Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR) TIME OF REPORT: 10 JUN 25 / 08:37 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 10 JUN 25 / 08:07 ZULU - 10 JUN 25 / 08:37 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk CLASSIFICATION: TOP SECRET / ORCON / NOFORN

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• Kyiv Oblast: Continued damage assessment and firefighting operations following overnight strikes. Photos from "Оперативний ЗСУ" confirm large-scale fire suppression by "ДСНС КИЇВЩИНИ" (State Emergency Service of Ukraine for the Kyiv Region) in Boryspil community. Russian channel "НгП раZVедка" also provides imagery of smoke in Kyiv this morning, consistent with ongoing fires. Colonelcassad reports severe damage to a building identified as the former British visa center in Kyiv. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Kharkiv Oblast: DeepState map updated, indicating dynamic changes on the battlefield. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). Kotsnews and Старше Эдды (Russian milbloggers) claim a Russian Su-34 strike using an ODAB-1500 on a temporary deployment point of the Ukrainian 114th Territorial Defense Brigade near Kupyansk. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - for BDA, HIGH - for claim of strike).
• Donetsk Oblast: MoD Russia claims "Yug Group's strike UAV teams destroyed U.S.-made HMMWV and Turkish-made Kobra-2 armoured vehicles in Aleksandro-Kalinovo direction." (CONFIDENCE: LOW for BDA, HIGH for claim).
• Russian Internal Territories:
  • Cheboksary (Chuvashia, RU): Confirmed drone strike on "VNIIR-Progress" JSC military-industrial facility, producing "Kometa" anti-EW receivers. Production halted. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - carried over from previous report).
  • Savasleyka airbase (Nizhny Novgorod Oblast, RU): Confirmed drone strike. Ukrainian General Staff reports damage to two aircraft (likely MiG-31K). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - carried over from previous report). TASS reports temporary restrictions on aircraft reception/departure at Nizhnekamsk airport, potentially related to ongoing AD activity or alert posture after deep strikes. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• Smoke and debris from fires in Kyiv (Boryspil) continue to impact localized visibility and air quality, potentially hindering emergency response and local traffic. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces (Air Defense/Emergency Services): Actively engaged in fire suppression and damage control operations in Kyiv Oblast, demonstrating civilian-military coordination in response to Russian strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian Forces (Ground Defensive): OTU "Kharkiv" highlights the role of commanders like Andriy "Sheva" of the 228th Battalion, 127th Territorial Defense Brigade, indicating continued presence and leadership on the Kharkiv axis. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). DeepState map update suggests ongoing adjustments to force dispositions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ukrainian Forces (Deep Strike/Asymmetric): Continued successful deep strikes within Russia targeting military-industrial and air assets. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). "БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС" publishes video appearing to show successful Ukrainian strikes on Russian positions, including "ineffective shelters" and vehicle/infantry losses. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - for BDA, HIGH - for claim).
• Russian Forces (Air): Continued use of tactical aviation (Su-34) and large-caliber aerial bombs (ODAB-1500) against Ukrainian forward positions (Kupyansk). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian Forces (Ground Offensive): MoD Russia's claims of HMMWV and Kobra-2 destruction suggest continued ground engagements on the Donetsk axis. "Народная милиция ДНР" shares video claiming to show "special purpose unit" striking Ukrainian positions, equipment, and drones. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - for BDA, HIGH - for claim).
• Russian Forces (Force Protection): "Два майора" (Russian milblogger) highlights the "increase in protection of military airfields" with images of what appear to be hardened/underground aircraft shelters, possibly featuring historical F-104 or F-4 aircraft. This indicates Russian concerns over Ukrainian deep strikes and their efforts to harden critical assets. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - for Russian concern, MEDIUM - for specific images).

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action:

• Capabilities:
  • Enhanced Ballistic Missiles: Budanov's reiteration via РБК-Україна that Russia has "improved North Korean KN-23 ballistic missiles" and they "now strike more accurately" significantly elevates the precision strike threat. This warrants immediate re-evaluation of target sets and AD effectiveness. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for Budanov's statement, HIGH for increased threat).
  • Heavy Aerial Bombing: Continued use of large-yield aerial bombs (ODAB-1500) by Su-34s demonstrates a sustained capability to inflict significant damage on entrenched positions and temporary deployment points. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Information Warfare: Russia's FSB Director Bortnikov's statements via TASS on CIS counter-terrorism efforts are likely intended for domestic consumption to project security and control, but also to potentially link Ukrainian actions to "terrorism." (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). "Kotsnews" and "Старше Эдды" (Russian milbloggers) are actively publishing claims of Ukrainian losses. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Intentions:
  • Degrade Ukrainian Precision: The reported improvement in KN-23 accuracy suggests an intent to improve the effectiveness of strikes against critical infrastructure and high-value military targets, challenging Ukrainian AD. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Protect Air Assets: Russian milbloggers emphasizing "increasing protection for military airfields" with images of hardened shelters directly reflects Russian intent to mitigate the impact of successful Ukrainian deep strikes on their air force. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Sustain Ground Pressure: Continued use of heavy aerial bombs on frontline positions (Kupyansk) indicates an intent to soften defenses for subsequent ground assaults or to degrade Ukrainian force readiness. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Internal Security Narrative: Bortnikov's statement via TASS aims to project an image of a strong, secure Russia countering external threats, potentially conflating Ukrainian resistance with broader "terrorism" for domestic audiences. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• Enhanced Missile Precision: The reported improved accuracy of KN-23 missiles (Budanov) represents a significant tactical adaptation, demanding recalibration of defensive priorities and AD deployment. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Hardened Airfield Infrastructure: The increased focus on protecting military airfields through hardened/underground shelters (Два майора) is a direct tactical adaptation by Russia in response to Ukrainian deep strike capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Combined Arms IO: Russian milbloggers are increasingly combining claims of ground BDA (MoD Russia), specific air strikes (ODAB-1500), and general "special purpose unit" successes to project a comprehensive image of battlefield dominance. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• Missiles: The continued use and alleged improvement of KN-23s indicate a sustained (and possibly expanding) supply of these foreign-sourced ballistic missiles. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Aerial Bomb Production: Continued large-scale production/deployment of heavy aerial bombs like ODAB-1500. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Airfield Hardening: The imagery of hardened aircraft shelters implies significant investment in infrastructure and resources for force protection. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Personnel: Anatoliy Shtefan "Shtirlitz" reports "no less than 6350 Rashnofitser" (Russian officers) demobilized since Feb 2022, suggesting significant attrition of experienced personnel. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for observation, MEDIUM for precise count).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• FSB C2: Bortnikov's statement on CIS security efforts demonstrates centralized control over internal security and intelligence messaging. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Airfield Protection C2: The apparent concerted effort to harden airfields suggests a top-down directive to implement force protection measures against deep strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• Air Defense & Emergency Response: Rapid and large-scale response to fires in Kyiv Oblast demonstrates effective coordination between military (Air Defense) and civilian emergency services (DSNS), indicative of high readiness for disaster response in urban environments. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ground Forces: Commanders like Andriy "Sheva" of the 127th TDB being highlighted suggests continued leadership and resilience at the unit level, crucial for sustained defensive operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). "БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС" displaying Russian losses implies effective Ukrainian ground operations. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Deep Strike Capability: Continued successful deep strikes against Russian military-industrial targets and airbases remain a key strategic capability, forcing Russian adaptations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Personnel Readiness: The ongoing reports of Russian officer losses (6350+) by "Shtirlitz" highlight the attritional impact on the enemy, indirectly benefiting Ukrainian personnel readiness by degrading Russian combat effectiveness. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Prisoner Affairs Coordination: The "Coordination Staff for the Treatment of Prisoners of War" meeting with families of the 36th Marine Brigade (Korshynsky) demonstrates continued focus on POW affairs and family support, essential for troop morale. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Successes:
  • Effective Emergency Response: Rapid and comprehensive firefighting in Kyiv Oblast limits collateral damage and shows strong civil defense.
  • Sustained Deep Strike Impact: The Russian focus on hardening airfields (Два майора) is direct evidence of the effectiveness of Ukrainian deep strikes.
  • Confirmed Enemy Losses: "Shtirlitz" reports on Russian officer losses and "БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС" video showing destroyed Russian positions indicate continued successful engagements.
  • POW Advocacy: The Coordination Staff's meeting with families of the 36th Marine Brigade underscores ongoing efforts for POWs.
• Setbacks:
  • Increased Missile Precision Threat: Budanov's assessment of improved KN-23 accuracy implies an increased threat to high-value targets, potentially challenging existing AD systems.
  • Civilian Infrastructure Damage: The severe damage to the former British visa center and other civilian structures in Kyiv highlights continued Russian targeting of urban centers.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• Air Defense: The heightened threat from more accurate KN-23s necessitates an urgent review of existing AD capabilities and a renewed push for more advanced ballistic missile interceptors and munitions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Firefighting/Emergency Response: Continued attacks on urban areas will place persistent strain on emergency services, requiring sustained resources for equipment, personnel, and medical supplies. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Medical & Rehabilitation: The focus on POW family meetings highlights the ongoing humanitarian needs related to combatants, requiring resources for support and potential repatriation/rehabilitation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Narratives:
  • Domestic Security: FSB Director Bortnikov's TASS statement on CIS counter-terrorism is designed to project strength and security to a domestic audience, potentially framing Ukraine as a 'terrorist' state. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Amplified BDA: Russian milbloggers (Kotsnews, Старше Эдды, MoD Russia) are actively publishing claims of Ukrainian military equipment destruction and personnel losses to demoralize Ukrainian forces and boost Russian morale. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Distraction/Moral Decay: "Новости Москвы" and "Операция Z" continuing to disseminate content unrelated to the war (e.g., "alpha generation" work ethic, Greta Thunberg) aims to distract and imply Western societal issues. ASTRA's report on legal action against a Russian politician for "discrediting the army" shows ongoing internal repression of dissent. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Justification for Airfield Hardening: "Два майора" framing the images of hardened airfields as "increased protection" implicitly acknowledges Ukrainian deep strike capabilities while attempting to show a proactive Russian response. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian Counter-Narratives:
  • Highlighting Russian War Crimes: "Оперативний ЗСУ" photos of firefighting in Boryspil community after shelling serve to highlight Russian aggression against civilian areas. "РБК-Україна" also published photos of damaged civilian buildings. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Exposing Enemy Losses: "Shtirlitz" and "БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС" actively publish figures on Russian officer losses and BDA, directly countering Russian claims of dominance. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Focus on POW Welfare: The "Coordination Staff for the Treatment of Prisoners of War" meeting with families of the 36th Marine Brigade is a clear counter to Russian dehumanizing narratives about POWs and emphasizes Ukrainian commitment to its personnel. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Transparency on Threat Assessment: Budanov's statement on enhanced KN-23s (РБК-Україна) informs the public and international partners of the evolving threat, maintaining trust and preparing for future attacks. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Ukrainian Morale:
  • Resilience: The images of DSNS responding to fires and volunteer efforts indicate continued public resilience and community solidarity in the face of attacks. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Determination: Budanov's clear assessment of evolving threats is likely to reinforce resolve, while the focus on POW issues addresses a key concern for military families. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Anger: Attacks on civilian infrastructure in Kyiv will undoubtedly fuel public anger and reinforce anti-Russian sentiment. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian Morale:
  • Reinforced "Victory" Narrative: Continual claims of Ukrainian losses and successes will be used to maintain domestic support for the war.
  • Internal Control: Repression of dissent (e.g., case against Schlosberg) aims to maintain control over information space and public opinion. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• International Condemnation: The continued targeting of civilian areas in Kyiv will likely prompt further international condemnation and calls for increased support to Ukraine, particularly air defense. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Sanctions Evasion: The reported enhancement of North Korean missiles by Russia (Budanov) raises concerns about sanctions evasion and the deepening of military-technical cooperation between Russia and DPRK. This could prompt further international pressure on both. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Military Aid Implications: The shift to more accurate KN-23s necessitates a re-evaluation by Western allies of the types and quantities of AD systems and munitions required for Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• NATO Readiness: Russian focus on protecting their airfields underscores the effectiveness of Ukrainian deep strikes, implicitly demonstrating the strategic importance of Western long-range capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• Sustained Precision Strikes with Enhanced Missiles: Russia will continue using enhanced KN-23 ballistic missiles, and potentially other precision munitions, to target Ukrainian critical infrastructure (energy, military-industrial, logistics hubs) and government/military C2 nodes with increased accuracy. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Intensified Frontline Air Support: Russian tactical aviation will continue to employ heavy aerial bombs (ODABs, KABs) to support ground offensives, particularly on the Kharkiv and Donetsk axes, attempting to soften Ukrainian defenses ahead of assaults. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Fortification of Strategic Assets: Russia will continue to harden critical military infrastructure, especially airfields and command centers, to mitigate the impact of Ukrainian deep strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Aggressive Information Operations: Russia will maintain a high tempo of IO, focusing on discrediting Ukrainian forces, claiming exaggerated BDA, and projecting an image of internal stability and strength while leveraging distractions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Internal Security Clampdown: Russia will continue to suppress internal dissent and prosecute individuals for "discrediting the army" to maintain control over the domestic information environment. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• Coordinated Precision Strike to Degrade AD: Russia launches a highly synchronized, multi-wave attack incorporating newly precise KN-23s and other advanced missiles, specifically targeting key Ukrainian AD systems and their C2 nodes, aiming to significantly degrade Ukraine's ability to defend its airspace. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM-HIGH)
• Massed Ground Offensive After Precision Shaping: Following successful precision strikes on AD and logistics, Russia initiates a large-scale ground offensive on a previously identified axis (e.g., Sumy or Dnipropetrovsk) leveraging the degraded Ukrainian defensive capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Escalated Civilian Targeting with Enhanced Missiles: Russia deliberately targets highly populated civilian areas with the improved KN-23s, aiming to break Ukrainian morale and provoke a crisis, accepting significant international outcry. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Next 6-12 Hours (Immediate Threat): Continued firefighting and damage assessment in Kyiv Oblast. Ukrainian AD units remain on high alert for follow-on missile/drone strikes, with particular concern for the reported improved KN-23 accuracy. Decision point: allocation of emergency response and medical teams to damaged areas. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Next 12-24 Hours: Sustained ground combat on key axes (Kharkiv, Donetsk). Ukrainian forces must prioritize intelligence collection on potential new Russian C2 and logistics in hardened facilities. Decision points: urgent review of AD deployment and replenishment needs based on the enhanced KN-23 threat. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Next 24-72 Hours: High probability of renewed large-scale aerial attacks incorporating the more accurate KN-23s. Russia will likely continue to probe defenses on multiple axes. Ukrainian decision points include intensified diplomatic engagement to secure more advanced AD and continued military aid, alongside rapid analysis of new Russian tactics for hardened targets. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

6. RECOMMENDATIONS

• Air Defense & Force Protection:

  1. CRITICAL: Immediately conduct a comprehensive assessment of the capabilities of the "improved" KN-23 ballistic missiles (range, accuracy, payload) and update AD engagement priorities and tactics accordingly.
  2. URGENT: Prioritize deployment of Patriot and other advanced ballistic missile defense systems to protect Kyiv, Odesa, and other critical infrastructure.
  3. IMMEDIATE: Expedite requests to Western partners for additional ballistic missile interceptors and more advanced AD platforms, emphasizing the escalating precision strike threat.
  4. ONGOING: Enhance passive defense measures around critical infrastructure and military C2 nodes to mitigate the impact of more accurate strikes.

• Ground Forces:

  1. URGENT: Maintain aggressive counter-battery fire and anti-drone measures on all active fronts, particularly on the Kharkiv and Donetsk axes, to counter increased use of heavy aerial bombs and strike UAVs.
  2. ONGOING: Continue to leverage asymmetric advantages (e.g., FPV drones) to inflict attrition on Russian forces and disrupt their logistics, while prioritizing force protection for personnel against large-yield munitions.
  3. CRITICAL: Disseminate intelligence on Russian officer attrition (6350+) to frontline units to bolster morale and highlight enemy weaknesses.

• Intelligence & Special Operations:

  1. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: Intensify HUMINT, SIGINT, and IMINT collection on all Russian hardened and underground military facilities, particularly airfields, to understand their design, capacity, and operational status.
  2. URGENT: Prioritize intelligence collection on any evidence of further North Korean-Russian military-technical cooperation, especially regarding missile guidance systems or production.
  3. ONGOING: Continue deep strike operations against Russian military-industrial targets and air assets, focusing on those most critical to their precision strike capabilities and long-range aviation. Conduct thorough BDA to confirm effectiveness.
  4. ANALYZE: Monitor and analyze Russian information operations regarding their internal security and counter-terrorism narratives to identify potential shifts in framing Ukrainian actions.

• Information Operations:

  1. IMMEDIATE: Launch a targeted IO campaign highlighting the severity of damage to civilian infrastructure in Kyiv and the Boryspil community, emphasizing the human cost of Russia's enhanced precision strikes.
  2. URGENT: Publicize Budanov's assessment of improved KN-23 accuracy to international partners and the public, framing it as evidence of Russia's disregard for international law and reliance on rogue state support. Use this to advocate for more sophisticated AD.
  3. ONGOING: Continue to actively publicize Russian military losses, particularly officer casualties, using verified data from sources like "Shtirlitz" and "БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС", to undermine Russian domestic morale and international credibility.
  4. CRITICAL: Amplify the work of the "Coordination Staff for the Treatment of Prisoners of War" to reinforce Ukrainian commitment to its personnel and counter Russian dehumanization narratives.