Situation Report

OPSEC CLASSIFICATION: NATO SECRET // RELEASABLE TO UKR FORCES

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR) TIME OF REPORT: 07 JUN 25 / 21:42 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 07 JUN 25 / 21:12 ZULU - 07 JUN 25 / 21:42 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• AOR Update: Kharkiv Oblast (Kharkiv City - Kyivskyi, Osnovyanskyi, Shevchenkivskyi Districts, suburbs, Kommunar factory, recreational park, children's railway, central part, educational building near railway, Eastern parts, Western course), Volyn Oblast (Lutsk), Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (Dnipro, oblast border, Kryvyi Rih, Pavlohrad, Pleshcheevka, Malinovka, Charivne, Mezheva community, Synelnykove district, Nikopol region, Petrykivska community), Zaporizhzhia Oblast (14 populated areas, Zaporozhye direction, Orikhiv, Huliaipole, Chervonne, Malinovka), Black Sea, Azov Sea, Sumy Oblast (Sumy direction, Yunakivka, Kondratovka, Alexandropol, Klymentove, Uhroyidy, Novonikolaevka, Pisarevka, Khotin, Vorochina, Nizhnya Duvanka, Yablonovka, Andreevka, Eastern parts, Western course), Russian Federation (Kursk, Bryansk, Kaluga, Smolensk Oblasts, Moscow Region including Dubna, Podmoskovye, Moscow city (Gorbushkin Dvor, VDNKh), Pushkino, Irkutsk region - Belaya airfield; Tambov Oblast - Michurinsk; Ryazan Oblast - Dyagilevo; Belgorod Oblast - Prokhorovka-Belenikhino, Zhuravlevka, Pushkarozhadinsky, Azov - Rostov Oblast, Nizhny Novgorod Oblast - Kstovo, Sevastopol, Lipetsk Oblast, Orel Oblast, Tula Oblast - Novomoskovsk, Azot chemical plant), Southern Donetsk Direction (Fedorivka, Perbudova, Komar, Maksimovka, Razdolnoye, Vorskresenka, Poddubnoye, Velyka Novosilka, Chasov Yar), Konstantinovka direction (Novoolenovka, Novaya Poltavka, Tarasovka, Ignatovka, Zarya), Siversk direction (Serebryanka, Hryhorivka, Bilohorivka, Verkhnokamyanske, Vyimka, Ivano-Daryivka, Pereizne), Odesa Oblast, Donetsk Oblast (Pokrovsk, Kurakhovo - Alekseevka, Chasov Yar, Kramatorsk axis, Toretsk axis, Novopavlivka axis, Krasnoarmeysk-Novosergeevka, Maryinka, Dalnee, Sokol, Lipovoe, Bakhmut, Progress, Kleshcheevka), Kupyansk axis (Zahryzove, Stepova Novoselivka), Kherson axis (Mykolayivka, Berislav), Ternopil Oblast, Kyiv, Krasnoarmeysk direction, Lviv Oblast (Drohobych), Mykolaiv Oblast, Poltava Oblast, Kirovohrad Oblast.

• Key Terrain (Novomoskovsk, Tula Oblast, RF - CONFIRMED STRIKE): Multiple sources (ASTRA, Оперативний ЗСУ, STERNENKO, Операция Z, Alex Parker Returns) confirm at least five explosions in Novomoskovsk, Tula Oblast. Initial reports and video evidence suggest a strike on the "Azot" chemical plant (Eurochem). This indicates a successful Ukrainian deep strike on a key industrial facility within Russia. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - based on multiple corroborating reports, including Russian milbloggers' complaints)

• Key Terrain (Kharkiv/Sumy Oblasts - UPDATED UAV THREAT): Two new groups of Russian strike UAVs are reported in central and western Kharkiv Oblast, and one strike UAV in southern Vinnytsia Oblast. All groups are moving westward. This confirms sustained and geographically broadening aerial threat. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• The confirmed strike on the "Azot" chemical plant, particularly the "Eurochem" facility, poses a high risk of environmental contamination depending on the specific chemicals produced or stored. Potential for air quality issues, downwind hazardous plume. Immediate and comprehensive hazmat response is required. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ongoing night-time UAV operations require clear visibility for effective air defense and counter-drone measures.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces (Deep Strike): Successfully executed a deep strike on the Azot chemical plant in Novomoskovsk, Tula Oblast, demonstrating consistent capability and intent to target Russian military-industrial complex. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian Forces (Air Defense): Actively tracking and reporting incoming Russian strike UAVs across multiple oblasts, including Kharkiv, Sumy, and Vinnytsia. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian Forces (Air): Actively deploying strike UAVs in multiple directions (Kharkiv, Sumy, Vinnytsia), consistently pushing westward. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian Forces (Information Operations):
  • Damage Control/Internal Security: Russian milbloggers (Операция Z, Alex Parker Returns) quickly confirmed and complained about the Novomoskovsk attack, attempting to manage the domestic narrative. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Propaganda/Morale Boosting: Colonelcassad released a propaganda video featuring medics from the "74th Independent Motorized Rifle Brigade Reconnaissance Battalion" ("Battalion of Mad Dogs"), highlighting their professionalism, physical fitness, religious devotion, and the unit's cohesion. The video acknowledges the threat from FPV drones to evacuation routes, portraying resilience. This aims to boost internal morale and recruitment. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Diplomatic Messaging: TASS reported on a statement from Sergey Ryabkov regarding US focus on a deal with Iran. This indicates continued Russian diplomatic efforts to influence international perceptions and potential proxy conflicts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action:

• Capabilities:
  • Aerial (UAVs): Confirmed continued capability to conduct saturation strike UAV operations across multiple Ukrainian oblasts, with new western-bound groups. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Information Warfare/Internal Security: Highly capable of coordinated propaganda, quickly reacting to and attempting to control narratives around deep strikes (Novomoskovsk). Capable of producing sophisticated internal propaganda promoting military professionalism and morale (Colonelcassad's medic video). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Medical/Logistics (Demonstrated): Russian forces demonstrate an understanding of tactical combat casualty care (TCCC) principles, and logistics for medical supplies, as indicated by the equipment and training portrayed in the Colonelcassad video. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - based on propaganda portrayal vs. actual widespread capability)
• Intentions:
  • Retaliation/Overwhelm AD: Continue and likely intensify strike UAV and missile attacks across Ukraine in retaliation for deep strikes, aiming to exhaust Ukrainian AD munitions and personnel. New western-bound UAV groups indicate an intent to broaden strike areas or bypass AD. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Control Domestic Narrative: Actively manage information regarding deep strikes on Russian territory to prevent panic and maintain public support for the war. Continue to promote positive narratives about military personnel and professionalism to boost morale and recruitment. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Courses of Action (COA):

  • COA 1 (MLCOA - Sustained and Escalated Retaliatory Saturation Attacks on Urban Centers and Critical Infrastructure, Coupled with Amplified Disinformation on Humanitarian Issues and Western Divisions, with Direct Targeting of First Responders, and New Attack Vectors): Russia will continue and likely intensify KAB and missile/UAV strikes on Ukrainian urban centers, particularly Kharkiv, Sumy, Zaporizhzhia, Mykolaiv, Odesa, and Dnipropetrovsk/Kirovohrad, with an increased focus on civilian targets (kindergarten, educational buildings) to maximize terror and drain Ukrainian emergency resources. There will be an increased likelihood of deliberate targeting of first responders or "double-tap" strikes to impede rescue efforts and maximize casualties. New groups of strike UAVs moving westbound into Kharkiv, Sumy, and Vinnytsia Oblasts indicate new attack vectors or a re-focusing of efforts to overwhelm specific AD sectors, which will persist and likely broaden. Concurrently, Russia will continue a persistent and aggressive information campaign, particularly regarding body/POW exchanges (using fabricated evidence), blaming Ukraine for delays, and exploiting any perceived Western failures or internal divisions (e.g., US politics, Polish EU accession).

    • Confidence: HIGH
    • Indicators: Immediate KAB strike on central Kharkiv after previous strikes (now 2 fatalities), persistent Russian narrative on body exchange from multiple sources, Russian amplification of Zelenskiy's AD appeal, Alex Parker Returns's Musk/Trump narrative, amplification of Polish President's statement, new UAV threat in Mykolaiv/Kryvyi Rih directions and now Kirovohrad, KABs on Sumy Oblast and now Dnipropetrovsk. Injury of SES workers in Kharkiv strike. Aviation munitions threat in Zaporizhzhia. New groups of strike UAVs entering Kharkiv, Sumy, and Vinnytsia Oblasts, moving westward (Air Force of AFU). Confirmed strike on Azot chemical plant, Novomoskovsk, Tula Oblast.

  • COA 2 (Ground Offensive Support with Targeted Artillery/MLRS and Drone Strikes, while Enhancing Counter-Deep Strike Internal Security and Expanding Maritime Hybrid Operations, with Enhanced Crimean Defenses, and Increased Internal Propaganda focus alongside Divisive Narratives, with a renewed focus on medic support): Russian forces will continue to press ground offensives on existing axes (e.g., Donetsk, Novopavlivka, Pokrovsk, Konstantinovka, Sumy), supporting them with targeted artillery, MLRS, and FPV drone strikes against Ukrainian positions and C2 nodes. They will likely intensify internal security efforts to prevent and detect further Ukrainian deep strikes on Russian territory, including targeting family members of alleged participants, and maintaining and publicizing air defense alerts/interceptions in border regions (Kursk, Orel). Additionally, Russia will likely attempt to conduct further hybrid maritime operations in the Black Sea. New, specific warning systems will be implemented and publicized in Crimea (Sevastopol). Russian forces will continue to adapt ground vehicles with "cope cages" and similar improvised defenses against drones. Russia will increase internal propaganda efforts focusing on state support for veterans and promoting national unity through cultural events (e.g., Shaman concert), while simultaneously allowing the amplification of divisive internal narratives (e.g., migration/ethnic issues) through controlled channels to serve specific political objectives. Propaganda will also highlight improvements in battlefield medical care to bolster morale.

    • Confidence: HIGH
    • Indicators: Observed Grad MLRS firing (previous ISR), claimed Alexandropol strike on mortar/ammo depot (previous ISR), Russian milblogger claims of ambushing Ukrainian groups, active search for alleged drone attack participants (Colonelcassad), "Espanola" unit video demonstrating maritime sabotage, "Два майора" claims of successful Black Sea infrastructure destruction and "cope cage" fundraising. MoD Russia training video for Marines. Lipetsk/Kursk/Orel air alerts/interceptions. Russian SpN drone operations. New alert signals in Sevastopol. Kaluga airport restrictions. Russian social event showcasing veteran support. Shaman concert on TASS. Alex Parker Returns's migration/ethnic narratives. Colonelcassad's video showcasing "74th Independent Motorized Rifle Brigade Reconnaissance Battalion" medics.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• Targeting of Industrial Chemical Facilities (RF): The confirmed strike on the "Azot" chemical plant in Novomoskovsk signifies an escalation in Ukrainian deep strike targeting strategy, moving beyond fuel depots and arms factories to potentially dual-use chemical industrial targets. This suggests an intent to impact Russia's broader industrial base. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Broadening UAV Ingress Routes: The detection of a strike UAV in Vinnytsia Oblast, in addition to Kharkiv and Sumy, indicates Russia's ongoing effort to broaden its UAV attack vectors, potentially probing for AD weaknesses or targeting a wider range of objectives across central and western Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Emphasis on Medical Care in Propaganda: The detailed propaganda video showcasing frontline medics highlights a potential shift in Russian internal information strategy to address soldier welfare and bolster confidence in military support systems, likely in response to casualty rates or morale issues. It also acknowledges the effectiveness of Ukrainian FPV drones against evacuation routes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• Munitions: Continued widespread UAV attacks demonstrate Russian ability to sustain production or procurement of Shahed-type UAVs. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Military-Industrial Complex Vulnerability: The strike on the "Azot" chemical plant reinforces the vulnerability of key Russian industrial facilities to Ukrainian deep strikes, potentially impacting their ability to produce or process materials vital for military efforts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Medical Logistics: The Colonelcassad video, while propaganda, suggests some level of medical supply and equipment provision to frontline units, including advanced TCCC items. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Russian C2 demonstrates continued ability to coordinate multi-domain strikes (UAVs in Kharkiv/Sumy/Vinnytsia) and rapidly respond to deep strikes with information management. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• The structured propaganda output (e.g., Colonelcassad's medic video) indicates centralized control over key information channels. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian C2 effectively orchestrated the deep strike on Novomoskovsk and maintains active air defense posture across broad areas. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• Air Defense: Maintaining a high state of readiness, actively tracking and warning of incoming UAVs across multiple fronts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Deep Strike Capability: Demonstrated continued and escalating deep strike capability by targeting a significant industrial chemical plant in Tula Oblast, indicating a broadening of target sets. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• ISR/Threat Monitoring: Effective in identifying and reporting new UAV ingress routes, allowing for dynamic AD response. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Successes:
  • Deep Strike on Azot Chemical Plant (Novomoskovsk): This is a significant success, marking a new category of industrial target and potentially impacting Russian military-industrial output. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Persistent Threat Monitoring: Successful identification of new UAV groups in Kharkiv, Sumy, and Vinnytsia Oblasts allows for timely AD alerts and civilian protection. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Setbacks:
  • Broadening UAV Threat: The extension of strike UAV activity to Vinnytsia Oblast indicates a growing aerial threat across a wider geographical area, stretching Ukrainian AD resources. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• Air Defense Munitions & Systems: Continued high expenditure due to persistent and broadening UAV attacks. Urgent need for replenishment and additional layered AD systems. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Counter-Disinformation Capability: Urgent need for robust, proactive counter-information campaigns to neutralize aggressive Russian propaganda and highlight Ukrainian successes effectively. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Environmental Remediation/Monitoring: Potential requirement for resources to monitor and respond to environmental impacts if the Novomoskovsk chemical plant strike results in significant contamination. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - dependent on BDA)

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Propaganda (Internal & External):
  • Damage Control: Russian milbloggers quickly acknowledge and complain about the Novomoskovsk strike, indicating attempts to manage internal perception of vulnerability. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Morale Boosting/Recruitment: Colonelcassad's video on medics aims to portray the Russian military as professional, caring, and resilient, including religious undertones, to counter negative narratives and boost recruitment. It also indirectly acknowledges the effectiveness of Ukrainian FPV drones against Russian logistics. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Strategic Messaging: TASS's report on US-Iran deal negotiations reflects Russia's continuous diplomatic engagement to position itself on the world stage. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian Counter-Propaganda/Information Operations:
  • Highlighting Successes: Ukrainian channels (Оперативний ЗСУ, STERNENKO) immediately reported and amplified the Novomoskovsk strike, aiming to boost morale and demonstrate offensive capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Threat Awareness: Ukrainian Air Force and RBC-Ukraine promptly disseminate warnings about incoming UAVs, building public awareness and trust. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Negative Impact: The continued, broadening UAV attacks will sustain civilian anxiety and pressure on emergency services. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Positive Impact: Successful deep strikes on Russian territory (Novomoskovsk) will significantly boost Ukrainian public and military morale, reinforcing the perception of Ukraine's ability to strike back. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• The strike on a Russian chemical plant, especially one potentially with dual-use capabilities, may generate international discussion regarding the escalation of Ukrainian deep strikes and the implications for the Russian military-industrial complex. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian diplomatic messaging regarding US-Iran relations suggests a broader strategic intent to maintain influence in other geopolitical flashpoints, potentially diverting international attention or resources. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• MLCOA 1: Sustained and Escalated Retaliatory Saturation Attacks on Urban Centers and Critical Infrastructure, Coupled with Amplified Disinformation on Humanitarian Issues and Western Divisions, with Direct Targeting of First Responders, and New Attack Vectors (INCLUDING CHEMICAL HAZARDS): Russia will continue and likely intensify KAB and missile/UAV strikes on Ukrainian urban centers, particularly Kharkiv, Sumy, Zaporizhzhia, Mykolaiv, Odesa, Dnipropetrovsk, and Kirovohrad, with an increased focus on civilian targets (kindergarten, educational buildings) to maximize terror and drain Ukrainian emergency resources. There will be an increased likelihood of deliberate targeting of first responders or "double-tap" strikes to impede rescue efforts and maximize casualties. New groups of strike UAVs moving westbound into Kharkiv, Sumy, and Vinnytsia Oblasts indicate new attack vectors or a re-focusing of efforts to overwhelm specific AD sectors, which will persist and likely broaden in geographical scope. Concurrently, Russia will continue a persistent and aggressive information campaign, particularly regarding body/POW exchanges (using fabricated evidence), blaming Ukraine for delays, and exploiting any perceived Western failures or internal divisions (e.g., US politics, Polish EU accession). The strike on the Azot chemical plant may lead to Russian retaliatory strikes against Ukrainian chemical or industrial facilities, or an increase in strikes with a focus on creating secondary hazards.

  • Confidence: HIGH
  • Indicators: Immediate KAB strike on central Kharkiv after previous strikes (now 2 fatalities), persistent Russian narrative on body exchange from multiple sources, Russian amplification of Zelenskiy's AD appeal, Alex Parker Returns's Musk/Trump narrative, amplification of Polish President's statement, new UAV threat in Mykolaiv/Kryvyi Rih directions and now Kirovohrad, KABs on Sumy Oblast and now Dnipropetrovsk. Injury of SES workers in Kharkiv strike. Aviation munitions threat in Zaporizhzhia. New groups of strike UAVs entering Kharkiv, Sumy, and Vinnytsia Oblasts, moving westward (RBC Ukraine, Air Force of AFU). Confirmed strike on Azot chemical plant, Novomoskovsk, Tula Oblast, will provoke severe retaliation.

• MLCOA 2: Ground Offensive Support with Targeted Artillery/MLRS and Drone Strikes, while Enhancing Counter-Deep Strike Internal Security and Expanding Maritime Hybrid Operations, with Enhanced Crimean Defenses, and Increased Internal Propaganda focus alongside Divisive Narratives, with a renewed focus on medic support: Russian forces will continue to press ground offensives on existing axes (e.g., Donetsk, Novopavlivka, Pokrovsk, Konstantinovka, Sumy), supporting them with targeted artillery, MLRS, and FPV drone strikes against Ukrainian positions and C2 nodes. They will likely intensify internal security efforts to prevent and detect further Ukrainian deep strikes on Russian territory, including targeting family members of alleged participants, and maintaining and publicizing air defense alerts/interceptions in border regions (Kursk, Orel). Additionally, Russia will likely attempt to conduct further hybrid maritime operations in the Black Sea. New, specific warning systems will be implemented and publicized in Crimea (Sevastopol). Russian forces will continue to adapt ground vehicles with "cope cages" and similar improvised defenses against drones. Russia will increase internal propaganda efforts focusing on state support for veterans and promoting national unity through cultural events (e.g., Shaman concert), while simultaneously allowing the amplification of divisive internal narratives (e.g., migration/ethnic issues by Alex Parker Returns) through controlled channels to serve specific political objectives. Propaganda will also highlight improvements in battlefield medical care and troop welfare to bolster morale and recruitment.

  • Confidence: HIGH
  • Indicators: Observed Grad MLRS firing (previous ISR), claimed Alexandropol strike on mortar/ammo depot (previous ISR), Russian milblogger claims of ambushing Ukrainian groups, active search for alleged drone attack participants (Colonelcassad), "Espanola" unit video demonstrating maritime sabotage, "Два майора" claims of successful Black Sea infrastructure destruction and "cope cage" fundraising. MoD Russia training video for Marines. Lipetsk/Kursk/Orel air alerts/interceptions. Russian SpN drone operations. New alert signals in Sevastopol. Kaluga airport restrictions. Russian social event showcasing veteran support. Shaman concert on TASS. Alex Parker Returns's migration/ethnic narratives. Colonelcassad's video showcasing "74th Independent Motorized Rifle Brigade Reconnaissance Battalion" medics.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• MDCOA 1: Renewed Large-Scale Ballistic/Cruise Missile Campaign to Cripple Ukrainian AD and Energy/Logistics Infrastructure, with Increased Focus on Chemical/Industrial Targets: Russia, despite Iskander losses, will attempt to launch a renewed, multi-wave missile and drone campaign targeting Ukraine's critical national infrastructure (energy, logistics hubs, and remaining high-value military facilities), with a specific emphasis on overwhelming weakened Ukrainian air defenses. This aims to exhaust their munition reserves and cripple Ukraine's ability to sustain military operations and civilian life, especially ahead of the colder months. This MDCOA would exploit the publicly stated AD procurement challenges and the confirmed losses of Ukrainian AD munitions. The expansion of KAB attacks and UAV routes signals a probing for AD weaknesses. The confirmed strike on the Azot chemical plant in Tula Oblast may trigger a significant, high-volume missile retaliation aimed at Ukraine's critical infrastructure, potentially including targets with industrial chemical significance, aiming to create secondary hazards.

  • Confidence: MEDIUM (Increased due to Zelenskiy's public statement about AD procurement, the strategic impact of losing 3 Iskander launchers and the Tu-22M3 bomber, prompting Russia to consider other high-impact strike options and rely more on existing cruise missile stocks. New KAB targets and UAV penetration routes also indicate this. The strike on the Azot chemical plant, a significant industrial target, significantly increases the likelihood of a severe retaliatory strike, potentially involving chemical or industrial targets.)
  • Indicators: Significant increase in missile/drone attacks beyond current levels, targeting of energy infrastructure components not previously hit, significant increase in Russian strategic bomber activity, increased Russian reconnaissance efforts over critical infrastructure.

• MDCOA 2: Attempted Strategic Breakthrough on Sumy Axis with Major Force Commitment and Massed Air Support (with Chemical Warfare consideration): Russia commits substantial additional reserves to the Sumy axis, initiating a rapid, decisive breakthrough aimed at encircling or seizing Sumy city. This would involve overwhelming combined arms force, massed KAB strikes to suppress Ukrainian defenses, and deep strikes to neutralize Ukrainian command and control and logistics in the region. This would aim to open a new major operational front, fix a large portion of Ukrainian reserves, and create a significant humanitarian crisis, diverting resources from the Donbas. Given the recent strike on the Azot chemical plant, and Russia's past false flag attempts regarding chemical weapons, there is a low but non-zero risk of Russia preparing to conduct an operation with chemical munitions or a "dirty bomb" in the context of a strategic breakthrough, or blame Ukraine for such an event, potentially fabricating evidence.

  • Confidence: MEDIUM (Based on previous Russian claims of "buffer zone" and mapped territorial control, reinforced by confirmed advances towards Sumy Oblast from previous ISR and the presence of Sumy in Russian casualty lists from memorials. The SOF night raid in the Sumy/Belgorod border area indicates active Russian presence and Ukrainian counter-operations.) The claimed KAB strike on a TD PVD in Ugroiedy and new groups of strike UAVs targeting Sumy Oblast reinforce Russian intent in the region. The "chemical warfare" aspect is LOW confidence but must be considered in MDCOA given the Azot strike and Russia's history.
  • Indicators: Sustained high rate of KABs and missile strikes on deep targets in Sumy Oblast, large-scale troop movements on Sumy axis beyond current levels, intelligence of Russian force restructuring or redeployment from other axes. Propaganda narratives pushing false flag chemical attack warnings; detection of chemical munitions or CBRN deployment signs.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Next 24-48 Hours (Short-Term):

  • Immediate Retaliation/Sustained Attacks: Expect continued, possibly intensified, KAB and missile/UAV strikes on Kharkiv, Sumy, Zaporizhzhia, Mykolaiv, Odesa, Dnipropetrovsk, and now Vinnytsia Oblasts, with heightened risk of targeting first responders. High probability of further Russian retaliatory deep strikes due to the Iskander and logistics train losses, and the Novomoskovsk chemical plant strike. New UAV threat in Mykolaiv/Kryvyi Rih regions, and reconnaissance drone activity in Poltava and Kirovohrad. New groups of strike UAVs entering Kharkiv, Sumy, and Vinnytsia Oblasts from the East, moving West.
  • Ground Pressure: Continued tactical ground engagements, particularly on the Donetsk (Pokrovsk, Konstantinovka) and Sumy axes, with Russian efforts to consolidate claimed gains. Increased Russian counter-drone and anti-AD operations.
  • Decision Point (UKR): Prioritize air defense assets to protect key urban centers (Kharkiv, Sumy, Mykolaiv, Odesa, Dnipro, Kryvyi Rih, Poltava, Kirovohrad, Vinnytsia) and critical infrastructure, with explicit consideration for protecting emergency services and first responders. Expedite deployment of countermeasures to Russian anti-drone tactics. Reassess ground force posture on the Sumy axis based on updated Russian advances and map intelligence. Immediately counter Russian disinformation on body exchanges, POW testimonies, and Western internal politics (especially Polish relations) with factual and transparent communication. Assess impact of Novomoskovsk strike on Russian logistics/production and prepare for potential severe retaliatory strikes, including those targeting industrial or chemical facilities.

• Next 72 Hours (Medium-Term):

  • Decision Point (UKR): Evaluate the full impact of the Iskander launcher and logistics train destruction, and the Novomoskovsk chemical plant strike on Russian operational tempo and strategic options. Re-evaluate and adapt ground force deployments on the Sumy axis based on continued Russian advances and the scale of the threat to Sumy city, potentially deploying additional reserves. Develop a comprehensive plan for mine clearance and public safety in areas affected by PFM-1 mines (as reported in previous ISR). Expedite high-level diplomatic engagement regarding AD systems. Monitor and respond to escalating Russian disinformation campaigns targeting Western unity and Ukrainian credibility, particularly the fabricated POW videos and body lists, and narratives exploiting internal Western politics. Increase force protection measures for all emergency services personnel. Initiate contingency planning for potential chemical or biological contamination scenarios, both from Russian strikes on Ukrainian targets or Russian false flag operations.

• Next 1 Week (Near-Term Strategic):

  • Decision Point (UKR): Evaluate the overall effectiveness of Ukrainian deep strike campaign on Russian military-industrial complex and logistics, considering both successes and Russian claims of countermeasures. Continue to optimize air defense deployments based on evolving Russian targeting patterns and replenish munition stockpiles. Intensify intelligence collection on Russian strategic aviation, air defense assets, potential dispersal efforts, and maritime special operations. Prioritize resources for the Sumy axis if Russian pressure continues, potentially initiating pre-emptive civilian evacuation planning. Reinforce maritime security measures in the Black Sea and Azov Sea. Conduct a comprehensive review of all critical Ukrainian industrial facilities, particularly chemical plants, for vulnerability assessment and hardening measures against potential Russian retaliatory strikes.

---

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Prioritize and Augment Air Defense for Eastern, Southern, and Central Urban Centers, with Enhanced First Responder Protection and Adapting to New UAV Ingress Routes (Immediate & Urgent):

   • Action: Immediately re-prioritize and reinforce layered air defense systems (including mobile fire groups with MANPADS for KAB and drone defense) to protect Kharkiv, Sumy, Mykolaiv, Odesa, Dnipro, Kryvyi Rih, Poltava, Kirovohrad, and Vinnytsia from continued KAB and missile/UAV attacks. Deploy active and passive defenses around critical civilian infrastructure, particularly educational buildings and kindergartens. Crucially, implement enhanced force protection measures for all emergency services personnel, including hardened shelters at known response sites and updated protocols for "double-tap" strike scenarios. Expedite diplomatic efforts for the acquisition of additional advanced AD systems (e.g., Patriot, NASAMS) and secure urgent resupply of interceptor munitions. Allocate AD assets to counter new UAV threat vectors from Berislav into Mykolaiv/Kirovohrad Oblasts and reconnaissance drones into Poltava. Analyze the new western-bound UAV ingress routes into Kharkiv, Sumy, and Vinnytsia Oblasts to pre-position AD assets and optimize interception tactics.
   • Justification: Russian forces are deliberately escalating attacks on civilian areas and opening new attack vectors to inflict casualties and psychological impact. The latest KAB strike on a central Kharkiv educational building (now 2 fatalities), KABs on Sumy and Dnipropetrovsk Oblasts (Mezheva community, kindergarten, 1 fatality), and ongoing UAV threats into Kirovohrad and Vinnytsia underscore the urgency and breadth of the threat. The injury of SES workers highlights a direct targeting of first responders. The new groups of strike UAVs entering Kharkiv, Sumy, and now Vinnytsia from the East, moving West, indicate tactical adaptation by Russia to bypass current AD or strike new targets.
   • Intelligence Gap: Real-time air defense munition expenditure rates in affected areas and current inventory levels for key systems; full extent of Russian UAV reconnaissance and strike capabilities in the Mykolaiv/Odesa/Poltava/Kirovohrad/Zaporizhzhia/Vinnytsia sectors. Russian intent and capability for deliberate targeting of first responders. Specific objectives of new UAV ingress routes into Kharkiv, Sumy, and Vinnytsia Oblasts.
   • Collection Requirement: Automated tracking of AD engagements and munition usage, updated imagery of damaged civilian sites for munition analysis, SIGINT/HUMINT on AD system readiness, drone flight path analysis from Mykolaiv/Poltava/Kirovohrad/Zaporizhzhia/Vinnytsia Oblasts. HUMINT/OSINT on Russian TTPs regarding first responder targeting. IMINT/SIGINT on UAV launch locations and operational patterns for new ingress routes into Kharkiv, Sumy, and Vinnytsia.

2. Sustain and Exploit Deep Strike Successes, Prepare for Retaliation and Enhanced Russian Defenses, Targeting Chemical/Industrial Nodes (Urgent):

   • Action: Conduct rapid, detailed BDA on the destroyed Iskander launchers, the logistics train, the Tu-22M3 bomber, and the "Azot" chemical plant in Novomoskovsk, Tula Oblast (satellite imagery, OSINT analysis) to confirm operational impact and specific targets. Publicize these successes widely to boost morale and demonstrate capability. Simultaneously, prepare for heightened Russian retaliatory strikes across Ukraine, particularly on strategic infrastructure. Disperse high-value assets and reinforce their defenses. Continue to assess targets for further deep strikes on Russian logistics and military-industrial complex, prioritizing industrial nodes with potential dual-use or military production capabilities, especially those related to chemical production (e.g., fertilizers, basic chemicals that can be converted for military use). Integrate FPV drone operations more widely for precision strikes on personnel and high-value equipment. Leverage SOF for continued cross-border raids against high-value Russian personnel and forward operating bases. Develop and deploy countermeasures to Russian new warning systems (e.g., in Sevastopol) and airfield restrictions (e.g., Kaluga), assessing their impact on Ukrainian deep strike TTPs.
   • Justification: Ukrainian deep strikes are a significant strategic success but will provoke severe retaliation, requiring preemptive defensive measures and effective information operations. The destruction of a logistics train highlights a key vulnerability, and the VDV crowdfunding indicates systemic issues. SOF raids maintain pressure on Russian border regions. Russian attempts to adapt to drone threats and deep strikes (new warning systems, airport restrictions) must be actively countered. The strike on a chemical industrial plant is a new category of target for deep strikes, likely increasing Russian pressure and potentially indicating a focus on their war production capabilities.
   • Intelligence Gap: Full BDA and long-term operational impact on Russian ballistic missile capabilities, Southern logistics, and strategic aviation. Specific details on the GRU personnel targeted in the SOF raid. Effectiveness of Russian counter-drone adaptations (e.g., "cope cages"). Full impact of Ukrainian deep strikes on Russian air force operations and airfields (e.g., Kaluga). Full implications of new Sevastopol warning systems on Ukrainian maritime drone operations. Precise function and production output of the "Azot" chemical plant in Novomoskovsk and its connection to Russian military efforts, specifically dual-use materials.
   • Collection Requirement: High-resolution satellite imagery of Bryansk/Kursk missile sites, Southern logistics hubs, Russian airfields (especially Engels, Belaya, Dyagilevo, Kaluga), and other military-industrial targets, including Novomoskovsk's "Azot" plant; monitoring Russian strategic aviation movements and activity. HUMINT/SIGINT on Russian GRU force composition and deployment on the border. IMINT/OSINT on Russian vehicle adaptations and their effectiveness. SIGINT/OSINT on the operational effectiveness of new Russian warning systems. Targeted intelligence on Russian chemical industrial production and potential dual-use materials.

3. Intensify Counter-Information Warfare on Humanitarian Issues, Western Divisions, and Russian Fabrications, Addressing Internal Russian Propaganda (Ongoing & Critical):

   • Action: Proactively and transparently communicate Ukraine's official stance and actions regarding prisoner and body exchanges to both domestic and international audiences, providing verifiable evidence and consistently refuting Russian disinformation. Immediately and publicly expose Russian fabrications, such as the "future-dated" body lists (e.g., 06 JUN 2025) and the alleged POW video from MoD Russia, highlighting their manipulative nature and the intent to demoralize. Highlight Russian violations of international law (e.g., confirmed KAB strikes on children's railway, central Kharkiv educational building, kindergarten in Mezheva, PFM-1 mine use, targeting of SES workers) to discredit their humanitarian claims. Publicly counter Russian narratives attempting to exploit Western internal politics (e.g., Musk/Trump claims) and international relations (e.g., Polish EU accession statements), exposing them as deliberate psychological operations. Leverage the opening of rehabilitation centers to showcase Ukrainian commitment to its people and support for its diverse military. Additionally, monitor and analyze Russian internal propaganda related to veteran support, cultural events, and especially inflammatory narratives concerning migration/ethnic issues, to understand their domestic messaging strategies and identify potential weaknesses or opportunities for counter-messaging. Specifically analyze Russian military propaganda, such as the Colonelcassad medics video, to identify their key messaging (e.g., professionalism, care for soldiers, resilience) and counter it by highlighting actual Russian deficiencies or by providing superior, authentic Ukrainian narratives on similar themes.
   • Justification: Russia is leveraging highly sensitive humanitarian issues, internal Western political dynamics, and sensationalist narratives for information warfare, using increasingly blatant fabrications (e.g., "future-dated" lists, fabricated POW testimonials) aiming to undermine Ukrainian credibility, international support, and Western unity. Effective, consistent counter-narratives are critical. The proliferation of internal Russian propaganda, particularly the divisive narratives about "replacement of the Russian people," requires monitoring to understand internal Russian stability and potential points of leverage. The specific focus on medical care in Russian propaganda indicates a recognized vulnerability or area for morale boosting that Ukraine can counter with its own successes or expose Russian deficiencies.
   • Intelligence Gap: Full scope of Russian information narratives targeting Ukrainian society and Western audiences, and the specific impact of Russian propaganda on Ukrainian public and troop morale. Identification of key Russian psychological operations (PSYOP) themes. Understanding the intent and impact of highly divisive internal Russian propaganda regarding ethnic/migration issues. Effectiveness of Russian military propaganda on internal and external audiences, and specific vulnerabilities of Russian messaging.
   • Collection Requirement: Comprehensive monitoring of Russian state media and milblogger channels, and analysis of their messaging tactics and impact, coupled with public opinion polling in Ukraine and Western nations. OSINT analysis of specific Russian PSYOP channels and their reach. Targeted OSINT/HUMINT on internal Russian social dynamics and reactions to state-sponsored and nationalist propaganda. Detailed content analysis of Russian military propaganda videos to identify subtle and overt messaging, and comparison with verifiable ground truth.

4. Reinforce and Monitor Sumy and Konstantinovka Axis Defenses (Urgent):

   • Action: Immediately reinforce personnel, fortifications (including anti-tank obstacles), and anti-tank capabilities on the Sumy axis, prioritizing areas within 40km of Sumy city and identified Russian avenues of advance (e.g., around Yablonovka, Andreevka, Vorochina, Ugroiedy). Intensify ISR collection on Russian force composition, strength, and objectives in the area. Advise civilian authorities on potential evacuation routes and shelter options in Sumy City and surrounding settlements. Conduct aggressive counter-battery fire against Russian artillery/MLRS supporting advances. Similarly, reinforce defenses and conduct ISR on the Konstantinovka axis, given Russian claims of advances. Prepare for potential increased KAB/UAV strikes on Sumy Oblast in conjunction with new westward-bound UAV groups.
   • Justification: Russian claims of an "expanding buffer zone" and confirmed advances (including mapped territorial control) indicate a serious intent to press the Sumy axis, threatening Sumy City. The continued focus on the Novopavlivka and Pokrovsk directions, and new claims on Konstantinovka, also indicate sustained pressure on ground forces. The SOF raid highlights active Russian presence in the border region. Russian claims of KAB strikes on a TD PVD in Ugroiedy and new UAV activity over Sumy Oblast further indicate their focus on this region.
   • Intelligence Gap: Precise composition and strength of Russian forces on Sumy and Konstantinovka axes, and their immediate operational objectives and timeline for further advance.
   • Collection Requirement: HUMINT from local sources, SIGINT on Russian communications, IMINT for troop movements and fortifications, cross-referencing Russian map claims with ground truth.

5. Enhance Maritime Security in the Black Sea and Crimea (New & Critical):

   • Action: Increase Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) in areas with critical maritime infrastructure (ports, offshore platforms, key shipping lanes) in the Black Sea, particularly off Odesa, Mykolaiv, and the Ukrainian coast, and intensify ISR on Sevastopol and other Crimean naval bases. Develop and deploy enhanced physical and electronic security measures for offshore platforms, subsea cables, and pipelines (e.g., anti-diver, anti-drone, and rapid response capabilities). Share intelligence on Russian maritime special operations (e.g., "Espanola" unit's TTPs, "Два майора" claims) with relevant maritime security agencies and allied nations. Prioritize monitoring of specific offshore platforms and naval assets for signs of Russian activity. Analyze the new Sevastopol warning signals to understand their operational triggers and potential implications for Ukrainian maritime and aerial drone operations.
   • Justification: The "Espanola" unit's video and "Два майора" claims demonstrate a sophisticated Russian capability for maritime sabotage against critical energy infrastructure, posing a significant threat to Ukrainian and international interests in the Black Sea. The introduction of new, specific warning signals in Sevastopol indicates heightened Russian concern and defensive posture in response to Ukrainian threats in the maritime domain.
   • Intelligence Gap: Full understanding of "Espanola" unit's capabilities, specific targets, operational areas, and force structure. Precise location and function of the "infrastructure" claimed destroyed by "Два майора." Full details on the triggers and operational procedures for the new Sevastopol warning signals.
   • Collection Requirement: IMINT/OSINT on Russian naval special forces units, SIGINT on their communications, HUMINT from Black Sea region, commercial satellite imagery of offshore infrastructure for BDA and pattern of life analysis. SIGINT/OSINT on Sevastopol air defense and naval activities, including responses to alert signals.

---

END REPORT