Situation Report

OPSEC CLASSIFICATION: NATO SECRET // RELEASABLE TO UKR FORCES

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR) TIME OF REPORT: 07 JUN 25 / 18:12 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 07 JUN 25 / 17:42 ZULU - 07 JUN 25 / 18:12 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• AOR Update (Unchanged from previous report unless specified): Kharkiv Oblast (Kharkiv City - Kyivskyi, Osnovyanskyi, Shevchenkivskyi Districts, suburbs, Kommunar factory, recreational park, children's railway), Volyn Oblast (Lutsk), Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (Dnipro, oblast border, Kryvyi Rih, Pavlohrad, Pleshcheevka, Malinovka, Charivne, Mezheva community, Synelnykove district, Nikopol region), Zaporizhzhia Oblast (14 populated areas, Zaporozhye direction, Orikhiv, Huliaipole, Chervonne, Malinovka), Black Sea, Azov Sea, Sumy Oblast (Sumy direction, Yunakivka, Kondratovka, Alexandropol, Klymentove, Uhroyidy, Novonikolaevka, Pisarevka, Khotin, Vorochina, Nizhnya Duvanka, Yablonovka, Andreevka), Russian Federation (Kursk, Bryansk, Kaluga, Smolensk Oblasts, Moscow Region including Dubna, Podmoskovye, Moscow city (Gorbushkin Dvor, VDNKh), Saratov Oblast - Engels; Tambov Oblast - Michurinsk; Ryazan Oblast - Dyagilevo; Belgorod Oblast - Prokhorovka-Belenikhino, Zhuravlevka, Pushkarozhadinsky, Azov - Rostov Oblast, Nizhny Novgorod Oblast - Kstovo, Sevastopol), Southern Donetsk Direction (Fedorivka, Perbudova, Komar, Maksimovka, Razdolnoye, Vorskresenka, Poddubnoye, Velyka Novosilka, Chasov Yar), Konstantinovka direction (Novoolenovka, Novaya Poltavka, Tarasovka, Ignatovka, Zarya), Siversk direction (Serebryanka, Hryhorivka, Bilohorivka, Verkhnokamyanske, Vyimka, Ivano-Daryivka, Pereizne), Odesa Oblast, Donetsk Oblast (Pokrovsk, Kurakhovo - Alekseevka, Chasov Yar, Kramatorsk axis, Toretsk axis, Novopavlivka axis, Krasnoarmeysk-Novosergeevka), Kupyansk axis (Zahryzove, Stepova Novoselivka), Kherson axis (Mykolayivka), Ternopil Oblast, Kyiv, Krasnoarmeysk direction, Lviv Oblast (Drohobych), Mykolaiv Oblast.

• Key Terrain (Kharkiv City - Updated): Airstrike with two KABs on central Kharkiv resulted in 1 fatality and 5 injured (Север.Реалии). This confirms continued targeting of urban civilian areas, compounding the previous strikes on recreational park and children's railway. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

• Key Terrain (Dnipropetrovsk Oblast - Dnipro - NEW): Olena Zelenska's working visit related to mental health and physical rehabilitation for soldiers and civilians, including photos from a medical/rehabilitation setting (Serhii Lysak). This indicates continued Ukrainian efforts to support and rehabilitate war-wounded. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

• Key Terrain (Pushkino, Moscow Region, RF - Updated): The large warehouse fire (PMM/oils/lubricants) has escalated, with roof collapse over 13,000 sq meters. "Clapping" sounds (хлопки) are occurring at the burning fuel/lubricant warehouse, indicating potential explosions of contained materials. Firefighters are operating from a safe distance using foam. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

• Key Terrain (Alexandropol - NEW): Russian milblogger Colonelcassad claims destruction of a mortar position and ammunition depot in Alexandropol. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - Russian claim of BDA).

• Key Terrain (Mykolaiv, Kherson Oblasts - NEW): Air Force of Ukraine reports threat of Russian attack UAVs in Mykolaiv and Kherson Oblasts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• The escalating fire in Pushkino, with roof collapse and "clapping" sounds, signifies a severe, uncontrolled industrial fire. This will continue to generate massive smoke plumes, severely affecting air quality and potentially visibility in the Moscow region. It also poses a significant internal security and environmental hazard. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Continued KAB strikes on urban areas will lead to persistent debris, structural damage, and ongoing hazards for emergency services and civilians. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces (Air Defense): Continue to face threats from KABs in Kharkiv and attack UAVs in Mykolaiv and Kherson Oblasts. Zelenskiy's public statement, amplified by Russian channels, confirms Ukraine is still awaiting a US response on purchasing air defense systems. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian Forces (Deep Strike): Zelenskiy confirms all 3 Iskander-M launchers were destroyed in Bryansk Oblast on 5 June as a result of a missile strike. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) This is a significant strategic success. STERNENKO reports drone safety measures in Kaluga, Tula, Tambov, Ryazan, and Kursk Oblasts, indicating continued deep strike pressure by Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian Forces (Ground Forces - Offensive Operations): Operational ZSU video shows Ukrainian forces conducting a successful strike, with commentary "Orcs in a panic, because they didn't make it again." This implies rapid action and successful engagement. STERNENKO also posted a video captioned "This is the end for those who came to kill," likely demonstrating successful engagements against Russian personnel. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - for observed actions, MEDIUM for BDA).
• Ukrainian Forces (Rehabilitation/Medical): First Lady Olena Zelenska's visit to Dnipro highlights ongoing efforts in mental health and physical rehabilitation for war-affected personnel and civilians, demonstrating resilience and commitment to long-term care. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian Forces (Air): Confirmed continued KAB launches on Kharkiv. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian Forces (Ground - Artillery/MLRS): ARCHANGEL SPETSNAZ video shows a BM-21 Grad MLRS firing from a field position. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) Colonelcassad claims destruction of Ukrainian mortar position and ammo depot in Alexandropol. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Russian Forces (Information Operations):
  • Amplified Body Exchange Disinformation: MoD Russia, TASS (Medvedev), and Colonelcassad continue to amplify the narrative that Kyiv refuses to accept bodies of its fallen, linking it to unwillingness to pay compensation. Medvedev explicitly ties it to Ukraine's stated losses of 30,000, arguing a return of 6,000 bodies would confirm "independent experts'" claims of Ukrainian losses closer to a million. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) Lt. Gen. Aleksandr Zorin (Russian negotiating group) stated Ukraine failed to make contact for a body exchange of 1,212 bodies, blaming Kyiv for "illogical meanness." (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Exploiting Ukrainian AD Needs: "Операция Z" published a video of Zelenskiy titled "Give! - Zelenskiy lashed out at the USA for refusing to sell Ukraine air defense systems," clearly aiming to exploit and amplify Ukrainian grievances for propaganda purposes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Showcasing Tactical "Successes": Alex Parker Returns (Russian milblogger) posted a video showing a "Ukrainian drone on fiber optics and Russian ingenuity," with a tactical ambush/shooting of a vehicle, claiming "cleverly!". (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for observation, MEDIUM for attribution of 'Ukrainian drone').
  • Kharkiv Strike Analysis: "Дневник Десантника" claims "intermediate analysis of Russian strikes on enemy targets in Kharkiv," perpetuating the narrative of legitimate military targeting despite clear civilian impact. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for intent).
• Russian Forces (Internal Security/Emergency Response): The Pushkino fire (Moscow Region) is a major ongoing incident, with significant escalation (roof collapse). Firefighters operating from a "safe distance" due to "clapping" sounds indicate a severe, uncontrolled and hazardous situation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action:

• Capabilities:
  • Aerial (Precision Guided Munitions): Confirmed continued capability to deliver KABs on civilian targets in Kharkiv to inflict maximum psychological and physical damage, and missile strikes (Iskander-M losses notwithstanding). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Aerial (Drones): Continued capability to launch attack UAVs (Mykolaiv, Kherson threat). Observed use of tactical FPV drones for targeting (Alexandropol mortar position). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Ground (Artillery/MLRS): Continued capability to employ MLRS (Grad) for area saturation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Information Warfare: Highly coordinated, multi-faceted, and emotionally manipulative disinformation campaigns, particularly regarding humanitarian issues (body exchanges) and exploiting perceived Western failures (AD supply). Capable of rapid amplification and targeting of specific narratives to undermine Ukrainian credibility and international support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Internal Security: Strained by large-scale incidents (Pushkino fire). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Intentions:
  • Kharkiv/Southern Ukraine: Continue to terrorize civilian populations and overwhelm emergency services through indiscriminate aerial attacks, particularly KABs, likely in retaliation for Ukrainian deep strikes. Intent to inflict maximum psychological damage by targeting non-military civilian sites. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Sumy Axis: (No new specific messages on ground advances in this window, but previous reports indicate ongoing intent to expand "buffer zone" and threaten Sumy). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - based on previous info).
  • Information Warfare: Aggressively undermine Ukrainian credibility, portray Ukraine as inhumane (body exchange), and exploit any perceived weaknesses in Western support. Reinforce domestic morale and present Russia as a responsible actor while blaming Ukraine for failures. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Internal Security: Manage and contain significant internal incidents, like the Pushkino fire, and suppress any perceived sabotage or threats. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Courses of Action (COA):
  • COA 1 (MLCOA - Sustained and Escalated Retaliatory Saturation Attacks on Urban Centers, Coupled with Amplified Disinformation on Humanitarian Issues): Russia will continue and likely intensify KAB and missile strikes on Ukrainian urban centers, particularly Kharkiv, Sumy, and Zaporizhzhia, with an increased focus on civilian targets to maximize terror and drain Ukrainian emergency resources. The immediate follow-up KAB strike on central Kharkiv supports this. Concurrently, Russia will continue a persistent and aggressive information campaign, particularly regarding body/POW exchanges, blaming Ukraine for delays, and exploiting Western disunity and Ukraine's AD needs.
    • Confidence: HIGH
    • Indicators: Immediate KAB strike on central Kharkiv after previous strikes, persistent Russian narrative on body exchange from multiple sources (Medvedev, Zorin), Russian amplification of Zelenskiy's AD appeal.
  • COA 2 (Ground Offensive Support with Targeted Artillery/MLRS and Drone Strikes, while Maintaining Defensive Lines): Russian forces will continue to press ground offensives where gains are made (e.g., Sumy, Donetsk axes), supporting them with targeted artillery, MLRS (Grad observed), and FPV drone strikes against Ukrainian positions (e.g., claimed Alexandropol strike) and C2 nodes. They will likely enhance counter-drone and anti-artillery measures. They will maintain their established defensive lines where necessary.
    • Confidence: HIGH
    • Indicators: Observed Grad MLRS firing, claimed Alexandropol strike on mortar/ammo depot, Russian milblogger claims of "Russian ingenuity" countering "Ukrainian drone on fiber optics."

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• Focus on Disinformation Amplification: Russia is significantly escalating its disinformation efforts, with high-level officials (Medvedev, Zorin) directly addressing humanitarian issues (body exchange) and linking them to broader claims of Ukrainian losses and Western disinterest. This is a deliberate, coordinated effort to undermine Ukrainian credibility. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Exploitation of Ukrainian Resource Needs: Publicly amplifying Zelenskiy's statements about unmet AD requests is a tactical adaptation in the information domain to demoralize Ukraine and discourage international support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Resilience of Air Strike Capability despite Losses: The immediate KAB strike on central Kharkiv after the reported destruction of 3 Iskander launchers indicates Russia's ability to sustain aerial assaults despite significant losses of high-value assets. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• Continued high rate of KAB usage, MLRS firing, and FPV drone operations indicates sustained, though potentially strained, supply chains for these munitions.
• The escalating Pushkino fire, confirmed to involve PMM and experiencing roof collapse and "clapping" sounds (explosions), represents a severe and significant disruption to Russian internal logistics. The nature of the materials (fuel/lubricants) suggests a strategic impact if prolonged. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• The destruction of 3 Iskander launchers on 5 June represents a significant hit to Russia's high-precision ballistic missile launch capability and inventory, potentially impacting future strategic strike options. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Russian C2 demonstrates continued ability to coordinate multi-domain strikes (KABs, MLRS, tactical drones) across multiple oblasts. The coordinated disinformation campaign also highlights effective centralized C2 over information operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian C2 over internal security/emergency response is clearly challenged by the scale of the Pushkino fire and the ongoing search for individuals connected to deep strike attacks (as reported in previous ISR). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• The confirmation of 3 Iskander launcher destructions points to a potential C2 vulnerability or successful Ukrainian targeting of key C2/launch elements. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• Air Defense: Under severe pressure from continuous KABs and missile threats, particularly in Kharkiv, and new UAV threats in Mykolaiv/Kherson. Zelenskiy's public statement about awaiting a US response for AD purchases highlights a critical resource constraint and sustained high expenditure of AD munitions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Emergency Services: Severely strained by the constant need to respond to civilian casualties and infrastructure damage in Kharkiv (new KAB strike, 1 fatality, 5 injured). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Deep Strike Capability: Demonstrated continued strategic capability by confirming the destruction of 3 Iskander-M launchers. Continued pressure on Russian territory (drone safety warnings in multiple oblasts) indicates sustained reach. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ground Forces: Demonstrated rapid action and successful engagement (Operational ZSU video). Ukrainian SOF and TD Brigades are actively engaging Russian assault groups (previous ISR). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Medical/Rehabilitation Services: Olena Zelenska's visit to Dnipro highlights ongoing commitment and readiness to provide mental health and physical rehabilitation for war-wounded. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Successes:
  • Confirmed Destruction of 3 Iskander Launchers: Zelenskiy's statement confirms the destruction of three critical Russian ballistic missile launchers, directly impacting their strike capability. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Continued Deep Strike Pressure: Drone safety warnings in multiple Russian oblasts indicate sustained Ukrainian deep strike activity, forcing Russia to dedicate resources to internal defense. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Successful Ground Engagement: Operational ZSU video showing effective strike against Russian forces. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Rehabilitation Infrastructure Expansion: Olena Zelenska's visit to Dnipro highlights the ongoing development of critical rehabilitation infrastructure for war-wounded. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Setbacks:
  • Increased Civilian Casualties in Kharkiv: Another KAB strike on central Kharkiv resulted in 1 fatality and 5 injured, adding to the growing civilian toll and demonstrating continued Russian intent to terrorize urban populations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Persistent AD Shortfall: Zelenskiy's public statement about awaiting a US response for AD systems highlights a critical unmet need that exacerbates the impact of Russian air attacks. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Russian Claims of Equipment Losses: Russian claims of destroying Ukrainian mortar positions and ammunition depots (Alexandropol) indicate continued losses on the battlefield. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - Russian claims)
  • Information Warfare Impact: Russian disinformation regarding body exchanges is being aggressively amplified by high-level Russian officials and milbloggers, creating a challenging information environment for Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• Air Defense Munitions & Systems: Continued high expenditure due to persistent aerial attacks, particularly KABs and massed drone assaults. Zelenskiy's public statement reinforces the urgent need for additional AD systems and sustained resupply from international partners. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Emergency Response Resources: Severe strain on emergency and medical services in Kharkiv due to increased casualties and widespread damage. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Medical & Rehabilitation Support: The need for mental health and physical rehabilitation services for war-wounded personnel and civilians is significant and ongoing, requiring sustained resources. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Propaganda (Internal & External):
  • Body Exchange Disinformation: This is the primary and most aggressive Russian disinformation campaign at present. High-level officials (Medvedev, Lt. Gen. Zorin) and state media (TASS) are consistently pushing the narrative that Ukraine refuses to accept bodies to avoid compensation, and linking it to false claims of massively inflated Ukrainian casualties. This is a highly coordinated and morally aggressive information warfare effort. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Exploiting Ukrainian AD Shortfalls: Russian channels are actively using Zelenskiy's public appeal for AD systems to portray Ukraine as desperate and unsupported, aiming to demoralize the Ukrainian populace and discourage international aid. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Justifying Civilian Strikes: "Дневник Десантника" continued to frame strikes on Kharkiv as targeting "enemy targets," attempting to legitimize indiscriminate attacks on urban areas. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Glorifying Russian Tactical Prowess: Russian milbloggers continue to post videos showcasing alleged "Russian ingenuity" in countering Ukrainian drones or demonstrating MLRS use, to boost domestic morale and project an image of military effectiveness. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian Counter-Propaganda/Information Operations:
  • Transparency on Russian Atrocities: Ukrainian officials and media continue to immediately report on KAB strikes on civilian areas in Kharkiv, providing real-time evidence of civilian casualties and damage. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Highlighting Strategic Successes: Zelenskiy's public confirmation of 3 Iskander launcher destructions is a powerful information operation, demonstrating advanced capabilities and directly refuting Russian military invulnerability. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Showcasing Resilience & Care: Olena Zelenska's visit to Dnipro rehabilitation centers provides a powerful counter-narrative of Ukrainian resilience, commitment to its people, and long-term planning, contrasting with Russian narratives of Ukrainian collapse. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Negative Impact: The continued KAB strikes on Kharkiv, with new civilian casualties, will severely impact civilian morale, particularly given the explicit targeting of non-military areas. The persistent AD shortfall highlighted by Zelenskiy's statement may also cause anxiety about protection. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Positive Impact: The confirmation of 3 Iskander launcher destructions is a significant morale boost for Ukrainian forces and the population, demonstrating a concrete ability to strike back at Russian strategic assets. Continued deep strike activity in Russian territory will reinforce this. Efforts in rehabilitation also contribute positively to overall societal morale. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Information Warfare Impact: The aggressive Russian disinformation regarding body exchanges could cause significant emotional distress and distrust among Ukrainian families and the general public, if not effectively countered. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• The confirmed destruction of 3 Iskander launchers and continued Ukrainian deep strike activity will likely underscore Ukraine's need for continued long-range strike capabilities and air defense systems to international partners. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian disinformation on body exchanges aims to undermine international trust in Ukraine. However, the clear and verifiable targeting of civilians in Kharkiv provides a strong counter-narrative, likely solidifying international condemnation of Russia and calls for continued support for Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian attempts to exploit internal Western divisions (amplifying Zelenskiy's AD appeal) aim to weaken the coherence of international support for Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• MLCOA 1: Sustained Aerial Terror Campaign on Urban Centers and Intensified Disinformation on Humanitarian Issues: Russia will continue and likely intensify KAB and missile strikes on Ukrainian urban centers, particularly Kharkiv, Sumy, and Zaporizhzhia, with an explicit focus on civilian targets to maximize terror, drain Ukrainian emergency resources, and retaliate for successful Ukrainian deep strikes (e.g., Iskander launchers). This will be accompanied by a persistent and aggressive information campaign, particularly regarding body/POW exchanges, blaming Ukraine for delays, and exploiting Western disunity and Ukraine's AD needs.

  • Confidence: HIGH
  • Indicators: Immediate KAB strike on central Kharkiv after previous strikes, persistent Russian narrative on body exchange from multiple sources (Medvedev, Zorin), Russian amplification of Zelenskiy's AD appeal, persistent UAV threat in Mykolaiv/Kherson.

• MLCOA 2: Ground Offensive Support with Targeted Artillery/MLRS and Drone Strikes, Enhanced Counter-Drone/Anti-Artillery Measures: Russian forces will continue to support ground offensives on existing axes (Donetsk, Sumy) and potentially new areas by utilizing targeted artillery, MLRS (Grad observed), and FPV drone strikes against Ukrainian positions, C2 nodes, and logistics. Russia will likely intensify efforts to counter Ukrainian drones and artillery, given observed successes in this domain.

  • Confidence: HIGH
  • Indicators: Observed Grad MLRS firing, claimed Alexandropol strike on mortar/ammo depot, Russian milblogger claims of "Russian ingenuity" countering "Ukrainian drone on fiber optics."

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• MDCOA 1: Renewed Large-Scale Ballistic/Cruise Missile Campaign to Cripple Ukrainian AD and Energy Infrastructure: Russia, despite Iskander losses, will attempt to launch a renewed, multi-wave missile and drone campaign targeting Ukraine's critical national infrastructure (energy, logistics hubs, and remaining high-value military facilities). This aims to overwhelm Ukrainian air defenses, exhaust their munition reserves, and cripple Ukraine's ability to sustain military operations and civilian life, especially ahead of the colder months. This MDCOA would exploit the publicly stated AD procurement challenges.

  • Confidence: MEDIUM (Increased due to recent claimed deep strike on Ternopil, Zelenskiy's public statement about AD procurement, and the strategic impact of losing 3 Iskander launchers, prompting Russia to consider other high-impact strike options).
  • Indicators: Significant increase in missile/drone attacks beyond current levels, targeting of energy infrastructure components not previously hit, significant increase in Russian strategic bomber activity.

• MDCOA 2: Attempted Strategic Breakthrough on Sumy Axis with Major Force Commitment and Massed Air Support: Russia commits substantial additional reserves to the Sumy axis, initiating a rapid, decisive breakthrough aimed at encircling or seizing Sumy city. This would involve overwhelming combined arms force, massed KAB strikes to suppress Ukrainian defenses, and deep strikes to neutralize Ukrainian command and control and logistics in the region. This would aim to open a new major operational front, fix a large portion of Ukrainian reserves, and create a significant humanitarian crisis.

  • Confidence: MEDIUM (Based on previous Russian claims of "buffer zone" and map showing deep territorial control, though no new ground advances were confirmed in this immediate reporting window).
  • Indicators: Sustained high rate of KABs and missile strikes on deep targets, large-scale troop movements on Sumy axis beyond current levels, intelligence of Russian force restructuring or redeployment from other axes.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Next 24-48 Hours (Short-Term):

  • Immediate Retaliation/Sustained Attacks: Expect continued, possibly intensified, KAB and missile strikes on Kharkiv, Sumy, and Zaporizhzhia Oblasts. High probability of further Russian retaliatory deep strikes.
  • Ground Pressure: Continued tactical ground engagements, particularly on the Donetsk and Sumy axes, with Russian efforts to consolidate claimed gains. Increased Russian counter-drone and anti-AD operations.
  • Decision Point (UKR): Prioritize air defense assets to protect key urban centers (Kharkiv, Sumy) and critical infrastructure. Expedite deployment of countermeasures to Russian anti-drone tactics. Reassess ground force posture on the Sumy axis based on updated Russian advances and map intelligence. Immediately counter Russian disinformation on body exchanges with factual and transparent communication.

• Next 72 Hours (Medium-Term):

  • Decision Point (UKR): Evaluate the full impact of the Iskander launcher destruction. Re-evaluate and adapt ground force deployments on the Sumy axis based on continued Russian advances and the scale of the threat to Sumy city, potentially deploying additional reserves. Develop a comprehensive plan for mine clearance and public safety in areas affected by PFM-1 mines (as reported in previous ISR). Expedite high-level diplomatic engagement regarding AD systems. Monitor and respond to escalating Russian disinformation campaigns.

• Next 1 Week (Near-Term Strategic):

  • Decision Point (UKR): Evaluate the overall effectiveness of Ukrainian deep strike campaign on Russian military-industrial complex and logistics, considering both successes and Russian claims of countermeasures. Continue to optimize air defense deployments based on evolving Russian targeting patterns and replenish munition stockpiles. Intensify intelligence collection on Russian strategic aviation, air defense assets, and potential dispersal efforts. Prioritize resources for the Sumy axis if Russian pressure continues, potentially initiating pre-emptive civilian evacuation planning.

---

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Prioritize and Augment Air Defense for Eastern Urban Centers (Immediate & Urgent):

   • Action: Immediately re-prioritize and reinforce layered air defense systems (including mobile fire groups with MANPADS for KAB and drone defense) to protect Kharkiv and Sumy from continued KAB and missile attacks. Deploy active and passive defenses around critical civilian infrastructure. Expedite diplomatic efforts for the acquisition of additional advanced AD systems (e.g., Patriot, NASAMS) and secure urgent resupply of interceptor munitions.
   • Justification: Russian forces are deliberately escalating attacks on civilian areas to inflict casualties and psychological impact. The latest KAB strike on central Kharkiv and Zelenskiy's public appeal for AD underscore the urgency.
   • Intelligence Gap: Real-time air defense munition expenditure rates in affected areas and current inventory levels for key systems.
   • Collection Requirement: Automated tracking of AD engagements and munition usage, updated imagery of damaged civilian sites for munition analysis, SIGINT/HUMINT on AD system readiness.

2. Sustain and Exploit Deep Strike Successes, Prepare for Retaliation (Urgent):

   • Action: Conduct rapid, detailed BDA on the destroyed Iskander launchers (satellite imagery, OSINT analysis) to confirm operational impact and specific targets. Publicize the success widely to boost morale and demonstrate capability. Simultaneously, prepare for heightened Russian retaliatory strikes across Ukraine, particularly on strategic infrastructure, following the Iskander destruction. Disperse high-value assets and reinforce their defenses. Continue to assess targets for further deep strikes on Russian logistics and military-industrial complex.
   • Justification: Ukrainian deep strikes are a significant strategic success but will provoke severe retaliation, requiring preemptive defensive measures and effective information operations.
   • Intelligence Gap: Full BDA and long-term operational impact on Russian ballistic missile capabilities.
   • Collection Requirement: High-resolution satellite imagery of Bryansk/Kursk missile sites and other Russian airfields/logistics hubs; monitoring Russian strategic aviation movements and activity.

3. Intensify Counter-Information Warfare on Humanitarian Issues (Ongoing & Critical):

   • Action: Proactively and transparently communicate Ukraine's official stance and actions regarding prisoner and body exchanges to both domestic and international audiences, providing verifiable evidence and consistently refuting Russian disinformation. Highlight Russian violations of international law (e.g., confirmed KAB strikes on children's railway and central Kharkiv, PFM-1 mine use) to discredit their humanitarian claims. Leverage the opening of rehabilitation centers to showcase Ukrainian commitment to its people.
   • Justification: Russia is leveraging highly sensitive humanitarian issues and Western internal politics for information warfare, aiming to undermine Ukrainian credibility and international support. Effective, consistent counter-narratives are critical.
   • Intelligence Gap: Full scope of Russian information narratives targeting Ukrainian society, and the specific impact of Russian propaganda on Ukrainian public and troop morale.
   • Collection Requirement: Comprehensive monitoring of Russian state media and milblogger channels, and analysis of their messaging tactics and impact, coupled with public opinion polling in Ukraine.

4. Reinforce and Monitor Sumy Axis Defenses (Urgent):

   • Action: Immediately reinforce personnel, fortifications (including anti-tank obstacles), and anti-tank capabilities on the Sumy axis, prioritizing areas within 40km of Sumy city and identified Russian avenues of advance (e.g., around Yablonovka, Andreevka). Intensify ISR collection on Russian force composition, strength, and objectives in the area. Advise civilian authorities on potential evacuation routes and shelter options in Sumy City and surrounding settlements. Conduct aggressive counter-battery fire against Russian artillery/MLRS supporting advances.
   • Justification: Russian claims of an "expanding buffer zone" and confirmed advances (including mapped territorial control) indicate a serious intent to press the Sumy axis, threatening Sumy City. The new Grad MLRS footage reinforces the potential for concentrated fire.
   • Intelligence Gap: Precise composition and strength of Russian forces on Sumy axis, and their immediate operational objectives and timeline for further advance.
   • Collection Requirement: HUMINT from local sources, SIGINT on Russian communications, IMINT for troop movements and fortifications, cross-referencing Russian map claims with ground truth.

---

END REPORT