Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR) TIME OF REPORT: 09 JUN 25 / 23:37 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 09 JUN 25 / 23:07 ZULU - 09 JUN 25 / 23:37 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk CLASSIFICATION: TOP SECRET / ORCON / NOFORN

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• AOR Update: The current operational picture is dominated by an ongoing, high-intensity Russian aerial assault focused heavily on Kyiv Oblast and Kyiv City, with secondary attention on Odesa Oblast and persistent ground pressure in Donetsk and Sumy Oblasts. Ukraine continues deep strikes within Russia. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Kyiv Under Direct Drone/Ballistic Threat (UPDATE): Multiple sources confirm continued waves of Shahed UAVs and ballistic missiles targeting Kyiv. Explosions reported in Kyiv's Desnyanskyi district (Klitschko). Shaheds continue to traverse Cherkasy Oblast towards Kyiv Oblast, with "Николаевский Ванёк" reporting 8-13 UAVs heading for Kyiv. KMWTA issues stay-in-shelter orders. Confirmed damage in Desnyanskyi, Obolonskyi, and Shevchenkivskyi districts (KMWTA, Operatyvny ZSU). Russian milbloggers (NGP RazVedka) are actively posting videos claiming successful "Geran" (Shahed) strikes in Boryspil, showing large fires and secondary detonations, mocking "children's toys" as stored contents. They also claim Kyiv residents dropped a missile on themselves, reinforcing a narrative of Ukrainian AD failures. Klitschko reports several enemy UAVs entering central Kyiv. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Odesa Maternity Hospital Struck (CONFIRMED/BDA Ongoing): Multiple Ukrainian sources (РБК-Україна, STERNENKO, ЦАПЛІЄНКО, Оперативний ЗСУ) confirm a drone strike on a maternity hospital in Odesa. Photos show significant damage to the administrative section, shattered glass, debris, and emergency services personnel on site. Russian milbloggers are mocking this strike, portraying it as a "lesson." (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - on strike and initial damage, MEDIUM - on full extent of damage/casualties, HIGH - on Russian mockery).
• Russian Internal Affairs: TASS reports over 150 settlements liberated by Russian forces since the start of the year (propaganda claim). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - as Russian claim).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• Continuation of Air Operations: Clear weather conditions remain conducive to the widespread aerial assaults from Russia and Ukrainian deep strike operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Impact of Strikes: Confirmed explosions and damage in multiple Kyiv districts and the confirmed strike on a maternity hospital in Odesa will place significant strain on emergency services and pose immediate environmental and humanitarian concerns in urban areas. The alleged secondary detonation in Boryspil suggests potential for hazardous material release or significant infrastructure damage. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces (Air Defense): AD is actively engaged in Kyiv Oblast and Kyiv City against multiple groups of Shahed UAVs and ballistic missiles. Initial reports of AD effectiveness are mixed, with confirmed impacts in Kyiv and Odesa, but also implied interceptions (e.g., NGP RazVedka mocking AD failures). AD remains on high alert. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ukrainian Forces (Ground): No new significant ground disposition changes reported in this period. Focus remains on air defense and consequence management. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Forces (Air): Continued employment of Shahed UAVs across multiple axes, with primary focus on Kyiv. Videos from Russian sources confirm kinetic strikes and subsequent damage/fires. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Forces (Ground): No new significant ground disposition changes reported. Russian claims of liberated settlements are likely broad, long-term propaganda and not reflective of immediate tactical advances. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Forces (Information Operations): Russia continues its multi-pronged IO, focusing on explicit psychological intimidation (direct threats to Kyiv, "Борисполь не нужен" - "Boryspil is not needed"), immediate mockery and justification of civilian casualties (Odesa maternity hospital, "children's toys" in Boryspil), and discrediting Ukrainian AD (claiming missiles are self-inflicted). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action:

• Capabilities:
  • Air: Russia continues to demonstrate the capability to conduct sustained, multi-wave strikes with Shahed UAVs, concentrating assets on high-value targets like Kyiv and other major urban centers. Their ability to generate secondary detonations and large fires (Boryspil) indicates successful targeting of storage or sensitive facilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Ground: No new ground capabilities demonstrated in this reporting period beyond standard attritional operations. Russian claims of "liberated settlements" are propagandistic. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
  • Hybrid/Information Operations (IO): Russia's IO remains highly sophisticated and aggressive. They are actively utilizing real-time events to amplify narratives, engage in explicit psychological warfare, and rapidly justify alleged war crimes with grotesque mockery. The coordination of kinetic strikes with real-time, mocking IO is a key aspect of their hybrid warfare strategy. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Intentions:
  • Strategic: To continue to degrade Ukraine's military and civilian will, especially through relentless strikes on Kyiv and other major population centers, and to exhaust Ukrainian air defenses, opening pathways for more destructive strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Operational: To overwhelm Ukrainian AD in key urban areas, particularly Kyiv, through continuous waves of drones and potentially missiles. To inflict maximal civilian casualties and damage critical infrastructure to break morale. To test Ukrainian defenses and create psychological effects with explicit threats and mocking narratives. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Information: To control both domestic and international narratives, justify their actions, portray Western instability (less present in this window), and demoralize the Ukrainian population by mocking their AD and celebrating strikes on civilian targets, including protected sites like hospitals. To deflect attention from the impact of Ukrainian deep strikes within Russia by projecting overwhelming Russian success. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• Concentrated Follow-on Strikes: The immediate follow-up of multiple Shahed groups and ballistic missile threats directly targeting Kyiv and its surrounding districts after initial widespread attacks demonstrates a concerted effort to maximize impact on the capital. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Heightened Explicit Psychological Warfare: The direct, mocking threats and justifications by NGP RazVedka (e.g., "Boryspil not needed," "Kyiv residents dropped missile on themselves," mocking "children's toys" and "maternity hospital lesson") are becoming more depraved and synchronized with kinetic events. This represents a significant escalation in their psychological intimidation campaign, designed to break morale and normalize atrocities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Immediate Narrative Control: Russian milbloggers are very quick to provide their "explanation" and mockery of strikes, even on clearly civilian targets, indicating a well-rehearsed and responsive IO apparatus. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• Ammunition & Missiles: The continued ability to launch multiple waves of Shaheds and ballistic missiles, and NGP RazVedka's claim of "Gerans for another two hours," indicates ongoing, albeit potentially strained, production and/or strategic reserves. The focus on UAVs may be a strategic choice to conserve more expensive cruise/ballistic missiles. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM-HIGH).
• Personnel: No new information on personnel sustainment. Russian claims of "liberated settlements" are likely for morale boosting. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Centralized Coordination: The synchronized nature of kinetic strikes with explicit, real-time psychological warfare demonstrates effective centralized C2 for integrated multi-domain operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• IO Integration: The seamless and immediate integration of claims, justifications, and threats by Russian milbloggers during ongoing strikes highlights a sophisticated and highly responsive IO apparatus, likely with direct or indirect guidance from higher command. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• Air Defense: Ukrainian AD remains on maximum alert and is actively engaged against multiple waves of Shaheds and ballistic missiles targeting Kyiv and Odesa Oblasts. The confirmed impacts in multiple Kyiv districts and Odesa suggest challenges in achieving 100% interception against saturating attacks. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ground Forces: Maintaining current defensive postures. Primary focus is on supporting AD efforts and managing consequences of strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Successes:
  • Continued AD Performance: Active engagement against multiple waves of UAVs and missiles, preventing even more widespread damage and casualties. The AD system is still functioning under immense pressure.
• Setbacks:
  • Direct Hits on Kyiv: Confirmed impacts and damage in Desnyanskyi, Obolonskyi, and Shevchenkivskyi districts, indicating some penetration of AD in the capital, leading to potential civilian casualties and infrastructure damage.
  • Maternity Hospital Strike: The confirmed drone strike on a maternity hospital in Odesa is a severe setback in terms of civilian impact, international perception, and a potential war crime.
  • Sustained Pressure: The ongoing, high-intensity air assault across multiple regions continues to place immense strain on Ukrainian AD assets and personnel, leading to high expenditure of interceptors.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• Air Defense Munitions: Continued high rate of expenditure of AD interceptors, particularly for systems protecting Kyiv and Odesa, due to successive waves of mixed threats. Urgent resupply is paramount to sustain defense. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• ISR Assets: Critical need for real-time BDA on strikes in Kyiv and Odesa to assess damage and casualties, identify specific targets, and to counter Russian disinformation. Continued need for ISR on Russian launch points and force concentrations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Emergency Response & Medical Support: The confirmed strike on a maternity hospital and widespread damage in Kyiv will necessitate significant emergency services, medical support, and psychological aid. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Counter-IO: Immediate and robust counter-IO is required to refute Russian justifications for targeting the Odesa maternity hospital, and to counter the explicit threats against Kyiv and other cities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Escalated Psychological Warfare: NGP RazVedka's direct, mocking, and dehumanizing threats against Kyiv, Boryspil ("not needed"), and the rapid justification of the Odesa maternity hospital strike as a "lesson" represents a new and depraved level of explicit psychological intimidation, directly linked to ongoing kinetic strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• War Crime Justification & Mockery: The immediate and depraved justification by NGP RazVedka of the Odesa maternity hospital strike, framing it as a "lesson" and mocking "children's toys" stored in a "warehouse" (referencing Boryspil), is a critical and deeply concerning escalation in Russian IO. This signals an open willingness to target and celebrate attacks on protected civilian facilities and then mock the victims. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Fabricated Battlefield Successes: TASS's claim of "over 150 liberated settlements" is a broad, likely inflated, propaganda claim designed to project an image of overwhelming Russian ground success and consolidate domestic support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Discrediting Ukrainian AD: Russian milbloggers are directly trying to sow doubt and fear by claiming Ukrainian AD is causing self-inflicted damage (e.g., "Kyiv residents dropped a missile on themselves"). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Ukrainian Morale:
  • Severe Strain: The direct, sustained air assault on Kyiv, confirmed impacts in multiple districts, and the devastating strike on a maternity hospital in Odesa will place immense strain on civilian morale, a sense of security, and trust in safe zones.
  • Resilience via AD & Response: Continued active AD engagements and rapid emergency response efforts will be crucial to counter negative morale impacts and demonstrate resilience.
• Russian Morale:
  • Reinforced Aggression: The aggressive and mocking tone of Russian IO aims to consolidate support among hardliners and demonize Ukraine, reinforcing their narrative of military necessity and success.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• Heightened Condemnation: The ongoing mass air assault, particularly the direct threats to Kyiv and the confirmed strike on a maternity hospital, will undoubtedly draw increased international condemnation and likely renewed calls for stronger support for Ukraine, including more advanced AD systems and interceptors. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• Continued Massed Air Assault on Key Cities (Kyiv Focus): Russia will likely continue its current high-intensity air assault, focusing heavily on Kyiv and its surrounding oblast (Boryspil, Brovary), and other major urban centers (Odesa), aiming to exhaust AD, inflict maximal civilian casualties, and degrade critical infrastructure. This will involve successive waves of Shahed UAVs, potentially mixed with ballistic/cruise missiles. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Intensified, More Depraved Psychological Operations: Russian IO will continue its explicit psychological intimidation, directly naming target cities, mocking Ukrainian AD, and rapidly generating justifications for strikes on civilian infrastructure, including medical facilities, with increasingly grotesque and dehumanizing language. They will continue to amplify claims of Ukrainian losses and Western instability. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Persistent Attritional Ground Operations: Ground assaults in Donetsk (Pokrovsk, Chasiv Yar) will continue with high intensity, maintaining pressure and attempting localized advances. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• Targeted Strike on Senior Political/Military Leadership or Major C2 Node in Kyiv: Following the saturation attacks, Russia attempts a precision strike (e.g., Kinzhal, Iskander) on a known or suspected senior leadership location or a major C2 facility in Kyiv, attempting to decapitate Ukrainian command. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Widespread Use of Chemical Weapons (False Flag or Direct): In conjunction with or as a follow-up to mass aerial attacks, Russia attempts a false flag chemical attack or directly employs non-lethal/incapacitating chemical agents in an urban area to induce panic and force a rapid collapse of civilian resistance, blaming Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: LOW, but with catastrophic impact)

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Next 2-6 Hours (Immediate Threat): The current mass air assault on Kyiv, including ongoing Shahed and potential ballistic missile threats, will continue. Ukrainian AD will remain heavily engaged. Decision points for Ukrainian command involve dynamic allocation of AD assets, immediate response to civilian casualties and damage (especially for the confirmed maternity hospital strike), and urgent counter-IO. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Next 6-24 Hours: Expect follow-on waves of aerial attacks, potentially focusing on areas with perceived AD vulnerabilities or areas that have just been struck to hinder recovery efforts. Russian IO will rapidly consolidate narratives around the current strikes, particularly the Odesa hospital. Ukrainian decision points will involve post-strike assessment, managing AD munition resupply, and immediate, aggressive counter-IO to manage domestic and international perception. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Next 24-48 Hours: Continued, but likely reduced, aerial harassment. Ground operations in Donetsk will remain high. Russian IO will persist with new, aggressive narratives. Ukrainian decision points will focus on strategic resupply of AD, assessing long-term impact on Russian capabilities from Ukrainian deep strikes, and further developing multi-layered counter-IO strategies. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

6. RECOMMENDATIONS

• Air Defense & Force Protection:

  1. IMMEDIATE: Maintain maximum AD readiness for Kyiv, Kyiv Oblast (Boryspil/Brovary), Sumy Oblast (Romny), and Odesa due to active Shahed and ballistic missile threats. Prioritize protection of critical civilian infrastructure, particularly medical facilities and residential areas.
  2. URGENT: Conduct rapid BDA for all reported impacts in Kyiv and Odesa, especially the confirmed maternity hospital strike. This information is critical for humanitarian response, legal documentation of war crimes, and counter-IO.
  3. CRITICAL: Re-evaluate AD asset allocation based on the ongoing mass attacks and explicit Russian threats against Kyiv and other cities. Expedite emergency requests for additional interceptor munitions, emphasizing the high expenditure rate on Shaheds.
  4. TACTICAL ADAPTATION: Develop and implement tactical AD adjustments (e.g., passive defenses, mobile AD teams, counter-drone technologies) to mitigate saturation attacks by cheap UAVs and conserve high-value interceptors.

• Ground Forces:

  1. ONGOING: Maintain robust defensive postures on all active fronts. No new ground developments require immediate changes in force posture, but vigilance on the Dnipropetrovsk and Sumy axes against Russian feints or opportunistic advances is crucial.

• Intelligence & Special Operations:

  1. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: All-source ISR assets must be focused on documenting and verifying the Odesa maternity hospital strike. This requires rapid, on-the-ground verification, satellite imagery, forensic analysis of munitions, and detailed casualty/damage assessment. This is paramount for legal action against Russia.
  2. URGENT: Continue to track and assess the impact of Ukrainian deep strikes on Russian internal security (e.g., airport closures, public responses to drone threats). This provides crucial leverage for future operations and highlights the real cost of the war for Russia.
  3. ONGOING: Continue the deep strike campaign against Russian military-industrial targets and logistics to degrade their ability to sustain such large-scale aerial assaults. Prioritize targets impacting missile and drone production/launch capabilities.

• Information Operations:

  1. IMMEDIATE: Launch an aggressive, international counter-IO campaign condemning the strike on the Odesa maternity hospital as a blatant war crime. Rapidly disseminate verifiable evidence (photos of damage, emergency responders) and highlight the explicit justification of this attack by Russian milbloggers (NGP RazVedka) as irrefutable evidence of deliberate targeting of civilians and a profound moral depravity. Emphasize the direct contradiction with international law and norms.
  2. IMMEDIATE: Publicly address and condemn Russia's explicit psychological threats against Kyiv, Boryspil, Lubny, and Khmelnytskyi, emphasizing these as acts of state terror and deliberate psychological warfare against civilian populations.
  3. URGENT: Continue to widely publicize the efforts of Ukrainian AD and emergency services in mitigating damage and saving lives during ongoing mass attacks to maintain domestic morale and international confidence. Do not fall into the trap of overstating AD successes if impacts are significant.
  4. ONGOING: Exploit the temporary closure of Moscow and Saratov airports due to UAV threats as evidence of Ukrainian deep strike effectiveness and the real impact of the war on Russian territory. Highlight Russian censorship efforts (fines for publishing drone strike footage) as a sign of weakness and lack of transparency.
  5. ONGOING: Counter Russian efforts to amplify Western internal divisions by consistently redirecting focus to Russian war crimes, human rights abuses, and internal instability.