Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR) TIME OF REPORT: 10 JUN 25 / 08:07 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 10 JUN 25 / 07:37 ZULU - 10 JUN 25 / 08:07 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk CLASSIFICATION: TOP SECRET / ORCON / NOFORN

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• Kyiv Oblast: Continued damage assessment and firefighting operations following overnight strikes. A video from "ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS" shows a Ka-32 helicopter drawing water from the Dnipro to extinguish a fire in Kyiv, indicating ongoing efforts. "РБК-Україна" provides photo evidence of a severely damaged multi-story residential/commercial building with a pharmacy, confirming extensive civilian infrastructure damage and ongoing casualty assessments. TASS also reports damage to an infrastructure object in Kyiv Oblast. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Kharkiv Oblast:
  • Northern Kharkiv: "Повітряні Сили ЗС України" reports "КАБ launches to the north of Kharkiv region," indicating continued Russian aerial bombardment. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Vovchansk/Hlyboke/Kamianka Axis: Ukrainian General Staff reports continued clashes near Vovchansk, Kamyanka, and Hlyboke, with five assault attempts repelled by Ukrainian forces. The map overlay confirms a contested zone and two main axes of Russian advance: one directly targeting Vovchansk/Hlyboke/Kamianka, and another further east towards Strilecha/Hoptivka. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Kupyansk Axis: Ukrainian General Staff reports clashes near Kindrashivka, Zahryzove, Zelenyi Hai, Holubivka, Stepova Novoselivka, Kolisnykivka, and towards Kurylivka. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Donetsk Oblast:
  • General: Russian aviation conducted airstrikes at Razine, Myrnohrad, Sukhyy Yar, Pokrovsk, Poltavka, Popiv Yar, Novoekonomichne, Novopil, Voskresenka, according to Ukrainian General Staff. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Pokrovsk Axis: Ukrainian General Staff reports extensive clashes near Nova Poltavka, Novoukrayinka, Novoolenivka, Bohdanivka, Novoserhiyivka, Myrolubivka, Yelyzavetivka, Malynivka, Promin, Lysivka, Udachne, Bohdanivka, Oleksiyivka, Andriyivka, and towards Zelenyy Kut, Pokrovsk, Muravka. This confirms persistent, high-intensity Russian pressure on this axis. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Toretsk Axis: Ukrainian General Staff reports clashes near Dyliyivka, Toretsk and towards Yablunivka. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Kramatorsk Axis: Ukrainian General Staff reports clashes near Bila Hora, Kurdumivka and towards Stupochky. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Lyman Axis: Ukrainian General Staff reports clashes near Lypove, Nadiya and towards Ridkodub, Karpivka, Novyi Myr, Olhivka and Hryhorivka. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Siversk Axis: Ukrainian General Staff reports clashes near Hryhorivka. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Novopavlivka Axis: Ukrainian General Staff reports clashes near Kostyantynopil, Novosilka, Zelene Pole, Vilne Pole, Vesele, towards Shevchenko, Bahatyr and Zaporizhzhya. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Zaporizhzhia Oblast:
  • General: Russian aviation conducted airstrikes at Hulyaypole, Olhivske, Novoandriyivka, Kamyanske, Mala Tokmachka according to Ukrainian General Staff. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Orikhiv Axis: Ukrainian General Staff reports clashes near Novoandriyivka, Stepove, Nesteryanka and towards Pavlivka. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Huliaipole Axis: Ukrainian General Staff reports clashes near Malynivka, and Russian "Воин DV" claims 35th Combined Arms Army drone strikes in Huliaipole, Chervone, and surrounding areas, destroying a large-caliber gun crew, a repeater antenna, a UAV control point, and a trench EW station. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for sustained combat; MEDIUM for specific Russian BDA claims).
• Chernihiv Oblast: Russian aviation conducted airstrikes at Hremyach according to Ukrainian General Staff. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Kherson Oblast: Russian aviation conducted airstrikes at Lvove according to Ukrainian General Staff. Ukrainian General Staff reports repelling 5 Russian army assaults on this axis. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Kursk Oblast (RU): Ukrainian General Staff reports repelling 38 Russian army assaults in Kursk region, indicating sustained Ukrainian cross-border defensive/counter-offensive actions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Odesa Oblast: "Шеф Hayabusa🫡🇺🇦" provides video evidence of severe damage to a civilian area in Odesa "this night," consistent with a military strike. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Suwalki Corridor: Rybar's map indicates a significant NATO military presence in the Suwalki Corridor, including US, German, Polish, and UK forces, totaling approximately 10,000 personnel with armored and air assets. This is a critical area for NATO defense planning. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for content of map, MEDIUM for precise figures/unit dispositions).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• Smoke and debris from fires in Kyiv and Odesa continue to impact localized visibility and air quality, potentially hindering emergency response. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces (Air Defense): Continued AD operations against Russian aerial attacks, as indicated by the need for firefighting efforts in Kyiv and Odesa, and reports of repelled assaults. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian Forces (Ground Defensive): Actively repelling numerous Russian assaults across multiple axes (Kharkiv, Donetsk, Novopavlivka, Orikhiv, Huliaipole, Kherson, Kursk). Ukrainian General Staff reports confirm consistent defensive posture. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian Forces (Drones): "Десантно-штурмові війська ЗС України" (Ukrainian Airmobile Forces) recruitment video for FPV drone operators highlights the continued importance and active role of these assets in Ukrainian TTPs. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian Forces (Air): Continued use of tactical aviation (KABs on Kharkiv) and drone strikes on frontline positions (Huliaipole). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian Forces (Ground Offensive): Sustained multi-axis ground assaults, particularly intense on the Pokrovsk direction, and continued probing/offensive actions on Kharkiv and Sumy axes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• NATO Forces (Suwalki Gap): Deployed multinational forces are a significant deterrent and demonstrate collective defense posture. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for presence, MEDIUM for specific unit readiness).

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action:

• Capabilities:
  • Aerial Attack: Russia maintains the capability for massed aerial attacks on population centers (Kyiv, Odesa) and continued use of precision-guided munitions (KABs) on frontline areas. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Enhanced Ballistic Missiles: "Операция Z" reiterates Budanov's claim that Russia has "improved North Korean KN-23 ballistic missiles," suggesting a persistent, evolving precision strike threat. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM for "improved" claim, HIGH for continued use of KN-23).
  • Ground Attrition: Russian forces continue to conduct high-intensity ground assaults across multiple axes, accepting significant casualties for incremental territorial gains. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Information Warfare: Russia's IO remains highly adaptive, immediately amplifying claims of battlefield success ("Два майора" on British visa center, "Воин DV" on drone strikes) and fabricating narratives (list of "abandoned" AFU dead by Balitsky). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Intentions:
  • Strategic: Continue to degrade Ukraine's military and economic potential through strikes on critical infrastructure and population centers. Maintain pressure on all fronts to exhaust Ukrainian forces and force territorial concessions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Operational: Achieve tactical breakthroughs on the Pokrovsk, Kharkiv, and Sumy axes. Degrade Ukrainian defensive capabilities and logistical chains. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Information: Undermine Ukrainian morale, discredit its military and government, and project an image of Russian strength and success domestically and internationally. Exploit any perceived Western weakness or internal divisions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Diplomatic: Continue to exert influence on regional conflicts (e.g., Karabakh) to demonstrate Russia's geopolitical relevance, as highlighted by Lavrov's statements. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• Persistent Multi-Axis Ground Pressure: Ukrainian General Staff reports confirm that Russia is maintaining significant offensive pressure across at least eight different axes, suggesting a strategy to disperse Ukrainian reserves and prevent consolidation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Targeting of Civilian Infrastructure: The evident damage in Kyiv and Odesa, coupled with Russian milblogger claims of hitting civilian targets (e.g., British visa center), indicates a continued, deliberate targeting strategy of civilian and dual-use infrastructure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Refined Drone Strike Claims: Russian sources are providing more specific BDA claims for drone strikes on Huliaipole, suggesting improved drone ISR or a focus on validating their operations for IO purposes. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• Munitions: Continued large-scale missile/drone strikes and KAB usage across multiple fronts indicate sustained, though likely strained, munition supply. The reported enhancement of KN-23s (if true) suggests an ongoing effort to improve the lethality of foreign-supplied systems. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Personnel: High-tempo ground assaults across numerous axes will continue to incur heavy personnel losses for Russia, requiring constant mobilization and recruitment. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Integrated Strikes: The coordinated multi-axis ground operations and continued aerial attacks suggest effective C2 for complex offensive and strike operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Information C2: Russia's rapid and consistent messaging on Karabakh (TASS, Alex Parker Returns) and immediate exploitation of battlefield events (Два майора) demonstrates a highly centralized and responsive IO C2. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• NATO C2: The multinational deployment in Suwalki Gap (Rybar) indicates effective NATO C2 in reinforcing border security. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• Ground Forces: Maintaining a resilient defensive posture across multiple axes, repelling numerous Russian assaults. The General Staff reports show active engagement and defense on all major directions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Air Defense: Actively engaged in intercepting Russian aerial threats, as evidenced by ongoing firefighting and damage assessment, though some strikes are clearly penetrating defenses. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Deep Strike Capability: Continued successful deep strike operations within Russia (Kursk region, per Ukrainian General Staff) confirm persistent counter-offensive capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Adaptability: The focus on FPV drone operator recruitment highlights the adaptability of Ukrainian forces in leveraging innovative tactics and equipment. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Public Morale: KMIIS data (via ЦАПЛІЄНКО) indicating 52% of Ukrainians are "resolutely against any territorial concessions, even if the war is significantly longer," demonstrates high public morale and resolve. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Successes:
  • High Repulsion Rate: Ukrainian forces are successfully repelling numerous Russian assaults across all axes (e.g., 5 in Kherson, 38 in Kursk, multiple on Kharkiv and Donetsk axes).
  • Sustained Cross-Border Pressure: Continued defensive/counter-offensive actions in Kursk region force Russia to allocate resources to internal defense.
  • Resilient Public Will: Public opinion data indicates strong national resolve against territorial concessions, which is crucial for long-term resistance.
• Setbacks:
  • Civilian Casualties and Infrastructure Damage: Significant damage to residential and commercial buildings in Kyiv and Odesa underscores the continued vulnerability of civilian centers to Russian strikes.
  • Persistent Frontline Pressure: The sheer number of Russian assaults across multiple axes indicates the enduring pressure on Ukrainian forces and the attritional nature of the conflict.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• Air Defense: Urgent need for more advanced AD systems and munitions to counter enhanced ballistic missile threats and reduce collateral damage from sustained aerial attacks. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ground Forces: Continued requirement for ammunition, equipment, and personnel to sustain defensive operations against high-intensity, multi-axis assaults. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Humanitarian Aid/Reconstruction: Immediate need for resources for search and rescue, medical aid, and emergency housing for civilians affected by the Kyiv and Odesa strikes. Long-term, reconstruction efforts will be substantial. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Medical Capacity: Continued need for medical supplies and infrastructure to handle combat casualties and civilian injuries (as evidenced by photos of damaged buildings and the need for cleanup efforts). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Narratives:
  • Exaggerated Successes: TASS and Russian milbloggers (Alex Parker Returns, Два майора, Воин DV) consistently claim destruction of Ukrainian military assets and civilian targets (British visa center) to project dominance and effectiveness.
  • Moral Depravity/Disunity: Balitsky's list of "abandoned" Ukrainian soldiers is a clear attempt to undermine Ukrainian morale, create internal divisions, and project an image of Ukrainian callousness towards its dead. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Domestic Diversions: Continued focus on US protests (АРХАНГЕЛ СПЕЦНАЗА) and the Greta Thunberg story (Colonelcassad, ASTRA, Alex Parker Returns) to distract from the war and portray Western instability or hypocrisy.
  • Geopolitical Reassertion: Russian MFA statements on Karabakh (TASS, Alex Parker Returns) demonstrate an effort to project Russia's diplomatic influence in its near abroad.
• Ukrainian Counter-Narratives:
  • Exposure of War Crimes: Immediate dissemination of civilian damage (Kyiv, Odesa) and calls for AD support serve to highlight Russian aggression and rally international condemnation.
  • Military Effectiveness: General Staff reports on repelled assaults across multiple axes reinforce Ukrainian resilience and defensive capabilities.
  • National Unity/Resolve: KMIIS polling on territorial concessions directly counters Russian efforts to break Ukrainian will.
  • Transparency/Warning: Budanov's statements on KN-23 enhancement serve to inform and prepare the population and international partners for evolving threats.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Ukrainian Morale:
  • Resilience & Anger: The widespread attacks on civilian targets will likely deepen anger but also reinforce national unity and resolve to resist.
  • Solidarity: Cleanup efforts in Dnipropetrovsk (Сергій Лисак) suggest continued strong civilian support and community spirit, which is a key morale indicator.
  • Determination to Resist: KMIIS poll results are a strong indicator of high public resolve against territorial concessions.
• Russian Morale:
  • Reinforced "Victory" Narrative: Continued claims of battlefield successes and strikes on Kyiv/Odesa are designed to maintain domestic support for the war.
  • Justification for Repression: The internal security measures and judicial actions (as previously reported) continue to suppress dissent and maintain an outward appearance of internal stability.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• Condemnation of Strikes: The civilian nature of targets in Kyiv and Odesa will likely elicit strong international condemnation and calls for increased humanitarian and military aid. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• NATO Vigilance: The detailed Rybar map on Suwalki Gap forces underscores the importance of NATO's eastern flank and the need for continued vigilance and reinforcement. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Arms Supply Debates: Trump's comments (Шеф Hayabusa) suggesting an oversupply of weapons to "one country" (implicitly Ukraine) could foreshadow future debates or constraints on Western military aid. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for political statement, LOW-MEDIUM for immediate policy change).
• Geopolitical Alignment: Russia's explicit recognition of Karabakh as Azerbaijani territory (TASS, Alex Parker Returns) demonstrates Russia's active role in shaping regional dynamics, potentially affecting future diplomatic alignments. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• Sustained Multi-Axis Ground Offensives: Russia will maintain intense, attritional ground assaults on the Pokrovsk and Kharkiv axes, aiming to achieve incremental gains and tie down Ukrainian forces. They will continue probing attacks on the Sumy axis. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Targeted Aerial Strikes on Civilian and Dual-Use Infrastructure: Russia will continue to conduct aerial attacks on Ukrainian cities, focusing on energy, transportation, and military-industrial infrastructure, and accepting collateral damage to civilian areas. The reported enhanced KN-23s will be employed against high-value targets. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Increased Use of KABs and FPV Drones: Russian forces will intensify the use of KABs to clear and soften defensive positions on the front lines and continue FPV drone interdiction on Ukrainian logistics and personnel movements. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Aggressive Information Operations: Russia will continue its multifaceted IO campaign, immediately exploiting battlefield events, fabricating claims of Ukrainian losses, and spreading narratives designed to erode Ukrainian morale and internal unity, while distracting from the war with unrelated international events. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Continued Diplomatic Signaling: Russia will continue to use diplomatic channels and statements (e.g., on Karabakh) to project influence and challenge perceived Western dominance in specific regions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• Breakthrough on a Major Axis: Russia achieves a localized operational breakthrough on either the Pokrovsk or Kharkiv axis, exploiting Ukrainian force dispersal and limited reserves, leading to a rapid advance that outflanks existing defensive lines. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM-HIGH)
• Coordinated Escalation in Suwalki Gap: Russia initiates a deliberate, deniable hybrid operation in the Suwalki Corridor, potentially involving "green men" or significant cyber attacks, aiming to test NATO's Article 5 and create a crisis on the alliance's eastern flank. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Widespread Use of High-Precision Ballistic Missiles: Russia employs its allegedly enhanced KN-23 ballistic missiles in a coordinated strike against multiple critical military and government C2 nodes across Ukraine, aiming to disrupt command and control and degrade strategic response capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Next 6-12 Hours (Immediate Threat): Continued Russian ground assaults on multiple axes, particularly Pokrovsk and Kharkiv. Ukrainian AD units remain on high alert for follow-on missile/drone strikes on cities. Decision point: allocation of emergency response and medical teams to damaged areas in Kyiv and Odesa. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Next 12-24 Hours: Sustained, high-intensity ground combat. Russian IO will continue to amplify claims of success and undermine Ukrainian will. Ukrainian decision points include rapid analysis of new BDA from all strikes to refine AD strategies and munition requirements. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Next 24-72 Hours: Potential for renewed large-scale aerial attacks on Ukrainian cities, possibly incorporating refined missile capabilities. Heightened risk of intensified Russian ground pressure to capitalize on AD attrition. Ukrainian decision points include urgent international diplomatic engagement to secure more advanced AD and continued military aid, as well as maintaining vigilance on all border areas, especially with NATO. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

6. RECOMMENDATIONS

• Air Defense & Force Protection:

  1. IMMEDIATE: Prioritize rapid damage assessment (BDA) for the impacts in Kyiv and Odesa, especially for any potential indicators of enhanced missile precision (e.g., KN-23 variants).
  2. URGENT: Reinforce air defense coverage for Kyiv, Odesa, and other critical infrastructure, especially with systems capable of ballistic missile interception.
  3. CRITICAL: Expedite requests for additional Western AD systems and interceptor munitions, emphasizing the increased threat from potentially enhanced KN-23 missiles.

• Ground Forces:

  1. IMMEDIATE: Maintain maximum vigilance and readiness on the Pokrovsk and Kharkiv axes, reinforcing defensive positions and preparing for sustained high-intensity assaults.
  2. URGENT: Continue proactive reconnaissance and counter-battery fire on the Sumy axis to disrupt any Russian force build-up or offensive preparations.
  3. ONGOING: Integrate lessons learned from repelling multi-axis assaults, focusing on rapid response, counter-drone measures, and resilient logistics.

• Intelligence & Special Operations:

  1. IMMEDIATE: Prioritize SIGINT, IMINT, and HUMINT collection on all aspects of North Korean-Russian military cooperation, particularly missile technology transfer and production, as per Budanov's statements.
  2. URGENT: Intensify ISR in the Suwalki Corridor and other sensitive border areas, in coordination with NATO partners, to detect any indicators of "green men" activity, hybrid operations, or force build-ups.
  3. ONGOING: Continue deep strike operations against Russian military-industrial targets and logistical nodes to disrupt their war-making capacity. Focus on confirmed targets from previous reports for BDA.
  4. ANALYZE: Monitor Russian claims regarding "abandoned" Ukrainian soldiers and develop counter-narratives based on verified facts regarding POW treatment and repatriation efforts.

• Information Operations:

  1. IMMEDIATE: Launch a comprehensive IO campaign highlighting the severity of Russian strikes on civilian infrastructure in Kyiv and Odesa, emphasizing civilian casualties and the disregard for international law. Use graphic imagery (e.g., damaged pharmacy building) to amplify impact.
  2. URGENT: Counter Russian disinformation regarding "abandoned" Ukrainian soldiers by disseminating information on Ukrainian efforts to repatriate remains and conduct prisoner exchanges.
  3. URGENT: Reinforce public messaging regarding national unity and resilience against territorial concessions, using KMIIS data to bolster morale and deter Russian psychological operations.
  4. ONGOING: Work with international partners to expose and condemn Russia's deepening military alliances (e.g., with North Korea) and their impact on global security.
  5. CRITICAL: Advocate for increased international aid, explicitly linking the need for more advanced AD systems to Russia's continued targeting of civilian areas and the evolving missile threat.