive into Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, aiming to cut off Ukrainian forces in the east or seize strategic industrial centers. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Integrated Hybrid Attack on NATO Flank: Russia stages a verifiable "terrorist attack" by alleged Ukrainian proxies within a NATO border state (e.g., Poland, Romania) or a Baltic state, providing a pretext for limited Russian military response or heightened escalation on NATO's eastern flank. (CONFIDENCE: LOW).

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Next 6-12 Hours (Immediate Threat): Risk of follow-on missile/drone strikes targeting critical infrastructure, particularly in central and southern Ukraine, given previous waves. Ukrainian AD remains on high alert. Decision point: Rapid BDA of cultural sites and immediate activation of cultural heritage protection protocols. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Next 12-24 Hours: Continued ground combat pressure on the Donetsk axis. Verification of claimed Russian advances on Konstantinovka axis. Decision point: Assess Russian ground intentions in Dnipropetrovsk carefully; avoid premature commitment of reserves. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Next 24-72 Hours: High probability of renewed large-scale aerial attacks incorporating more accurate KN-23s, as Russia seeks to exploit AD vulnerabilities. International response to cultural site damage will begin to materialize. Ukrainian decision points: Intensified diplomatic push for advanced AD, counter-drone systems, and long-range fires; continued targeted deep strikes; and aggressive counter-IO to frame Russian actions as war crimes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

6. RECOMMENDATIONS

• Air Defense & Force Protection:

  1. CRITICAL: Prioritize protection of major cultural heritage sites (e.g., St. Sophia Cathedral, Kyiv Pechersk Lavra) within AD engagement zones, while balancing with military target protection.
  2. URGENT: Accelerate procurement and deployment of mobile anti-drone systems and electronic warfare capabilities to counter evolving Russian UAV threats (e.g., AI-equipped drones) and to effectively target "Shaheds" outside of major AD umbrella.
  3. IMMEDIATE: Conduct detailed post-strike analysis of damage to St. Sophia Cathedral and Odesa Film Studio to identify munition types and refine defensive strategies.
  4. ONGOING: Reinforce public messaging regarding AD alerts, clearly distinguishing between real threats and technical checks, to maintain public trust and prevent complacency.

• Ground Forces:

  1. URGENT: Maintain high vigilance and defensive posture on the Dnipropetrovsk axis, using robust ISR to confirm genuine Russian ground movements before committing significant reserves. Avoid overreaction to IO.
  2. CRITICAL: Strengthen and deepen defensive lines, particularly in the Konstantinovka direction and areas identified by Russian sources as significant gains, leveraging existing fortifications ("dragon's teeth," trenches) and rapidly constructing new ones.
  3. ONGOING: Continue to leverage FPV drones and other asymmetric capabilities to inflict attrition on Russian ground forces and supply lines, particularly in newly claimed areas.
  4. TACTICAL: Disseminate intelligence on Russian BMP-1TS, pick-up truck, and ATV destruction to frontline units as examples of successful engagements and to bolster morale.

• Intelligence & Special Operations:

  1. CRITICAL: Task all available ISR assets to monitor Russian-DPRK naval and air routes for evidence of "Shahed" component or complete UAV transfers.
  2. URGENT: Investigate the claimed downing of the "AI-equipped V2U" drone by the 5th Assault Brigade. If verified, assess its capabilities and potential implications for future Russian drone warfare.
  3. IMMEDIATE: Conduct thorough BDA on the claimed Russian gains on the Konstantinovka axis using satellite imagery and other sources to verify their veracity and identify current Russian force dispositions.
  4. ANALYZE: Closely monitor Russian FSB statements on "terrorist plots" for patterns, potential false flag operations, or indicators of broader Russian internal security campaigns.

• Information Operations:

  1. IMMEDIATE: Launch a global IO campaign highlighting the damage to St. Sophia Cathedral and Odesa Film Studio as deliberate attacks on Ukrainian and world cultural heritage, emphasizing Russia's disregard for international law and cultural norms.
  2. URGENT: Amplify Budanov's statement on Russia-DPRK "Shahed" production assistance to international partners and media, framing it as evidence of an expanding axis of authoritarian states undermining global security. Use this to advocate for further sanctions and military aid.
  3. ONGOING: Actively counter Russian claims of "breakthroughs" and territorial gains with verified ground truth, particularly on the Dnipropetrovsk axis.
  4. STRATEGIC: Continue to publicize all successful Ukrainian AD engagements and BDA of Russian assets to maintain domestic morale and international confidence in Ukrainian capabilities.