Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR) TIME OF REPORT: 09 JUN 25 / 23:07 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 09 JUN 25 / 22:37 ZULU - 09 JUN 25 / 23:07 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk CLASSIFICATION: TOP SECRET / ORCON / NOFORN

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• AOR Update: The widespread air assault continues, with immediate focus on Kyiv Oblast (Borispol/Brovary), Kyiv City, and Sumy Oblast (Romny). Russian claims of strikes on Odesa (Chornomorsk) and direct threats to Lubny and Kyiv are active. Moscow airports temporarily closed due to UAV threat, then reopened, followed by Saratov airport closure. This indicates continued Ukrainian deep strike capability and Russian internal security concerns. A Leopard 2 tank is shown in a wooded area, camouflaged, likely in a forward position. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• New Developments (UKR):
  • Kyiv Under Direct Drone/Ballistic Threat: Air Force of the AFU, RBK-Ukraine, and Nikolaevskiy Vanek confirm multiple groups of Shahed UAVs heading towards Boryspil/Brovary in Kyiv Oblast, then directly towards Kyiv City. Explosions are confirmed in Kyiv. Tsaplienko reports a Shahed strike in a central district of Kyiv. Nikolaevskiy Vanek reports 3 Shaheds over Kyiv and active AD. Air Force of the AFU reports a high-speed target over Sumy Oblast, and a ballistic missile threat from the northeast. Romny, Sumy Oblast, is ordered to shelter. Nikolaevskiy Vanek confirms ballistic missile threat to Brovary/Kyiv, citing launch from Kursk. STERNENKO confirms Kyiv is under ballistic missile attack with loud explosions. Air Force of the AFU warns of an incoming missile to Kyiv. RBK-Ukraine confirms powerful explosions in Kyiv. UPDATE: Kyiv Mayor Klitschko confirms preliminary drone impact in Desnyanskyi district, Kyiv, with emergency services en route. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Odesa Maternity Hospital Struck (Alleged): Nikolaevskiy Vanek reports a "moped" (Shahed) hit a maternity hospital in Odesa. This is a critical, potentially war crime, development. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - as reported by Ukrainian source, requiring independent verification).
  • Moscow Airport Closures: RBK-Ukraine confirms Moscow airports (Vnukovo, Domodedovo, Zhukovsky, Sheremetyevo) activated "Carpet Plan" (flight restrictions) due to UAV threat, then reports temporary lifting of restrictions. This indicates Ukrainian deep strike effectiveness. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• New Developments (RU):
  • Russian Threats Against Kyiv, Brovary, Lubny, Khmelnytskyi: НгП раZVедка explicitly states "Boryspil is not sleeping," "Brovary is so worthless," "Kyiv is too quiet. But it won't take long to fix that," and "Starting to [curse/beat] Kyiv." They also ask "Does anyone need Khmelnytskyi?" and explicitly state "Lubny is a rather worthless town. Not needed." This is direct, aggressive psychological warfare and targeting. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Russian Claims of Strikes on Chornomorsk: НгП раZVедка claims "Chornomorsk got hit in the face." (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - as Russian claim).
  • Russian Confirmation of Moscow Airport Closures: TASS and Новости Москвы confirm temporary flight restrictions at all Moscow airports due to UAV threat, then TASS reports lifting of restrictions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Russian Internal Affairs - Pension Payments: TASS reports early pension payouts in Russia due to Russia Day. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Russian Narrative of US Internal Conflicts: TASS amplifies Senator Pushkov's opinion that US internal conflicts are growing and threaten to split the country, a clear IO effort to deflect and portray Western instability. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Leopard 2 Tank Video (Russian Trophy Claim): Colonelcassad posts a video of a Leopard 2 tank, camouflaged with mud, with an operator visible, captioned "Another valuable trophy." This video depicts a stationary tank, with turret rotation and engine running. It is unclear if this is a captured tank, or an opportunistic filming of a Ukrainian tank in a rear area for propaganda purposes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - as Russian publication, MEDIUM - as confirmed trophy, LOW - as tactical impact of trophy).
  • Saratov Airport Closure: TASS reports temporary flight restrictions at Saratov airport. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• Continuation of Air Operations: Clear weather conditions remain conducive to the widespread aerial assaults from Russia and Ukrainian deep strike operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Impact of Strikes: The confirmed explosions in Kyiv and Odesa, and the alleged maternity hospital strike in Odesa, will place significant strain on emergency services and pose immediate environmental and humanitarian concerns in urban areas. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces (Air Defense): AD is actively engaged in Kyiv Oblast and Kyiv City against multiple groups of Shahed UAVs and ballistic missiles. AD is also active in Sumy Oblast against a high-speed target. Confirmed successes against sea-launched drones targeting Odesa. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ukrainian Forces (Ground): No new significant ground disposition changes reported in this period. The Leopard 2 tank video from Colonelcassad is unverified as a trophy and may represent a Ukrainian tank in a concealed position. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Russian Forces (Air): Continued employment of Shahed UAVs and ballistic missiles across multiple axes, with new threats to Kyiv and Sumy. Moscow airports temporarily closed, indicating the impact of Ukrainian deep strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Forces (Ground): No new significant ground disposition changes reported in this period. Russian IO continues to generate narratives regarding ground advances and "trophies" (e.g., Leopard 2 tank). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Forces (Information Operations): Russia continues its multi-pronged IO, focusing on psychological intimidation (explicit threats to Kyiv, Lubny, Khmelnytskyi), distraction (US internal conflicts, Russian pension payments), and false claims of battlefield successes or "trophies." The rapid mocking justification of the Odesa maternity hospital strike is a key, egregious element of their IO. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action:

• Capabilities:
  • Air: Russia maintains the capability to conduct simultaneous, multi-wave strikes with Shahed UAVs and ballistic missiles across broad geographical areas, as demonstrated by the current assault on Kyiv, Sumy, and Odesa. Their ability to force temporary closures of Moscow airports underscores Ukrainian deep strike effectiveness against their own territory. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Ground: No new ground capabilities demonstrated in this reporting period. The Leopard 2 video is unverified as a captured vehicle. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
  • Hybrid/Information Operations (IO): Russia's IO remains sophisticated and highly aggressive. They are actively utilizing real-time events to amplify narratives (US internal conflicts), engage in explicit psychological warfare (direct threats to Kyiv and other cities), and rapidly justify alleged war crimes (Odesa maternity hospital). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Intentions:
  • Strategic: To continue to degrade Ukraine's military and civilian will, especially through targeted strikes on Kyiv and other major population centers, and to exhaust Ukrainian air defenses. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Operational: To overwhelm Ukrainian AD in key urban areas, particularly Kyiv, through continuous waves of drones and ballistic missiles. To inflict civilian casualties and damage critical infrastructure to break morale. To test Ukrainian defenses and create psychological effects with explicit threats against specific cities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Information: To control both domestic and international narratives, justifying their actions, portraying Western instability, and demoralizing the Ukrainian population by mocking their AD and celebrating strikes on civilian targets. To deflect attention from the impact of Ukrainian deep strikes within Russia. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• Focused Air Assault on Kyiv: The shift of multiple Shahed groups and ballistic missile threats directly to Kyiv City and Kyiv Oblast (Boryspil/Brovary) indicates a concentrated effort to strike the capital directly in this reporting period, following initial widespread attacks. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Explicit Psychological Warfare: The verbal threats from NGP RazVedka directly naming Kyiv, Brovary, Lubny, and Khmelnytskyi, and mocking Ukrainian AD, represent an intensification of direct psychological intimidation, synchronized with kinetic strikes. The rapid and depraved justification of the alleged Odesa maternity hospital strike shows a new, more brazen, and open acknowledgment of civilian targeting. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Internal Security Response to Deep Strikes: The temporary closure of Moscow airports, followed by Saratov airport, indicates a real and evolving Russian response to Ukrainian deep strikes, adapting their civilian air traffic control for security reasons. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• Ammunition & Missiles: The continued ability to launch multiple waves of Shaheds and ballistic missiles demonstrates ongoing, albeit potentially strained, production and/or strategic reserves. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM-HIGH).
• Personnel: No new information on personnel sustainment. The "Leopard 2 trophy" claim is likely for morale boosting. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Centralized Coordination: The synchronized nature of kinetic strikes with explicit, real-time psychological warfare (NGP RazVedka's threats) demonstrates effective centralized C2 for integrated operations. The rapid, coordinated response to internal security concerns (Moscow airport closures) also indicates effective centralized control. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• IO Integration: The seamless and immediate integration of claims, justifications, and threats by Russian milbloggers during ongoing strikes highlights a sophisticated and highly responsive IO apparatus. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• Air Defense: Ukrainian AD remains on high alert and is actively engaged against multiple waves of Shaheds and ballistic missiles targeting Kyiv and Sumy Oblasts. Initial reports indicate successful AD against sea-launched drones in Odesa. This demonstrates continued high readiness and capability in response to ongoing threats. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ground Forces: Maintaining current defensive postures. The appearance of a Leopard 2 in a Russian propaganda video does not necessarily indicate a loss but requires further assessment. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Successes:
  • Continued AD Performance: Active and successful engagement against multiple waves of UAVs and ballistic missiles, particularly in Kyiv and Odesa, preventing more widespread damage and casualties. The reported "minus" on sea-launched drones in Odesa.
  • Imposed Cost on Russia: Ukrainian deep strikes continue to force Russian internal security measures, as evidenced by the temporary closure of Moscow and Saratov airports.
• Setbacks:
  • Direct Hits on Kyiv: Confirmed explosions in Kyiv and an alleged Shahed strike in a central district indicate some penetration of AD in the capital, potentially resulting in damage and casualties.
  • Civilian Casualties/Infrastructure Damage: The alleged strike on a maternity hospital in Odesa, if confirmed, represents a severe setback in terms of civilian impact and a potential war crime.
  • Sustained Pressure: The ongoing, high-intensity air assault across multiple regions continues to place immense strain on Ukrainian AD assets and personnel.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• Air Defense Munitions: Continued high rate of expenditure of AD interceptors, particularly for systems protecting Kyiv, due to successive waves of mixed threats. Urgent resupply is paramount. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• ISR Assets: Critical need for real-time BDA on strikes in Kyiv and Odesa to assess damage and casualties, and to counter Russian disinformation. Continued need for ISR on Russian launch points and force concentrations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Counter-IO: Immediate and robust counter-IO is required to refute the alleged Odesa maternity hospital strike and its subsequent Russian justification, as well as the explicit threats against Kyiv and other cities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Escalated Psychological Warfare: NGP RazVedka's direct and mocking threats against Kyiv, Brovary, Lubny, and Khmelnytskyi represent a new level of explicit psychological intimidation, directly linked to ongoing kinetic strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Justification of War Crimes: The immediate and depraved justification by NGP RazVedka of the alleged Odesa maternity hospital strike, framing it as a "lesson," is a critical and deeply concerning escalation in Russian IO. This signals an open willingness to target and celebrate attacks on protected civilian facilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Amplification of Western Internal Issues: TASS continues to amplify narratives of US internal conflict, aiming to distract and portray Western instability. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Fabricated Battlefield Successes: The "Leopard 2 trophy" video, unverified and possibly staged, is a continuation of attempts to project Russian military prowess and demoralize Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Distraction Tactics: Russian media reporting on mundane internal issues (pension payouts) serves as a distraction from the conflict's impact. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Ukrainian Morale:
  • Severe Strain: The direct, sustained air assault on Kyiv and the alleged strike on a maternity hospital in Odesa will place immense strain on civilian morale and a sense of security.
  • Resilience via AD: Continued successful AD engagements will provide a crucial counter-narrative and bolster confidence in Ukraine's defensive capabilities.
• Russian Morale:
  • Mixed: Claims of successes and "trophies" aim to boost morale, but the temporary closure of major airports due to drone threats will likely generate public concern and may subtly undermine narratives of complete control. The aggressive IO is designed to rally support around perceived grievances and victories.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• Heightened Awareness: The ongoing mass air assault, particularly the direct threats to Kyiv and the alleged maternity hospital strike, will undoubtedly draw increased international attention and likely calls for stronger condemnation and support for Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• Continued Massed Air Assault on Key Cities: Russia will continue its current high-intensity air assault, focusing on Kyiv, its surrounding oblast, and potentially other major urban centers (e.g., Lubny, Khmelnytskyi, Odesa, Zaporizhzhia). This will involve successive waves of Shahed UAVs and ballistic/cruise missiles, aiming to exhaust AD and inflict maximal civilian casualties and damage. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Intensified Psychological Operations: Russian IO will continue its explicit psychological intimidation, directly naming target cities, mocking Ukrainian AD, and rapidly generating justifications for strikes on civilian infrastructure, including medical facilities. They will continue to amplify claims of Ukrainian losses and Western instability. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Increased Internal Security Measures in Russia: Russia will continue to implement and adapt internal security measures in response to Ukrainian deep strikes, potentially including further temporary airport closures or airspace restrictions, and continued suppression of information. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Persistent Attritional Ground Operations: Ground assaults in Donetsk (Pokrovsk, Chasiv Yar) will continue with high intensity, albeit likely without significant operational breakthroughs in the immediate timeframe. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• Deployment of "Oreshnik" or Other New Weapon System: In a direct response to continued Ukrainian deep strikes or perceived AD vulnerabilities, Russia launches a novel, highly destructive weapon system ("Oreshnik" or similar) against a high-value, possibly civilian, target in Kyiv or Lviv, as previously threatened by Medinsky. This would mark a significant escalation and carry high risks of further retaliation. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Successful Mass Penetration of Kyiv AD: A coordinated Russian air attack (mixing drones and ballistic missiles) achieves a truly overwhelming penetration of Kyiv's air defenses, resulting in widespread destruction, mass casualties, and a significant degradation of critical infrastructure. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Next 2-6 Hours (Immediate Threat): The current mass air assault on Kyiv and Sumy, including ballistic missile threats, will continue. Ukrainian AD will be heavily engaged. Decision points for Ukrainian command will involve dynamic allocation of AD assets and immediate response to civilian casualties and damage, particularly for any confirmed strikes on medical facilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Next 6-24 Hours: Expect follow-on waves of aerial attacks, potentially focusing on areas with perceived AD vulnerabilities or areas that have just been struck to hinder recovery efforts. Russian IO will rapidly consolidate narratives around the current strikes. Ukrainian decision points will involve post-strike assessment, managing AD munition resupply, and immediate counter-IO to manage domestic and international perception. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Next 24-48 Hours: Continued, but likely reduced, aerial harassment. Ground operations in Donetsk will remain high. Russian IO will persist with new, aggressive narratives. Ukrainian decision points will focus on strategic resupply of AD, assessing long-term impact on Russian capabilities from Ukrainian deep strikes, and further developing multi-layered counter-IO strategies. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

6. RECOMMENDATIONS

• Air Defense & Force Protection:

  1. IMMEDIATE: Maintain maximum AD readiness for Kyiv, Kyiv Oblast (Boryspil/Brovary), Sumy Oblast (Romny), and Odesa due to active Shahed and ballistic missile threats. Prioritize protection of critical civilian infrastructure, particularly medical facilities and residential areas.
  2. URGENT: Conduct rapid BDA for all reported impacts in Kyiv and Odesa, including the alleged maternity hospital strike. This information is critical for humanitarian response and counter-IO.
  3. CRITICAL: Re-evaluate AD asset allocation based on the ongoing mass attacks and explicit Russian threats against Kyiv and other cities. Expedite emergency requests for additional interceptor munitions.

• Ground Forces:

  1. ONGOING: Maintain robust defensive postures on all active fronts. No new ground developments require immediate changes in force posture, but vigilance on the Dnipropetrovsk and Sumy axes against Russian feints is crucial.

• Intelligence & Special Operations:

  1. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: All-source ISR assets must be focused on verifying the alleged Odesa maternity hospital strike. This requires rapid, on-the-ground verification, satellite imagery, and forensic analysis.
  2. URGENT: Continue to track and assess the impact of Ukrainian deep strikes on Russian internal security (e.g., airport closures, public responses to drone threats). This provides crucial leverage for future operations.
  3. ONGOING: Continue the deep strike campaign against Russian military-industrial targets and logistics to degrade their ability to sustain such large-scale aerial assaults. Prioritize targets impacting missile and drone production/launch.

• Information Operations:

  1. IMMEDIATE: Launch an aggressive, international counter-IO campaign condemning the alleged strike on the Odesa maternity hospital as a war crime, if confirmed. Rapidly disseminate verifiable evidence and highlight the explicit justification of this attack by Russian milbloggers (NGP RazVedka) as evidence of deliberate targeting of civilians.
  2. IMMEDIATE: Publicly address and condemn Russia's explicit psychological threats against Kyiv, Brovary, Lubny, and Khmelnytskyi, emphasizing these as acts of terror and deliberate psychological warfare against civilian populations.
  3. URGENT: Continue to widely publicize the high success rate of Ukrainian AD against ongoing mass attacks to maintain domestic morale and international confidence.
  4. ONGOING: Exploit the temporary closure of Moscow and Saratov airports due to UAV threats as evidence of Ukrainian deep strike effectiveness and the real impact of the war on Russian territory. Highlight Russian censorship efforts (fines for publishing drone strike footage) as a sign of weakness.
  5. ONGOING: Counter Russian efforts to amplify Western internal divisions (e.g., US riots) by focusing on Russian internal issues and war crimes.