Situation Report

OPSEC CLASSIFICATION: NATO SECRET // RELEASABLE TO UKR FORCES

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR) TIME OF REPORT: 07 JUN 25 / 18:42 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 07 JUN 25 / 18:12 ZULU - 07 JUN 25 / 18:42 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• AOR Update: Kharkiv Oblast (Kharkiv City - Kyivskyi, Osnovyanskyi, Shevchenkivskyi Districts, suburbs, Kommunar factory, recreational park, children's railway, central part, educational building near railway), Volyn Oblast (Lutsk), Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (Dnipro, oblast border, Kryvyi Rih, Pavlohrad, Pleshcheevka, Malinovka, Charivne, Mezheva community, Synelnykove district, Nikopol region, Petrykivska community), Zaporizhzhia Oblast (14 populated areas, Zaporozhye direction, Orikhiv, Huliaipole, Chervonne, Malinovka), Black Sea, Azov Sea, Sumy Oblast (Sumy direction, Yunakivka, Kondratovka, Alexandropol, Klymentove, Uhroyidy, Novonikolaevka, Pisarevka, Khotin, Vorochina, Nizhnya Duvanka, Yablonovka, Andreevka), Russian Federation (Kursk, Bryansk, Kaluga, Smolensk Oblasts, Moscow Region including Dubna, Podmoskovye, Moscow city (Gorbushkin Dvor, VDNKh), Pushkino, Irkutsk region - Belaya airfield; Tambov Oblast - Michurinsk; Ryazan Oblast - Dyagilevo; Belgorod Oblast - Prokhorovka-Belenikhino, Zhuravlevka, Pushkarozhadinsky, Azov - Rostov Oblast, Nizhny Novgorod Oblast - Kstovo, Sevastopol), Southern Donetsk Direction (Fedorivka, Perbudova, Komar, Maksimovka, Razdolnoye, Vorskresenka, Poddubnoye, Velyka Novosilka, Chasov Yar), Konstantinovka direction (Novoolenovka, Novaya Poltavka, Tarasovka, Ignatovka, Zarya), Siversk direction (Serebryanka, Hryhorivka, Bilohorivka, Verkhnokamyanske, Vyimka, Ivano-Daryivka, Pereizne), Odesa Oblast, Donetsk Oblast (Pokrovsk, Kurakhovo - Alekseevka, Chasov Yar, Kramatorsk axis, Toretsk axis, Novopavlivka axis, Krasnoarmeysk-Novosergeevka), Kupyansk axis (Zahryzove, Stepova Novoselivka), Kherson axis (Mykolayivka), Ternopil Oblast, Kyiv, Krasnoarmeysk direction, Lviv Oblast (Drohobych), Mykolaiv Oblast.

• Key Terrain (Kharkiv City - Updated):

  • Ukrainian Prosecutor General's Office (PGO) confirms a KAB strike on a central Kharkiv educational building, resulting in 1 fatality and 19 injured. Multiple photos show shattered windows, debris, and investigators (including a "WAR CRIMES prosecutor"). A pixelated area on one photo likely indicates severe casualties. This confirms continued indiscriminate targeting of civilian infrastructure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Video from RBK-Ukraine shows immediate aftermath of the strike in central Kharkiv, reinforcing civilian impact. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Zaporizhzhia Regional Military Administration statement highlights continued KAB strikes on Kharkiv, noting "dozens of people injured in a day," confirming the city remains a primary target for aerial bombardment. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

• Key Terrain (Dnipropetrovsk Oblast - Petrykivska community - NEW): First Lady Olena Zelenska visited a "Center of Vitality" for mental health and physical rehabilitation. This indicates continued Ukrainian efforts to support and rehabilitate war-wounded, both military and civilian. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

• Key Terrain (Mykolaiv Oblast - Kryvyi Rih direction - NEW): Ukrainian Air Force reports a Shahed UAV moving north towards Kryvyi Rih. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

• Key Terrain (Southern Ukraine - NEW): Ukrainian Defense Forces (South) report a successful strike on a Russian locomotive carrying 13 tanks and over 100 other armored and automotive vehicles. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

• Key Terrain (Donetsk Oblast - Southern direction - NEW): Russian milblogger Colonelcassad claims their motor riflemen ambushed a Ukrainian assault group. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - Russian claim of BDA). Another Russian milblogger (Операция Z) posted a video showing a Ukrainian assault group allegedly ambushed in Donbas, with visible casualty. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - Russian claim of BDA).

• Key Terrain (Novopavlivka direction - NEW): Russian milblogger Военкор Котенок posted a map with overlaid operational graphics, indicating continued Russian focus on this direction. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - Russian source for operational details).

• Key Terrain (Pushkino, Moscow Region, RF - Updated): TASS reports the PMM warehouse fire is localized at 21,000 sq meters. While previously noted as a roof collapse over 13,000 sq meters and "clapping" sounds (explosions), "localization" implies some control, but the large area indicates a significant, ongoing incident. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• The large-scale fire in Pushkino, though "localized," continues to be a major incident affecting air quality and potentially visibility in the Moscow region. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Continued KAB strikes on urban areas will lead to persistent debris, structural damage, and ongoing hazards for emergency services and civilians, particularly in Kharkiv. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces (Air Defense): Continue to face threats from KABs in Kharkiv and new UAV threats in Mykolaiv/Kherson Oblasts. Air Force of Ukraine issued a warning for aviation munitions in Kharkiv and Sumy. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian Forces (Emergency Services & PGO): Actively responding to and investigating the KAB strike on central Kharkiv, including documenting war crimes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian Forces (Deep Strike):
  • Zelenskiy publicly confirmed the destruction of 3 Iskander-M launchers on 5 June. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Defense Forces of the South confirmed a successful strike on a Russian logistics train, destroying 13 tanks and over 100 other vehicles. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • This deep strike capability remains a significant operational tool and a source of Russian concern (as evidenced by searching for alleged drone attack participants). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian Forces (Ground Forces - Defensive Operations): Ukrainian SOF and TD Brigades continue to engage Russian assault groups (previous ISR). Demonstrated capability to conduct precise strikes on fortified enemy positions (БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС video showing building destruction by PGM). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian Forces (Medical/Rehabilitation): First Lady Olena Zelenska's visit to the Center of Vitality in Petrykivska community highlights continued focus on and provision of mental health and physical rehabilitation services. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian Forces (Air): Confirmed continued KAB launches on Kharkiv. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) Ongoing Shahed UAV threat in Mykolaiv direction. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian Forces (Ground - Assaults): Russian milbloggers claim ambushing Ukrainian assault groups in Donbas, attempting to highlight successful defensive engagements. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM). Continued focus on Novopavlivka direction. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Russian Forces (Information Operations):
  • Internal Security/Counter-Sabotage: Colonelcassad reports the wife of a suspected participant in drone attacks on Russian airfields is on a wanted list. This confirms an active internal search for individuals involved in Ukrainian deep strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Disinformation/Psychological Operations:
    • Alex Parker Returns amplified a sensationalized, unverified "Newsweek" claim about Elon Musk being beaten by the US Treasury Secretary, attributing it to a "yellow tabloid." This is a clear attempt to sow internal discord and portray Western figures negatively, likely for domestic consumption. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
    • Russian milbloggers continue to portray Ukrainian soldiers as "boys who signed a contract for endless burgers," attempting to dehumanize and mock Ukrainian forces, particularly foreign volunteers, while claiming ambushes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
    • "Военкор Котенок" and "Операция Z" shared video of alleged Ukrainian casualties with English-language patches, likely to amplify narratives of foreign involvement and casualties. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Damage Control: TASS reporting on the Pushkino fire focuses on "localization" rather than the initial severity (roof collapse, explosions), attempting to downplay the incident. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action:

• Capabilities:
  • Aerial (Precision Guided Munitions/UAVs): Confirmed continued capability to deliver KABs on civilian targets in Kharkiv (educational building) and launch attack UAVs (Mykolaiv, Kryvyi Rih direction). This indicates sustained, though perhaps strained, munitions supply. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Ground (Offensive/Defensive): Demonstrated capability to conduct ground assaults and ambushes, particularly on the Donetsk axis (claims of ambushing Ukrainian groups). (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
  • Information Warfare/Internal Security: Highly capable of coordinated and manipulative disinformation campaigns, actively hunting individuals involved in deep strikes, and attempting to control narratives around internal incidents (Pushkino fire). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Intentions:
  • Kharkiv/Sumy/Southern Ukraine: Continue to terrorize civilian populations and overwhelm emergency services through indiscriminate aerial attacks, particularly KABs, likely in retaliation for Ukrainian deep strikes. Intent to inflict maximum psychological and physical damage by targeting non-military civilian sites. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Donetsk/Novopavlivka Axis: Continue localized ground offensives to achieve tactical gains and attrition against Ukrainian forces. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Information Warfare: Aggressively undermine Ukrainian credibility, portray Ukraine as inhumane (body exchange), exploit perceived Western failures/internal divisions (Musk/Trump narratives), and demoralize Ukrainian forces (ambush videos). Reinforce domestic morale and project an image of Russian military success and internal control. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Internal Security: Actively pursue and neutralize individuals perceived as threats involved in deep strike attacks. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Courses of Action (COA):
  • COA 1 (MLCOA - Sustained and Escalated Retaliatory Saturation Attacks on Urban Centers, Coupled with Amplified Disinformation on Humanitarian Issues and Western Divisions): Russia will continue and likely intensify KAB and missile strikes on Ukrainian urban centers, particularly Kharkiv, Sumy, and Zaporizhzhia, with an increased focus on civilian targets to maximize terror and drain Ukrainian emergency resources. The immediate KAB strike on central Kharkiv and ongoing UAV threats support this. Concurrently, Russia will continue a persistent and aggressive information campaign, particularly regarding body/POW exchanges, blaming Ukraine for delays, and exploiting any perceived Western failures or internal divisions (e.g., US politics).
    • Confidence: HIGH
    • Indicators: Immediate KAB strike on central Kharkiv after previous strikes, persistent Russian narrative on body exchange from multiple sources (Medvedev, Zorin), Russian amplification of Zelenskiy's AD appeal, Alex Parker Returns's Musk/Trump narrative.
  • COA 2 (Ground Offensive Support with Targeted Artillery/MLRS and Drone Strikes, while Enhancing Counter-Deep Strike Measures): Russian forces will continue to press ground offensives on existing axes (e.g., Donetsk, Novopavlivka), supporting them with targeted artillery, MLRS, and FPV drone strikes against Ukrainian positions and C2 nodes. They will likely enhance counter-drone and anti-artillery measures, and significantly increase internal security efforts to prevent and detect further Ukrainian deep strikes on Russian territory.
    • Confidence: HIGH
    • Indicators: Observed Grad MLRS firing (previous ISR), claimed Alexandropol strike on mortar/ammo depot (previous ISR), Russian milblogger claims of ambushing Ukrainian groups, active search for alleged drone attack participants.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• Intensified Focus on Counter-Deep Strike Internal Security: The reported search for the wife of an alleged drone attack participant indicates a heightened and more aggressive internal security posture aimed at disrupting Ukrainian deep strike capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Refined Information Warfare Tactics: Russia is increasingly leveraging sensationalist, unverified Western news and internal Western political dynamics to create divisive narratives for internal consumption and external influence. This is a hybrid warfare adaptation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Persistent Urban Aerial Strikes: The continued targeting of Kharkiv with KABs, despite Ukrainian deep strike successes (Iskander launchers, logistics train), demonstrates a sustained and unyielding intent to inflict damage on Ukrainian cities, indicating a shift in focus to psychological warfare and resource attrition. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• Munitons: Continued high rate of KAB usage, MLRS firing, and FPV drone operations indicates sustained, though potentially strained, supply chains for these munitions. The confirmed destruction of a logistics train carrying 13 tanks and over 100 other vehicles represents a significant logistical setback for Russia in Southern Ukraine, impacting resupply and forward deployment. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Fuel/Lubricants: The escalating Pushkino fire (PMM warehouse) represents a severe, ongoing disruption to Russian internal logistics and strategic reserves. Though "localized" now, the scale and nature of the materials indicate a significant impact if not fully contained soon. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Strategic Missiles: The destruction of 3 Iskander launchers represents a significant hit to Russia's high-precision ballistic missile launch capability and inventory, potentially impacting future strategic strike options and forcing reliance on other platforms (e.g., KABs, cruise missiles from strategic bombers). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Russian C2 demonstrates continued ability to coordinate multi-domain strikes (KABs, UAVs) and ground operations across multiple axes. The coordinated disinformation campaign also highlights effective centralized C2 over information operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian C2 over internal security/emergency response is clearly challenged by the scale of the Pushkino fire and the ongoing search for individuals connected to deep strike attacks, suggesting a diversion of resources. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• The successful Ukrainian deep strike on the logistics train indicates potential vulnerabilities in Russian logistics C2 and route security. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• Air Defense: Under severe pressure from continuous KABs (Kharkiv) and UAV threats (Mykolaiv/Kryvyi Rih direction). The continued need for AD systems (as highlighted by Zelenskiy) indicates a critical resource constraint and sustained high expenditure of AD munitions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Emergency Services & PGO: Operating at high readiness to respond to civilian casualties and infrastructure damage, particularly in Kharkiv, and are actively documenting war crimes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Deep Strike Capability: Demonstrated continued strategic capability by confirming the destruction of 3 Iskander-M launchers and a major logistics train. This capability remains a significant operational asset for interdicting Russian logistics and degrading high-value targets. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ground Forces: Demonstrated rapid action and successful engagement (Operational ZSU video in previous ISR). Ukrainian SOF and TD Brigades are actively engaging Russian assault groups and conducting precise strikes against fortified positions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Medical/Rehabilitation Services: Olena Zelenska's visit to Dnipro highlights ongoing commitment and readiness to provide mental health and physical rehabilitation for war-wounded, indicating long-term resilience efforts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Successes:
  • Confirmed Destruction of 3 Iskander Launchers: Zelenskiy's statement confirms the destruction of three critical Russian ballistic missile launchers, directly impacting their strike capability. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Major Logistics Interdiction: Successful strike on a Russian logistics train, destroying 13 tanks and over 100 vehicles, significantly disrupting Russian resupply in the south. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Continued Deep Strike Pressure: Drone safety warnings in multiple Russian oblasts and the active search for alleged drone attack participants indicate sustained Ukrainian deep strike activity, forcing Russia to dedicate resources to internal defense. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Successful Ground Engagement: Precise destruction of a fortified building by PGM (БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС video) demonstrates effective targeting and munition use. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Rehabilitation Infrastructure Expansion: Olena Zelenska's visit to Dnipro highlights the ongoing development of critical rehabilitation infrastructure for war-wounded. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Setbacks:
  • Increased Civilian Casualties in Kharkiv: Another KAB strike on central Kharkiv resulted in 1 fatality and 19 injured, adding to the growing civilian toll and demonstrating continued Russian intent to terrorize urban populations and overwhelm emergency services. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Persistent AD Shortfall: Zelenskiy's public statement about awaiting a US response for AD systems highlights a critical unmet need that exacerbates the impact of Russian air attacks. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Russian Claims of Ambush/Casualties: Russian claims of ambushing Ukrainian assault groups (with video evidence of casualties) indicate continued high-intensity fighting and losses on the battlefield. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - Russian claims, but video corroborates engagement).
  • Information Warfare Impact: Russian disinformation (body exchanges, Musk/Trump narratives, mockery of volunteers) is being aggressively amplified by high-level Russian officials and milbloggers, creating a challenging information environment for Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• Air Defense Munitions & Systems: Continued high expenditure due to persistent aerial attacks, particularly KABs and massed drone assaults. Zelenskiy's public statement reinforces the urgent need for additional AD systems and sustained resupply from international partners. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Emergency Response Resources: Severe strain on emergency and medical services in Kharkiv due to increased casualties and widespread damage. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Medical & Rehabilitation Support: The need for mental health and physical rehabilitation services for war-wounded personnel and civilians is significant and ongoing, requiring sustained resources. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Counter-Disinformation Capability: Urgent need for robust, proactive, and coordinated counter-information campaigns to neutralize aggressive Russian disinformation tactics. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Propaganda (Internal & External):
  • Body Exchange Disinformation: Remains a primary, aggressive campaign by high-level officials (Medvedev, Lt. Gen. Zorin) and state media (TASS) to portray Ukraine as inhumane and inflate casualty figures. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Exploiting Ukrainian AD Shortfalls: Russian channels continue to use Zelenskiy's public appeal for AD systems to portray Ukraine as desperate and unsupported. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Discrediting Western Leaders/Internal Divisions: The amplification of fabricated stories about Elon Musk and US officials (Alex Parker Returns) demonstrates a clear intent to sow discord and discredit Western leadership, likely aimed at undermining public confidence and unity in the West. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Demoralizing Ukrainian Forces/Glorifying Russian Successes: Russian milbloggers continue to share videos of alleged Ukrainian casualties and ambushes, often with derogatory captions (e.g., "boys who signed a contract for endless burgers"), to demoralize Ukrainian forces and boost Russian domestic morale. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Justifying Civilian Strikes: Russian sources continue to frame strikes on Kharkiv as targeting "enemy targets" despite clear civilian impact. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian Counter-Propaganda/Information Operations:
  • Transparency on Russian Atrocities: Ukrainian officials (PGO, local administrations) and media continue to immediately report on KAB strikes on civilian areas in Kharkiv, providing real-time evidence of civilian casualties and documenting war crimes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Highlighting Strategic Successes: Zelenskiy's public confirmation of 3 Iskander launcher destructions and the reporting of the destroyed logistics train are powerful information operations, demonstrating advanced capabilities and directly refuting Russian military invulnerability. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Showcasing Resilience & Care: Olena Zelenska's visit to Dnipro rehabilitation centers provides a powerful counter-narrative of Ukrainian resilience, commitment to its people, and long-term planning, contrasting with Russian narratives of Ukrainian collapse. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Negative Impact: The continued KAB strikes on Kharkiv, with new civilian casualties at an educational building, will severely impact civilian morale, particularly given the explicit targeting of non-military areas. The persistent AD shortfall highlighted by Zelenskiy's statement may also cause anxiety about protection. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Positive Impact: The confirmation of 3 Iskander launcher destructions and the major logistics interdiction are significant morale boosts for Ukrainian forces and the population, demonstrating a concrete ability to strike back at Russian strategic assets. Continued deep strike activity in Russian territory will reinforce this. Efforts in rehabilitation also contribute positively to overall societal morale. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Information Warfare Impact: The aggressive Russian disinformation regarding body exchanges and Western internal divisions could cause significant emotional distress and distrust among Ukrainian families and the general public if not effectively countered. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• The confirmed destruction of 3 Iskander launchers, the major logistics interdiction, and continued Ukrainian deep strike activity will likely underscore Ukraine's need for continued long-range strike capabilities and air defense systems to international partners. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian disinformation on body exchanges and attempts to exploit Western internal divisions aim to undermine international trust in Ukraine and the coherence of support. However, the clear and verifiable targeting of civilians in Kharkiv provides a strong counter-narrative, likely solidifying international condemnation of Russia and calls for continued support for Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• MLCOA 1: Sustained Aerial Terror Campaign on Urban Centers and Intensified Disinformation on Humanitarian Issues and Western Divisions: Russia will continue and likely intensify KAB and missile strikes on Ukrainian urban centers, particularly Kharkiv, Sumy, and Zaporizhzhia, with an explicit focus on civilian targets to maximize terror, drain Ukrainian emergency resources, and retaliate for successful Ukrainian deep strikes (e.g., Iskander launchers, logistics train). This will be accompanied by a persistent and aggressive information campaign, particularly regarding body/POW exchanges, blaming Ukraine for delays, and exploiting any perceived Western failures or internal divisions (e.g., US politics, celebrity narratives).

  • Confidence: HIGH
  • Indicators: Immediate KAB strike on central Kharkiv after previous strikes, persistent Russian narrative on body exchange from multiple sources (Medvedev, Zorin), Russian amplification of Zelenskiy's AD appeal, Alex Parker Returns's Musk/Trump narrative.

• MLCOA 2: Ground Offensive Support with Targeted Artillery/MLRS and Drone Strikes, while Enhancing Counter-Deep Strike Internal Security: Russian forces will continue to press ground offensives on existing axes (e.g., Donetsk, Novopavlivka), supporting them with targeted artillery, MLRS, and FPV drone strikes against Ukrainian positions, C2 nodes, and logistics. Russia will likely intensify internal security efforts to prevent and detect further Ukrainian deep strikes on Russian territory, including targeting family members of alleged participants.

  • Confidence: HIGH
  • Indicators: Observed Grad MLRS firing (previous ISR), claimed Alexandropol strike on mortar/ammo depot (previous ISR), Russian milblogger claims of ambushing Ukrainian groups, active search for alleged drone attack participants (Colonelcassad).

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• MDCOA 1: Renewed Large-Scale Ballistic/Cruise Missile Campaign to Cripple Ukrainian AD and Energy Infrastructure: Russia, despite Iskander losses, will attempt to launch a renewed, multi-wave missile and drone campaign targeting Ukraine's critical national infrastructure (energy, logistics hubs, and remaining high-value military facilities). This aims to overwhelm Ukrainian air defenses, exhaust their munition reserves, and cripple Ukraine's ability to sustain military operations and civilian life, especially ahead of the colder months. This MDCOA would exploit the publicly stated AD procurement challenges.

  • Confidence: MEDIUM (Increased due to Zelenskiy's public statement about AD procurement and the strategic impact of losing 3 Iskander launchers, prompting Russia to consider other high-impact strike options and rely more on existing cruise missile stocks).
  • Indicators: Significant increase in missile/drone attacks beyond current levels, targeting of energy infrastructure components not previously hit, significant increase in Russian strategic bomber activity.

• MDCOA 2: Attempted Strategic Breakthrough on Sumy Axis with Major Force Commitment and Massed Air Support: Russia commits substantial additional reserves to the Sumy axis, initiating a rapid, decisive breakthrough aimed at encircling or seizing Sumy city. This would involve overwhelming combined arms force, massed KAB strikes to suppress Ukrainian defenses, and deep strikes to neutralize Ukrainian command and control and logistics in the region. This would aim to open a new major operational front, fix a large portion of Ukrainian reserves, and create a significant humanitarian crisis.

  • Confidence: MEDIUM (Based on previous Russian claims of "buffer zone" and mapped territorial control, reinforced by continued limited advances towards Sumy Oblast from previous ISR).
  • Indicators: Sustained high rate of KABs and missile strikes on deep targets in Sumy Oblast, large-scale troop movements on Sumy axis beyond current levels, intelligence of Russian force restructuring or redeployment from other axes.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Next 24-48 Hours (Short-Term):

  • Immediate Retaliation/Sustained Attacks: Expect continued, possibly intensified, KAB and missile/UAV strikes on Kharkiv, Sumy, and Zaporizhzhia Oblasts. High probability of further Russian retaliatory deep strikes due to the Iskander and logistics train losses.
  • Ground Pressure: Continued tactical ground engagements, particularly on the Donetsk and Sumy axes, with Russian efforts to consolidate claimed gains. Increased Russian counter-drone and anti-AD operations.
  • Decision Point (UKR): Prioritize air defense assets to protect key urban centers (Kharkiv, Sumy) and critical infrastructure. Expedite deployment of countermeasures to Russian anti-drone tactics. Reassess ground force posture on the Sumy axis based on updated Russian advances and map intelligence. Immediately counter Russian disinformation on body exchanges and Western internal politics with factual and transparent communication.

• Next 72 Hours (Medium-Term):

  • Decision Point (UKR): Evaluate the full impact of the Iskander launcher and logistics train destruction on Russian operational tempo and strategic options. Re-evaluate and adapt ground force deployments on the Sumy axis based on continued Russian advances and the scale of the threat to Sumy city, potentially deploying additional reserves. Develop a comprehensive plan for mine clearance and public safety in areas affected by PFM-1 mines (as reported in previous ISR). Expedite high-level diplomatic engagement regarding AD systems. Monitor and respond to escalating Russian disinformation campaigns targeting Western unity and Ukrainian credibility.

• Next 1 Week (Near-Term Strategic):

  • Decision Point (UKR): Evaluate the overall effectiveness of Ukrainian deep strike campaign on Russian military-industrial complex and logistics, considering both successes and Russian claims of countermeasures. Continue to optimize air defense deployments based on evolving Russian targeting patterns and replenish munition stockpiles. Intensify intelligence collection on Russian strategic aviation, air defense assets, and potential dispersal efforts. Prioritize resources for the Sumy axis if Russian pressure continues, potentially initiating pre-emptive civilian evacuation planning.

---

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Prioritize and Augment Air Defense for Eastern Urban Centers (Immediate & Urgent):

   • Action: Immediately re-prioritize and reinforce layered air defense systems (including mobile fire groups with MANPADS for KAB and drone defense) to protect Kharkiv and Sumy from continued KAB and missile attacks. Deploy active and passive defenses around critical civilian infrastructure, particularly educational and public buildings. Expedite diplomatic efforts for the acquisition of additional advanced AD systems (e.g., Patriot, NASAMS) and secure urgent resupply of interceptor munitions.
   • Justification: Russian forces are deliberately escalating attacks on civilian areas to inflict casualties and psychological impact. The latest KAB strike on a central Kharkiv educational building and ongoing UAV threats underscore the urgency.
   • Intelligence Gap: Real-time air defense munition expenditure rates in affected areas and current inventory levels for key systems.
   • Collection Requirement: Automated tracking of AD engagements and munition usage, updated imagery of damaged civilian sites for munition analysis, SIGINT/HUMINT on AD system readiness.

2. Sustain and Exploit Deep Strike Successes, Prepare for Retaliation (Urgent):

   • Action: Conduct rapid, detailed BDA on the destroyed Iskander launchers and the logistics train (satellite imagery, OSINT analysis) to confirm operational impact and specific targets. Publicize these successes widely to boost morale and demonstrate capability. Simultaneously, prepare for heightened Russian retaliatory strikes across Ukraine, particularly on strategic infrastructure, following these high-value asset destructions. Disperse high-value assets and reinforce their defenses. Continue to assess targets for further deep strikes on Russian logistics and military-industrial complex.
   • Justification: Ukrainian deep strikes are a significant strategic success but will provoke severe retaliation, requiring preemptive defensive measures and effective information operations. The destruction of a logistics train highlights a key vulnerability.
   • Intelligence Gap: Full BDA and long-term operational impact on Russian ballistic missile capabilities and Southern logistics.
   • Collection Requirement: High-resolution satellite imagery of Bryansk/Kursk missile sites, Southern logistics hubs, and other Russian airfields; monitoring Russian strategic aviation movements and activity.

3. Intensify Counter-Information Warfare on Humanitarian Issues and Western Divisions (Ongoing & Critical):

   • Action: Proactively and transparently communicate Ukraine's official stance and actions regarding prisoner and body exchanges to both domestic and international audiences, providing verifiable evidence and consistently refuting Russian disinformation. Highlight Russian violations of international law (e.g., confirmed KAB strikes on children's railway, central Kharkiv educational building, PFM-1 mine use) to discredit their humanitarian claims. Publicly counter Russian narratives attempting to exploit Western internal politics (e.g., Musk/Trump claims), exposing them as deliberate psychological operations. Leverage the opening of rehabilitation centers to showcase Ukrainian commitment to its people.
   • Justification: Russia is leveraging highly sensitive humanitarian issues, internal Western political dynamics, and sensationalist narratives for information warfare, aiming to undermine Ukrainian credibility, international support, and Western unity. Effective, consistent counter-narratives are critical.
   • Intelligence Gap: Full scope of Russian information narratives targeting Ukrainian society and Western audiences, and the specific impact of Russian propaganda on Ukrainian public and troop morale.
   • Collection Requirement: Comprehensive monitoring of Russian state media and milblogger channels, and analysis of their messaging tactics and impact, coupled with public opinion polling in Ukraine and Western nations.

4. Reinforce and Monitor Sumy Axis Defenses (Urgent):

   • Action: Immediately reinforce personnel, fortifications (including anti-tank obstacles), and anti-tank capabilities on the Sumy axis, prioritizing areas within 40km of Sumy city and identified Russian avenues of advance (e.g., around Yablonovka, Andreevka, Vorochina). Intensify ISR collection on Russian force composition, strength, and objectives in the area. Advise civilian authorities on potential evacuation routes and shelter options in Sumy City and surrounding settlements. Conduct aggressive counter-battery fire against Russian artillery/MLRS supporting advances.
   • Justification: Russian claims of an "expanding buffer zone" and confirmed advances (including mapped territorial control) indicate a serious intent to press the Sumy axis, threatening Sumy City. The continued focus on the Novopavlivka direction also indicates sustained pressure on ground forces.
   • Intelligence Gap: Precise composition and strength of Russian forces on Sumy axis, and their immediate operational objectives and timeline for further advance.
   • Collection Requirement: HUMINT from local sources, SIGINT on Russian communications, IMINT for troop movements and fortifications, cross-referencing Russian map claims with ground truth.

---

END REPORT